author_facet Scholten, Nadine
Ohnhaeuser, Tim
Schellartz, Isabell
von Gersdorff, Gero
Hellmich, Martin
Karbach, Ute
Pfaff, Holger
Samel, Christina
Stock, Stephanie
Rascher, Katherine
Mettang, Thomas
Scholten, Nadine
Ohnhaeuser, Tim
Schellartz, Isabell
von Gersdorff, Gero
Hellmich, Martin
Karbach, Ute
Pfaff, Holger
Samel, Christina
Stock, Stephanie
Rascher, Katherine
Mettang, Thomas
author Scholten, Nadine
Ohnhaeuser, Tim
Schellartz, Isabell
von Gersdorff, Gero
Hellmich, Martin
Karbach, Ute
Pfaff, Holger
Samel, Christina
Stock, Stephanie
Rascher, Katherine
Mettang, Thomas
spellingShingle Scholten, Nadine
Ohnhaeuser, Tim
Schellartz, Isabell
von Gersdorff, Gero
Hellmich, Martin
Karbach, Ute
Pfaff, Holger
Samel, Christina
Stock, Stephanie
Rascher, Katherine
Mettang, Thomas
BMJ Open
Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
General Medicine
author_sort scholten, nadine
spelling Scholten, Nadine Ohnhaeuser, Tim Schellartz, Isabell von Gersdorff, Gero Hellmich, Martin Karbach, Ute Pfaff, Holger Samel, Christina Stock, Stephanie Rascher, Katherine Mettang, Thomas 2044-6055 2044-6055 BMJ General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025451 <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Patients with end-stage kidney failure can be treated either by transplant or by dialysis, which can be administered as haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although they are equivalent therapeutic options in terms of mortality, the percentage of patients in Germany treated with PD is currently very low (∼6%) compared with other countries. The aim of our study is to analyse the factors behind this percentage and their relevance to the choice of dialysis treatment in Germany. This includes analyses of regional disparities in the provision of care for dialysis patients as well as the evaluations of costs and the influence of reimbursement structures. This approach should provide further insights to explain the variation in the usage of PD and HD and will help to define starting points for future interventions.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and analysis</jats:title><jats:p>A mixed-methods approach will be applied to several data sources, including administrative data (ambulatory physicians’ claim data, statutory health insurance claim data), quality assurance data from one of the largest German dialysis providers Kuratorium für Dialyse (KfH) and qualitative and quantitative survey data (patients, nephrologists and dialysis nurses). Qualitative data will be analysed content-analytically. Based on the quantitative data, multivariable analyses will be performed and, where possible, hierarchical models will be tested. This multidimensional approach will enable us to account for the different factors influencing the penetration of PD in Germany.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Ethics and dissemination</jats:title><jats:p>Ethics approval (17-299) has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne on 25 April 2018. National and international dissemination will be accomplished by informing healthcare practitioners, patients and professional organisations and other stakeholders via conferences, scientific and non-scientific publications and seminars.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>DRKS00012555; Pre-Results.</jats:p></jats:sec> Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol BMJ Open
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025451
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTgtMDI1NDUx
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTgtMDI1NDUx
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint BMJ, 2019
imprint_str_mv BMJ, 2019
issn 2044-6055
issn_str_mv 2044-6055
language English
mega_collection BMJ (CrossRef)
match_str scholten2019multidimensionalanalysisoffactorsresponsibleforthelowprevalenceofambulatoryperitonealdialysisingermanymaupdacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudyprotocol
publishDateSort 2019
publisher BMJ
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series BMJ Open
source_id 49
title Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_unstemmed Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_full Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_fullStr Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_short Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_sort multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in germany (mau-pd): a cross-sectional mixed-methods study protocol
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025451
publishDate 2019
physical e025451
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Patients with end-stage kidney failure can be treated either by transplant or by dialysis, which can be administered as haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although they are equivalent therapeutic options in terms of mortality, the percentage of patients in Germany treated with PD is currently very low (∼6%) compared with other countries. The aim of our study is to analyse the factors behind this percentage and their relevance to the choice of dialysis treatment in Germany. This includes analyses of regional disparities in the provision of care for dialysis patients as well as the evaluations of costs and the influence of reimbursement structures. This approach should provide further insights to explain the variation in the usage of PD and HD and will help to define starting points for future interventions.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and analysis</jats:title><jats:p>A mixed-methods approach will be applied to several data sources, including administrative data (ambulatory physicians’ claim data, statutory health insurance claim data), quality assurance data from one of the largest German dialysis providers Kuratorium für Dialyse (KfH) and qualitative and quantitative survey data (patients, nephrologists and dialysis nurses). Qualitative data will be analysed content-analytically. Based on the quantitative data, multivariable analyses will be performed and, where possible, hierarchical models will be tested. This multidimensional approach will enable us to account for the different factors influencing the penetration of PD in Germany.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Ethics and dissemination</jats:title><jats:p>Ethics approval (17-299) has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne on 25 April 2018. National and international dissemination will be accomplished by informing healthcare practitioners, patients and professional organisations and other stakeholders via conferences, scientific and non-scientific publications and seminars.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>DRKS00012555; Pre-Results.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 0
container_title BMJ Open
container_volume 9
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792332813527154697
