Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Central European Journal of Public Policy |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | Central European Journal of Public Policy, 9, 2015, 2, S. 10-31 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Sedlačko, Michal Staroňová, Katarína Sedlačko, Michal Staroňová, Katarína |
|---|---|
| author |
Sedlačko, Michal Staroňová, Katarína |
| spellingShingle |
Sedlačko, Michal Staroňová, Katarína Central European Journal of Public Policy An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together Law Public Administration Sociology and Political Science |
| author_sort |
sedlačko, michal |
| spelling |
Sedlačko, Michal Staroňová, Katarína 1802-4866 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Law Public Administration Sociology and Political Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0011 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> Around the world, there is a growing interest among policy scholars and practitioners in the role of knowledge in relation to public policy. These debates are accompanied by some confusion about what is meant by knowledge or evidence, as well as controversies around the role of scientists and suspicions of increasingly technocratic decision making. Our aim is to provide a useful overview of the major debates in this paper, and to trace six dominant discourses in current research that address the role of scientific knowledge or expertise in the policy process. We distinguish evidence-based policy making, knowledge utilisation, policy learning, knowledge transfer, social construction of knowledge and boundaries, and knowing in practice as separate discourses. We show how they differ in their understanding of knowledge, of the problem to solve in terms of the role of knowledge in policy, of practical implications, as well as in their understanding of public policy and in their ontologies and epistemologies. A condensed and structured representation serves as a basis for conducting comparisons across discourses as well as to open ways for analysis of strategic associations between the discourses. We hope to contribute to extending the discussion of knowledge in policy into the realm of epistemic politics and we suggest several avenues for future research that can draw on a range of concepts from across all of the discourses.</jats:p> An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together Central European Journal of Public Policy |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1515/cejpp-2016-0011 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Rechtswissenschaft Allgemeines Soziologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jZWpwcC0yMDE2LTAwMTE |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jZWpwcC0yMDE2LTAwMTE |
| institution |
DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Zwi2 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 |
| imprint |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2015 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2015 |
| issn |
1802-4866 |
| issn_str_mv |
1802-4866 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
sedlacko2015anoverviewofdiscoursesonknowledgeinpolicythinkingknowledgepolicyandconflicttogether |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| publisher |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Central European Journal of Public Policy |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_unstemmed |
An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_full |
An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_fullStr |
An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_full_unstemmed |
An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_short |
An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_sort |
an overview of discourses on knowledge in policy: thinking knowledge, policy and conflict together |
| topic |
Law Public Administration Sociology and Political Science |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0011 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| physical |
10-31 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p> Around the world, there is a growing interest among policy scholars and practitioners in the role of knowledge in relation to public policy. These debates are accompanied by some confusion about what is meant by knowledge or evidence, as well as controversies around the role of scientists and suspicions of increasingly technocratic decision making. Our aim is to provide a useful overview of the major debates in this paper, and to trace six dominant discourses in current research that address the role of scientific knowledge or expertise in the policy process. We distinguish evidence-based policy making, knowledge utilisation, policy learning, knowledge transfer, social construction of knowledge and boundaries, and knowing in practice as separate discourses. We show how they differ in their understanding of knowledge, of the problem to solve in terms of the role of knowledge in policy, of practical implications, as well as in their understanding of public policy and in their ontologies and epistemologies. A condensed and structured representation serves as a basis for conducting comparisons across discourses as well as to open ways for analysis of strategic associations between the discourses. We hope to contribute to extending the discussion of knowledge in policy into the realm of epistemic politics and we suggest several avenues for future research that can draw on a range of concepts from across all of the discourses.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
10 |
| container_title |
Central European Journal of Public Policy |
| container_volume |
