author_facet Lambert, Eve-Angéline
Chappe, Nathalie
Lambert, Eve-Angéline
Chappe, Nathalie
author Lambert, Eve-Angéline
Chappe, Nathalie
spellingShingle Lambert, Eve-Angéline
Chappe, Nathalie
Review of Law & Economics
Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
Law
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
author_sort lambert, eve-angéline
spelling Lambert, Eve-Angéline Chappe, Nathalie 2194-6000 1555-5879 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Law General Economics, Econometrics and Finance http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rle-2013-0028 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the last few years, legal aid has been much debated, especially in the European Union. Our aim is to determine in a tort litigation model the impact of legal aid upon plaintiffs’ decision whether to sue, plaintiffs’ level of expenses at trial and the level of deterrence of potential injurers. We study the two most common types of legal aid: fixed and proportional. Whatever the system, we show that increasing legal aid induces more cases filed and more deterrence (fewer accidents). Then we compare these incentives with those given by the contingent/conditional fees systems. We show that the incentives to bring suit are higher in the contingent/conditional fees systems, but incentives to take care are higher with legal aid since legal expenses from the plaintiff are higher.</jats:p> Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees Review of Law & Economics
doi_str_mv 10.1515/rle-2013-0028
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Rechtswissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9ybGUtMjAxMy0wMDI4
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9ybGUtMjAxMy0wMDI4
institution DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2014
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2014
issn 2194-6000
1555-5879
issn_str_mv 2194-6000
1555-5879
language Undetermined
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
match_str lambert2014litigationwithlegalaidversuslitigationwithcontingentconditionalfees
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Review of Law & Economics
source_id 49
title Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_unstemmed Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_full Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_fullStr Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_full_unstemmed Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_short Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_sort litigation with legal aid versus litigation with contingent/conditional fees
topic Law
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rle-2013-0028
publishDate 2014
physical
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the last few years, legal aid has been much debated, especially in the European Union. Our aim is to determine in a tort litigation model the impact of legal aid upon plaintiffs’ decision whether to sue, plaintiffs’ level of expenses at trial and the level of deterrence of potential injurers. We study the two most common types of legal aid: fixed and proportional. Whatever the system, we show that increasing legal aid induces more cases filed and more deterrence (fewer accidents). Then we compare these incentives with those given by the contingent/conditional fees systems. We show that the incentives to bring suit are higher in the contingent/conditional fees systems, but incentives to take care are higher with legal aid since legal expenses from the plaintiff are higher.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 0
container_title Review of Law & Economics
container_volume 10
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792341372051652611
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:18:51.527Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Litigation+with+Legal+Aid+versus+Litigation+with+Contingent%2FConditional+Fees&rft.date=2014-01-01&genre=article&issn=1555-5879&volume=10&issue=1&jtitle=Review+of+Law+%26+Economics&atitle=Litigation+with+Legal+Aid+versus+Litigation+with+Contingent%2FConditional+Fees&aulast=Chappe&aufirst=Nathalie&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Frle-2013-0028&rft.language%5B0%5D=und
SOLR
_version_ 1792341372051652611
author Lambert, Eve-Angéline, Chappe, Nathalie
author_facet Lambert, Eve-Angéline, Chappe, Nathalie, Lambert, Eve-Angéline, Chappe, Nathalie
author_sort lambert, eve-angéline
container_issue 1
container_start_page 0
container_title Review of Law & Economics
container_volume 10
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the last few years, legal aid has been much debated, especially in the European Union. Our aim is to determine in a tort litigation model the impact of legal aid upon plaintiffs’ decision whether to sue, plaintiffs’ level of expenses at trial and the level of deterrence of potential injurers. We study the two most common types of legal aid: fixed and proportional. Whatever the system, we show that increasing legal aid induces more cases filed and more deterrence (fewer accidents). Then we compare these incentives with those given by the contingent/conditional fees systems. We show that the incentives to bring suit are higher in the contingent/conditional fees systems, but incentives to take care are higher with legal aid since legal expenses from the plaintiff are higher.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1515/rle-2013-0028
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Rechtswissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9ybGUtMjAxMy0wMDI4
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2014
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2014
institution DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1
issn 2194-6000, 1555-5879
issn_str_mv 2194-6000, 1555-5879
language Undetermined
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:18:51.527Z
match_str lambert2014litigationwithlegalaidversuslitigationwithcontingentconditionalfees
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Review of Law & Economics
source_id 49
spelling Lambert, Eve-Angéline Chappe, Nathalie 2194-6000 1555-5879 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Law General Economics, Econometrics and Finance http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rle-2013-0028 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the last few years, legal aid has been much debated, especially in the European Union. Our aim is to determine in a tort litigation model the impact of legal aid upon plaintiffs’ decision whether to sue, plaintiffs’ level of expenses at trial and the level of deterrence of potential injurers. We study the two most common types of legal aid: fixed and proportional. Whatever the system, we show that increasing legal aid induces more cases filed and more deterrence (fewer accidents). Then we compare these incentives with those given by the contingent/conditional fees systems. We show that the incentives to bring suit are higher in the contingent/conditional fees systems, but incentives to take care are higher with legal aid since legal expenses from the plaintiff are higher.</jats:p> Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees Review of Law & Economics
spellingShingle Lambert, Eve-Angéline, Chappe, Nathalie, Review of Law & Economics, Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees, Law, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
title Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_full Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_fullStr Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_full_unstemmed Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_short Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
title_sort litigation with legal aid versus litigation with contingent/conditional fees
title_unstemmed Litigation with Legal Aid versus Litigation with Contingent/Conditional Fees
topic Law, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rle-2013-0028