Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Online-Ressource

Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Zeitschriftentitel: Studia Humana
Personen und Körperschaften: Krzych, Bartłomiej K.
In: Studia Humana, 8, 2019, 2, S. 16-24
Format: E-Article
Sprache: Englisch
veröffentlicht:
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Schlagwörter:
General Medicine
author_facet Krzych, Bartłomiej K.
Krzych, Bartłomiej K.
author Krzych, Bartłomiej K.
spellingShingle Krzych, Bartłomiej K.
Studia Humana
Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
General Medicine
author_sort krzych, bartłomiej k.
spelling Krzych, Bartłomiej K. 2299-0518 Walter de Gruyter GmbH General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sh-2019-0014 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Augustyn Jakubisiak (1884-1945), Polish priest, philosopher and theologian, undertook polemics with Jan Łukasiewicz, whom he knew personally. A dispute concerning the so-called logistics (mathematical logic) and its relationship with philosophy developed between the two. The most important arguments were laid out, primarily in the following works: in the case of Jakubisiak, in the book <jats:italic>From Scope to Content</jats:italic> and in the case of Łukasiewicz, in the texts <jats:italic>Logistics and Philosophy</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>In the Defense of Logistics</jats:italic>. Jakubisiak criticized logistics for its anti-metaphysical, anti-theological and anti-religious attitude, which was based on neo-positivist philosophy, and led, in consequence to atheism. He also claimed that one should focus on what is concrete, avoiding idealization and abstraction (meaning the content of concepts, not their scope). Łukasiewicz defended logistics claiming that it possesses its own methods based on intellect, and is also an area of independent knowledge (but not completely detached) from philosophy, due to the fact it can consider the most important philosophical problems such as finiteness and infinity. This dispute, as the researchers identified, basically concerned the reduction of philosophy to the study of language (analytic philosophy) and initiated one of the most important discussions concerning the relationship between philosophy and logic. This debate was crucial because it also concerned questions related to fundamental metaphysical issues (naturalism – supranaturalism, rationalism – irrationalism) and epistemological issues (realism – idealism, boundaries and structure of cognition).</jats:p> Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important? Studia Humana
doi_str_mv 10.2478/sh-2019-0014
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjQ3OC9zaC0yMDE5LTAwMTQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjQ3OC9zaC0yMDE5LTAwMTQ
institution DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Zwi2
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
issn 2299-0518
issn_str_mv 2299-0518
language English
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
match_str krzych2019disputeoverlogisticbetweenjanlukasiewiczandaugustynjakubisiakwhywasitimportant
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Studia Humana
source_id 49
title Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_unstemmed Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_full Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_fullStr Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_full_unstemmed Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_short Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_sort dispute over logistic between jan łukasiewicz and augustyn jakubisiak. why was it important?
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sh-2019-0014
publishDate 2019
physical 16-24
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Augustyn Jakubisiak (1884-1945), Polish priest, philosopher and theologian, undertook polemics with Jan Łukasiewicz, whom he knew personally. A dispute concerning the so-called logistics (mathematical logic) and its relationship with philosophy developed between the two. The most important arguments were laid out, primarily in the following works: in the case of Jakubisiak, in the book <jats:italic>From Scope to Content</jats:italic> and in the case of Łukasiewicz, in the texts <jats:italic>Logistics and Philosophy</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>In the Defense of Logistics</jats:italic>. Jakubisiak criticized logistics for its anti-metaphysical, anti-theological and anti-religious attitude, which was based on neo-positivist philosophy, and led, in consequence to atheism. He also claimed that one should focus on what is concrete, avoiding idealization and abstraction (meaning the content of concepts, not their scope). Łukasiewicz defended logistics claiming that it possesses its own methods based on intellect, and is also an area of independent knowledge (but not completely detached) from philosophy, due to the fact it can consider the most important philosophical problems such as finiteness and infinity. This dispute, as the researchers identified, basically concerned the reduction of philosophy to the study of language (analytic philosophy) and initiated one of the most important discussions concerning the relationship between philosophy and logic. This debate was crucial because it also concerned questions related to fundamental metaphysical issues (naturalism – supranaturalism, rationalism – irrationalism) and epistemological issues (realism – idealism, boundaries and structure of cognition).</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 16
container_title Studia Humana
container_volume 8
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792330693265588231
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:29:08.145Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Dispute+Over+Logistic+Between+Jan+%C5%81ukasiewicz+and+Augustyn+Jakubisiak.+Why+Was+it+Important%3F&rft.date=2019-06-01&genre=article&issn=2299-0518&volume=8&issue=2&spage=16&epage=24&pages=16-24&jtitle=Studia+Humana&atitle=Dispute+Over+Logistic+Between+Jan+%C5%81ukasiewicz+and+Augustyn+Jakubisiak.+Why+Was+it+Important%3F&aulast=Krzych&aufirst=Bart%C5%82omiej+K.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2478%2Fsh-2019-0014&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792330693265588231
author Krzych, Bartłomiej K.
