author_facet Channon, Anthony J.
Günther, Michael M.
Crompton, Robin H.
D'Août, Kristiaan
Preuschoft, Holger
Vereecke, Evie E.
Channon, Anthony J.
Günther, Michael M.
Crompton, Robin H.
D'Août, Kristiaan
Preuschoft, Holger
Vereecke, Evie E.
author Channon, Anthony J.
Günther, Michael M.
Crompton, Robin H.
D'Août, Kristiaan
Preuschoft, Holger
Vereecke, Evie E.
spellingShingle Channon, Anthony J.
Günther, Michael M.
Crompton, Robin H.
D'Août, Kristiaan
Preuschoft, Holger
Vereecke, Evie E.
Journal of Experimental Biology
The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
Insect Science
Molecular Biology
Animal Science and Zoology
Aquatic Science
Physiology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
author_sort channon, anthony j.
spelling Channon, Anthony J. Günther, Michael M. Crompton, Robin H. D'Août, Kristiaan Preuschoft, Holger Vereecke, Evie E. 1477-9145 0022-0949 The Company of Biologists Insect Science Molecular Biology Animal Science and Zoology Aquatic Science Physiology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.046797 <jats:title>SUMMARY</jats:title><jats:p>The storage and recovery of elastic strain energy in the musculoskeletal systems of locomoting animals has been extensively studied, yet the external environment represents a second potentially useful energy store that has often been neglected. Recent studies have highlighted the ability of orangutans to usefully recover energy from swaying trees to minimise the cost of gap crossing. Although mechanically similar mechanisms have been hypothesised for wild leaping primates, to date no such energy recovery mechanisms have been demonstrated biomechanically in leapers. We used a setup consisting of a forceplate and two high-speed video cameras to conduct a biomechanical analysis of captive gibbons leaping from stiff and compliant poles. We found that the gibbons minimised pole deflection by using different leaping strategies. Two leap types were used: slower orthograde leaps and more rapid pronograde leaps. The slower leaps used a wider hip joint excursion to negate the downward movement of the pole, using more impulse to power the leap, but with no increase in work done on the centre of mass. Greater hip excursion also minimised the effective leap distance during orthograde leaps. The more rapid leaps conversely applied peak force earlier in stance where the pole was effectively stiffer, minimising deflection and potential energy loss. Neither leap type appeared to usefully recover energy from the pole to increase leap performance, but the gibbons demonstrated an ability to best adapt their leap biomechanics to counter the negative effects of the compliant pole.</jats:p> The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps Journal of Experimental Biology
doi_str_mv 10.1242/jeb.046797
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
Geographie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI0Mi9qZWIuMDQ2Nzk3
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI0Mi9qZWIuMDQ2Nzk3
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint The Company of Biologists, 2011
imprint_str_mv The Company of Biologists, 2011
issn 1477-9145
0022-0949
issn_str_mv 1477-9145
0022-0949
language English
mega_collection The Company of Biologists (CrossRef)
match_str channon2011theeffectofsubstratecomplianceonthebiomechanicsofgibbonleaps
publishDateSort 2011
publisher The Company of Biologists
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Experimental Biology
source_id 49
title The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_unstemmed The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_full The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_fullStr The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_full_unstemmed The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_short The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_sort the effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
topic Insect Science
Molecular Biology
Animal Science and Zoology
Aquatic Science
Physiology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.046797
publishDate 2011
physical 687-696
description <jats:title>SUMMARY</jats:title><jats:p>The storage and recovery of elastic strain energy in the musculoskeletal systems of locomoting animals has been extensively studied, yet the external environment represents a second potentially useful energy store that has often been neglected. Recent studies have highlighted the ability of orangutans to usefully recover energy from swaying trees to minimise the cost of gap crossing. Although mechanically similar mechanisms have been hypothesised for wild leaping primates, to date no such energy recovery mechanisms have been demonstrated biomechanically in leapers. We used a setup consisting of a forceplate and two high-speed video cameras to conduct a biomechanical analysis of captive gibbons leaping from stiff and compliant poles. We found that the gibbons minimised pole deflection by using different leaping strategies. Two leap types were used: slower orthograde leaps and more rapid pronograde leaps. The slower leaps used a wider hip joint excursion to negate the downward movement of the pole, using more impulse to power the leap, but with no increase in work done on the centre of mass. Greater hip excursion also minimised the effective leap distance during orthograde leaps. The more rapid leaps conversely applied peak force earlier in stance where the pole was effectively stiffer, minimising deflection and potential energy loss. Neither leap type appeared to usefully recover energy from the pole to increase leap performance, but the gibbons demonstrated an ability to best adapt their leap biomechanics to counter the negative effects of the compliant pole.</jats:p>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 687
container_title Journal of Experimental Biology
container_volume 214
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792344401130815488
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:06:45.123Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+effect+of+substrate+compliance+on+the+biomechanics+of+gibbon+leaps&rft.date=2011-02-15&genre=article&issn=0022-0949&volume=214&issue=4&spage=687&epage=696&pages=687-696&jtitle=Journal+of+Experimental+Biology&atitle=The+effect+of+substrate+compliance+on+the+biomechanics+of+gibbon+leaps&aulast=Vereecke&aufirst=Evie+E.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1242%2Fjeb.046797&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792344401130815488
author Channon, Anthony J., Günther, Michael M., Crompton, Robin H., D'Août, Kristiaan, Preuschoft, Holger, Vereecke, Evie E.
