Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments: An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgemen...
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 38, 2019, 1, S. 37-79 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Vogel, Ralf Vogel, Ralf |
---|---|
author |
Vogel, Ralf |
spellingShingle |
Vogel, Ralf Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics |
author_sort |
vogel, ralf |
spelling |
Vogel, Ralf 1613-3706 0721-9067 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0002 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This explorative study focuses on <jats:italic>grammatical taboos</jats:italic> in German, morphosyntactic constructions which are subject to stigmatisation, as they regularly occur in standard languages. They are subjected to systematic experimental testing in a questionnaire study with gradient rating scales on two salient and two non-salient grammatical taboo phenomena of German. The study is divided into three subexperiments with different judgement types, an aesthetic judgement, a norm-oriented judgement and the sort of possibility judgement that comes closest to linguists’ understanding of grammar. Included in the investigated material are also examples of ordinary gradient grammaticality: unmarked, marked and ungrammatical sentences. The empirical characteristics of grammatical taboos are compared to those ordinary cases with the finding that they are rated at the level of markedness, but differ from ordinary markedness in that they produce a different pattern of between-subject variance. In addition, we find that grammatical taboos have a particular disadvantage under the aesthetic judgement type. The paper also introduces the concept of <jats:italic>empirical grammaticality</jats:italic> as a necessary theoretical cornerstone for empirical linguistics. Methodically, the study applies a mix of parametric and non-parametric methods of statistical analysis.</jats:p> An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/zfs-2019-0002 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS96ZnMtMjAxOS0wMDAy |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS96ZnMtMjAxOS0wMDAy |
institution |
DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 |
imprint |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019 |
issn |
1613-3706 0721-9067 |
issn_str_mv |
1613-3706 0721-9067 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
match_str |
vogel2019grammaticaltaboosaninvestigationontheimpactofprescriptioninacceptabilityjudgementexperimentsaninvestigationontheimpactofprescriptioninacceptabilityjudgementexperiments |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
publisher |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
source_id |
49 |
title_sub |
An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title |
Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_unstemmed |
Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_full |
Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_fullStr |
Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_short |
Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_sort |
grammatical taboos : an investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
topic |
Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0002 |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
37-79 |
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>This explorative study focuses on <jats:italic>grammatical taboos</jats:italic> in German, morphosyntactic constructions which are subject to stigmatisation, as they regularly occur in standard languages. They are subjected to systematic experimental testing in a questionnaire study with gradient rating scales on two salient and two non-salient grammatical taboo phenomena of German. The study is divided into three subexperiments with different judgement types, an aesthetic judgement, a norm-oriented judgement and the sort of possibility judgement that comes closest to linguists’ understanding of grammar. Included in the investigated material are also examples of ordinary gradient grammaticality: unmarked, marked and ungrammatical sentences. The empirical characteristics of grammatical taboos are compared to those ordinary cases with the finding that they are rated at the level of markedness, but differ from ordinary markedness in that they produce a different pattern of between-subject variance. In addition, we find that grammatical taboos have a particular disadvantage under the aesthetic judgement type. The paper also introduces the concept of <jats:italic>empirical grammaticality</jats:italic> as a necessary theoretical cornerstone for empirical linguistics. Methodically, the study applies a mix of parametric and non-parametric methods of statistical analysis.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
37 |
container_title |
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
container_volume |
38 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792338407345618944 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:31:44.956Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Grammatical+taboos+%3A+An+investigation+on+the+impact+of+prescription+in+acceptability+judgement+experiments&rft.date=2019-06-26&genre=article&issn=0721-9067&volume=38&issue=1&spage=37&epage=79&pages=37-79&jtitle=Zeitschrift+f%C3%BCr+Sprachwissenschaft&atitle=Grammatical+taboos+%3A+An+investigation+on+the+impact+of+prescription+in+acceptability+judgement+experiments&aulast=Vogel&aufirst=Ralf&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fzfs-2019-0002&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792338407345618944 |
author | Vogel, Ralf |
author_facet | Vogel, Ralf, Vogel, Ralf |
author_sort | vogel, ralf |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
container_volume | 38 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This explorative study focuses on <jats:italic>grammatical taboos</jats:italic> in German, morphosyntactic constructions which are subject to stigmatisation, as they regularly occur in standard languages. They are subjected to systematic experimental testing in a questionnaire study with gradient rating scales on two salient and two non-salient grammatical taboo phenomena of German. The study is divided into three subexperiments with different judgement types, an aesthetic judgement, a norm-oriented judgement and the sort of possibility judgement that comes closest to linguists’ understanding of grammar. Included in the investigated material are also examples of ordinary gradient grammaticality: unmarked, marked and ungrammatical sentences. The empirical characteristics of grammatical taboos are compared to those ordinary cases with the finding that they are rated at the level of markedness, but differ from ordinary markedness in that they produce a different pattern of between-subject variance. In addition, we find that grammatical taboos have a particular disadvantage under the aesthetic judgement type. The paper also introduces the concept of <jats:italic>empirical grammaticality</jats:italic> as a necessary theoretical cornerstone for empirical linguistics. Methodically, the study applies a mix of parametric and non-parametric methods of statistical analysis.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/zfs-2019-0002 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS96ZnMtMjAxOS0wMDAy |
imprint | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019 |
imprint_str_mv | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019 |
institution | DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4 |
issn | 1613-3706, 0721-9067 |
issn_str_mv | 1613-3706, 0721-9067 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:31:44.956Z |
match_str | vogel2019grammaticaltaboosaninvestigationontheimpactofprescriptioninacceptabilityjudgementexperimentsaninvestigationontheimpactofprescriptioninacceptabilityjudgementexperiments |
mega_collection | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
physical | 37-79 |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Vogel, Ralf 1613-3706 0721-9067 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0002 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This explorative study focuses on <jats:italic>grammatical taboos</jats:italic> in German, morphosyntactic constructions which are subject to stigmatisation, as they regularly occur in standard languages. They are subjected to systematic experimental testing in a questionnaire study with gradient rating scales on two salient and two non-salient grammatical taboo phenomena of German. The study is divided into three subexperiments with different judgement types, an aesthetic judgement, a norm-oriented judgement and the sort of possibility judgement that comes closest to linguists’ understanding of grammar. Included in the investigated material are also examples of ordinary gradient grammaticality: unmarked, marked and ungrammatical sentences. The empirical characteristics of grammatical taboos are compared to those ordinary cases with the finding that they are rated at the level of markedness, but differ from ordinary markedness in that they produce a different pattern of between-subject variance. In addition, we find that grammatical taboos have a particular disadvantage under the aesthetic judgement type. The paper also introduces the concept of <jats:italic>empirical grammaticality</jats:italic> as a necessary theoretical cornerstone for empirical linguistics. Methodically, the study applies a mix of parametric and non-parametric methods of statistical analysis.</jats:p> An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
spellingShingle | Vogel, Ralf, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics |
title | Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_full | Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_fullStr | Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_short | Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_sort | grammatical taboos : an investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_sub | An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
title_unstemmed | Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments |
topic | Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0002 |