author_facet Mueller, Sarah M.
Camberato, James J.
Messina, Charlie
Shanahan, John
Zhang, Hao
Vyn, Tony J.
Mueller, Sarah M.
Camberato, James J.
Messina, Charlie
Shanahan, John
Zhang, Hao
Vyn, Tony J.
author Mueller, Sarah M.
Camberato, James J.
Messina, Charlie
Shanahan, John
Zhang, Hao
Vyn, Tony J.
spellingShingle Mueller, Sarah M.
Camberato, James J.
Messina, Charlie
Shanahan, John
Zhang, Hao
Vyn, Tony J.
Agronomy Journal
Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
Agronomy and Crop Science
author_sort mueller, sarah m.
spelling Mueller, Sarah M. Camberato, James J. Messina, Charlie Shanahan, John Zhang, Hao Vyn, Tony J. 0002-1962 1435-0645 Wiley Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.05.0282 <jats:sec><jats:title>Core Ideas</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Late‐split N applications at V12 increased total N uptake and N recovery efficiency.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Gains in N recovery with late‐split N came from increased post‐silking N uptake.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Increased whole‐plant N accumulation by R6 did not result in increased grain yields.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Grain yield was not sensitive to in‐season N timing in this single‐location study.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Newer (2012, 2014) and older (1993, 1995) hybrids respond similarly to late‐split N.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>Theoretically, N losses are reduced by synchronizing fertilizer additions with plant uptake requirements. We investigated the impacts of supplemental, late‐season N applications on nitrogen fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE), and N accumulation and partitioning in maize (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) at silking (R1) and physiological maturity (R6). Also tested was whether modern hybrids responded differently to split‐N applications compared to hybrids released 20 yr ago. We compared 3 to 4 N rates ranging from 0 to 245 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> applied either in a single application at V3, or split with the last 45 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> delayed until V12, over 3 yr. Two newer hybrids (2012 and 2014) and two 1990 era hybrids (1991 and 1995) were compared at all N treatment combinations. Additional plant N accumulation following late‐split N applications was already apparent at R1, particularly in stems. Late‐split N application increased both whole‐plant R6 N accumulation and NRE through higher post‐silking N uptake. However, these benefits were rarely accompanied by increased grain yields. We found little evidence of differential hybrid responses to N rate or timing treatments. Principal component analysis revealed that the most consistent predictor of high post‐silking N uptake was lower N remobilization during grain‐fill; these had a strong inverse relationship. Therefore, gains from N management programs aiming to increase post‐silking N uptake are most likely in environments where whole‐plant N accumulation at R1 (and, consequently, potential N remobilization) is reduced. Further studies of late‐split N approaches are most warranted at lower total‐season N rates.</jats:p></jats:sec> Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates Agronomy Journal
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2017.05.0282
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDE3LjA1LjAyODI
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDE3LjA1LjAyODI
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
issn_str_mv 0002-1962
1435-0645
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str mueller2017latesplitnitrogenapplicationsincreasedmaizeplantnitrogenrecoverybutnotyieldundermoderatetohighnitrogenrates
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Agronomy Journal
source_id 49
title Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_unstemmed Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_full Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_fullStr Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_full_unstemmed Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_short Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_sort late‐split nitrogen applications increased maize plant nitrogen recovery but not yield under moderate to high nitrogen rates
topic Agronomy and Crop Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.05.0282
publishDate 2017
physical 2689-2699
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Core Ideas</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Late‐split N applications at V12 increased total N uptake and N recovery efficiency.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Gains in N recovery with late‐split N came from increased post‐silking N uptake.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Increased whole‐plant N accumulation by R6 did not result in increased grain yields.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Grain yield was not sensitive to in‐season N timing in this single‐location study.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Newer (2012, 2014) and older (1993, 1995) hybrids respond similarly to late‐split N.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>Theoretically, N losses are reduced by synchronizing fertilizer additions with plant uptake requirements. We investigated the impacts of supplemental, late‐season N applications on nitrogen fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE), and N accumulation and partitioning in maize (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) at silking (R1) and physiological maturity (R6). Also tested was whether modern hybrids responded differently to split‐N applications compared to hybrids released 20 yr ago. We compared 3 to 4 N rates ranging from 0 to 245 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> applied either in a single application at V3, or split with the last 45 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> delayed until V12, over 3 yr. Two newer hybrids (2012 and 2014) and two 1990 era hybrids (1991 and 1995) were compared at all N treatment combinations. Additional plant N accumulation following late‐split N applications was already apparent at R1, particularly in stems. Late‐split N application increased both whole‐plant R6 N accumulation and NRE through higher post‐silking N uptake. However, these benefits were rarely accompanied by increased grain yields. We found little evidence of differential hybrid responses to N rate or timing treatments. Principal component analysis revealed that the most consistent predictor of high post‐silking N uptake was lower N remobilization during grain‐fill; these had a strong inverse relationship. Therefore, gains from N management programs aiming to increase post‐silking N uptake are most likely in environments where whole‐plant N accumulation at R1 (and, consequently, potential N remobilization) is reduced. Further studies of late‐split N approaches are most warranted at lower total‐season N rates.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2689
container_title Agronomy Journal
container_volume 109
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792347287854252036
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:52:36.463Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Late%E2%80%90Split+Nitrogen+Applications+Increased+Maize+Plant+Nitrogen+Recovery+but+not+Yield+under+Moderate+to+High+Nitrogen+Rates&rft.date=2017-11-01&genre=article&issn=1435-0645&volume=109&issue=6&spage=2689&epage=2699&pages=2689-2699&jtitle=Agronomy+Journal&atitle=Late%E2%80%90Split+Nitrogen+Applications+Increased+Maize+Plant+Nitrogen+Recovery+but+not+Yield+under+Moderate+to+High+Nitrogen+Rates&aulast=Vyn&aufirst=Tony+J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2134%2Fagronj2017.05.0282&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792347287854252036
author Mueller, Sarah M., Camberato, James J., Messina, Charlie, Shanahan, John, Zhang, Hao, Vyn, Tony J.
author_facet Mueller, Sarah M., Camberato, James J., Messina, Charlie, Shanahan, John, Zhang, Hao, Vyn, Tony J., Mueller, Sarah M., Camberato, James J., Messina, Charlie, Shanahan, John, Zhang, Hao, Vyn, Tony J.
author_sort mueller, sarah m.
