author_facet Morris, Dave M.
Hazlett, Paul W.
Fleming, Rob L.
Kwiaton, Martin M.
Hawdon, Laura A.
Leblanc, J.‐D.
Primavera, M.J.
Weldon, Tom P.
Morris, Dave M.
Hazlett, Paul W.
Fleming, Rob L.
Kwiaton, Martin M.
Hawdon, Laura A.
Leblanc, J.‐D.
Primavera, M.J.
Weldon, Tom P.
author Morris, Dave M.
Hazlett, Paul W.
Fleming, Rob L.
Kwiaton, Martin M.
Hawdon, Laura A.
Leblanc, J.‐D.
Primavera, M.J.
Weldon, Tom P.
spellingShingle Morris, Dave M.
Hazlett, Paul W.
Fleming, Rob L.
Kwiaton, Martin M.
Hawdon, Laura A.
Leblanc, J.‐D.
Primavera, M.J.
Weldon, Tom P.
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
Soil Science
author_sort morris, dave m.
spelling Morris, Dave M. Hazlett, Paul W. Fleming, Rob L. Kwiaton, Martin M. Hawdon, Laura A. Leblanc, J.‐D. Primavera, M.J. Weldon, Tom P. 0361-5995 1435-0661 Wiley Soil Science http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.08.0306 <jats:sec><jats:title>Core Ideas</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Biomass removal trials targeted soils sensitive to nutrient removal (shallow to bedrock and infertile sands).</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>14 long‐term sites (42 plots per treatment) were used to evaluate C and nutrient reserves 20 years post‐harvest.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>After 20 years, soil C, N, and K reserves did not differ between pre‐harvest levels and SO and FT.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Soil reserves of FTB treatments remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Jack pine and black spruce declined in height on FTB on sandy sites; there were no differences between SO and FT.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p><jats:p>Here we report on 20‐yr soil (forest floor plus the upper 20 cm of mineral soil) carbon and nutrient reserves from 14 biomass removal trials established on coarse‐textured, nutrient poor sites. Harvest treatments included stem only (SO, delimbed at the stump), full‐tree (FT, entire trees with boles and branches removed), and full‐tree plus forest floor blading (FTB, full‐tree harvest followed by removal of the forest floor and approximately the upper 5 cm of mineral soil). After 20 yr, there were no significant differences in soil C, N, and K reserves between pre‐harvest levels and the SO and FT treatments. Only the soil reserves of the FTB treatment remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels. Extractable soil Ca and Mg reserves increased in Year 5 in all treatments, followed by slow declines, but all treatments remained comparable to or exceeded pre‐harvest levels at Year 20. For P, harvesting (SO and FT) resulted in significant declines that remain after 20 yr. Both jack pine and black spruce showed reduced top height growth on FTB, but only on some of the sandy sites. There were no differences in top height for either species between SO and FT across all 14 study sites. Current results suggest there is no need for restrictions on full‐tree harvesting for traditional wood products on these nutrient poor sites. However, from a cautionary perspective, it seems prudent at this time to restrict more intensive bioenergy harvests to deep, finer‐textured sites that have larger soil C and nutrient reserves.</jats:p></jats:sec> Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results Soil Science Society of America Journal
doi_str_mv 10.2136/sssaj2018.08.0306
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNi9zc3NhajIwMTguMDguMDMwNg
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNi9zc3NhajIwMTguMDguMDMwNg
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
issn_str_mv 0361-5995
1435-0661
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str morris2019effectsofbiomassremovallevelsonsoilcarbonandnutrientreservesinconiferdominatedcoarsetexturedsitesinnorthernontario20yearresults
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Soil Science Society of America Journal
source_id 49
title Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_unstemmed Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_full Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_fullStr Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_short Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_sort effects of biomass removal levels on soil carbon and nutrient reserves in conifer‐dominated, coarse‐textured sites in northern ontario: 20‐year results
topic Soil Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.08.0306
publishDate 2019
physical
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Core Ideas</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Biomass removal trials targeted soils sensitive to nutrient removal (shallow to bedrock and infertile sands).</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>14 long‐term sites (42 plots per treatment) were used to evaluate C and nutrient reserves 20 years post‐harvest.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>After 20 years, soil C, N, and K reserves did not differ between pre‐harvest levels and SO and FT.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Soil reserves of FTB treatments remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Jack pine and black spruce declined in height on FTB on sandy sites; there were no differences between SO and FT.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p><jats:p>Here we report on 20‐yr soil (forest floor plus the upper 20 cm of mineral soil) carbon and nutrient reserves from 14 biomass removal trials established on coarse‐textured, nutrient poor sites. Harvest treatments included stem only (SO, delimbed at the stump), full‐tree (FT, entire trees with boles and branches removed), and full‐tree plus forest floor blading (FTB, full‐tree harvest followed by removal of the forest floor and approximately the upper 5 cm of mineral soil). After 20 yr, there were no significant differences in soil C, N, and K reserves between pre‐harvest levels and the SO and FT treatments. Only the soil reserves of the FTB treatment remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels. Extractable soil Ca and Mg reserves increased in Year 5 in all treatments, followed by slow declines, but all treatments remained comparable to or exceeded pre‐harvest levels at Year 20. For P, harvesting (SO and FT) resulted in significant declines that remain after 20 yr. Both jack pine and black spruce showed reduced top height growth on FTB, but only on some of the sandy sites. There were no differences in top height for either species between SO and FT across all 14 study sites. Current results suggest there is no need for restrictions on full‐tree harvesting for traditional wood products on these nutrient poor sites. However, from a cautionary perspective, it seems prudent at this time to restrict more intensive bioenergy harvests to deep, finer‐textured sites that have larger soil C and nutrient reserves.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue S1
container_start_page 0
container_title Soil Science Society of America Journal
container_volume 83
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792340453856641030
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:04:15.165Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Effects+of+Biomass+Removal+Levels+on+Soil+Carbon+and+Nutrient+Reserves+in+Conifer%E2%80%90Dominated%2C+Coarse%E2%80%90Textured+Sites+in+Northern+Ontario%3A+20%E2%80%90Year+Results&rft.date=2019-08-01&genre=article&issn=1435-0661&volume=83&issue=S1&jtitle=Soil+Science+Society+of+America+Journal&atitle=Effects+of+Biomass+Removal+Levels+on+Soil+Carbon+and+Nutrient+Reserves+in+Conifer%E2%80%90Dominated%2C+Coarse%E2%80%90Textured+Sites+in+Northern+Ontario%3A+20%E2%80%90Year+Results&aulast=Weldon&aufirst=Tom+P.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2136%2Fsssaj2018.08.0306&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792340453856641030
author Morris, Dave M., Hazlett, Paul W., Fleming, Rob L., Kwiaton, Martin M., Hawdon, Laura A., Leblanc, J.‐D., Primavera, M.J., Weldon, Tom P.
author_facet Morris, Dave M., Hazlett, Paul W., Fleming, Rob L., Kwiaton, Martin M., Hawdon, Laura A., Leblanc, J.‐D., Primavera, M.J., Weldon, Tom P., Morris, Dave M., Hazlett, Paul W., Fleming, Rob L., Kwiaton, Martin M., Hawdon, Laura A., Leblanc, J.‐D., Primavera, M.J., Weldon, Tom P.
author_sort morris, dave m.