9 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792345399378313216 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T17:22:53.513Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=An+Overview+of+Discourses+on+Knowledge+in+Policy%3A+Thinking+Knowledge%2C+Policy+and+Conflict+Together&rft.date=2015-12-01&genre=article&issn=1802-4866&volume=9&issue=2&spage=10&epage=31&pages=10-31&jtitle=Central+European+Journal+of+Public+Policy&atitle=An+Overview+of+Discourses+on+Knowledge+in+Policy%3A+Thinking+Knowledge%2C+Policy+and+Conflict+Together&aulast=Staro%C5%88ov%C3%A1&aufirst=Katar%C3%ADna&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fcejpp-2016-0011&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792345399378313216 |
| author | Sedlačko, Michal, Staroňová, Katarína |
| author_facet | Sedlačko, Michal, Staroňová, Katarína, Sedlačko, Michal, Staroňová, Katarína |
| author_sort | sedlačko, michal |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 10 |
| container_title | Central European Journal of Public Policy |
| container_volume | 9 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> Around the world, there is a growing interest among policy scholars and practitioners in the role of knowledge in relation to public policy. These debates are accompanied by some confusion about what is meant by knowledge or evidence, as well as controversies around the role of scientists and suspicions of increasingly technocratic decision making. Our aim is to provide a useful overview of the major debates in this paper, and to trace six dominant discourses in current research that address the role of scientific knowledge or expertise in the policy process. We distinguish evidence-based policy making, knowledge utilisation, policy learning, knowledge transfer, social construction of knowledge and boundaries, and knowing in practice as separate discourses. We show how they differ in their understanding of knowledge, of the problem to solve in terms of the role of knowledge in policy, of practical implications, as well as in their understanding of public policy and in their ontologies and epistemologies. A condensed and structured representation serves as a basis for conducting comparisons across discourses as well as to open ways for analysis of strategic associations between the discourses. We hope to contribute to extending the discussion of knowledge in policy into the realm of epistemic politics and we suggest several avenues for future research that can draw on a range of concepts from across all of the discourses.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/cejpp-2016-0011 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Rechtswissenschaft, Allgemeines, Soziologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jZWpwcC0yMDE2LTAwMTE |
| imprint | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2015 |
| imprint_str_mv | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2015 |
| institution | DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4 |
| issn | 1802-4866 |
| issn_str_mv | 1802-4866 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T17:22:53.513Z |
| match_str | sedlacko2015anoverviewofdiscoursesonknowledgeinpolicythinkingknowledgepolicyandconflicttogether |
| mega_collection | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
| physical | 10-31 |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Central European Journal of Public Policy |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Sedlačko, Michal Staroňová, Katarína 1802-4866 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Law Public Administration Sociology and Political Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0011 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> Around the world, there is a growing interest among policy scholars and practitioners in the role of knowledge in relation to public policy. These debates are accompanied by some confusion about what is meant by knowledge or evidence, as well as controversies around the role of scientists and suspicions of increasingly technocratic decision making. Our aim is to provide a useful overview of the major debates in this paper, and to trace six dominant discourses in current research that address the role of scientific knowledge or expertise in the policy process. We distinguish evidence-based policy making, knowledge utilisation, policy learning, knowledge transfer, social construction of knowledge and boundaries, and knowing in practice as separate discourses. We show how they differ in their understanding of knowledge, of the problem to solve in terms of the role of knowledge in policy, of practical implications, as well as in their understanding of public policy and in their ontologies and epistemologies. A condensed and structured representation serves as a basis for conducting comparisons across discourses as well as to open ways for analysis of strategic associations between the discourses. We hope to contribute to extending the discussion of knowledge in policy into the realm of epistemic politics and we suggest several avenues for future research that can draw on a range of concepts from across all of the discourses.</jats:p> An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together Central European Journal of Public Policy |
| spellingShingle | Sedlačko, Michal, Staroňová, Katarína, Central European Journal of Public Policy, An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together, Law, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science |
| title | An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_full | An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_fullStr | An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_short | An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| title_sort | an overview of discourses on knowledge in policy: thinking knowledge, policy and conflict together |
| title_unstemmed | An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together |
| topic | Law, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0011 |