Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , |
In: | Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 12, 2017, 11, S. 1831-1840 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Leung, Kelvin C.W. Quinn, Robert R. Ravani, Pietro Duff, Henry MacRae, Jennifer M. Leung, Kelvin C.W. Quinn, Robert R. Ravani, Pietro Duff, Henry MacRae, Jennifer M. |
---|---|
author |
Leung, Kelvin C.W. Quinn, Robert R. Ravani, Pietro Duff, Henry MacRae, Jennifer M. |
spellingShingle |
Leung, Kelvin C.W. Quinn, Robert R. Ravani, Pietro Duff, Henry MacRae, Jennifer M. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis Transplantation Nephrology Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Epidemiology |
author_sort |
leung, kelvin c.w. |
spelling |
Leung, Kelvin C.W. Quinn, Robert R. Ravani, Pietro Duff, Henry MacRae, Jennifer M. 1555-9041 1555-905X Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) Transplantation Nephrology Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Epidemiology http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/cjn.01030117 <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and objectives</jats:title> <jats:p>Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is associated with morbidity. The effect of blood volume–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback, which automatically adjusts fluid removal rate on the basis of blood volume parameters, on the reduction of IDH was tested in a randomized crossover trial.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Design, setting, participants, & measurements</jats:title> <jats:p>We performed a 22-week, single blind, randomized crossover trial in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who had >30% of sessions complicated by symptomatic IDH in five centers in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period to standardize dialysis prescription and dry weight on the basis of clinical examination. Those meeting inclusion criteria were randomized to best clinical practice hemodialysis (control) or best clinical practice plus blood volume–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback (intervention) for 8 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout and subsequent crossover for a second 8-week phase. The primary outcome was rate of symptomatic IDH.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Thirty-five participants entered, 32 were randomized, and 26 completed the study. The rate of symptomatic IDH with biofeedback was 0.10/h (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.14) and 0.07/h (95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.10) during control (<jats:italic toggle="yes">P</jats:italic>=0.29). There were no differences in the rate or proportion of sessions with asymptomatic IDH or symptoms alone. Results remained consistent when adjusted for randomization order and study week. There were no differences between intervention and control in the last study week in interdialytic weight gain (difference [SD], −0.02 [0.8] kg), brain natriuretic peptide (1460 [19,052] ng/L), cardiac troponins (3 [86] ng/L), extracellular water–to–intracellular water ratio (0.05 [0.33]), ultrafiltration rate (1.1 [7.0] ml/kg per hour), and dialysis recovery time (0.43 [19.25] hours).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>The use of blood volume monitoring–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback in patients prone to IDH did not reduce the rate of symptomatic IDH events.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
doi_str_mv |
10.2215/cjn.01030117 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjIxNS9jam4uMDEwMzAxMTc |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjIxNS9jam4uMDEwMzAxMTc |
institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 |
imprint |
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2017 |
imprint_str_mv |
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2017 |
issn |
1555-9041 1555-905X |
issn_str_mv |
1555-9041 1555-905X |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
leung2017randomizedcrossovertrialofbloodvolumemonitoringguidedultrafiltrationbiofeedbacktoreduceintradialytichypotensiveepisodeswithhemodialysis |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
publisher |
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_unstemmed |
Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_full |
Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_fullStr |
Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_short |
Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_sort |
randomized crossover trial of blood volume monitoring–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback to reduce intradialytic hypotensive episodes with hemodialysis |
topic |
Transplantation Nephrology Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Epidemiology |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/cjn.01030117 |
publishDate |
2017 |
physical |
1831-1840 |
description |
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background and objectives</jats:title>
<jats:p>Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is associated with morbidity. The effect of blood volume–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback, which automatically adjusts fluid removal rate on the basis of blood volume parameters, on the reduction of IDH was tested in a randomized crossover trial.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Design, setting, participants, & measurements</jats:title>
