Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Norms as Equilibria
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Analyse & Kritik |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Analyse & Kritik, 38, 2016, 2, S. 433-458 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Lahno, Bernd Lahno, Bernd |
---|---|
author |
Lahno, Bernd |
spellingShingle |
Lahno, Bernd Analyse & Kritik Norms as Equilibria Philosophy Sociology and Political Science |
author_sort |
lahno, bernd |
spelling |
Lahno, Bernd 2365-9858 0171-5860 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Philosophy Sociology and Political Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0121 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper presents a survey on contemporary RC accounts of norms. The characteristic common feature of these accounts is that norms are understood as equilibrium selection devices. The most sophisticated positions driven by this idea are Herbert Gintis’ theory of norms as choreographers and Cristina Bicchieri’s theory of norms as solutions to mixed motive games. In order to give a comprehensive account of social norms, though, RC theory needs to be substantially extended. In particular, it seems to be impossible in principle to fully understand the concept of normativity and the motivating power of norms within a traditional, pure RC framework.</jats:p> Norms as Equilibria Analyse & Kritik |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/auk-2016-0121 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Philosophie Soziologie |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9hdWstMjAxNi0wMTIx |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9hdWstMjAxNi0wMTIx |
institution |
DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 |
imprint |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016 |
imprint_str_mv |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016 |
issn |
2365-9858 0171-5860 |
issn_str_mv |
2365-9858 0171-5860 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
match_str |
lahno2016normsasequilibria |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
publisher |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Analyse & Kritik |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Norms as Equilibria |
title_unstemmed |
Norms as Equilibria |
title_full |
Norms as Equilibria |
title_fullStr |
Norms as Equilibria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Norms as Equilibria |
title_short |
Norms as Equilibria |
title_sort |
norms as equilibria |
topic |
Philosophy Sociology and Political Science |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0121 |
publishDate |
2016 |
physical |
433-458 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>This paper presents a survey on contemporary RC accounts of norms. The characteristic common feature of these accounts is that norms are understood as equilibrium selection devices. The most sophisticated positions driven by this idea are Herbert Gintis’ theory of norms as choreographers and Cristina Bicchieri’s theory of norms as solutions to mixed motive games. In order to give a comprehensive account of social norms, though, RC theory needs to be substantially extended. In particular, it seems to be impossible in principle to fully understand the concept of normativity and the motivating power of norms within a traditional, pure RC framework.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
433 |
container_title |
Analyse & Kritik |
container_volume |
38 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792339947845320705 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:56:13.465Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Norms+as+Equilibria&rft.date=2016-11-01&genre=article&issn=0171-5860&volume=38&issue=2&spage=433&epage=458&pages=433-458&jtitle=Analyse+%26+Kritik&atitle=Norms+as+Equilibria&aulast=Lahno&aufirst=Bernd&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fauk-2016-0121&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792339947845320705 |
author | Lahno, Bernd |
author_facet | Lahno, Bernd, Lahno, Bernd |
author_sort | lahno, bernd |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 433 |
container_title | Analyse & Kritik |
container_volume | 38 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper presents a survey on contemporary RC accounts of norms. The characteristic common feature of these accounts is that norms are understood as equilibrium selection devices. The most sophisticated positions driven by this idea are Herbert Gintis’ theory of norms as choreographers and Cristina Bicchieri’s theory of norms as solutions to mixed motive games. In order to give a comprehensive account of social norms, though, RC theory needs to be substantially extended. In particular, it seems to be impossible in principle to fully understand the concept of normativity and the motivating power of norms within a traditional, pure RC framework.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/auk-2016-0121 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Philosophie, Soziologie |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9hdWstMjAxNi0wMTIx |
imprint | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016 |
imprint_str_mv | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016 |
institution | DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3 |
issn | 2365-9858, 0171-5860 |
issn_str_mv | 2365-9858, 0171-5860 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:56:13.465Z |
match_str | lahno2016normsasequilibria |
mega_collection | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
physical | 433-458 |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Analyse & Kritik |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Lahno, Bernd 2365-9858 0171-5860 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Philosophy Sociology and Political Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0121 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper presents a survey on contemporary RC accounts of norms. The characteristic common feature of these accounts is that norms are understood as equilibrium selection devices. The most sophisticated positions driven by this idea are Herbert Gintis’ theory of norms as choreographers and Cristina Bicchieri’s theory of norms as solutions to mixed motive games. In order to give a comprehensive account of social norms, though, RC theory needs to be substantially extended. In particular, it seems to be impossible in principle to fully understand the concept of normativity and the motivating power of norms within a traditional, pure RC framework.</jats:p> Norms as Equilibria Analyse & Kritik |
spellingShingle | Lahno, Bernd, Analyse & Kritik, Norms as Equilibria, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science |
title | Norms as Equilibria |
title_full | Norms as Equilibria |
title_fullStr | Norms as Equilibria |
title_full_unstemmed | Norms as Equilibria |
title_short | Norms as Equilibria |
title_sort | norms as equilibria |
title_unstemmed | Norms as Equilibria |
topic | Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0121 |