Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Agronomy Journal |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | , , |
In: | Agronomy Journal, 108, 2016, 2, S. 509-518 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Maharjan, Bijesh Ferguson, Richard B. Slater, Glen P. Maharjan, Bijesh Ferguson, Richard B. Slater, Glen P. |
---|---|
author |
Maharjan, Bijesh Ferguson, Richard B. Slater, Glen P. |
spellingShingle |
Maharjan, Bijesh Ferguson, Richard B. Slater, Glen P. Agronomy Journal Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil Agronomy and Crop Science |
author_sort |
maharjan, bijesh |
spelling |
Maharjan, Bijesh Ferguson, Richard B. Slater, Glen P. 0002-1962 1435-0645 Wiley Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0356 <jats:p>Increasing economic and environmental concerns in corn (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) production have prompted the need for improved N management. In this study, effects of two N sources [urea‐ammonium‐nitrate (UAN) and polymer‐coated urea (PCU)] on corn response were evaluated at different N rates over three site‐years. An additional N treatment of split‐applied UAN (UAN‐SP) based on the University of Nebraska‐Lincoln recommendation algorithm was also included. Leaf chlorophyll was indirectly measured using a chlorophyll meter at different corn growth stages for all N treatments to determine in‐season corn N status. Both PCU and UAN‐SP increased grain yield compared to UAN, even when the UAN rate was higher than that of PCU or UAN‐SP. The PCU treatment applied at 168 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was as effective as UAN‐SP applied at ∼200 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. At early growth stages, leaf chlorophyll was higher in a dry year than in wet years, when more N loss was likely. At different growth stages taken individually or together, chlorophyll meter readings were significantly correlated to grain yield. Temporal N release from PCU in the conditions of this study was not an issue, as shown by the consistently greater chlorophyll meter readings in PCU treatments than in UAN treatments, regardless of interannual climatic variations. These results indicate that PCU consistently performed better than UAN.</jats:p> Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil Agronomy Journal |
doi_str_mv |
10.2134/agronj2015.0356 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDE1LjAzNTY |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDE1LjAzNTY |
institution |
DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 |
imprint |
Wiley, 2016 |
imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2016 |
issn |
0002-1962 1435-0645 |
issn_str_mv |
0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
match_str |
maharjan2016polymercoatedureaimprovedcornresponsecomparedtoureaammoniumnitratewhenappliedonacoarsetexturedsoil |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
publisher |
Wiley |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Agronomy Journal |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_unstemmed |
Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_full |
Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_fullStr |
Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_short |
Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_sort |
polymer‐coated urea improved corn response compared to urea‐ammonium‐nitrate when applied on a coarse‐textured soil |
topic |
Agronomy and Crop Science |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0356 |
publishDate |
2016 |
physical |
509-518 |
description |
<jats:p>Increasing economic and environmental concerns in corn (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) production have prompted the need for improved N management. In this study, effects of two N sources [urea‐ammonium‐nitrate (UAN) and polymer‐coated urea (PCU)] on corn response were evaluated at different N rates over three site‐years. An additional N treatment of split‐applied UAN (UAN‐SP) based on the University of Nebraska‐Lincoln recommendation algorithm was also included. Leaf chlorophyll was indirectly measured using a chlorophyll meter at different corn growth stages for all N treatments to determine in‐season corn N status. Both PCU and UAN‐SP increased grain yield compared to UAN, even when the UAN rate was higher than that of PCU or UAN‐SP. The PCU treatment applied at 168 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was as effective as UAN‐SP applied at ∼200 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. At early growth stages, leaf chlorophyll was higher in a dry year than in wet years, when more N loss was likely. At different growth stages taken individually or together, chlorophyll meter readings were significantly correlated to grain yield. Temporal N release from PCU in the conditions of this study was not an issue, as shown by the consistently greater chlorophyll meter readings in PCU treatments than in UAN treatments, regardless of interannual climatic variations. These results indicate that PCU consistently performed better than UAN.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
509 |
container_title |
Agronomy Journal |
container_volume |