author_facet Channon, Anthony J., Günther, Michael M., Crompton, Robin H., D'Août, Kristiaan, Preuschoft, Holger, Vereecke, Evie E., Channon, Anthony J., Günther, Michael M., Crompton, Robin H., D'Août, Kristiaan, Preuschoft, Holger, Vereecke, Evie E.
author_sort channon, anthony j.
container_issue 4
container_start_page 687
container_title Journal of Experimental Biology
container_volume 214
description <jats:title>SUMMARY</jats:title><jats:p>The storage and recovery of elastic strain energy in the musculoskeletal systems of locomoting animals has been extensively studied, yet the external environment represents a second potentially useful energy store that has often been neglected. Recent studies have highlighted the ability of orangutans to usefully recover energy from swaying trees to minimise the cost of gap crossing. Although mechanically similar mechanisms have been hypothesised for wild leaping primates, to date no such energy recovery mechanisms have been demonstrated biomechanically in leapers. We used a setup consisting of a forceplate and two high-speed video cameras to conduct a biomechanical analysis of captive gibbons leaping from stiff and compliant poles. We found that the gibbons minimised pole deflection by using different leaping strategies. Two leap types were used: slower orthograde leaps and more rapid pronograde leaps. The slower leaps used a wider hip joint excursion to negate the downward movement of the pole, using more impulse to power the leap, but with no increase in work done on the centre of mass. Greater hip excursion also minimised the effective leap distance during orthograde leaps. The more rapid leaps conversely applied peak force earlier in stance where the pole was effectively stiffer, minimising deflection and potential energy loss. Neither leap type appeared to usefully recover energy from the pole to increase leap performance, but the gibbons demonstrated an ability to best adapt their leap biomechanics to counter the negative effects of the compliant pole.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1242/jeb.046797
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Biologie, Geographie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI0Mi9qZWIuMDQ2Nzk3
imprint The Company of Biologists, 2011
imprint_str_mv The Company of Biologists, 2011
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 1477-9145, 0022-0949
issn_str_mv 1477-9145, 0022-0949
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:06:45.123Z
match_str channon2011theeffectofsubstratecomplianceonthebiomechanicsofgibbonleaps
mega_collection The Company of Biologists (CrossRef)
physical 687-696
publishDate 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher The Company of Biologists
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Experimental Biology
source_id 49
spelling Channon, Anthony J. Günther, Michael M. Crompton, Robin H. D'Août, Kristiaan Preuschoft, Holger Vereecke, Evie E. 1477-9145 0022-0949 The Company of Biologists Insect Science Molecular Biology Animal Science and Zoology Aquatic Science Physiology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.046797 <jats:title>SUMMARY</jats:title><jats:p>The storage and recovery of elastic strain energy in the musculoskeletal systems of locomoting animals has been extensively studied, yet the external environment represents a second potentially useful energy store that has often been neglected. Recent studies have highlighted the ability of orangutans to usefully recover energy from swaying trees to minimise the cost of gap crossing. Although mechanically similar mechanisms have been hypothesised for wild leaping primates, to date no such energy recovery mechanisms have been demonstrated biomechanically in leapers. We used a setup consisting of a forceplate and two high-speed video cameras to conduct a biomechanical analysis of captive gibbons leaping from stiff and compliant poles. We found that the gibbons minimised pole deflection by using different leaping strategies. Two leap types were used: slower orthograde leaps and more rapid pronograde leaps. The slower leaps used a wider hip joint excursion to negate the downward movement of the pole, using more impulse to power the leap, but with no increase in work done on the centre of mass. Greater hip excursion also minimised the effective leap distance during orthograde leaps. The more rapid leaps conversely applied peak force earlier in stance where the pole was effectively stiffer, minimising deflection and potential energy loss. Neither leap type appeared to usefully recover energy from the pole to increase leap performance, but the gibbons demonstrated an ability to best adapt their leap biomechanics to counter the negative effects of the compliant pole.</jats:p> The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps Journal of Experimental Biology
spellingShingle Channon, Anthony J., Günther, Michael M., Crompton, Robin H., D'Août, Kristiaan, Preuschoft, Holger, Vereecke, Evie E., Journal of Experimental Biology, The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps, Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Aquatic Science, Physiology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
title The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_full The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_fullStr The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_full_unstemmed The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_short The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_sort the effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
title_unstemmed The effect of substrate compliance on the biomechanics of gibbon leaps
topic Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Aquatic Science, Physiology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.046797