author_facet Vogel, Ralf
Vogel, Ralf
author Vogel, Ralf
spellingShingle Vogel, Ralf
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
author_sort vogel, ralf
spelling Vogel, Ralf 1613-3706 0721-9067 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0002 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This explorative study focuses on <jats:italic>grammatical taboos</jats:italic> in German, morphosyntactic constructions which are subject to stigmatisation, as they regularly occur in standard languages. They are subjected to systematic experimental testing in a questionnaire study with gradient rating scales on two salient and two non-salient grammatical taboo phenomena of German. The study is divided into three subexperiments with different judgement types, an aesthetic judgement, a norm-oriented judgement and the sort of possibility judgement that comes closest to linguists’ understanding of grammar. Included in the investigated material are also examples of ordinary gradient grammaticality: unmarked, marked and ungrammatical sentences. The empirical characteristics of grammatical taboos are compared to those ordinary cases with the finding that they are rated at the level of markedness, but differ from ordinary markedness in that they produce a different pattern of between-subject variance. In addition, we find that grammatical taboos have a particular disadvantage under the aesthetic judgement type. The paper also introduces the concept of <jats:italic>empirical grammaticality</jats:italic> as a necessary theoretical cornerstone for empirical linguistics. Methodically, the study applies a mix of parametric and non-parametric methods of statistical analysis.</jats:p> An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
doi_str_mv 10.1515/zfs-2019-0002
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS96ZnMtMjAxOS0wMDAy
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS96ZnMtMjAxOS0wMDAy
institution DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
issn 1613-3706
0721-9067
issn_str_mv 1613-3706
0721-9067
language English
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
match_str vogel2019grammaticaltaboosaninvestigationontheimpactofprescriptioninacceptabilityjudgementexperimentsaninvestigationontheimpactofprescriptioninacceptabilityjudgementexperiments
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
source_id 49
title_sub An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_unstemmed Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_full Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_fullStr Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_full_unstemmed Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_short Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_sort grammatical taboos : an investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
topic Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0002
publishDate 2019
physical 37-79
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This explorative study focuses on <jats:italic>grammatical taboos</jats:italic> in German, morphosyntactic constructions which are subject to stigmatisation, as they regularly occur in standard languages. They are subjected to systematic experimental testing in a questionnaire study with gradient rating scales on two salient and two non-salient grammatical taboo phenomena of German. The study is divided into three subexperiments with different judgement types, an aesthetic judgement, a norm-oriented judgement and the sort of possibility judgement that comes closest to linguists’ understanding of grammar. Included in the investigated material are also examples of ordinary gradient grammaticality: unmarked, marked and ungrammatical sentences. The empirical characteristics of grammatical taboos are compared to those ordinary cases with the finding that they are rated at the level of markedness, but differ from ordinary markedness in that they produce a different pattern of between-subject variance. In addition, we find that grammatical taboos have a particular disadvantage under the aesthetic judgement type. The paper also introduces the concept of <jats:italic>empirical grammaticality</jats:italic> as a necessary theoretical cornerstone for empirical linguistics. Methodically, the study applies a mix of parametric and non-parametric methods of statistical analysis.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
container_volume 38
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792338407345618944
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:31:44.956Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Grammatical+taboos+%3A+An+investigation+on+the+impact+of+prescription+in+acceptability+judgement+experiments&rft.date=2019-06-26&genre=article&issn=0721-9067&volume=38&issue=1&spage=37&epage=79&pages=37-79&jtitle=Zeitschrift+f%C3%BCr+Sprachwissenschaft&atitle=Grammatical+taboos+%3A+An+investigation+on+the+impact+of+prescription+in+acceptability+judgement+experiments&aulast=Vogel&aufirst=Ralf&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fzfs-2019-0002&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792338407345618944
author Vogel, Ralf
author_facet Vogel, Ralf, Vogel, Ralf
author_sort vogel, ralf
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
container_volume 38
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This explorative study focuses on <jats:italic>grammatical taboos</jats:italic> in German, morphosyntactic constructions which are subject to stigmatisation, as they regularly occur in standard languages. They are subjected to systematic experimental testing in a questionnaire study with gradient rating scales on two salient and two non-salient grammatical taboo phenomena of German. The study is divided into three subexperiments with different judgement types, an aesthetic judgement, a norm-oriented judgement and the sort of possibility judgement that comes closest to linguists’ understanding of grammar. Included in the investigated material are also examples of ordinary gradient grammaticality: unmarked, marked and ungrammatical sentences. The empirical characteristics of grammatical taboos are compared to those ordinary cases with the finding that they are rated at the level of markedness, but differ from ordinary markedness in that they produce a different pattern of between-subject variance. In addition, we find that grammatical taboos have a particular disadvantage under the aesthetic judgement type. The paper also introduces the concept of <jats:italic>empirical grammaticality</jats:italic> as a necessary theoretical cornerstone for empirical linguistics. Methodically, the study applies a mix of parametric and non-parametric methods of statistical analysis.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1515/zfs-2019-0002
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS96ZnMtMjAxOS0wMDAy
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019
institution DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4
issn 1613-3706, 0721-9067
issn_str_mv 1613-3706, 0721-9067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:31:44.956Z
match_str vogel2019grammaticaltaboosaninvestigationontheimpactofprescriptioninacceptabilityjudgementexperimentsaninvestigationontheimpactofprescriptioninacceptabilityjudgementexperiments
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
physical 37-79
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
source_id 49
spelling Vogel, Ralf 1613-3706 0721-9067 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0002 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This explorative study focuses on <jats:italic>grammatical taboos</jats:italic> in German, morphosyntactic constructions which are subject to stigmatisation, as they regularly occur in standard languages. They are subjected to systematic experimental testing in a questionnaire study with gradient rating scales on two salient and two non-salient grammatical taboo phenomena of German. The study is divided into three subexperiments with different judgement types, an aesthetic judgement, a norm-oriented judgement and the sort of possibility judgement that comes closest to linguists’ understanding of grammar. Included in the investigated material are also examples of ordinary gradient grammaticality: unmarked, marked and ungrammatical sentences. The empirical characteristics of grammatical taboos are compared to those ordinary cases with the finding that they are rated at the level of markedness, but differ from ordinary markedness in that they produce a different pattern of between-subject variance. In addition, we find that grammatical taboos have a particular disadvantage under the aesthetic judgement type. The paper also introduces the concept of <jats:italic>empirical grammaticality</jats:italic> as a necessary theoretical cornerstone for empirical linguistics. Methodically, the study applies a mix of parametric and non-parametric methods of statistical analysis.</jats:p> An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
spellingShingle Vogel, Ralf, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics
title Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_full Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_fullStr Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_full_unstemmed Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_short Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_sort grammatical taboos : an investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_sub An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
title_unstemmed Grammatical taboos : An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgement experiments
topic Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0002