Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Sustainability |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , |
| In: | Sustainability, 12, 2020, 1, S. 342 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
MDPI AG
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori Ferreira, Víctor García-Armingol, Tatiana López-Sabirón, Ana Ferreira, Germán Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori Ferreira, Víctor García-Armingol, Tatiana López-Sabirón, Ana Ferreira, Germán |
|---|---|
| author |
Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori Ferreira, Víctor García-Armingol, Tatiana López-Sabirón, Ana Ferreira, Germán |
| spellingShingle |
Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori Ferreira, Víctor García-Armingol, Tatiana López-Sabirón, Ana Ferreira, Germán Sustainability Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Geography, Planning and Development |
| author_sort |
díaz-ramírez, maryori |
| spelling |
Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori Ferreira, Víctor García-Armingol, Tatiana López-Sabirón, Ana Ferreira, Germán 2071-1050 MDPI AG Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Geography, Planning and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12010342 <jats:p>Electricity from the combination of photovoltaic panels and wind turbines exhibits potential benefits towards the sustainable cities transition. Nevertheless, the highly fluctuating and intermittent character limits an extended applicability in the energy market. Particularly, batteries represent a challenging approach to overcome the existing constraints and to achieve sustainable urban energy development. On the basis of the market roll-out and level of technological maturity, five commercially available battery technologies are assessed in this work, namely, lead–acid, lithium manganese oxide, nickel–cadmium, nickel–metal hydride, and vanadium redox flow. When considering sustainable development, environmental assessments provide valuable information. In this vein, an environmental analysis of the technologies is conducted using a life cycle assessment methodology from a cradle-to-gate perspective. A comparison of the environmental burden of battery components identified vanadium redox flow battery as the lowest environmental damage battery. In terms of components, electrodes; the electrolyte; and the set of pumps, motors, racks, and bolts exhibited the greatest environmental impact related to manufacturing. In terms of materials, copper, steel, sulphuric acid, and vanadium were identified as the main contributors to the midpoint impact categories. The results have highlighted that challenging materials 4.0 are still needed in battery manufacturing to provide sustainable technology designs required to the future urban planning based on circular economy demands.</jats:p> Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 Sustainability |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3390/su12010342 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Wirtschaftswissenschaften Geographie Technik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9zdTEyMDEwMzQy |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9zdTEyMDEwMzQy |
| institution |
DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 |
| imprint |
MDPI AG, 2020 |
| imprint_str_mv |
MDPI AG, 2020 |
| issn |
2071-1050 |
| issn_str_mv |
2071-1050 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
MDPI AG (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
diazramirez2020environmentalassessmentofelectrochemicalenergystoragedevicemanufacturingtoidentifydriversforattaininggoalsofsustainablematerials40 |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| publisher |
MDPI AG |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Sustainability |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_unstemmed |
Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_full |
Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_fullStr |
Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_short |
Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_sort |
environmental assessment of electrochemical energy storage device manufacturing to identify drivers for attaining goals of sustainable materials 4.0 |
| topic |
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Geography, Planning and Development |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12010342 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| physical |
342 |
| description |
<jats:p>Electricity from the combination of photovoltaic panels and wind turbines exhibits potential benefits towards the sustainable cities transition. Nevertheless, the highly fluctuating and intermittent character limits an extended applicability in the energy market. Particularly, batteries represent a challenging approach to overcome the existing constraints and to achieve sustainable urban energy development. On the basis of the market roll-out and level of technological maturity, five commercially available battery technologies are assessed in this work, namely, lead–acid, lithium manganese oxide, nickel–cadmium, nickel–metal hydride, and vanadium redox flow. When considering sustainable development, environmental assessments provide valuable information. In this vein, an environmental analysis of the technologies is conducted using a life cycle assessment methodology from a cradle-to-gate perspective. A comparison of the environmental burden of battery components identified vanadium redox flow battery as the lowest environmental damage battery. In terms of components, electrodes; the electrolyte; and the set of pumps, motors, racks, and bolts exhibited the greatest environmental impact related to manufacturing. In terms of materials, copper, steel, sulphuric acid, and vanadium were identified as the main contributors to the midpoint impact categories. The results have highlighted that challenging materials 4.0 are still needed in battery manufacturing to provide sustainable technology designs required to the future urban planning based on circular economy demands.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
1 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
Sustainability |
| container_volume |
