Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Sustainability |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , |
| In: | Sustainability, 12, 2020, 22, S. 9501 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
MDPI AG
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Shin, Dong Jin Cha, Byung Sub Kim, Brian H.S. Shin, Dong Jin Cha, Byung Sub Kim, Brian H.S. |
|---|---|
| author |
Shin, Dong Jin Cha, Byung Sub Kim, Brian H.S. |
| spellingShingle |
Shin, Dong Jin Cha, Byung Sub Kim, Brian H.S. Sustainability Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Geography, Planning and Development |
| author_sort |
shin, dong jin |
| spelling |
Shin, Dong Jin Cha, Byung Sub Kim, Brian H.S. 2071-1050 MDPI AG Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Geography, Planning and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229501 <jats:p>There have been contrasting trends in government expenditures spending among OECD countries. This study analyzed and compared the efficiency of government expenditures of OECD countries and Korea, focused on the health and welfare and social overhead capital (SOC) sectors, using data envelop analysis (DEA) and Tobit methods. Based on the indicator values of national ranking, Korea ranked 19th in the health and welfare sector and 10th in the SOC sector. However, compared to other countries in the OECD, Korea’s government expenditure has shown the highest efficiency in health and welfare (rank 1 with efficiency score of 2.401), while transportation SOC was at a level below the average (rank 13 with efficiency score of 0.813). In order to maintain a high level of efficiency in health and welfare expenditures, it is important for the Korean government to understand and improve conditions of the rates of poverty, unemployment, life expectancy, and low fertility. Moreover, in order to overcome the low level of efficiency in the SOC sector, the government needs to improve the quality of transport infrastructures along with implementation of an effective infrastructure-linking system between various modes of transportation, thereby enhancing its transport network density.</jats:p> Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries Sustainability |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3390/su12229501 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Wirtschaftswissenschaften Geographie Technik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9zdTEyMjI5NTAx |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9zdTEyMjI5NTAx |
| institution |
DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 |
| imprint |
MDPI AG, 2020 |
| imprint_str_mv |
MDPI AG, 2020 |
| issn |
2071-1050 |
| issn_str_mv |
2071-1050 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
MDPI AG (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
shin2020efficientexpenditureallocationforsustainablepublicservicescomparativecasesofkoreaandoecdcountries |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| publisher |
MDPI AG |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Sustainability |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_unstemmed |
Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_full |
Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_fullStr |
Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_short |
Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_sort |
efficient expenditure allocation for sustainable public services?—comparative cases of korea and oecd countries |
| topic |
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Geography, Planning and Development |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229501 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| physical |
9501 |
| description |
<jats:p>There have been contrasting trends in government expenditures spending among OECD countries. This study analyzed and compared the efficiency of government expenditures of OECD countries and Korea, focused on the health and welfare and social overhead capital (SOC) sectors, using data envelop analysis (DEA) and Tobit methods. Based on the indicator values of national ranking, Korea ranked 19th in the health and welfare sector and 10th in the SOC sector. However, compared to other countries in the OECD, Korea’s government expenditure has shown the highest efficiency in health and welfare (rank 1 with efficiency score of 2.401), while transportation SOC was at a level below the average (rank 13 with efficiency score of 0.813). In order to maintain a high level of efficiency in health and welfare expenditures, it is important for the Korean government to understand and improve conditions of the rates of poverty, unemployment, life expectancy, and low fertility. Moreover, in order to overcome the low level of efficiency in the SOC sector, the government needs to improve the quality of transport infrastructures along with implementation of an effective infrastructure-linking system between various modes of transportation, thereby enhancing its transport network density.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
22 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
Sustainability |
| container_volume |
