Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Analyse & Kritik |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Analyse & Kritik, 38, 2016, 1, S. 91-120 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Eifier, Stefanie Eifier, Stefanie |
|---|---|
| author |
Eifier, Stefanie |
| spellingShingle |
Eifier, Stefanie Analyse & Kritik Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation Philosophy Sociology and Political Science |
| author_sort |
eifier, stefanie |
| spelling |
Eifier, Stefanie 2365-9858 0171-5860 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Philosophy Sociology and Political Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0106 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>At the centre of this study is the theoretical and empirical analysis of action-formation mechanisms in norm-relevant, situations. Basically two mechanisms are employed, namely action according to a) moral principles and b) the principle of deterrence. Conflicting assumptions concerning the way these mechanisms work are deduced from two theoretical perspectives, the high-cost/low-cost. hypothesis and Situational Action Theory (SAT). While the high-cost/low-cost. hypothesis leads to the assumption that, criminal action is explained by the principle of deterrence in high-cost, situations and, in low-cost, situations, by moral principles, it. follows from SAT that., in high-cost, situations, the principle of deterrence has an effect, only on those persons with weak moral principles, and influences of moral principles are expected in low-cost, situations. Empirical analysis of these hypotheses is conducted with the help of data that, have been collected as part, of a mail survey (n=2383) of a disproportionately layered random sample of residents of an East. German city. Data analyses are carried out. in order to estimate the influences of the theoretically specified predictors simultaneously for high-cost, and low-cost, situations with multiple group comparisons. The study’s results partially support, both theoretical perspectives. They are finally discussed with respect, to theoretical and methodological aspects.</jats:p> Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation Analyse & Kritik |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1515/auk-2016-0106 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Philosophie Soziologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9hdWstMjAxNi0wMTA2 |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9hdWstMjAxNi0wMTA2 |
| institution |
DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 |
| imprint |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016 |
| issn |
2365-9858 0171-5860 |
| issn_str_mv |
2365-9858 0171-5860 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
eifier2016socialmechanismsinnormrelevantsituationsexplanationsfortheftbyfindinginhighcostandlowcostsituation |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| publisher |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Analyse & Kritik |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_unstemmed |
Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_full |
Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_fullStr |
Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_short |
Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_sort |
social mechanisms in norm-relevant situations: explanations for theft by finding in high-cost, and low-cost situation |
| topic |
Philosophy Sociology and Political Science |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0106 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| physical |
91-120 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>At the centre of this study is the theoretical and empirical analysis of action-formation mechanisms in norm-relevant, situations. Basically two mechanisms are employed, namely action according to a) moral principles and b) the principle of deterrence. Conflicting assumptions concerning the way these mechanisms work are deduced from two theoretical perspectives, the high-cost/low-cost. hypothesis and Situational Action Theory (SAT). While the high-cost/low-cost. hypothesis leads to the assumption that, criminal action is explained by the principle of deterrence in high-cost, situations and, in low-cost, situations, by moral principles, it. follows from SAT that., in high-cost, situations, the principle of deterrence has an effect, only on those persons with weak moral principles, and influences of moral principles are expected in low-cost, situations. Empirical analysis of these hypotheses is conducted with the help of data that, have been collected as part, of a mail survey (n=2383) of a disproportionately layered random sample of residents of an East. German city. Data analyses are carried out. in order to estimate the influences of the theoretically specified predictors simultaneously for high-cost, and low-cost, situations with multiple group comparisons. The study’s results partially support, both theoretical perspectives. They are finally discussed with respect, to theoretical and methodological aspects.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
1 |
| container_start_page |
91 |
| container_title |
Analyse & Kritik |
| container_volume |
