author_facet Wiatrak, P. J.
Wright, D. L.
Marois, J. J.
Koziara, W.
Pudelko, J. A.
Wiatrak, P. J.
Wright, D. L.
Marois, J. J.
Koziara, W.
Pudelko, J. A.
author Wiatrak, P. J.
Wright, D. L.
Marois, J. J.
Koziara, W.
Pudelko, J. A.
spellingShingle Wiatrak, P. J.
Wright, D. L.
Marois, J. J.
Koziara, W.
Pudelko, J. A.
Agronomy Journal
Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
Agronomy and Crop Science
author_sort wiatrak, p. j.
spelling Wiatrak, P. J. Wright, D. L. Marois, J. J. Koziara, W. Pudelko, J. A. 0002-1962 1435-0645 Wiley Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0288 <jats:p>Tillage and N fertilization influence cotton (<jats:italic>Gosspium hirsutum</jats:italic> L.) growth and yield. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of two tillage systems (conventional tillage [CT] and strip‐till [ST]) and four N rates (0, 67, 134, and 202 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) on growth, development, and yield of ‘DP 5409’ cotton following wheat (<jats:italic>Triticum aestivum</jats:italic> L.). The experiment was conducted at the University of Florida's North Florida Research and Education Center in Quincy, FL, in 1995–1997. Lint yields, plant height, boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> varied across years. With every 1 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> applied to cotton, lint yields increased by 1.74 and 1.53 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in 1996, and 2.76 and 1.76 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in 1997 for CT and ST, respectively. In 1995, maximum lint yields were estimated with 105 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for CT. Averaged across years, cotton lint yield increase with N application greater than 67 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was not significant and tillage did not influence lint yields. Plant height, boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> generally increased with increasing N rates, except for boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> in the ST system in 1995. Greatest boll weight and lint weight boll<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> were obtained with the application of 134 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. Compared with CT, ST reduced boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and increased boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>. Tillage did not influence plant height, boll weight, and lint weight boll<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. These results indicate that cotton can be grown successfully in ST and that yields may not increase significantly with rates &gt;67 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup></jats:p> Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat Agronomy Journal
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2005.0288
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDA1LjAyODg
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDA1LjAyODg
institution DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
imprint Wiley, 2005
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2005
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
issn_str_mv 0002-1962
1435-0645
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str wiatrak2005tillageandnitrogenapplicationimpactoncottonfollowingwheat
publishDateSort 2005
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Agronomy Journal
source_id 49
title Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_unstemmed Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_full Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_fullStr Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_full_unstemmed Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_short Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_sort tillage and nitrogen application impact on cotton following wheat
topic Agronomy and Crop Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0288
publishDate 2005
physical 288-293
description <jats:p>Tillage and N fertilization influence cotton (<jats:italic>Gosspium hirsutum</jats:italic> L.) growth and yield. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of two tillage systems (conventional tillage [CT] and strip‐till [ST]) and four N rates (0, 67, 134, and 202 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) on growth, development, and yield of ‘DP 5409’ cotton following wheat (<jats:italic>Triticum aestivum</jats:italic> L.). The experiment was conducted at the University of Florida's North Florida Research and Education Center in Quincy, FL, in 1995–1997. Lint yields, plant height, boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> varied across years. With every 1 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> applied to cotton, lint yields increased by 1.74 and 1.53 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in 1996, and 2.76 and 1.76 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in 1997 for CT and ST, respectively. In 1995, maximum lint yields were estimated with 105 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for CT. Averaged across years, cotton lint yield increase with N application greater than 67 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was not significant and tillage did not influence lint yields. Plant height, boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> generally increased with increasing N rates, except for boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> in the ST system in 1995. Greatest boll weight and lint weight boll<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> were obtained with the application of 134 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. Compared with CT, ST reduced boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and increased boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>. Tillage did not influence plant height, boll weight, and lint weight boll<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. These results indicate that cotton can be grown successfully in ST and that yields may not increase significantly with rates &gt;67 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup></jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 288
container_title Agronomy Journal
container_volume 97
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792333168297115653
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:08:27.891Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Tillage+and+Nitrogen+Application+Impact+on+Cotton+following+Wheat&rft.date=2005-01-01&genre=article&issn=1435-0645&volume=97&issue=1&spage=288&epage=293&pages=288-293&jtitle=Agronomy+Journal&atitle=Tillage+and+Nitrogen+Application+Impact+on+Cotton+following+Wheat&aulast=Pudelko&aufirst=J.+A.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2134%2Fagronj2005.0288&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792333168297115653
author Wiatrak, P. J., Wright, D. L., Marois, J. J., Koziara, W., Pudelko, J. A.
