Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 61, 2013, 1, S. 91-107 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Schönecker, Dieter Schönecker, Dieter |
---|---|
author |
Schönecker, Dieter |
spellingShingle |
Schönecker, Dieter Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung Philosophy |
author_sort |
schönecker, dieter |
spelling |
Schönecker, Dieter 0012-1045 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2013.0006 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Kant is by no means the pure rationalist that Husserl and others represented him as being. To the contrary I claim that Kant is an ethical intuitionist when it comes to our recognition of the validity of the moral law. Interpreting Kant’s famous thesis about the “fact of reason”, I will first argue for three interpretative theses: 1. The factum theory explains our insight into the binding character of the moral law; it is a theory of justification. 2. In our consciousness of the categorical imperative, the moral law is immediately given in its unconditional and binding validity. 3. The unconditional validity of the CI is given in the feeling of respect. Drawing on basic thoughts of Reformed Epistemology, I will then sketch a way to defend Kant’s theory. </jats:p> Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
doi_str_mv |
10.1524/dzph.2013.0006 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Philosophie |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUyNC9kenBoLjIwMTMuMDAwNg |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUyNC9kenBoLjIwMTMuMDAwNg |
institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
imprint |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2013 |
imprint_str_mv |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2013 |
issn |
0012-1045 |
issn_str_mv |
0012-1045 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
match_str |
schonecker2013dasgefuhltefaktumdervernunftskizzeeinerinterpretationundverteidigung |
publishDateSort |
2013 |
publisher |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_unstemmed |
Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_full |
Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_fullStr |
Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_full_unstemmed |
Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_short |
Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_sort |
das gefühlte faktum der vernunft. skizze einer interpretation und verteidigung |
topic |
Philosophy |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2013.0006 |
publishDate |
2013 |
physical |
91-107 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>Kant is by no means the pure rationalist that Husserl and others represented him as being. To the contrary I claim that Kant is an ethical intuitionist when it comes to our recognition of the validity of the moral law. Interpreting Kant’s famous thesis about the “fact of reason”, I will first argue for three interpretative theses: 1. The factum theory explains our insight into the binding character of the moral law; it is a theory of justification. 2. In our consciousness of the categorical imperative, the moral law is immediately given in its unconditional and binding validity. 3. The unconditional validity of the CI is given in the feeling of respect. Drawing on basic thoughts of Reformed Epistemology, I will then sketch a way to defend Kant’s theory. </jats:p> |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
91 |
container_title |
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
container_volume |
61 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792327950776926214 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T12:45:06.798Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Das+gef%C3%BChlte+Faktum+der+Vernunft.+Skizze+einer+Interpretation+und+Verteidigung&rft.date=2013-04-01&genre=article&issn=0012-1045&volume=61&issue=1&spage=91&epage=107&pages=91-107&jtitle=Deutsche+Zeitschrift+f%C3%BCr+Philosophie&atitle=Das+gef%C3%BChlte+Faktum+der+Vernunft.+Skizze+einer+Interpretation+und+Verteidigung&aulast=Sch%C3%B6necker&aufirst=Dieter&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1524%2Fdzph.2013.0006&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792327950776926214 |
author | Schönecker, Dieter |
author_facet | Schönecker, Dieter, Schönecker, Dieter |
author_sort | schönecker, dieter |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
container_volume | 61 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Kant is by no means the pure rationalist that Husserl and others represented him as being. To the contrary I claim that Kant is an ethical intuitionist when it comes to our recognition of the validity of the moral law. Interpreting Kant’s famous thesis about the “fact of reason”, I will first argue for three interpretative theses: 1. The factum theory explains our insight into the binding character of the moral law; it is a theory of justification. 2. In our consciousness of the categorical imperative, the moral law is immediately given in its unconditional and binding validity. 3. The unconditional validity of the CI is given in the feeling of respect. Drawing on basic thoughts of Reformed Epistemology, I will then sketch a way to defend Kant’s theory. </jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1524/dzph.2013.0006 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Philosophie |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUyNC9kenBoLjIwMTMuMDAwNg |
imprint | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2013 |
imprint_str_mv | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2013 |
institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
issn | 0012-1045 |
issn_str_mv | 0012-1045 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T12:45:06.798Z |
match_str | schonecker2013dasgefuhltefaktumdervernunftskizzeeinerinterpretationundverteidigung |
mega_collection | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
physical | 91-107 |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Schönecker, Dieter 0012-1045 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2013.0006 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Kant is by no means the pure rationalist that Husserl and others represented him as being. To the contrary I claim that Kant is an ethical intuitionist when it comes to our recognition of the validity of the moral law. Interpreting Kant’s famous thesis about the “fact of reason”, I will first argue for three interpretative theses: 1. The factum theory explains our insight into the binding character of the moral law; it is a theory of justification. 2. In our consciousness of the categorical imperative, the moral law is immediately given in its unconditional and binding validity. 3. The unconditional validity of the CI is given in the feeling of respect. Drawing on basic thoughts of Reformed Epistemology, I will then sketch a way to defend Kant’s theory. </jats:p> Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
spellingShingle | Schönecker, Dieter, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung, Philosophy |
title | Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_full | Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_fullStr | Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_full_unstemmed | Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_short | Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
title_sort | das gefühlte faktum der vernunft. skizze einer interpretation und verteidigung |
title_unstemmed | Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung |
topic | Philosophy |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2013.0006 |