Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Mathematics |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Mathematics, 6, 2018, 12, S. 295 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
MDPI AG
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Wildi, Otto Wildi, Otto |
|---|---|
| author |
Wildi, Otto |
| spellingShingle |
Wildi, Otto Mathematics Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context General Mathematics Engineering (miscellaneous) Computer Science (miscellaneous) |
| author_sort |
wildi, otto |
| spelling |
Wildi, Otto 2227-7390 MDPI AG General Mathematics Engineering (miscellaneous) Computer Science (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math6120295 <jats:p>When striving for the ordination methods best predicting independently measured site factors, the following questions arise: does the optimal choice depend on the kind of biological community analysed? Are there different ordination methods needed to address different site factors? Simultaneously, I explore alternative similarity approaches of entire ordinations, as well as the role of the transformations applied to the scale used in measuring species performance. The combination of methods and data transformations results in 96 alternative solutions for any one data set. These are compared by a graphical display, that is, an ordination of ordinations. The goodness-of-fit of independently measured site factors is assessed by two alternative methods. The resulting 96 performance values serve as independent variables in trend surfaces overlaid to the ordination of ordinations. The results from two real-world data sets indicate that some ordination methods greatly vary with data transformation. Scores close to a binary scale perform best in almost all ordination methods. Methods that intrinsically constrain the range of species scores, such as principal components analysis based on correlation, correspondence analysis (including its detrended version), nonmetric multidimensional scaling, as well as principal coordinates analysis based on the Bray-Curtis distance, always figure among the most successful methods, irrespective of data used.</jats:p> Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context Mathematics |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3390/math6120295 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Technik Informatik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9tYXRoNjEyMDI5NQ |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9tYXRoNjEyMDI5NQ |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Zwi2 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
MDPI AG, 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv |
MDPI AG, 2018 |
| issn |
2227-7390 |
| issn_str_mv |
2227-7390 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
MDPI AG (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
wildi2018evaluatingthepredictivepowerofordinationmethodsinecologicalcontext |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| publisher |
MDPI AG |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Mathematics |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_unstemmed |
Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_full |
Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_fullStr |
Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_short |
Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_sort |
evaluating the predictive power of ordination methods in ecological context |
| topic |
General Mathematics Engineering (miscellaneous) Computer Science (miscellaneous) |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math6120295 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| physical |
295 |
| description |
<jats:p>When striving for the ordination methods best predicting independently measured site factors, the following questions arise: does the optimal choice depend on the kind of biological community analysed? Are there different ordination methods needed to address different site factors? Simultaneously, I explore alternative similarity approaches of entire ordinations, as well as the role of the transformations applied to the scale used in measuring species performance. The combination of methods and data transformations results in 96 alternative solutions for any one data set. These are compared by a graphical display, that is, an ordination of ordinations. The goodness-of-fit of independently measured site factors is assessed by two alternative methods. The resulting 96 performance values serve as independent variables in trend surfaces overlaid to the ordination of ordinations. The results from two real-world data sets indicate that some ordination methods greatly vary with data transformation. Scores close to a binary scale perform best in almost all ordination methods. Methods that intrinsically constrain the range of species scores, such as principal components analysis based on correlation, correspondence analysis (including its detrended version), nonmetric multidimensional scaling, as well as principal coordinates analysis based on the Bray-Curtis distance, always figure among the most successful methods, irrespective of data used.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
12 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
Mathematics |
| container_volume |
6 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792333127485489156 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:07:49.924Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Evaluating+the+Predictive+Power+of+Ordination+Methods+in+Ecological+Context&rft.date=2018-12-01&genre=article&issn=2227-7390&volume=6&issue=12&pages=295&jtitle=Mathematics&atitle=Evaluating+the+Predictive+Power+of+Ordination+Methods+in+Ecological+Context&aulast=Wildi&aufirst=Otto&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.3390%2Fmath6120295&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792333127485489156 |
| author | Wildi, Otto |
| author_facet | Wildi, Otto, Wildi, Otto |
| author_sort | wildi, otto |
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | Mathematics |
| container_volume | 6 |
| description | <jats:p>When striving for the ordination methods best predicting independently measured site factors, the following questions arise: does the optimal choice depend on the kind of biological community analysed? Are there different ordination methods needed to address different site factors? Simultaneously, I explore alternative similarity approaches of entire ordinations, as well as the role of the transformations applied to the scale used in measuring species performance. The combination of methods and data transformations results in 96 alternative solutions for any one data set. These are compared by a graphical display, that is, an ordination of ordinations. The goodness-of-fit of independently measured site factors is assessed by two alternative methods. The resulting 96 performance values serve as independent variables in trend surfaces overlaid to the ordination of ordinations. The results from two real-world data sets indicate that some ordination methods greatly vary with data transformation. Scores close to a binary scale perform best in almost all ordination methods. Methods that intrinsically constrain the range of species scores, such as principal components analysis based on correlation, correspondence analysis (including its detrended version), nonmetric multidimensional scaling, as well as principal coordinates analysis based on the Bray-Curtis distance, always figure among the most successful methods, irrespective of data used.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/math6120295 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Technik, Informatik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzM5MC9tYXRoNjEyMDI5NQ |
| imprint | MDPI AG, 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv | MDPI AG, 2018 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 2227-7390 |
| issn_str_mv | 2227-7390 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:07:49.924Z |
| match_str | wildi2018evaluatingthepredictivepowerofordinationmethodsinecologicalcontext |
| mega_collection | MDPI AG (CrossRef) |
| physical | 295 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Mathematics |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Wildi, Otto 2227-7390 MDPI AG General Mathematics Engineering (miscellaneous) Computer Science (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math6120295 <jats:p>When striving for the ordination methods best predicting independently measured site factors, the following questions arise: does the optimal choice depend on the kind of biological community analysed? Are there different ordination methods needed to address different site factors? Simultaneously, I explore alternative similarity approaches of entire ordinations, as well as the role of the transformations applied to the scale used in measuring species performance. The combination of methods and data transformations results in 96 alternative solutions for any one data set. These are compared by a graphical display, that is, an ordination of ordinations. The goodness-of-fit of independently measured site factors is assessed by two alternative methods. The resulting 96 performance values serve as independent variables in trend surfaces overlaid to the ordination of ordinations. The results from two real-world data sets indicate that some ordination methods greatly vary with data transformation. Scores close to a binary scale perform best in almost all ordination methods. Methods that intrinsically constrain the range of species scores, such as principal components analysis based on correlation, correspondence analysis (including its detrended version), nonmetric multidimensional scaling, as well as principal coordinates analysis based on the Bray-Curtis distance, always figure among the most successful methods, irrespective of data used.</jats:p> Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context Mathematics |
| spellingShingle | Wildi, Otto, Mathematics, Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context, General Mathematics, Engineering (miscellaneous), Computer Science (miscellaneous) |
| title | Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_full | Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_short | Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| title_sort | evaluating the predictive power of ordination methods in ecological context |
| title_unstemmed | Evaluating the Predictive Power of Ordination Methods in Ecological Context |
| topic | General Mathematics, Engineering (miscellaneous), Computer Science (miscellaneous) |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math6120295 |