author_facet Todorović, Darko
Todorović, Darko
author Todorović, Darko
spellingShingle Todorović, Darko
Byzantinische Zeitschrift
One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
Literature and Literary Theory
Visual Arts and Performing Arts
History
author_sort todorović, darko
spelling Todorović, Darko 1868-9027 0007-7704 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Literature and Literary Theory Visual Arts and Performing Arts History http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bz-2019-0010 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> The paper traces a three-century-long tradition of a mistaken attribution of the Defence of Eunuchs by Theophylact of Ohrid. Since Peter Lambeck, chief librarian of the Hofbibliothek in Vienna, identified in 1671 the author of the treatise as Theodore Pedagogue, a poorly known tutor to the emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the incorrect attribution was readily adopted and further disseminated by a series of scholars of the next generations. Although the issue of the authorship was successfully resolved as early as 1768 by Angelo Bandini, head of the Laurentian Library in Florence, the information remained unfamiliar to writers of the following centuries, leaving the entrenched error to persist until the late 1970s, on the eve of the first critical editions of the Defence (Gautier 1980, Spadaro 1981). The article follows the tangled history of the erroneous attribution, attempting to establish a kind of stemmatic regularity between several branches of the abortive tradition.</jats:p> One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs Byzantinische Zeitschrift
doi_str_mv 10.1515/bz-2019-0010
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geschichte
Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen
Kunst und Kunstgeschichte
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9iei0yMDE5LTAwMTA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9iei0yMDE5LTAwMTA
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
issn 1868-9027
0007-7704
issn_str_mv 1868-9027
0007-7704
language Undetermined
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
match_str todorovic2019oneerroneousattributionofdefenceofeunuchs
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Byzantinische Zeitschrift
source_id 49
title One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_unstemmed One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_full One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_fullStr One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_full_unstemmed One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_short One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_sort one erroneous attribution of defence of eunuchs
topic Literature and Literary Theory
Visual Arts and Performing Arts
History
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bz-2019-0010
publishDate 2019
physical 193-220
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> The paper traces a three-century-long tradition of a mistaken attribution of the Defence of Eunuchs by Theophylact of Ohrid. Since Peter Lambeck, chief librarian of the Hofbibliothek in Vienna, identified in 1671 the author of the treatise as Theodore Pedagogue, a poorly known tutor to the emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the incorrect attribution was readily adopted and further disseminated by a series of scholars of the next generations. Although the issue of the authorship was successfully resolved as early as 1768 by Angelo Bandini, head of the Laurentian Library in Florence, the information remained unfamiliar to writers of the following centuries, leaving the entrenched error to persist until the late 1970s, on the eve of the first critical editions of the Defence (Gautier 1980, Spadaro 1981). The article follows the tangled history of the erroneous attribution, attempting to establish a kind of stemmatic regularity between several branches of the abortive tradition.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 193
container_title Byzantinische Zeitschrift
container_volume 112
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792323943045005318
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T11:41:48.842Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=One+erroneous+attribution+of+Defence+of+Eunuchs&rft.date=2019-02-01&genre=article&issn=0007-7704&volume=112&issue=1&spage=193&epage=220&pages=193-220&jtitle=Byzantinische+Zeitschrift&atitle=One+erroneous+attribution+of+Defence+of+Eunuchs&aulast=Todorovi%C4%87&aufirst=Darko&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fbz-2019-0010&rft.language%5B0%5D=und
SOLR
_version_ 1792323943045005318
author Todorović, Darko
author_facet Todorović, Darko, Todorović, Darko
author_sort todorović, darko
container_issue 1
container_start_page 193
container_title Byzantinische Zeitschrift
container_volume 112
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> The paper traces a three-century-long tradition of a mistaken attribution of the Defence of Eunuchs by Theophylact of Ohrid. Since Peter Lambeck, chief librarian of the Hofbibliothek in Vienna, identified in 1671 the author of the treatise as Theodore Pedagogue, a poorly known tutor to the emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the incorrect attribution was readily adopted and further disseminated by a series of scholars of the next generations. Although the issue of the authorship was successfully resolved as early as 1768 by Angelo Bandini, head of the Laurentian Library in Florence, the information remained unfamiliar to writers of the following centuries, leaving the entrenched error to persist until the late 1970s, on the eve of the first critical editions of the Defence (Gautier 1980, Spadaro 1981). The article follows the tangled history of the erroneous attribution, attempting to establish a kind of stemmatic regularity between several branches of the abortive tradition.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1515/bz-2019-0010
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geschichte, Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen, Kunst und Kunstgeschichte
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9iei0yMDE5LTAwMTA
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 1868-9027, 0007-7704
issn_str_mv 1868-9027, 0007-7704
language Undetermined
last_indexed 2024-03-01T11:41:48.842Z
match_str todorovic2019oneerroneousattributionofdefenceofeunuchs
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
physical 193-220
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Byzantinische Zeitschrift
source_id 49
spelling Todorović, Darko 1868-9027 0007-7704 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Literature and Literary Theory Visual Arts and Performing Arts History http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bz-2019-0010 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p> The paper traces a three-century-long tradition of a mistaken attribution of the Defence of Eunuchs by Theophylact of Ohrid. Since Peter Lambeck, chief librarian of the Hofbibliothek in Vienna, identified in 1671 the author of the treatise as Theodore Pedagogue, a poorly known tutor to the emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the incorrect attribution was readily adopted and further disseminated by a series of scholars of the next generations. Although the issue of the authorship was successfully resolved as early as 1768 by Angelo Bandini, head of the Laurentian Library in Florence, the information remained unfamiliar to writers of the following centuries, leaving the entrenched error to persist until the late 1970s, on the eve of the first critical editions of the Defence (Gautier 1980, Spadaro 1981). The article follows the tangled history of the erroneous attribution, attempting to establish a kind of stemmatic regularity between several branches of the abortive tradition.</jats:p> One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs Byzantinische Zeitschrift
spellingShingle Todorović, Darko, Byzantinische Zeitschrift, One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs, Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History
title One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_full One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_fullStr One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_full_unstemmed One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_short One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
title_sort one erroneous attribution of defence of eunuchs
title_unstemmed One erroneous attribution of Defence of Eunuchs
topic Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bz-2019-0010