author_facet Wiatrak, P. J., Wright, D. L., Marois, J. J., Koziara, W., Pudelko, J. A., Wiatrak, P. J., Wright, D. L., Marois, J. J., Koziara, W., Pudelko, J. A.
author_sort wiatrak, p. j.
container_issue 1
container_start_page 288
container_title Agronomy Journal
container_volume 97
description <jats:p>Tillage and N fertilization influence cotton (<jats:italic>Gosspium hirsutum</jats:italic> L.) growth and yield. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of two tillage systems (conventional tillage [CT] and strip‐till [ST]) and four N rates (0, 67, 134, and 202 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) on growth, development, and yield of ‘DP 5409’ cotton following wheat (<jats:italic>Triticum aestivum</jats:italic> L.). The experiment was conducted at the University of Florida's North Florida Research and Education Center in Quincy, FL, in 1995–1997. Lint yields, plant height, boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> varied across years. With every 1 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> applied to cotton, lint yields increased by 1.74 and 1.53 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in 1996, and 2.76 and 1.76 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in 1997 for CT and ST, respectively. In 1995, maximum lint yields were estimated with 105 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for CT. Averaged across years, cotton lint yield increase with N application greater than 67 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was not significant and tillage did not influence lint yields. Plant height, boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> generally increased with increasing N rates, except for boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> in the ST system in 1995. Greatest boll weight and lint weight boll<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> were obtained with the application of 134 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. Compared with CT, ST reduced boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and increased boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>. Tillage did not influence plant height, boll weight, and lint weight boll<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. These results indicate that cotton can be grown successfully in ST and that yields may not increase significantly with rates &gt;67 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup></jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2005.0288
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEzNC9hZ3JvbmoyMDA1LjAyODg
imprint Wiley, 2005
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2005
institution DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275
issn 0002-1962, 1435-0645
issn_str_mv 0002-1962, 1435-0645
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:08:27.891Z
match_str wiatrak2005tillageandnitrogenapplicationimpactoncottonfollowingwheat
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 288-293
publishDate 2005
publishDateSort 2005
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Agronomy Journal
source_id 49
spelling Wiatrak, P. J. Wright, D. L. Marois, J. J. Koziara, W. Pudelko, J. A. 0002-1962 1435-0645 Wiley Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0288 <jats:p>Tillage and N fertilization influence cotton (<jats:italic>Gosspium hirsutum</jats:italic> L.) growth and yield. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of two tillage systems (conventional tillage [CT] and strip‐till [ST]) and four N rates (0, 67, 134, and 202 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) on growth, development, and yield of ‘DP 5409’ cotton following wheat (<jats:italic>Triticum aestivum</jats:italic> L.). The experiment was conducted at the University of Florida's North Florida Research and Education Center in Quincy, FL, in 1995–1997. Lint yields, plant height, boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> varied across years. With every 1 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> applied to cotton, lint yields increased by 1.74 and 1.53 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in 1996, and 2.76 and 1.76 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in 1997 for CT and ST, respectively. In 1995, maximum lint yields were estimated with 105 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for CT. Averaged across years, cotton lint yield increase with N application greater than 67 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was not significant and tillage did not influence lint yields. Plant height, boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> generally increased with increasing N rates, except for boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> in the ST system in 1995. Greatest boll weight and lint weight boll<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> were obtained with the application of 134 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. Compared with CT, ST reduced boll no. plant<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and increased boll no. m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>. Tillage did not influence plant height, boll weight, and lint weight boll<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. These results indicate that cotton can be grown successfully in ST and that yields may not increase significantly with rates &gt;67 kg N ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup></jats:p> Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat Agronomy Journal
spellingShingle Wiatrak, P. J., Wright, D. L., Marois, J. J., Koziara, W., Pudelko, J. A., Agronomy Journal, Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat, Agronomy and Crop Science
title Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_full Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_fullStr Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_full_unstemmed Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_short Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
title_sort tillage and nitrogen application impact on cotton following wheat
title_unstemmed Tillage and Nitrogen Application Impact on Cotton following Wheat
topic Agronomy and Crop Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0288