author_facet Jiahong, Wen
Yafeng, Wang
Jiying, Liu
Jezek, Kenneth C.
Huybrechts, Philippe
Csathó, Beata M.
Farness, Katy L.
Bo, Sun
Jiahong, Wen
Yafeng, Wang
Jiying, Liu
Jezek, Kenneth C.
Huybrechts, Philippe
Csathó, Beata M.
Farness, Katy L.
Bo, Sun
author Jiahong, Wen
Yafeng, Wang
Jiying, Liu
Jezek, Kenneth C.
Huybrechts, Philippe
Csathó, Beata M.
Farness, Katy L.
Bo, Sun
spellingShingle Jiahong, Wen
Yafeng, Wang
Jiying, Liu
Jezek, Kenneth C.
Huybrechts, Philippe
Csathó, Beata M.
Farness, Katy L.
Bo, Sun
Annals of Glaciology
Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
Earth-Surface Processes
author_sort jiahong, wen
spelling Jiahong, Wen Yafeng, Wang Jiying, Liu Jezek, Kenneth C. Huybrechts, Philippe Csathó, Beata M. Farness, Katy L. Bo, Sun 0260-3055 1727-5644 International Glaciological Society Earth-Surface Processes http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/172756408784700644 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We used remote-sensing and in situ measurements of surface accumulation rate, ice surface velocity, thickness and elevation to evaluate the mass budgets of grounded ice-flow regimes that form the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system. Three distinct drainage regimes are considered: the western and eastern margins of the ice shelf, and the southern grounding line at the major outlet glacier confluence, which can be identified with drainage zones 9, 11 and 10 respectively of Giovinetto and Zwally (2000). Our findings show the entire grounded portion of the basin is approximately in balance, with a mass budget of –4.2±9.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. Drainages 9, 10 and 11 are within balance to the level of our measurement uncertainty, with mass budgets of –2.5±2.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, –2.6±7.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> and 0.9±2.3 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, respectively. The region upstream of the Australian Lambert Glacier basin (LGB) traverse has a net mass budget of 4.4±6.3 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, while the downstream region has –8.9±9.9 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. These results indicate that glacier drainages 9, 10 and 11, upstream and downstream of the Australian LGB traverse, are in balance to within our measurement error.</jats:p> Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system Annals of Glaciology
doi_str_mv 10.3189/172756408784700644
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzE4OS8xNzI3NTY0MDg3ODQ3MDA2NDQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzE4OS8xNzI3NTY0MDg3ODQ3MDA2NDQ
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint International Glaciological Society, 2008
imprint_str_mv International Glaciological Society, 2008
issn 0260-3055
1727-5644
issn_str_mv 0260-3055
1727-5644
language English
mega_collection International Glaciological Society (CrossRef)
match_str jiahong2008massbudgetofthegroundediceinthelambertglacierameryiceshelfsystem
publishDateSort 2008
publisher International Glaciological Society
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Annals of Glaciology
source_id 49
title Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_unstemmed Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_full Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_fullStr Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_full_unstemmed Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_short Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_sort mass budget of the grounded ice in the lambert glacier–amery ice shelf system
topic Earth-Surface Processes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/172756408784700644
publishDate 2008
physical 193-197
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We used remote-sensing and in situ measurements of surface accumulation rate, ice surface velocity, thickness and elevation to evaluate the mass budgets of grounded ice-flow regimes that form the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system. Three distinct drainage regimes are considered: the western and eastern margins of the ice shelf, and the southern grounding line at the major outlet glacier confluence, which can be identified with drainage zones 9, 11 and 10 respectively of Giovinetto and Zwally (2000). Our findings show the entire grounded portion of the basin is approximately in balance, with a mass budget of –4.2±9.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. Drainages 9, 10 and 11 are within balance to the level of our measurement uncertainty, with mass budgets of –2.5±2.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, –2.6±7.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> and 0.9±2.3 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, respectively. The region upstream of the Australian Lambert Glacier basin (LGB) traverse has a net mass budget of 4.4±6.3 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, while the downstream region has –8.9±9.9 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. These results indicate that glacier drainages 9, 10 and 11, upstream and downstream of the Australian LGB traverse, are in balance to within our measurement error.</jats:p>
container_start_page 193
container_title Annals of Glaciology
container_volume 48
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792339107279536129