container_issue S1
container_start_page 0
container_title Soil Science Society of America Journal
container_volume 83
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Core Ideas</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Biomass removal trials targeted soils sensitive to nutrient removal (shallow to bedrock and infertile sands).</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>14 long‐term sites (42 plots per treatment) were used to evaluate C and nutrient reserves 20 years post‐harvest.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>After 20 years, soil C, N, and K reserves did not differ between pre‐harvest levels and SO and FT.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Soil reserves of FTB treatments remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Jack pine and black spruce declined in height on FTB on sandy sites; there were no differences between SO and FT.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p><jats:p>Here we report on 20‐yr soil (forest floor plus the upper 20 cm of mineral soil) carbon and nutrient reserves from 14 biomass removal trials established on coarse‐textured, nutrient poor sites. Harvest treatments included stem only (SO, delimbed at the stump), full‐tree (FT, entire trees with boles and branches removed), and full‐tree plus forest floor blading (FTB, full‐tree harvest followed by removal of the forest floor and approximately the upper 5 cm of mineral soil). After 20 yr, there were no significant differences in soil C, N, and K reserves between pre‐harvest levels and the SO and FT treatments. Only the soil reserves of the FTB treatment remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels. Extractable soil Ca and Mg reserves increased in Year 5 in all treatments, followed by slow declines, but all treatments remained comparable to or exceeded pre‐harvest levels at Year 20. For P, harvesting (SO and FT) resulted in significant declines that remain after 20 yr. Both jack pine and black spruce showed reduced top height growth on FTB, but only on some of the sandy sites. There were no differences in top height for either species between SO and FT across all 14 study sites. Current results suggest there is no need for restrictions on full‐tree harvesting for traditional wood products on these nutrient poor sites. However, from a cautionary perspective, it seems prudent at this time to restrict more intensive bioenergy harvests to deep, finer‐textured sites that have larger soil C and nutrient reserves.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.2136/sssaj2018.08.0306
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNi9zc3NhajIwMTguMDguMDMwNg
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 0361-5995, 1435-0661
issn_str_mv 0361-5995, 1435-0661
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:04:15.165Z
match_str morris2019effectsofbiomassremovallevelsonsoilcarbonandnutrientreservesinconiferdominatedcoarsetexturedsitesinnorthernontario20yearresults
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Soil Science Society of America Journal
source_id 49
spelling Morris, Dave M. Hazlett, Paul W. Fleming, Rob L. Kwiaton, Martin M. Hawdon, Laura A. Leblanc, J.‐D. Primavera, M.J. Weldon, Tom P. 0361-5995 1435-0661 Wiley Soil Science http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.08.0306 <jats:sec><jats:title>Core Ideas</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Biomass removal trials targeted soils sensitive to nutrient removal (shallow to bedrock and infertile sands).</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>14 long‐term sites (42 plots per treatment) were used to evaluate C and nutrient reserves 20 years post‐harvest.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>After 20 years, soil C, N, and K reserves did not differ between pre‐harvest levels and SO and FT.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Soil reserves of FTB treatments remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Jack pine and black spruce declined in height on FTB on sandy sites; there were no differences between SO and FT.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p><jats:p>Here we report on 20‐yr soil (forest floor plus the upper 20 cm of mineral soil) carbon and nutrient reserves from 14 biomass removal trials established on coarse‐textured, nutrient poor sites. Harvest treatments included stem only (SO, delimbed at the stump), full‐tree (FT, entire trees with boles and branches removed), and full‐tree plus forest floor blading (FTB, full‐tree harvest followed by removal of the forest floor and approximately the upper 5 cm of mineral soil). After 20 yr, there were no significant differences in soil C, N, and K reserves between pre‐harvest levels and the SO and FT treatments. Only the soil reserves of the FTB treatment remained significantly lower than the pre‐harvest levels. Extractable soil Ca and Mg reserves increased in Year 5 in all treatments, followed by slow declines, but all treatments remained comparable to or exceeded pre‐harvest levels at Year 20. For P, harvesting (SO and FT) resulted in significant declines that remain after 20 yr. Both jack pine and black spruce showed reduced top height growth on FTB, but only on some of the sandy sites. There were no differences in top height for either species between SO and FT across all 14 study sites. Current results suggest there is no need for restrictions on full‐tree harvesting for traditional wood products on these nutrient poor sites. However, from a cautionary perspective, it seems prudent at this time to restrict more intensive bioenergy harvests to deep, finer‐textured sites that have larger soil C and nutrient reserves.</jats:p></jats:sec> Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results Soil Science Society of America Journal
spellingShingle Morris, Dave M., Hazlett, Paul W., Fleming, Rob L., Kwiaton, Martin M., Hawdon, Laura A., Leblanc, J.‐D., Primavera, M.J., Weldon, Tom P., Soil Science Society of America Journal, Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results, Soil Science
title Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_full Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_fullStr Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_short Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
title_sort effects of biomass removal levels on soil carbon and nutrient reserves in conifer‐dominated, coarse‐textured sites in northern ontario: 20‐year results
title_unstemmed Effects of Biomass Removal Levels on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Reserves in Conifer‐Dominated, Coarse‐Textured Sites in Northern Ontario: 20‐Year Results
topic Soil Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.08.0306