12 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792341510385041408 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:21:02.914Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Efficient+Expenditure+Allocation+for+Sustainable+Public+Services%3F%E2%80%94Comparative+Cases+of+Korea+and+OECD+Countries&rft.date=2020-11-15&genre=article&issn=2071-1050&volume=12&issue=22&pages=9501&jtitle=Sustainability&atitle=Efficient+Expenditure+Allocation+for+Sustainable+Public+Services%3F%E2%80%94Comparative+Cases+of+Korea+and+OECD+Countries&aulast=Kim&aufirst=Brian+H.S.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.3390%2Fsu12229501&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792341510385041408 |
| author | Shin, Dong Jin, Cha, Byung Sub, Kim, Brian H.S. |
| author_facet | Shin, Dong Jin, Cha, Byung Sub, Kim, Brian H.S., Shin, Dong Jin, Cha, Byung Sub, Kim, Brian H.S. |
| author_sort | shin, dong jin |
| container_issue | 22 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | Sustainability |
| container_volume | 12 |
| description | <jats:p>There have been contrasting trends in government expenditures spending among OECD countries. This study analyzed and compared the efficiency of government expenditures of OECD countries and Korea, focused on the health and welfare and social overhead capital (SOC) sectors, using data envelop analysis (DEA) and Tobit methods. Based on the indicator values of national ranking, Korea ranked 19th in the health and welfare sector and 10th in the SOC sector. However, compared to other countries in the OECD, Korea’s government expenditure has shown the highest efficiency in health and welfare (rank 1 with efficiency score of 2.401), while transportation SOC was at a level below the average (rank 13 with efficiency score of 0.813). In order to maintain a high level of efficiency in health and welfare expenditures, it is important for the Korean government to understand and improve conditions of the rates of poverty, unemployment, life expectancy, and low fertility. Moreover, in order to overcome the low level of efficiency in the SOC sector, the government needs to improve the quality of transport infrastructures along with implementation of an effective infrastructure-linking system between various modes of transportation, thereby enhancing its transport network density.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12229501 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Geographie, Technik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9zdTEyMjI5NTAx |
| imprint | MDPI AG, 2020 |
| imprint_str_mv | MDPI AG, 2020 |
| institution | DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1 |
| issn | 2071-1050 |
| issn_str_mv | 2071-1050 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:21:02.914Z |
| match_str | shin2020efficientexpenditureallocationforsustainablepublicservicescomparativecasesofkoreaandoecdcountries |
| mega_collection | MDPI AG (CrossRef) |
| physical | 9501 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Sustainability |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Shin, Dong Jin Cha, Byung Sub Kim, Brian H.S. 2071-1050 MDPI AG Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Geography, Planning and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229501 <jats:p>There have been contrasting trends in government expenditures spending among OECD countries. This study analyzed and compared the efficiency of government expenditures of OECD countries and Korea, focused on the health and welfare and social overhead capital (SOC) sectors, using data envelop analysis (DEA) and Tobit methods. Based on the indicator values of national ranking, Korea ranked 19th in the health and welfare sector and 10th in the SOC sector. However, compared to other countries in the OECD, Korea’s government expenditure has shown the highest efficiency in health and welfare (rank 1 with efficiency score of 2.401), while transportation SOC was at a level below the average (rank 13 with efficiency score of 0.813). In order to maintain a high level of efficiency in health and welfare expenditures, it is important for the Korean government to understand and improve conditions of the rates of poverty, unemployment, life expectancy, and low fertility. Moreover, in order to overcome the low level of efficiency in the SOC sector, the government needs to improve the quality of transport infrastructures along with implementation of an effective infrastructure-linking system between various modes of transportation, thereby enhancing its transport network density.</jats:p> Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries Sustainability |
| spellingShingle | Shin, Dong Jin, Cha, Byung Sub, Kim, Brian H.S., Sustainability, Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Geography, Planning and Development |
| title | Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_full | Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_fullStr | Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_full_unstemmed | Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_short | Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| title_sort | efficient expenditure allocation for sustainable public services?—comparative cases of korea and oecd countries |
| title_unstemmed | Efficient Expenditure Allocation for Sustainable Public Services?—Comparative Cases of Korea and OECD Countries |
| topic | Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Geography, Planning and Development |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229501 |