author_facet Bertolini, S.
Elicio, N.
Cordera, R.
Gapitanio, G. L.
Montagna, G.
Croce, S.
Saturnino, M.
Balestreri, R.
De Cecco, L.
Bertolini, S.
Elicio, N.
Cordera, R.
Gapitanio, G. L.
Montagna, G.
Croce, S.
Saturnino, M.
Balestreri, R.
De Cecco, L.
author Bertolini, S.
Elicio, N.
Cordera, R.
Gapitanio, G. L.
Montagna, G.
Croce, S.
Saturnino, M.
Balestreri, R.
De Cecco, L.
spellingShingle Bertolini, S.
Elicio, N.
Cordera, R.
Gapitanio, G. L.
Montagna, G.
Croce, S.
Saturnino, M.
Balestreri, R.
De Cecco, L.
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
Obstetrics and Gynecology
General Medicine
author_sort bertolini, s.
spelling Bertolini, S. Elicio, N. Cordera, R. Gapitanio, G. L. Montagna, G. Croce, S. Saturnino, M. Balestreri, R. De Cecco, L. 0001-6349 1600-0412 Wiley Obstetrics and Gynecology General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016348709103647 <jats:p>Three oral contraceptive preparations were studied in 60 healthy women. This randomized, comparative, baseline controlled study was designed to investigate the effects of the preparations on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. The following formulations were studied: a monophasic preparation containing ethinylestradiol and desogestrel (M‐DSG) and two triphasic formulations containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene or levonorgestrel respectively (T‐GSD and T‐LNG). These preparations were studied for six treatment cycles. Total cholesterol and apoprotein B did not change in any group. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was significantly decreased in the groups of women treated with M‐DSG and T‐GSD respectively. No changes were observed in the T‐LNG group. With M‐DSG, significant increases were observed in high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and HDL<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> cholesterol, whilst HDL<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cholesterol did not change. With both T‐GSD and T‐LNG, no changes were observed in HDL cholesterol, whilst a significant increase in HDL<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> cholesterol together with a trend to decrease in HDL<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cholesterol were observed. Apolipoprotein AI increased with the following ranking M‐DSG &gt; T‐GSD &gt; T‐LNG. The LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio significantly decreased with both M‐DSG and T‐GSD. In the T‐LNG group there was no change in this ratio. Triglycerides increased to the same extent in all treatment groups. As far as concerns the risk of arterial diseases, these three oral contraceptive formulations mostly induced negligible and/or partly favorable changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins; however, the lipoprotein pattern during M‐DSG treatment resulted better than during T‐GSD, and the latter turned out to be better than during T‐LNG.</jats:p> Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
doi_str_mv 10.3109/00016348709103647
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzEwOS8wMDAxNjM0ODcwOTEwMzY0Nw
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzEwOS8wMDAxNjM0ODcwOTEwMzY0Nw
institution DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-Ch1
imprint Wiley, 1987
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1987
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
issn_str_mv 0001-6349
1600-0412
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str bertolini1987effectsofthreelowdoseoralcontraceptiveformulationsonlipidmetabolism
publishDateSort 1987
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
source_id 49
title Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_unstemmed Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_full Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_fullStr Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_short Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_sort effects of three low‐dose oral contraceptive formulations on lipid metabolism
topic Obstetrics and Gynecology
General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016348709103647
publishDate 1987
physical 327-332
description <jats:p>Three oral contraceptive preparations were studied in 60 healthy women. This randomized, comparative, baseline controlled study was designed to investigate the effects of the preparations on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. The following formulations were studied: a monophasic preparation containing ethinylestradiol and desogestrel (M‐DSG) and two triphasic formulations containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene or levonorgestrel respectively (T‐GSD and T‐LNG). These preparations were studied for six treatment cycles. Total cholesterol and apoprotein B did not change in any group. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was significantly decreased in the groups of women treated with M‐DSG and T‐GSD respectively. No changes were observed in the T‐LNG group. With M‐DSG, significant increases were observed in high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and HDL<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> cholesterol, whilst HDL<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cholesterol did not change. With both T‐GSD and T‐LNG, no changes were observed in HDL cholesterol, whilst a significant increase in HDL<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> cholesterol together with a trend to decrease in HDL<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cholesterol were observed. Apolipoprotein AI increased with the following ranking M‐DSG &gt; T‐GSD &gt; T‐LNG. The LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio significantly decreased with both M‐DSG and T‐GSD. In the T‐LNG group there was no change in this ratio. Triglycerides increased to the same extent in all treatment groups. As far as concerns the risk of arterial diseases, these three oral contraceptive formulations mostly induced negligible and/or partly favorable changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins; however, the lipoprotein pattern during M‐DSG treatment resulted better than during T‐GSD, and the latter turned out to be better than during T‐LNG.</jats:p>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 327
container_title Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
container_volume 66
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792342546836357122
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:37:31.424Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Effects+of+Three+Low%E2%80%90Dose+Oral+Contraceptive+Formulations+on+Lipid+Metabolism&rft.date=1987-01-01&genre=article&issn=1600-0412&volume=66&issue=4&spage=327&epage=332&pages=327-332&jtitle=Acta+Obstetricia+et+Gynecologica+Scandinavica&atitle=Effects+of+Three+Low%E2%80%90Dose+Oral+Contraceptive+Formulations+on+Lipid+Metabolism&aulast=De+Cecco&aufirst=L.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.3109%2F00016348709103647&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792342546836357122
author Bertolini, S., Elicio, N., Cordera, R., Gapitanio, G. L., Montagna, G., Croce, S., Saturnino, M., Balestreri, R., De Cecco, L.