author_facet Krzych, Bartłomiej K., Krzych, Bartłomiej K.
author_sort krzych, bartłomiej k.
container_issue 2
container_start_page 16
container_title Studia Humana
container_volume 8
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Augustyn Jakubisiak (1884-1945), Polish priest, philosopher and theologian, undertook polemics with Jan Łukasiewicz, whom he knew personally. A dispute concerning the so-called logistics (mathematical logic) and its relationship with philosophy developed between the two. The most important arguments were laid out, primarily in the following works: in the case of Jakubisiak, in the book <jats:italic>From Scope to Content</jats:italic> and in the case of Łukasiewicz, in the texts <jats:italic>Logistics and Philosophy</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>In the Defense of Logistics</jats:italic>. Jakubisiak criticized logistics for its anti-metaphysical, anti-theological and anti-religious attitude, which was based on neo-positivist philosophy, and led, in consequence to atheism. He also claimed that one should focus on what is concrete, avoiding idealization and abstraction (meaning the content of concepts, not their scope). Łukasiewicz defended logistics claiming that it possesses its own methods based on intellect, and is also an area of independent knowledge (but not completely detached) from philosophy, due to the fact it can consider the most important philosophical problems such as finiteness and infinity. This dispute, as the researchers identified, basically concerned the reduction of philosophy to the study of language (analytic philosophy) and initiated one of the most important discussions concerning the relationship between philosophy and logic. This debate was crucial because it also concerned questions related to fundamental metaphysical issues (naturalism – supranaturalism, rationalism – irrationalism) and epistemological issues (realism – idealism, boundaries and structure of cognition).</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.2478/sh-2019-0014
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjQ3OC9zaC0yMDE5LTAwMTQ
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
institution DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14
issn 2299-0518
issn_str_mv 2299-0518
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:29:08.145Z
match_str krzych2019disputeoverlogisticbetweenjanlukasiewiczandaugustynjakubisiakwhywasitimportant
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
physical 16-24
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Studia Humana
source_id 49
spelling Krzych, Bartłomiej K. 2299-0518 Walter de Gruyter GmbH General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sh-2019-0014 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Augustyn Jakubisiak (1884-1945), Polish priest, philosopher and theologian, undertook polemics with Jan Łukasiewicz, whom he knew personally. A dispute concerning the so-called logistics (mathematical logic) and its relationship with philosophy developed between the two. The most important arguments were laid out, primarily in the following works: in the case of Jakubisiak, in the book <jats:italic>From Scope to Content</jats:italic> and in the case of Łukasiewicz, in the texts <jats:italic>Logistics and Philosophy</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>In the Defense of Logistics</jats:italic>. Jakubisiak criticized logistics for its anti-metaphysical, anti-theological and anti-religious attitude, which was based on neo-positivist philosophy, and led, in consequence to atheism. He also claimed that one should focus on what is concrete, avoiding idealization and abstraction (meaning the content of concepts, not their scope). Łukasiewicz defended logistics claiming that it possesses its own methods based on intellect, and is also an area of independent knowledge (but not completely detached) from philosophy, due to the fact it can consider the most important philosophical problems such as finiteness and infinity. This dispute, as the researchers identified, basically concerned the reduction of philosophy to the study of language (analytic philosophy) and initiated one of the most important discussions concerning the relationship between philosophy and logic. This debate was crucial because it also concerned questions related to fundamental metaphysical issues (naturalism – supranaturalism, rationalism – irrationalism) and epistemological issues (realism – idealism, boundaries and structure of cognition).</jats:p> Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important? Studia Humana
spellingShingle Krzych, Bartłomiej K., Studia Humana, Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?, General Medicine
title Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_full Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_fullStr Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_full_unstemmed Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_short Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
title_sort dispute over logistic between jan łukasiewicz and augustyn jakubisiak. why was it important?
title_unstemmed Dispute Over Logistic Between Jan Łukasiewicz and Augustyn Jakubisiak. Why Was it Important?
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sh-2019-0014