38 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792342349082263552 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:33:54.541Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Social+Mechanisms+in+Norm-relevant+Situations%3A+Explanations+for+Theft+by+Finding+in+High-cost%2C+and+Low-cost+Situation&rft.date=2016-05-01&genre=article&issn=0171-5860&volume=38&issue=1&spage=91&epage=120&pages=91-120&jtitle=Analyse+%26+Kritik&atitle=Social+Mechanisms+in+Norm-relevant+Situations%3A+Explanations+for+Theft+by+Finding+in+High-cost%2C+and+Low-cost+Situation&aulast=Eifier&aufirst=Stefanie&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fauk-2016-0106&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792342349082263552 |
| author | Eifier, Stefanie |
| author_facet | Eifier, Stefanie, Eifier, Stefanie |
| author_sort | eifier, stefanie |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Analyse & Kritik |
| container_volume | 38 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>At the centre of this study is the theoretical and empirical analysis of action-formation mechanisms in norm-relevant, situations. Basically two mechanisms are employed, namely action according to a) moral principles and b) the principle of deterrence. Conflicting assumptions concerning the way these mechanisms work are deduced from two theoretical perspectives, the high-cost/low-cost. hypothesis and Situational Action Theory (SAT). While the high-cost/low-cost. hypothesis leads to the assumption that, criminal action is explained by the principle of deterrence in high-cost, situations and, in low-cost, situations, by moral principles, it. follows from SAT that., in high-cost, situations, the principle of deterrence has an effect, only on those persons with weak moral principles, and influences of moral principles are expected in low-cost, situations. Empirical analysis of these hypotheses is conducted with the help of data that, have been collected as part, of a mail survey (n=2383) of a disproportionately layered random sample of residents of an East. German city. Data analyses are carried out. in order to estimate the influences of the theoretically specified predictors simultaneously for high-cost, and low-cost, situations with multiple group comparisons. The study’s results partially support, both theoretical perspectives. They are finally discussed with respect, to theoretical and methodological aspects.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/auk-2016-0106 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Philosophie, Soziologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9hdWstMjAxNi0wMTA2 |
| imprint | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016 |
| institution | DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1 |
| issn | 2365-9858, 0171-5860 |
| issn_str_mv | 2365-9858, 0171-5860 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:33:54.541Z |
| match_str | eifier2016socialmechanismsinnormrelevantsituationsexplanationsfortheftbyfindinginhighcostandlowcostsituation |
| mega_collection | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
| physical | 91-120 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Analyse & Kritik |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Eifier, Stefanie 2365-9858 0171-5860 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Philosophy Sociology and Political Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0106 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>At the centre of this study is the theoretical and empirical analysis of action-formation mechanisms in norm-relevant, situations. Basically two mechanisms are employed, namely action according to a) moral principles and b) the principle of deterrence. Conflicting assumptions concerning the way these mechanisms work are deduced from two theoretical perspectives, the high-cost/low-cost. hypothesis and Situational Action Theory (SAT). While the high-cost/low-cost. hypothesis leads to the assumption that, criminal action is explained by the principle of deterrence in high-cost, situations and, in low-cost, situations, by moral principles, it. follows from SAT that., in high-cost, situations, the principle of deterrence has an effect, only on those persons with weak moral principles, and influences of moral principles are expected in low-cost, situations. Empirical analysis of these hypotheses is conducted with the help of data that, have been collected as part, of a mail survey (n=2383) of a disproportionately layered random sample of residents of an East. German city. Data analyses are carried out. in order to estimate the influences of the theoretically specified predictors simultaneously for high-cost, and low-cost, situations with multiple group comparisons. The study’s results partially support, both theoretical perspectives. They are finally discussed with respect, to theoretical and methodological aspects.</jats:p> Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation Analyse & Kritik |
| spellingShingle | Eifier, Stefanie, Analyse & Kritik, Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science |
| title | Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_full | Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_fullStr | Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_short | Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| title_sort | social mechanisms in norm-relevant situations: explanations for theft by finding in high-cost, and low-cost situation |
| title_unstemmed | Social Mechanisms in Norm-relevant Situations: Explanations for Theft by Finding in High-cost, and Low-cost Situation |
| topic | Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0106 |