author_facet Bertolini, S., Elicio, N., Cordera, R., Gapitanio, G. L., Montagna, G., Croce, S., Saturnino, M., Balestreri, R., De Cecco, L., Bertolini, S., Elicio, N., Cordera, R., Gapitanio, G. L., Montagna, G., Croce, S., Saturnino, M., Balestreri, R., De Cecco, L.
author_sort bertolini, s.
container_issue 4
container_start_page 327
container_title Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
container_volume 66
description <jats:p>Three oral contraceptive preparations were studied in 60 healthy women. This randomized, comparative, baseline controlled study was designed to investigate the effects of the preparations on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. The following formulations were studied: a monophasic preparation containing ethinylestradiol and desogestrel (M‐DSG) and two triphasic formulations containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene or levonorgestrel respectively (T‐GSD and T‐LNG). These preparations were studied for six treatment cycles. Total cholesterol and apoprotein B did not change in any group. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was significantly decreased in the groups of women treated with M‐DSG and T‐GSD respectively. No changes were observed in the T‐LNG group. With M‐DSG, significant increases were observed in high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and HDL<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> cholesterol, whilst HDL<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cholesterol did not change. With both T‐GSD and T‐LNG, no changes were observed in HDL cholesterol, whilst a significant increase in HDL<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> cholesterol together with a trend to decrease in HDL<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cholesterol were observed. Apolipoprotein AI increased with the following ranking M‐DSG &gt; T‐GSD &gt; T‐LNG. The LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio significantly decreased with both M‐DSG and T‐GSD. In the T‐LNG group there was no change in this ratio. Triglycerides increased to the same extent in all treatment groups. As far as concerns the risk of arterial diseases, these three oral contraceptive formulations mostly induced negligible and/or partly favorable changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins; however, the lipoprotein pattern during M‐DSG treatment resulted better than during T‐GSD, and the latter turned out to be better than during T‐LNG.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.3109/00016348709103647
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzEwOS8wMDAxNjM0ODcwOTEwMzY0Nw
imprint Wiley, 1987
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1987
institution DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-Ch1
issn 0001-6349, 1600-0412
issn_str_mv 0001-6349, 1600-0412
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:37:31.424Z
match_str bertolini1987effectsofthreelowdoseoralcontraceptiveformulationsonlipidmetabolism
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 327-332
publishDate 1987
publishDateSort 1987
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
source_id 49
spelling Bertolini, S. Elicio, N. Cordera, R. Gapitanio, G. L. Montagna, G. Croce, S. Saturnino, M. Balestreri, R. De Cecco, L. 0001-6349 1600-0412 Wiley Obstetrics and Gynecology General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016348709103647 <jats:p>Three oral contraceptive preparations were studied in 60 healthy women. This randomized, comparative, baseline controlled study was designed to investigate the effects of the preparations on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. The following formulations were studied: a monophasic preparation containing ethinylestradiol and desogestrel (M‐DSG) and two triphasic formulations containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene or levonorgestrel respectively (T‐GSD and T‐LNG). These preparations were studied for six treatment cycles. Total cholesterol and apoprotein B did not change in any group. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was significantly decreased in the groups of women treated with M‐DSG and T‐GSD respectively. No changes were observed in the T‐LNG group. With M‐DSG, significant increases were observed in high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and HDL<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> cholesterol, whilst HDL<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cholesterol did not change. With both T‐GSD and T‐LNG, no changes were observed in HDL cholesterol, whilst a significant increase in HDL<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> cholesterol together with a trend to decrease in HDL<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> cholesterol were observed. Apolipoprotein AI increased with the following ranking M‐DSG &gt; T‐GSD &gt; T‐LNG. The LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio significantly decreased with both M‐DSG and T‐GSD. In the T‐LNG group there was no change in this ratio. Triglycerides increased to the same extent in all treatment groups. As far as concerns the risk of arterial diseases, these three oral contraceptive formulations mostly induced negligible and/or partly favorable changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins; however, the lipoprotein pattern during M‐DSG treatment resulted better than during T‐GSD, and the latter turned out to be better than during T‐LNG.</jats:p> Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
spellingShingle Bertolini, S., Elicio, N., Cordera, R., Gapitanio, G. L., Montagna, G., Croce, S., Saturnino, M., Balestreri, R., De Cecco, L., Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Medicine
title Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_full Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_fullStr Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_short Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
title_sort effects of three low‐dose oral contraceptive formulations on lipid metabolism
title_unstemmed Effects of Three Low‐Dose Oral Contraceptive Formulations on Lipid Metabolism
topic Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016348709103647