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:42:52.264Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Mass+budget+of+the+grounded+ice+in+the+Lambert+Glacier%E2%80%93Amery+Ice+Shelf+system&rft.date=2008-01-01&genre=article&issn=1727-5644&volume=48&spage=193&epage=197&pages=193-197&jtitle=Annals+of+Glaciology&atitle=Mass+budget+of+the+grounded+ice+in+the+Lambert+Glacier%E2%80%93Amery+Ice+Shelf+system&aulast=Bo&aufirst=Sun&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.3189%2F172756408784700644&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792339107279536129
author Jiahong, Wen, Yafeng, Wang, Jiying, Liu, Jezek, Kenneth C., Huybrechts, Philippe, Csathó, Beata M., Farness, Katy L., Bo, Sun
author_facet Jiahong, Wen, Yafeng, Wang, Jiying, Liu, Jezek, Kenneth C., Huybrechts, Philippe, Csathó, Beata M., Farness, Katy L., Bo, Sun, Jiahong, Wen, Yafeng, Wang, Jiying, Liu, Jezek, Kenneth C., Huybrechts, Philippe, Csathó, Beata M., Farness, Katy L., Bo, Sun
author_sort jiahong, wen
container_start_page 193
container_title Annals of Glaciology
container_volume 48
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We used remote-sensing and in situ measurements of surface accumulation rate, ice surface velocity, thickness and elevation to evaluate the mass budgets of grounded ice-flow regimes that form the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system. Three distinct drainage regimes are considered: the western and eastern margins of the ice shelf, and the southern grounding line at the major outlet glacier confluence, which can be identified with drainage zones 9, 11 and 10 respectively of Giovinetto and Zwally (2000). Our findings show the entire grounded portion of the basin is approximately in balance, with a mass budget of –4.2±9.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. Drainages 9, 10 and 11 are within balance to the level of our measurement uncertainty, with mass budgets of –2.5±2.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, –2.6±7.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> and 0.9±2.3 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, respectively. The region upstream of the Australian Lambert Glacier basin (LGB) traverse has a net mass budget of 4.4±6.3 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, while the downstream region has –8.9±9.9 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. These results indicate that glacier drainages 9, 10 and 11, upstream and downstream of the Australian LGB traverse, are in balance to within our measurement error.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.3189/172756408784700644
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMzE4OS8xNzI3NTY0MDg3ODQ3MDA2NDQ
imprint International Glaciological Society, 2008
imprint_str_mv International Glaciological Society, 2008
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 0260-3055, 1727-5644
issn_str_mv 0260-3055, 1727-5644
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:42:52.264Z
match_str jiahong2008massbudgetofthegroundediceinthelambertglacierameryiceshelfsystem
mega_collection International Glaciological Society (CrossRef)
physical 193-197
publishDate 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher International Glaciological Society
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Annals of Glaciology
source_id 49
spelling Jiahong, Wen Yafeng, Wang Jiying, Liu Jezek, Kenneth C. Huybrechts, Philippe Csathó, Beata M. Farness, Katy L. Bo, Sun 0260-3055 1727-5644 International Glaciological Society Earth-Surface Processes http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/172756408784700644 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We used remote-sensing and in situ measurements of surface accumulation rate, ice surface velocity, thickness and elevation to evaluate the mass budgets of grounded ice-flow regimes that form the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system. Three distinct drainage regimes are considered: the western and eastern margins of the ice shelf, and the southern grounding line at the major outlet glacier confluence, which can be identified with drainage zones 9, 11 and 10 respectively of Giovinetto and Zwally (2000). Our findings show the entire grounded portion of the basin is approximately in balance, with a mass budget of –4.2±9.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. Drainages 9, 10 and 11 are within balance to the level of our measurement uncertainty, with mass budgets of –2.5±2.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, –2.6±7.8 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup> and 0.9±2.3 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, respectively. The region upstream of the Australian Lambert Glacier basin (LGB) traverse has a net mass budget of 4.4±6.3 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>, while the downstream region has –8.9±9.9 Gt a<jats:sup>–1</jats:sup>. These results indicate that glacier drainages 9, 10 and 11, upstream and downstream of the Australian LGB traverse, are in balance to within our measurement error.</jats:p> Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system Annals of Glaciology
spellingShingle Jiahong, Wen, Yafeng, Wang, Jiying, Liu, Jezek, Kenneth C., Huybrechts, Philippe, Csathó, Beata M., Farness, Katy L., Bo, Sun, Annals of Glaciology, Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system, Earth-Surface Processes
title Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_full Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_fullStr Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_full_unstemmed Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_short Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
title_sort mass budget of the grounded ice in the lambert glacier–amery ice shelf system
title_unstemmed Mass budget of the grounded ice in the Lambert Glacier–Amery Ice Shelf system
topic Earth-Surface Processes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/172756408784700644