Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Official Statistics |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , |
| In: | Journal of Official Statistics, 30, 2014, 3, S. 547-562 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
| author_facet |
Costa, Alex Garcıá, Jaume Raymond, Josep Lluis Costa, Alex Garcıá, Jaume Raymond, Josep Lluis |
|---|---|
| author |
Costa, Alex Garcıá, Jaume Raymond, Josep Lluis |
| spellingShingle |
Costa, Alex Garcıá, Jaume Raymond, Josep Lluis Journal of Official Statistics Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| author_sort |
costa, alex |
| spelling |
Costa, Alex Garcıá, Jaume Raymond, Josep Lluis 2001-7367 SAGE Publications http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0034 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Quality has become the key concept in official statistics. There is a general consensus that we have to consider several components when assessing the quality of statistical information. Relevance, accuracy, timeliness, punctuality, comparability, coherence, accessibility and clarity are the dimensions most frequently mentioned. In this article we use regression analysis to evaluate the contribution of these different dimensions when assessing the overall quality of statistical products. We do this using the information collected in the structured consultation with users and experts from both inside and outside the Spanish Central Administration carried out by the Working Group of the Spanish High Council on Statistics, responsible for the preliminary draft of the proposals and recommendations of this council for the Spanish Multiannual Statistical Programme 2013-2016. We find that the abovementioned dimensions have different weights in the overall assessment of perceived quality (with accuracy and reliability having the highest weight, and relevance having the lowest) and that the structure differs between both types of users.</jats:p> Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain Journal of Official Statistics |
| doi_str_mv |
10.2478/jos-2014-0034 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjQ3OC9qb3MtMjAxNC0wMDM0 |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjQ3OC9qb3MtMjAxNC0wMDM0 |
| institution |
DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 |
| imprint |
SAGE Publications, 2014 |
| imprint_str_mv |
SAGE Publications, 2014 |
| issn |
2001-7367 |
| issn_str_mv |
2001-7367 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
costa2014areallqualitydimensionsofequalimportancewhenmeasuringtheperceivedqualityofofficialstatisticsevidencefromspain |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| publisher |
SAGE Publications |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Journal of Official Statistics |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_unstemmed |
Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_full |
Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_fullStr |
Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_short |
Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_sort |
are all quality dimensions of equal importance when measuring the perceived quality of official statistics? evidence from spain |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0034 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| physical |
547-562 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>Quality has become the key concept in official statistics. There is a general consensus that we have to consider several components when assessing the quality of statistical information. Relevance, accuracy, timeliness, punctuality, comparability, coherence, accessibility and clarity are the dimensions most frequently mentioned. In this article we use regression analysis to evaluate the contribution of these different dimensions when assessing the overall quality of statistical products. We do this using the information collected in the structured consultation with users and experts from both inside and outside the Spanish Central Administration carried out by the Working Group of the Spanish High Council on Statistics, responsible for the preliminary draft of the proposals and recommendations of this council for the Spanish Multiannual Statistical Programme 2013-2016. We find that the abovementioned dimensions have different weights in the overall assessment of perceived quality (with accuracy and reliability having the highest weight, and relevance having the lowest) and that the structure differs between both types of users.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
3 |
| container_start_page |
547 |
| container_title |
Journal of Official Statistics |
| container_volume |
30 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792340981138325505 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:12:39.057Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Are+All+Quality+Dimensions+of+Equal+Importance+when+Measuring+the+Perceived+Quality+of+Official+Statistics%3F+Evidence+from+Spain&rft.date=2014-09-01&genre=article&issn=2001-7367&volume=30&issue=3&spage=547&epage=562&pages=547-562&jtitle=Journal+of+Official+Statistics&atitle=Are+All+Quality+Dimensions+of+Equal+Importance+when+Measuring+the+Perceived+Quality+of+Official+Statistics%3F+Evidence+from+Spain&aulast=Raymond&aufirst=Josep+Lluis&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2478%2Fjos-2014-0034&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792340981138325505 |
| author | Costa, Alex, Garcıá, Jaume, Raymond, Josep Lluis |
| author_facet | Costa, Alex, Garcıá, Jaume, Raymond, Josep Lluis, Costa, Alex, Garcıá, Jaume, Raymond, Josep Lluis |
| author_sort | costa, alex |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 547 |
| container_title | Journal of Official Statistics |
| container_volume | 30 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Quality has become the key concept in official statistics. There is a general consensus that we have to consider several components when assessing the quality of statistical information. Relevance, accuracy, timeliness, punctuality, comparability, coherence, accessibility and clarity are the dimensions most frequently mentioned. In this article we use regression analysis to evaluate the contribution of these different dimensions when assessing the overall quality of statistical products. We do this using the information collected in the structured consultation with users and experts from both inside and outside the Spanish Central Administration carried out by the Working Group of the Spanish High Council on Statistics, responsible for the preliminary draft of the proposals and recommendations of this council for the Spanish Multiannual Statistical Programme 2013-2016. We find that the abovementioned dimensions have different weights in the overall assessment of perceived quality (with accuracy and reliability having the highest weight, and relevance having the lowest) and that the structure differs between both types of users.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2478/jos-2014-0034 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjQ3OC9qb3MtMjAxNC0wMDM0 |
| imprint | SAGE Publications, 2014 |
| imprint_str_mv | SAGE Publications, 2014 |
| institution | DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105 |
| issn | 2001-7367 |
| issn_str_mv | 2001-7367 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:12:39.057Z |
| match_str | costa2014areallqualitydimensionsofequalimportancewhenmeasuringtheperceivedqualityofofficialstatisticsevidencefromspain |
| mega_collection | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| physical | 547-562 |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Journal of Official Statistics |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Costa, Alex Garcıá, Jaume Raymond, Josep Lluis 2001-7367 SAGE Publications http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0034 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Quality has become the key concept in official statistics. There is a general consensus that we have to consider several components when assessing the quality of statistical information. Relevance, accuracy, timeliness, punctuality, comparability, coherence, accessibility and clarity are the dimensions most frequently mentioned. In this article we use regression analysis to evaluate the contribution of these different dimensions when assessing the overall quality of statistical products. We do this using the information collected in the structured consultation with users and experts from both inside and outside the Spanish Central Administration carried out by the Working Group of the Spanish High Council on Statistics, responsible for the preliminary draft of the proposals and recommendations of this council for the Spanish Multiannual Statistical Programme 2013-2016. We find that the abovementioned dimensions have different weights in the overall assessment of perceived quality (with accuracy and reliability having the highest weight, and relevance having the lowest) and that the structure differs between both types of users.</jats:p> Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain Journal of Official Statistics |
| spellingShingle | Costa, Alex, Garcıá, Jaume, Raymond, Josep Lluis, Journal of Official Statistics, Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title | Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_full | Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_fullStr | Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_full_unstemmed | Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_short | Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| title_sort | are all quality dimensions of equal importance when measuring the perceived quality of official statistics? evidence from spain |
| title_unstemmed | Are All Quality Dimensions of Equal Importance when Measuring the Perceived Quality of Official Statistics? Evidence from Spain |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0034 |