<jats:p>We performed a 22-week, single blind, randomized crossover trial in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who had >30% of sessions complicated by symptomatic IDH in five centers in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period to standardize dialysis prescription and dry weight on the basis of clinical examination. Those meeting inclusion criteria were randomized to best clinical practice hemodialysis (control) or best clinical practice plus blood volume–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback (intervention) for 8 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout and subsequent crossover for a second 8-week phase. The primary outcome was rate of symptomatic IDH.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>Thirty-five participants entered, 32 were randomized, and 26 completed the study. The rate of symptomatic IDH with biofeedback was 0.10/h (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.14) and 0.07/h (95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.10) during control (<jats:italic toggle="yes">P</jats:italic>=0.29). There were no differences in the rate or proportion of sessions with asymptomatic IDH or symptoms alone. Results remained consistent when adjusted for randomization order and study week. There were no differences between intervention and control in the last study week in interdialytic weight gain (difference [SD], −0.02 [0.8] kg), brain natriuretic peptide (1460 [19,052] ng/L), cardiac troponins (3 [86] ng/L), extracellular water–to–intracellular water ratio (0.05 [0.33]), ultrafiltration rate (1.1 [7.0] ml/kg per hour), and dialysis recovery time (0.43 [19.25] hours).</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title>
<jats:p>The use of blood volume monitoring–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback in patients prone to IDH did not reduce the rate of symptomatic IDH events.</jats:p>
</jats:sec> |
container_issue |
11 |
container_start_page |
1831 |
container_title |
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
container_volume |
12 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792344891598045189 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T17:14:04.795Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Randomized+Crossover+Trial+of+Blood+Volume+Monitoring%E2%80%93Guided+Ultrafiltration+Biofeedback+to+Reduce+Intradialytic+Hypotensive+Episodes+with+Hemodialysis&rft.date=2017-11-01&genre=article&issn=1555-905X&volume=12&issue=11&spage=1831&epage=1840&pages=1831-1840&jtitle=Clinical+Journal+of+the+American+Society+of+Nephrology&atitle=Randomized+Crossover+Trial+of+Blood+Volume+Monitoring%E2%80%93Guided+Ultrafiltration+Biofeedback+to+Reduce+Intradialytic+Hypotensive+Episodes+with+Hemodialysis&aulast=MacRae&aufirst=Jennifer+M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2215%2Fcjn.01030117&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792344891598045189 |
author | Leung, Kelvin C.W., Quinn, Robert R., Ravani, Pietro, Duff, Henry, MacRae, Jennifer M. |
author_facet | Leung, Kelvin C.W., Quinn, Robert R., Ravani, Pietro, Duff, Henry, MacRae, Jennifer M., Leung, Kelvin C.W., Quinn, Robert R., Ravani, Pietro, Duff, Henry, MacRae, Jennifer M. |
author_sort | leung, kelvin c.w. |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1831 |
container_title | Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
container_volume | 12 |
description | <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and objectives</jats:title> <jats:p>Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is associated with morbidity. The effect of blood volume–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback, which automatically adjusts fluid removal rate on the basis of blood volume parameters, on the reduction of IDH was tested in a randomized crossover trial.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Design, setting, participants, & measurements</jats:title> <jats:p>We performed a 22-week, single blind, randomized crossover trial in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who had >30% of sessions complicated by symptomatic IDH in five centers in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period to standardize dialysis prescription and dry weight on the basis of clinical examination. Those meeting inclusion criteria were randomized to best clinical practice hemodialysis (control) or best clinical practice plus blood volume–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback (intervention) for 8 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout and subsequent crossover for a second 8-week phase. The primary outcome was rate of symptomatic IDH.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Thirty-five participants entered, 32 were randomized, and 26 completed the study. The rate of symptomatic IDH with biofeedback was 0.10/h (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.14) and 0.07/h (95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.10) during control (<jats:italic toggle="yes">P</jats:italic>=0.29). There were no differences in the rate or proportion of sessions with asymptomatic IDH or symptoms alone. Results remained consistent when adjusted for randomization order and study week. There were no differences between intervention and control in the last study week in interdialytic weight gain (difference [SD], −0.02 [0.8] kg), brain natriuretic peptide (1460 [19,052] ng/L), cardiac troponins (3 [86] ng/L), extracellular water–to–intracellular water ratio (0.05 [0.33]), ultrafiltration rate (1.1 [7.0] ml/kg per hour), and dialysis recovery time (0.43 [19.25] hours).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>The use of blood volume monitoring–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback in patients prone to IDH did not reduce the rate of symptomatic IDH events.</jats:p> </jats:sec> |
