Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | PLATO JOURNAL |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | PLATO JOURNAL, 19, 2019, S. 7-23 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Unbestimmt |
| veröffentlicht: |
Coimbra University Press
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Smith, Colin C. Smith, Colin C. |
|---|---|
| author |
Smith, Colin C. |
| spellingShingle |
Smith, Colin C. PLATO JOURNAL Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus Philosophy |
| author_sort |
smith, colin c. |
| spelling |
Smith, Colin C. 2183-4105 2079-7567 Coimbra University Press Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_19_1 <jats:p>Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman exhibit several related dialectical methods relevant to Platonic education: maieutic in Theaetetus, bifurcatory division in Sophist and Statesman, and non-bifurcatory division in Statesman, related to the ‘god-given’ method in Philebus. I consider the nature of each method through the letter or element (στοιχεῖον) paradigm, used to reflect on each method. At issue are the element’s appearances in given contexts, its fitness for communing with other elements like it in kind, and its own nature defined through its relations to others. These represent stages of inquiry for the Platonic student inquiring into the sources of knowledge.</jats:p> Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus PLATO JOURNAL |
| doi_str_mv |
10.14195/2183-4105_19_1 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Philosophie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTQxOTUvMjE4My00MTA1XzE5XzE |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTQxOTUvMjE4My00MTA1XzE5XzE |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
Coimbra University Press, 2019 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Coimbra University Press, 2019 |
| issn |
2183-4105 2079-7567 |
| issn_str_mv |
2183-4105 2079-7567 |
| language |
Undetermined |
| mega_collection |
Coimbra University Press (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
smith2019dialecticalmethodsandthestoicheiaparadigminplatostrilogyandphilebus |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| publisher |
Coimbra University Press |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
PLATO JOURNAL |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_unstemmed |
Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_full |
Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_fullStr |
Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_short |
Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_sort |
dialectical methods and the stoicheia paradigm in plato’s trilogy and philebus |
| topic |
Philosophy |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_19_1 |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| physical |
7-23 |
| description |
<jats:p>Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman exhibit several related dialectical methods relevant to Platonic education: maieutic in Theaetetus, bifurcatory division in Sophist and Statesman, and non-bifurcatory division in Statesman, related to the ‘god-given’ method in Philebus. I consider the nature of each method through the letter or element (στοιχεῖον) paradigm, used to reflect on each method. At issue are the element’s appearances in given contexts, its fitness for communing with other elements like it in kind, and its own nature defined through its relations to others. These represent stages of inquiry for the Platonic student inquiring into the sources of knowledge.</jats:p> |
| container_start_page |
7 |
| container_title |
PLATO JOURNAL |
| container_volume |
19 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792334506068279298 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:29:32.046Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Dialectical+Methods+and+the+Stoicheia+Paradigm+in+Plato%E2%80%99s+Trilogy+and+Philebus&rft.date=2019-07-15&genre=article&issn=2079-7567&volume=19&spage=7&epage=23&pages=7-23&jtitle=PLATO+JOURNAL&atitle=Dialectical+Methods+and+the+Stoicheia+Paradigm+in+Plato%E2%80%99s+Trilogy+and+Philebus&aulast=Smith&aufirst=Colin+C.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.14195%2F2183-4105_19_1&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792334506068279298 |
| author | Smith, Colin C. |
| author_facet | Smith, Colin C., Smith, Colin C. |
| author_sort | smith, colin c. |
| container_start_page | 7 |
| container_title | PLATO JOURNAL |
| container_volume | 19 |
| description | <jats:p>Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman exhibit several related dialectical methods relevant to Platonic education: maieutic in Theaetetus, bifurcatory division in Sophist and Statesman, and non-bifurcatory division in Statesman, related to the ‘god-given’ method in Philebus. I consider the nature of each method through the letter or element (στοιχεῖον) paradigm, used to reflect on each method. At issue are the element’s appearances in given contexts, its fitness for communing with other elements like it in kind, and its own nature defined through its relations to others. These represent stages of inquiry for the Platonic student inquiring into the sources of knowledge.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.14195/2183-4105_19_1 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Philosophie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTQxOTUvMjE4My00MTA1XzE5XzE |
| imprint | Coimbra University Press, 2019 |
| imprint_str_mv | Coimbra University Press, 2019 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 2183-4105, 2079-7567 |
| issn_str_mv | 2183-4105, 2079-7567 |
| language | Undetermined |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:29:32.046Z |
| match_str | smith2019dialecticalmethodsandthestoicheiaparadigminplatostrilogyandphilebus |
| mega_collection | Coimbra University Press (CrossRef) |
| physical | 7-23 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Coimbra University Press |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | PLATO JOURNAL |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Smith, Colin C. 2183-4105 2079-7567 Coimbra University Press Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_19_1 <jats:p>Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman exhibit several related dialectical methods relevant to Platonic education: maieutic in Theaetetus, bifurcatory division in Sophist and Statesman, and non-bifurcatory division in Statesman, related to the ‘god-given’ method in Philebus. I consider the nature of each method through the letter or element (στοιχεῖον) paradigm, used to reflect on each method. At issue are the element’s appearances in given contexts, its fitness for communing with other elements like it in kind, and its own nature defined through its relations to others. These represent stages of inquiry for the Platonic student inquiring into the sources of knowledge.</jats:p> Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus PLATO JOURNAL |
| spellingShingle | Smith, Colin C., PLATO JOURNAL, Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus, Philosophy |
| title | Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_full | Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_fullStr | Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_short | Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| title_sort | dialectical methods and the stoicheia paradigm in plato’s trilogy and philebus |
| title_unstemmed | Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus |
| topic | Philosophy |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_19_1 |