108 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792343937723138050 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:59:39.003Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Polymer%E2%80%90Coated+Urea+Improved+Corn+Response+Compared+to+Urea%E2%80%90Ammonium%E2%80%90Nitrate+When+Applied+on+a+Coarse%E2%80%90Textured+Soil&rft.date=2016-03-01&genre=article&issn=1435-0645&volume=108&issue=2&spage=509&epage=518&pages=509-518&jtitle=Agronomy+Journal&atitle=Polymer%E2%80%90Coated+Urea+Improved+Corn+Response+Compared+to+Urea%E2%80%90Ammonium%E2%80%90Nitrate+When+Applied+on+a+Coarse%E2%80%90Textured+Soil&aulast=Slater&aufirst=Glen+P.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2134%2Fagronj2015.0356&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792343937723138050 |
author | Maharjan, Bijesh, Ferguson, Richard B., Slater, Glen P. |
author_facet | Maharjan, Bijesh, Ferguson, Richard B., Slater, Glen P., Maharjan, Bijesh, Ferguson, Richard B., Slater, Glen P. |
author_sort | maharjan, bijesh |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 509 |
container_title | Agronomy Journal |
container_volume | 108 |
description | <jats:p>Increasing economic and environmental concerns in corn (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) production have prompted the need for improved N management. In this study, effects of two N sources [urea‐ammonium‐nitrate (UAN) and polymer‐coated urea (PCU)] on corn response were evaluated at different N rates over three site‐years. An additional N treatment of split‐applied UAN (UAN‐SP) based on the University of Nebraska‐Lincoln recommendation algorithm was also included. Leaf chlorophyll was indirectly measured using a chlorophyll meter at different corn growth stages for all N treatments to determine in‐season corn N status. Both PCU and UAN‐SP increased grain yield compared to UAN, even when the UAN rate was higher than that of PCU or UAN‐SP. The PCU treatment applied at 168 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was as effective as UAN‐SP applied at ∼200 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. At early growth stages, leaf chlorophyll was higher in a dry year than in wet years, when more N loss was likely. At different growth stages taken individually or together, chlorophyll meter readings were significantly correlated to grain yield. Temporal N release from PCU in the conditions of this study was not an issue, as shown by the consistently greater chlorophyll meter readings in PCU treatments than in UAN treatments, regardless of interannual climatic variations. These results indicate that PCU consistently performed better than UAN.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj2015.0356 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDE1LjAzNTY |
imprint | Wiley, 2016 |
imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2016 |
institution | DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1 |
issn | 0002-1962, 1435-0645 |
issn_str_mv | 0002-1962, 1435-0645 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:59:39.003Z |
match_str | maharjan2016polymercoatedureaimprovedcornresponsecomparedtoureaammoniumnitratewhenappliedonacoarsetexturedsoil |
mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
physical | 509-518 |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Agronomy Journal |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Maharjan, Bijesh Ferguson, Richard B. Slater, Glen P. 0002-1962 1435-0645 Wiley Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0356 <jats:p>Increasing economic and environmental concerns in corn (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) production have prompted the need for improved N management. In this study, effects of two N sources [urea‐ammonium‐nitrate (UAN) and polymer‐coated urea (PCU)] on corn response were evaluated at different N rates over three site‐years. An additional N treatment of split‐applied UAN (UAN‐SP) based on the University of Nebraska‐Lincoln recommendation algorithm was also included. Leaf chlorophyll was indirectly measured using a chlorophyll meter at different corn growth stages for all N treatments to determine in‐season corn N status. Both PCU and UAN‐SP increased grain yield compared to UAN, even when the UAN rate was higher than that of PCU or UAN‐SP. The PCU treatment applied at 168 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was as effective as UAN‐SP applied at ∼200 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. At early growth stages, leaf chlorophyll was higher in a dry year than in wet years, when more N loss was likely. At different growth stages taken individually or together, chlorophyll meter readings were significantly correlated to grain yield. Temporal N release from PCU in the conditions of this study was not an issue, as shown by the consistently greater chlorophyll meter readings in PCU treatments than in UAN treatments, regardless of interannual climatic variations. These results indicate that PCU consistently performed better than UAN.</jats:p> Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil Agronomy Journal |
spellingShingle | Maharjan, Bijesh, Ferguson, Richard B., Slater, Glen P., Agronomy Journal, Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil, Agronomy and Crop Science |
title | Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_full | Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_fullStr | Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_full_unstemmed | Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_short | Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
title_sort | polymer‐coated urea improved corn response compared to urea‐ammonium‐nitrate when applied on a coarse‐textured soil |
title_unstemmed | Polymer‐Coated Urea Improved Corn Response Compared to Urea‐Ammonium‐Nitrate When Applied on a Coarse‐Textured Soil |
topic | Agronomy and Crop Science |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0356 |