doi_str_mv | 10.2215/cjn.01030117 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Medizin |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjIxNS9jam4uMDEwMzAxMTc |
imprint | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2017 |
imprint_str_mv | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2017 |
institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161 |
issn | 1555-9041, 1555-905X |
issn_str_mv | 1555-9041, 1555-905X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T17:14:04.795Z |
match_str | leung2017randomizedcrossovertrialofbloodvolumemonitoringguidedultrafiltrationbiofeedbacktoreduceintradialytichypotensiveepisodeswithhemodialysis |
mega_collection | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (CrossRef) |
physical | 1831-1840 |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Leung, Kelvin C.W. Quinn, Robert R. Ravani, Pietro Duff, Henry MacRae, Jennifer M. 1555-9041 1555-905X Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) Transplantation Nephrology Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Epidemiology http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/cjn.01030117 <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and objectives</jats:title> <jats:p>Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is associated with morbidity. The effect of blood volume–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback, which automatically adjusts fluid removal rate on the basis of blood volume parameters, on the reduction of IDH was tested in a randomized crossover trial.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Design, setting, participants, & measurements</jats:title> <jats:p>We performed a 22-week, single blind, randomized crossover trial in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who had >30% of sessions complicated by symptomatic IDH in five centers in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period to standardize dialysis prescription and dry weight on the basis of clinical examination. Those meeting inclusion criteria were randomized to best clinical practice hemodialysis (control) or best clinical practice plus blood volume–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback (intervention) for 8 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout and subsequent crossover for a second 8-week phase. The primary outcome was rate of symptomatic IDH.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Thirty-five participants entered, 32 were randomized, and 26 completed the study. The rate of symptomatic IDH with biofeedback was 0.10/h (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.14) and 0.07/h (95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.10) during control (<jats:italic toggle="yes">P</jats:italic>=0.29). There were no differences in the rate or proportion of sessions with asymptomatic IDH or symptoms alone. Results remained consistent when adjusted for randomization order and study week. There were no differences between intervention and control in the last study week in interdialytic weight gain (difference [SD], −0.02 [0.8] kg), brain natriuretic peptide (1460 [19,052] ng/L), cardiac troponins (3 [86] ng/L), extracellular water–to–intracellular water ratio (0.05 [0.33]), ultrafiltration rate (1.1 [7.0] ml/kg per hour), and dialysis recovery time (0.43 [19.25] hours).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>The use of blood volume monitoring–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback in patients prone to IDH did not reduce the rate of symptomatic IDH events.</jats:p> </jats:sec> Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
spellingShingle | Leung, Kelvin C.W., Quinn, Robert R., Ravani, Pietro, Duff, Henry, MacRae, Jennifer M., Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis, Transplantation, Nephrology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology |
title | Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_full | Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_fullStr | Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_short | Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
title_sort | randomized crossover trial of blood volume monitoring–guided ultrafiltration biofeedback to reduce intradialytic hypotensive episodes with hemodialysis |
title_unstemmed | Randomized Crossover Trial of Blood Volume Monitoring–Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback to Reduce Intradialytic Hypotensive Episodes with Hemodialysis |
topic | Transplantation, Nephrology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/cjn.01030117 |