Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 112, 2019, 1, S. 193-220 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Unbestimmt |
veröffentlicht: |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Todorović, Darko Todorović, Darko |
---|---|
author |
Todorović, Darko |
spellingShingle |
Todorović, Darko Byzantinische Zeitschrift One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs Literature and Literary Theory Visual Arts and Performing Arts History |
author_sort |
todorović, darko |
spelling |
Todorović, Darko 1868-9027 0007-7704 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Literature and Literary Theory Visual Arts and Performing Arts History http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bz-2019-0010 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> The paper traces a three-century-long tradition of a mistaken attribution of the Defence of Eunuchs by Theophylact of Ohrid. Since Peter Lambeck, chief librarian of the Hofbibliothek in Vienna, identified in 1671 the author of the treatise as Theodore Pedagogue, a poorly known tutor to the emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the incorrect attribution was readily adopted and further disseminated by a series of scholars of the next generations. Although the issue of the authorship was successfully resolved as early as 1768 by Angelo Bandini, head of the Laurentian Library in Florence, the information remained unfamiliar to writers of the following centuries, leaving the entrenched error to persist until the late 1970s, on the eve of the first critical editions of the Defence (Gautier 1980, Spadaro 1981). The article follows the tangled history of the erroneous attribution, attempting to establish a kind of stemmatic regularity between several branches of the abortive tradition.</jats:p> One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/bz-2019-0010 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Geschichte Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen Kunst und Kunstgeschichte |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9iei0yMDE5LTAwMTA |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9iei0yMDE5LTAwMTA |
institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
imprint |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019 |
issn |
1868-9027 0007-7704 |
issn_str_mv |
1868-9027 0007-7704 |
language |
Undetermined |
mega_collection |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
match_str |
todorovic2019oneerroneousattributionofdefenceofeunuchs |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
publisher |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
source_id |
49 |
title |
One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_unstemmed |
One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_full |
One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_fullStr |
One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_full_unstemmed |
One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_short |
One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_sort |
one erroneous attribution of defence of eunuchs |
topic |
Literature and Literary Theory Visual Arts and Performing Arts History |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bz-2019-0010 |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
193-220 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p> The paper traces a three-century-long tradition of a mistaken attribution of the Defence of Eunuchs by Theophylact of Ohrid. Since Peter Lambeck, chief librarian of the Hofbibliothek in Vienna, identified in 1671 the author of the treatise as Theodore Pedagogue, a poorly known tutor to the emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the incorrect attribution was readily adopted and further disseminated by a series of scholars of the next generations. Although the issue of the authorship was successfully resolved as early as 1768 by Angelo Bandini, head of the Laurentian Library in Florence, the information remained unfamiliar to writers of the following centuries, leaving the entrenched error to persist until the late 1970s, on the eve of the first critical editions of the Defence (Gautier 1980, Spadaro 1981). The article follows the tangled history of the erroneous attribution, attempting to establish a kind of stemmatic regularity between several branches of the abortive tradition.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
193 |
container_title |
Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
container_volume |
112 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792323943045005318 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T11:41:48.842Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=One+erroneous+attribution+of+Defence+of+Eunuchs&rft.date=2019-02-01&genre=article&issn=0007-7704&volume=112&issue=1&spage=193&epage=220&pages=193-220&jtitle=Byzantinische+Zeitschrift&atitle=One+erroneous+attribution+of+Defence+of+Eunuchs&aulast=Todorovi%C4%87&aufirst=Darko&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fbz-2019-0010&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792323943045005318 |
author | Todorović, Darko |
author_facet | Todorović, Darko, Todorović, Darko |
author_sort | todorović, darko |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
container_volume | 112 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> The paper traces a three-century-long tradition of a mistaken attribution of the Defence of Eunuchs by Theophylact of Ohrid. Since Peter Lambeck, chief librarian of the Hofbibliothek in Vienna, identified in 1671 the author of the treatise as Theodore Pedagogue, a poorly known tutor to the emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the incorrect attribution was readily adopted and further disseminated by a series of scholars of the next generations. Although the issue of the authorship was successfully resolved as early as 1768 by Angelo Bandini, head of the Laurentian Library in Florence, the information remained unfamiliar to writers of the following centuries, leaving the entrenched error to persist until the late 1970s, on the eve of the first critical editions of the Defence (Gautier 1980, Spadaro 1981). The article follows the tangled history of the erroneous attribution, attempting to establish a kind of stemmatic regularity between several branches of the abortive tradition.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/bz-2019-0010 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Geschichte, Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen, Kunst und Kunstgeschichte |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9iei0yMDE5LTAwMTA |
imprint | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019 |
institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
issn | 1868-9027, 0007-7704 |
issn_str_mv | 1868-9027, 0007-7704 |
language | Undetermined |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T11:41:48.842Z |
match_str | todorovic2019oneerroneousattributionofdefenceofeunuchs |
mega_collection | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
physical | 193-220 |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Todorović, Darko 1868-9027 0007-7704 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Literature and Literary Theory Visual Arts and Performing Arts History http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bz-2019-0010 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> The paper traces a three-century-long tradition of a mistaken attribution of the Defence of Eunuchs by Theophylact of Ohrid. Since Peter Lambeck, chief librarian of the Hofbibliothek in Vienna, identified in 1671 the author of the treatise as Theodore Pedagogue, a poorly known tutor to the emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the incorrect attribution was readily adopted and further disseminated by a series of scholars of the next generations. Although the issue of the authorship was successfully resolved as early as 1768 by Angelo Bandini, head of the Laurentian Library in Florence, the information remained unfamiliar to writers of the following centuries, leaving the entrenched error to persist until the late 1970s, on the eve of the first critical editions of the Defence (Gautier 1980, Spadaro 1981). The article follows the tangled history of the erroneous attribution, attempting to establish a kind of stemmatic regularity between several branches of the abortive tradition.</jats:p> One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
spellingShingle | Todorović, Darko, Byzantinische Zeitschrift, One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs, Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History |
title | One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_full | One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_fullStr | One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_full_unstemmed | One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_short | One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
title_sort | one erroneous attribution of defence of eunuchs |
title_unstemmed | One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs |
topic | Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bz-2019-0010 |