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:02:50.698Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Multidimensional+analysis+of+factors+responsible+for+the+low+prevalence+of+ambulatory+peritoneal+dialysis+in+Germany+%28MAU-PD%29%3A+a+cross-sectional+Mixed-Methods+Study+Protocol&rft.date=2019-04-01&genre=article&issn=2044-6055&volume=9&issue=4&pages=e025451&jtitle=BMJ+Open&atitle=Multidimensional+analysis+of+factors+responsible+for+the+low+prevalence+of+ambulatory+peritoneal+dialysis+in+Germany+%28MAU-PD%29%3A+a+cross-sectional+Mixed-Methods+Study+Protocol&aulast=Mettang&aufirst=Thomas&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1136%2Fbmjopen-2018-025451&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792332813527154697
author Scholten, Nadine, Ohnhaeuser, Tim, Schellartz, Isabell, von Gersdorff, Gero, Hellmich, Martin, Karbach, Ute, Pfaff, Holger, Samel, Christina, Stock, Stephanie, Rascher, Katherine, Mettang, Thomas
author_facet Scholten, Nadine, Ohnhaeuser, Tim, Schellartz, Isabell, von Gersdorff, Gero, Hellmich, Martin, Karbach, Ute, Pfaff, Holger, Samel, Christina, Stock, Stephanie, Rascher, Katherine, Mettang, Thomas, Scholten, Nadine, Ohnhaeuser, Tim, Schellartz, Isabell, von Gersdorff, Gero, Hellmich, Martin, Karbach, Ute, Pfaff, Holger, Samel, Christina, Stock, Stephanie, Rascher, Katherine, Mettang, Thomas
author_sort scholten, nadine
container_issue 4
container_start_page 0
container_title BMJ Open
container_volume 9
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Patients with end-stage kidney failure can be treated either by transplant or by dialysis, which can be administered as haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although they are equivalent therapeutic options in terms of mortality, the percentage of patients in Germany treated with PD is currently very low (∼6%) compared with other countries. The aim of our study is to analyse the factors behind this percentage and their relevance to the choice of dialysis treatment in Germany. This includes analyses of regional disparities in the provision of care for dialysis patients as well as the evaluations of costs and the influence of reimbursement structures. This approach should provide further insights to explain the variation in the usage of PD and HD and will help to define starting points for future interventions.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and analysis</jats:title><jats:p>A mixed-methods approach will be applied to several data sources, including administrative data (ambulatory physicians’ claim data, statutory health insurance claim data), quality assurance data from one of the largest German dialysis providers Kuratorium für Dialyse (KfH) and qualitative and quantitative survey data (patients, nephrologists and dialysis nurses). Qualitative data will be analysed content-analytically. Based on the quantitative data, multivariable analyses will be performed and, where possible, hierarchical models will be tested. This multidimensional approach will enable us to account for the different factors influencing the penetration of PD in Germany.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Ethics and dissemination</jats:title><jats:p>Ethics approval (17-299) has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne on 25 April 2018. National and international dissemination will be accomplished by informing healthcare practitioners, patients and professional organisations and other stakeholders via conferences, scientific and non-scientific publications and seminars.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>DRKS00012555; Pre-Results.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025451
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTgtMDI1NDUx
imprint BMJ, 2019
imprint_str_mv BMJ, 2019
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 2044-6055
issn_str_mv 2044-6055
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:02:50.698Z
match_str scholten2019multidimensionalanalysisoffactorsresponsibleforthelowprevalenceofambulatoryperitonealdialysisingermanymaupdacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudyprotocol
mega_collection BMJ (CrossRef)
physical e025451
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher BMJ
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series BMJ Open
source_id 49
spelling Scholten, Nadine Ohnhaeuser, Tim Schellartz, Isabell von Gersdorff, Gero Hellmich, Martin Karbach, Ute Pfaff, Holger Samel, Christina Stock, Stephanie Rascher, Katherine Mettang, Thomas 2044-6055 2044-6055 BMJ General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025451 <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Patients with end-stage kidney failure can be treated either by transplant or by dialysis, which can be administered as haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although they are equivalent therapeutic options in terms of mortality, the percentage of patients in Germany treated with PD is currently very low (∼6%) compared with other countries. The aim of our study is to analyse the factors behind this percentage and their relevance to the choice of dialysis treatment in Germany. This includes analyses of regional disparities in the provision of care for dialysis patients as well as the evaluations of costs and the influence of reimbursement structures. This approach should provide further insights to explain the variation in the usage of PD and HD and will help to define starting points for future interventions.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and analysis</jats:title><jats:p>A mixed-methods approach will be applied to several data sources, including administrative data (ambulatory physicians’ claim data, statutory health insurance claim data), quality assurance data from one of the largest German dialysis providers Kuratorium für Dialyse (KfH) and qualitative and quantitative survey data (patients, nephrologists and dialysis nurses). Qualitative data will be analysed content-analytically. Based on the quantitative data, multivariable analyses will be performed and, where possible, hierarchical models will be tested. This multidimensional approach will enable us to account for the different factors influencing the penetration of PD in Germany.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Ethics and dissemination</jats:title><jats:p>Ethics approval (17-299) has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne on 25 April 2018. National and international dissemination will be accomplished by informing healthcare practitioners, patients and professional organisations and other stakeholders via conferences, scientific and non-scientific publications and seminars.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>DRKS00012555; Pre-Results.</jats:p></jats:sec> Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol BMJ Open
spellingShingle Scholten, Nadine, Ohnhaeuser, Tim, Schellartz, Isabell, von Gersdorff, Gero, Hellmich, Martin, Karbach, Ute, Pfaff, Holger, Samel, Christina, Stock, Stephanie, Rascher, Katherine, Mettang, Thomas, BMJ Open, Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol, General Medicine
title Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_full Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_fullStr Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_short Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
title_sort multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in germany (mau-pd): a cross-sectional mixed-methods study protocol
title_unstemmed Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025451