author_facet Seis, Muhammet
Beycioğlu, Ahmet
Seis, Muhammet
Beycioğlu, Ahmet
author Seis, Muhammet
Beycioğlu, Ahmet
spellingShingle Seis, Muhammet
Beycioğlu, Ahmet
Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
Materials Chemistry
Ceramics and Composites
author_sort seis, muhammet
spelling Seis, Muhammet Beycioğlu, Ahmet 2191-0359 0792-1233 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Materials Chemistry Ceramics and Composites http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/secm-2015-0210 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper reports the results of an experimental investigation carried out to evaluate the bond stress behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bar and steel rebar (SR) in conventional C30-type concrete. The experimental program was conducted on testing 16 hinged beam specimens that were prepared according to BS 4449:2005+A2:2009 standard. Conventional C30-type concrete was used to produce hinged beams. In beam tests, bar diameter and embedment length were used as experimental variables. The bond performances of BFRP bar and SR were compared with the help of the load-slip results of hinged beam bending tests conducted on produced beam samples after 28 days of curing. Results showed that much higher bond stress values were obtained from BFRP bars compared to SR for both 12 and 8 mm bar diameters. Besides, the maximum bond stress values decreased with increasing bar diameter and embedment length for both BFRP bar and SR.</jats:p> Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
doi_str_mv 10.1515/secm-2015-0210
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Chemie und Pharmazie
Technik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9zZWNtLTIwMTUtMDIxMA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9zZWNtLTIwMTUtMDIxMA
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017
issn 2191-0359
0792-1233
issn_str_mv 2191-0359
0792-1233
language English
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
match_str seis2017bondperformanceofbasaltfiberreinforcedpolymerbarsinconventionalportlandcementconcretearelativecomparisonwithsteelrebarusingthehingedbeamapproach
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
source_id 49
title Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_unstemmed Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_full Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_fullStr Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_full_unstemmed Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_short Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_sort bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
topic Materials Chemistry
Ceramics and Composites
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/secm-2015-0210
publishDate 2017
physical 909-918
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper reports the results of an experimental investigation carried out to evaluate the bond stress behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bar and steel rebar (SR) in conventional C30-type concrete. The experimental program was conducted on testing 16 hinged beam specimens that were prepared according to BS 4449:2005+A2:2009 standard. Conventional C30-type concrete was used to produce hinged beams. In beam tests, bar diameter and embedment length were used as experimental variables. The bond performances of BFRP bar and SR were compared with the help of the load-slip results of hinged beam bending tests conducted on produced beam samples after 28 days of curing. Results showed that much higher bond stress values were obtained from BFRP bars compared to SR for both 12 and 8 mm bar diameters. Besides, the maximum bond stress values decreased with increasing bar diameter and embedment length for both BFRP bar and SR.</jats:p>
container_issue 6
container_start_page 909
container_title Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
container_volume 24
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792342024011120640
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:29:14.441Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Bond+performance+of+basalt+fiber-reinforced+polymer+bars+in+conventional+Portland+cement+concrete%3A+a+relative+comparison+with+steel+rebar+using+the+hinged+beam+approach&rft.date=2017-11-27&genre=article&issn=0792-1233&volume=24&issue=6&spage=909&epage=918&pages=909-918&jtitle=Science+and+Engineering+of+Composite+Materials&atitle=Bond+performance+of+basalt+fiber-reinforced+polymer+bars+in+conventional+Portland+cement+concrete%3A+a+relative+comparison+with+steel+rebar+using+the+hinged+beam+approach&aulast=Beycio%C4%9Flu&aufirst=Ahmet&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fsecm-2015-0210&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792342024011120640
author Seis, Muhammet, Beycioğlu, Ahmet
author_facet Seis, Muhammet, Beycioğlu, Ahmet, Seis, Muhammet, Beycioğlu, Ahmet
author_sort seis, muhammet
container_issue 6
container_start_page 909
container_title Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
container_volume 24
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper reports the results of an experimental investigation carried out to evaluate the bond stress behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bar and steel rebar (SR) in conventional C30-type concrete. The experimental program was conducted on testing 16 hinged beam specimens that were prepared according to BS 4449:2005+A2:2009 standard. Conventional C30-type concrete was used to produce hinged beams. In beam tests, bar diameter and embedment length were used as experimental variables. The bond performances of BFRP bar and SR were compared with the help of the load-slip results of hinged beam bending tests conducted on produced beam samples after 28 days of curing. Results showed that much higher bond stress values were obtained from BFRP bars compared to SR for both 12 and 8 mm bar diameters. Besides, the maximum bond stress values decreased with increasing bar diameter and embedment length for both BFRP bar and SR.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1515/secm-2015-0210
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Chemie und Pharmazie, Technik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9zZWNtLTIwMTUtMDIxMA
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 2191-0359, 0792-1233
issn_str_mv 2191-0359, 0792-1233
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:29:14.441Z
match_str seis2017bondperformanceofbasaltfiberreinforcedpolymerbarsinconventionalportlandcementconcretearelativecomparisonwithsteelrebarusingthehingedbeamapproach
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
physical 909-918
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
source_id 49
spelling Seis, Muhammet Beycioğlu, Ahmet 2191-0359 0792-1233 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Materials Chemistry Ceramics and Composites http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/secm-2015-0210 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper reports the results of an experimental investigation carried out to evaluate the bond stress behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bar and steel rebar (SR) in conventional C30-type concrete. The experimental program was conducted on testing 16 hinged beam specimens that were prepared according to BS 4449:2005+A2:2009 standard. Conventional C30-type concrete was used to produce hinged beams. In beam tests, bar diameter and embedment length were used as experimental variables. The bond performances of BFRP bar and SR were compared with the help of the load-slip results of hinged beam bending tests conducted on produced beam samples after 28 days of curing. Results showed that much higher bond stress values were obtained from BFRP bars compared to SR for both 12 and 8 mm bar diameters. Besides, the maximum bond stress values decreased with increasing bar diameter and embedment length for both BFRP bar and SR.</jats:p> Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
spellingShingle Seis, Muhammet, Beycioğlu, Ahmet, Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach, Materials Chemistry, Ceramics and Composites
title Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_full Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_fullStr Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_full_unstemmed Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_short Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_sort bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
title_unstemmed Bond performance of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars in conventional Portland cement concrete: a relative comparison with steel rebar using the hinged beam approach
topic Materials Chemistry, Ceramics and Composites
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/secm-2015-0210