12 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792337594499989509 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:18:47.878Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Environmental+Assessment+of+Electrochemical+Energy+Storage+Device+Manufacturing+to+Identify+Drivers+for+Attaining+Goals+of+Sustainable+Materials+4.0&rft.date=2020-01-01&genre=article&issn=2071-1050&volume=12&issue=1&pages=342&jtitle=Sustainability&atitle=Environmental+Assessment+of+Electrochemical+Energy+Storage+Device+Manufacturing+to+Identify+Drivers+for+Attaining+Goals+of+Sustainable+Materials+4.0&aulast=Ferreira&aufirst=Germ%C3%A1n&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.3390%2Fsu12010342&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792337594499989509 |
| author | Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori, Ferreira, Víctor, García-Armingol, Tatiana, López-Sabirón, Ana, Ferreira, Germán |
| author_facet | Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori, Ferreira, Víctor, García-Armingol, Tatiana, López-Sabirón, Ana, Ferreira, Germán, Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori, Ferreira, Víctor, García-Armingol, Tatiana, López-Sabirón, Ana, Ferreira, Germán |
| author_sort | díaz-ramírez, maryori |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | Sustainability |
| container_volume | 12 |
| description | <jats:p>Electricity from the combination of photovoltaic panels and wind turbines exhibits potential benefits towards the sustainable cities transition. Nevertheless, the highly fluctuating and intermittent character limits an extended applicability in the energy market. Particularly, batteries represent a challenging approach to overcome the existing constraints and to achieve sustainable urban energy development. On the basis of the market roll-out and level of technological maturity, five commercially available battery technologies are assessed in this work, namely, lead–acid, lithium manganese oxide, nickel–cadmium, nickel–metal hydride, and vanadium redox flow. When considering sustainable development, environmental assessments provide valuable information. In this vein, an environmental analysis of the technologies is conducted using a life cycle assessment methodology from a cradle-to-gate perspective. A comparison of the environmental burden of battery components identified vanadium redox flow battery as the lowest environmental damage battery. In terms of components, electrodes; the electrolyte; and the set of pumps, motors, racks, and bolts exhibited the greatest environmental impact related to manufacturing. In terms of materials, copper, steel, sulphuric acid, and vanadium were identified as the main contributors to the midpoint impact categories. The results have highlighted that challenging materials 4.0 are still needed in battery manufacturing to provide sustainable technology designs required to the future urban planning based on circular economy demands.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12010342 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Geographie, Technik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9zdTEyMDEwMzQy |
| imprint | MDPI AG, 2020 |
| imprint_str_mv | MDPI AG, 2020 |
| institution | DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1 |
| issn | 2071-1050 |
| issn_str_mv | 2071-1050 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:18:47.878Z |
| match_str | diazramirez2020environmentalassessmentofelectrochemicalenergystoragedevicemanufacturingtoidentifydriversforattaininggoalsofsustainablematerials40 |
| mega_collection | MDPI AG (CrossRef) |
| physical | 342 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Sustainability |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori Ferreira, Víctor García-Armingol, Tatiana López-Sabirón, Ana Ferreira, Germán 2071-1050 MDPI AG Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Geography, Planning and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12010342 <jats:p>Electricity from the combination of photovoltaic panels and wind turbines exhibits potential benefits towards the sustainable cities transition. Nevertheless, the highly fluctuating and intermittent character limits an extended applicability in the energy market. Particularly, batteries represent a challenging approach to overcome the existing constraints and to achieve sustainable urban energy development. On the basis of the market roll-out and level of technological maturity, five commercially available battery technologies are assessed in this work, namely, lead–acid, lithium manganese oxide, nickel–cadmium, nickel–metal hydride, and vanadium redox flow. When considering sustainable development, environmental assessments provide valuable information. In this vein, an environmental analysis of the technologies is conducted using a life cycle assessment methodology from a cradle-to-gate perspective. A comparison of the environmental burden of battery components identified vanadium redox flow battery as the lowest environmental damage battery. In terms of components, electrodes; the electrolyte; and the set of pumps, motors, racks, and bolts exhibited the greatest environmental impact related to manufacturing. In terms of materials, copper, steel, sulphuric acid, and vanadium were identified as the main contributors to the midpoint impact categories. The results have highlighted that challenging materials 4.0 are still needed in battery manufacturing to provide sustainable technology designs required to the future urban planning based on circular economy demands.</jats:p> Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 Sustainability |
| spellingShingle | Díaz-Ramírez, Maryori, Ferreira, Víctor, García-Armingol, Tatiana, López-Sabirón, Ana, Ferreira, Germán, Sustainability, Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Geography, Planning and Development |
| title | Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_full | Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_fullStr | Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_short | Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| title_sort | environmental assessment of electrochemical energy storage device manufacturing to identify drivers for attaining goals of sustainable materials 4.0 |
| title_unstemmed | Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0 |
| topic | Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Geography, Planning and Development |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12010342 |