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2689
container_title Agronomy Journal
container_volume 109
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Core Ideas</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Late‐split N applications at V12 increased total N uptake and N recovery efficiency.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Gains in N recovery with late‐split N came from increased post‐silking N uptake.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Increased whole‐plant N accumulation by R6 did not result in increased grain yields.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Grain yield was not sensitive to in‐season N timing in this single‐location study.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Newer (2012, 2014) and older (1993, 1995) hybrids respond similarly to late‐split N.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>Theoretically, N losses are reduced by synchronizing fertilizer additions with plant uptake requirements. We investigated the impacts of supplemental, late‐season N applications on nitrogen fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE), and N accumulation and partitioning in maize (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) at silking (R1) and physiological maturity (R6). Also tested was whether modern hybrids responded differently to split‐N applications compared to hybrids released 20 yr ago. We compared 3 to 4 N rates ranging from 0 to 245 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> applied either in a single application at V3, or split with the last 45 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> delayed until V12, over 3 yr. Two newer hybrids (2012 and 2014) and two 1990 era hybrids (1991 and 1995) were compared at all N treatment combinations. Additional plant N accumulation following late‐split N applications was already apparent at R1, particularly in stems. Late‐split N application increased both whole‐plant R6 N accumulation and NRE through higher post‐silking N uptake. However, these benefits were rarely accompanied by increased grain yields. We found little evidence of differential hybrid responses to N rate or timing treatments. Principal component analysis revealed that the most consistent predictor of high post‐silking N uptake was lower N remobilization during grain‐fill; these had a strong inverse relationship. Therefore, gains from N management programs aiming to increase post‐silking N uptake are most likely in environments where whole‐plant N accumulation at R1 (and, consequently, potential N remobilization) is reduced. Further studies of late‐split N approaches are most warranted at lower total‐season N rates.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2017.05.0282
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDE3LjA1LjAyODI
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0002-1962, 1435-0645
issn_str_mv 0002-1962, 1435-0645
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:52:36.463Z
match_str mueller2017latesplitnitrogenapplicationsincreasedmaizeplantnitrogenrecoverybutnotyieldundermoderatetohighnitrogenrates
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 2689-2699
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Agronomy Journal
source_id 49
spelling Mueller, Sarah M. Camberato, James J. Messina, Charlie Shanahan, John Zhang, Hao Vyn, Tony J. 0002-1962 1435-0645 Wiley Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.05.0282 <jats:sec><jats:title>Core Ideas</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Late‐split N applications at V12 increased total N uptake and N recovery efficiency.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Gains in N recovery with late‐split N came from increased post‐silking N uptake.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Increased whole‐plant N accumulation by R6 did not result in increased grain yields.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Grain yield was not sensitive to in‐season N timing in this single‐location study.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Newer (2012, 2014) and older (1993, 1995) hybrids respond similarly to late‐split N.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>Theoretically, N losses are reduced by synchronizing fertilizer additions with plant uptake requirements. We investigated the impacts of supplemental, late‐season N applications on nitrogen fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE), and N accumulation and partitioning in maize (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) at silking (R1) and physiological maturity (R6). Also tested was whether modern hybrids responded differently to split‐N applications compared to hybrids released 20 yr ago. We compared 3 to 4 N rates ranging from 0 to 245 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> applied either in a single application at V3, or split with the last 45 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> delayed until V12, over 3 yr. Two newer hybrids (2012 and 2014) and two 1990 era hybrids (1991 and 1995) were compared at all N treatment combinations. Additional plant N accumulation following late‐split N applications was already apparent at R1, particularly in stems. Late‐split N application increased both whole‐plant R6 N accumulation and NRE through higher post‐silking N uptake. However, these benefits were rarely accompanied by increased grain yields. We found little evidence of differential hybrid responses to N rate or timing treatments. Principal component analysis revealed that the most consistent predictor of high post‐silking N uptake was lower N remobilization during grain‐fill; these had a strong inverse relationship. Therefore, gains from N management programs aiming to increase post‐silking N uptake are most likely in environments where whole‐plant N accumulation at R1 (and, consequently, potential N remobilization) is reduced. Further studies of late‐split N approaches are most warranted at lower total‐season N rates.</jats:p></jats:sec> Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates Agronomy Journal
spellingShingle Mueller, Sarah M., Camberato, James J., Messina, Charlie, Shanahan, John, Zhang, Hao, Vyn, Tony J., Agronomy Journal, Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates, Agronomy and Crop Science
title Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_full Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_fullStr Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_full_unstemmed Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_short Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
title_sort late‐split nitrogen applications increased maize plant nitrogen recovery but not yield under moderate to high nitrogen rates
title_unstemmed Late‐Split Nitrogen Applications Increased Maize Plant Nitrogen Recovery but not Yield under Moderate to High Nitrogen Rates
topic Agronomy and Crop Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.05.0282