author_facet Landry, Craig E
Lange, Andreas
List, John A
Price, Michael K
Rupp, Nicholas G
Landry, Craig E
Lange, Andreas
List, John A
Price, Michael K
Rupp, Nicholas G
author Landry, Craig E
Lange, Andreas
List, John A
Price, Michael K
Rupp, Nicholas G
spellingShingle Landry, Craig E
Lange, Andreas
List, John A
Price, Michael K
Rupp, Nicholas G
American Economic Review
Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
Economics and Econometrics
author_sort landry, craig e
spelling Landry, Craig E Lange, Andreas List, John A Price, Michael K Rupp, Nicholas G 0002-8282 American Economic Association Economics and Econometrics http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.958 <jats:p> This study examines why people initially give to charities, why they remain committed to the cause, and what factors attenuate these influences. Using an experimental design that links donations across distinct treatments separated in time, we present several results. For example, previous donors are more likely to give, and contribute more, than other donor types. Yet, how previous donors were acquired is critical: agents initially attracted by an economic mechanism are more likely to continue giving than agents attracted by a nonmechanism factor. From a methodological viewpoint, our study showcases the benefit of moving beyond an experimental design that focuses on short-run substitution effects. (JEL C93, D64, D82, H41, L31, Z12) </jats:p> Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment American Economic Review
doi_str_mv 10.1257/aer.100.3.958
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI1Ny9hZXIuMTAwLjMuOTU4
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI1Ny9hZXIuMTAwLjMuOTU4
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint American Economic Association, 2010
imprint_str_mv American Economic Association, 2010
issn 0002-8282
issn_str_mv 0002-8282
language English
mega_collection American Economic Association (CrossRef)
match_str landry2010isadonorinhandbetterthantwointhebushevidencefromanaturalfieldexperiment
publishDateSort 2010
publisher American Economic Association
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series American Economic Review
source_id 49
title Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_unstemmed Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_full Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_fullStr Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_short Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_sort is a donor in hand better than two in the bush? evidence from a natural field experiment
topic Economics and Econometrics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.958
publishDate 2010
physical 958-983
description <jats:p> This study examines why people initially give to charities, why they remain committed to the cause, and what factors attenuate these influences. Using an experimental design that links donations across distinct treatments separated in time, we present several results. For example, previous donors are more likely to give, and contribute more, than other donor types. Yet, how previous donors were acquired is critical: agents initially attracted by an economic mechanism are more likely to continue giving than agents attracted by a nonmechanism factor. From a methodological viewpoint, our study showcases the benefit of moving beyond an experimental design that focuses on short-run substitution effects. (JEL C93, D64, D82, H41, L31, Z12) </jats:p>
container_issue 3
container_start_page 958
container_title American Economic Review
container_volume 100
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792347329490059265
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:53:33.955Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Is+a+Donor+in+Hand+Better+than+Two+in+the+Bush%3F+Evidence+from+a+Natural+Field+Experiment&rft.date=2010-06-01&genre=article&issn=0002-8282&volume=100&issue=3&spage=958&epage=983&pages=958-983&jtitle=American+Economic+Review&atitle=Is+a+Donor+in+Hand+Better+than+Two+in+the+Bush%3F+Evidence+from+a+Natural+Field+Experiment&aulast=Rupp&aufirst=Nicholas+G&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1257%2Faer.100.3.958&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792347329490059265
author Landry, Craig E, Lange, Andreas, List, John A, Price, Michael K, Rupp, Nicholas G
author_facet Landry, Craig E, Lange, Andreas, List, John A, Price, Michael K, Rupp, Nicholas G, Landry, Craig E, Lange, Andreas, List, John A, Price, Michael K, Rupp, Nicholas G
author_sort landry, craig e
container_issue 3
container_start_page 958
container_title American Economic Review
container_volume 100
description <jats:p> This study examines why people initially give to charities, why they remain committed to the cause, and what factors attenuate these influences. Using an experimental design that links donations across distinct treatments separated in time, we present several results. For example, previous donors are more likely to give, and contribute more, than other donor types. Yet, how previous donors were acquired is critical: agents initially attracted by an economic mechanism are more likely to continue giving than agents attracted by a nonmechanism factor. From a methodological viewpoint, our study showcases the benefit of moving beyond an experimental design that focuses on short-run substitution effects. (JEL C93, D64, D82, H41, L31, Z12) </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1257/aer.100.3.958
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI1Ny9hZXIuMTAwLjMuOTU4
imprint American Economic Association, 2010
imprint_str_mv American Economic Association, 2010
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0002-8282
issn_str_mv 0002-8282
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:53:33.955Z
match_str landry2010isadonorinhandbetterthantwointhebushevidencefromanaturalfieldexperiment
mega_collection American Economic Association (CrossRef)
physical 958-983
publishDate 2010
publishDateSort 2010
publisher American Economic Association
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series American Economic Review
source_id 49
spelling Landry, Craig E Lange, Andreas List, John A Price, Michael K Rupp, Nicholas G 0002-8282 American Economic Association Economics and Econometrics http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.958 <jats:p> This study examines why people initially give to charities, why they remain committed to the cause, and what factors attenuate these influences. Using an experimental design that links donations across distinct treatments separated in time, we present several results. For example, previous donors are more likely to give, and contribute more, than other donor types. Yet, how previous donors were acquired is critical: agents initially attracted by an economic mechanism are more likely to continue giving than agents attracted by a nonmechanism factor. From a methodological viewpoint, our study showcases the benefit of moving beyond an experimental design that focuses on short-run substitution effects. (JEL C93, D64, D82, H41, L31, Z12) </jats:p> Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment American Economic Review
spellingShingle Landry, Craig E, Lange, Andreas, List, John A, Price, Michael K, Rupp, Nicholas G, American Economic Review, Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment, Economics and Econometrics
title Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_full Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_fullStr Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_short Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
title_sort is a donor in hand better than two in the bush? evidence from a natural field experiment
title_unstemmed Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
topic Economics and Econometrics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.958