author_facet Procházka, Vít
Klugar, Miloslav
Bachanova, Veronika
Klugarová, Jitka
Tučková, Dagmar
Papajík, Tomáš
Procházka, Vít
Klugar, Miloslav
Bachanova, Veronika
Klugarová, Jitka
Tučková, Dagmar
Papajík, Tomáš
author Procházka, Vít
Klugar, Miloslav
Bachanova, Veronika
Klugarová, Jitka
Tučková, Dagmar
Papajík, Tomáš
spellingShingle Procházka, Vít
Klugar, Miloslav
Bachanova, Veronika
Klugarová, Jitka
Tučková, Dagmar
Papajík, Tomáš
BMJ Open
Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
General Medicine
author_sort procházka, vít
spelling Procházka, Vít Klugar, Miloslav Bachanova, Veronika Klugarová, Jitka Tučková, Dagmar Papajík, Tomáš 2044-6055 2044-6055 BMJ General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011729 Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy BMJ Open
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011729
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTYtMDExNzI5
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTYtMDExNzI5
institution DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
imprint BMJ, 2016
imprint_str_mv BMJ, 2016
issn 2044-6055
issn_str_mv 2044-6055
language English
mega_collection BMJ (CrossRef)
match_str prochazka2016comparingtheaccuracyofquantitativeversusqualitativeanalysesofinterimpettoprognosticatehodgkinlymphomaasystematicreviewprotocolofdiagnostictestaccuracy
publishDateSort 2016
publisher BMJ
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series BMJ Open
source_id 49
title Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_unstemmed Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_fullStr Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_short Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_sort comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim pet to prognosticate hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011729
publishDate 2016
physical e011729
description
container_issue 8
container_start_page 0
container_title BMJ Open
container_volume 6
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792328499553370124
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:54:16.5Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Comparing+the+accuracy+of+quantitative+versus+qualitative+analyses+of+interim+PET+to+prognosticate+Hodgkin+lymphoma%3A+a+systematic+review+protocol+of+diagnostic+test+accuracy&rft.date=2016-08-01&genre=article&issn=2044-6055&volume=6&issue=8&pages=e011729&jtitle=BMJ+Open&atitle=Comparing+the+accuracy+of+quantitative+versus+qualitative+analyses+of+interim+PET+to+prognosticate+Hodgkin+lymphoma%3A+a+systematic+review+protocol+of+diagnostic+test+accuracy&aulast=Papaj%C3%ADk&aufirst=Tom%C3%A1%C5%A1&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1136%2Fbmjopen-2016-011729&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792328499553370124
author Procházka, Vít, Klugar, Miloslav, Bachanova, Veronika, Klugarová, Jitka, Tučková, Dagmar, Papajík, Tomáš
author_facet Procházka, Vít, Klugar, Miloslav, Bachanova, Veronika, Klugarová, Jitka, Tučková, Dagmar, Papajík, Tomáš, Procházka, Vít, Klugar, Miloslav, Bachanova, Veronika, Klugarová, Jitka, Tučková, Dagmar, Papajík, Tomáš
author_sort procházka, vít
container_issue 8
container_start_page 0
container_title BMJ Open
container_volume 6
description
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011729
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTYtMDExNzI5
imprint BMJ, 2016
imprint_str_mv BMJ, 2016
institution DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4
issn 2044-6055
issn_str_mv 2044-6055
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:54:16.5Z
match_str prochazka2016comparingtheaccuracyofquantitativeversusqualitativeanalysesofinterimpettoprognosticatehodgkinlymphomaasystematicreviewprotocolofdiagnostictestaccuracy
mega_collection BMJ (CrossRef)
physical e011729
publishDate 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher BMJ
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series BMJ Open
source_id 49
spelling Procházka, Vít Klugar, Miloslav Bachanova, Veronika Klugarová, Jitka Tučková, Dagmar Papajík, Tomáš 2044-6055 2044-6055 BMJ General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011729 Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy BMJ Open
spellingShingle Procházka, Vít, Klugar, Miloslav, Bachanova, Veronika, Klugarová, Jitka, Tučková, Dagmar, Papajík, Tomáš, BMJ Open, Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy, General Medicine
title Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_fullStr Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_short Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_sort comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim pet to prognosticate hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
title_unstemmed Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011729