Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | BMJ Global Health |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | BMJ Global Health, 3, 2018, Suppl 1, S. e000609 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
BMJ
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Skevington, Suzanne M Epton, Tracy Skevington, Suzanne M Epton, Tracy |
|---|---|
| author |
Skevington, Suzanne M Epton, Tracy |
| spellingShingle |
Skevington, Suzanne M Epton, Tracy BMJ Global Health How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Health Policy |
| author_sort |
skevington, suzanne m |
| spelling |
Skevington, Suzanne M Epton, Tracy 2059-7908 BMJ Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Health Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000609 <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2015 aim to ‘…promote well-being for all’, but this has raised questions about how its targets will be evaluated. A cross-cultural measure of subjective perspectives is needed to complement objective indicators in showing whether SDGs improve well-being. The WHOQOL-BREF offers a short, generic, subjective quality of life (QoL) measure, developed with lay people in 15 cultures worldwide; 25 important dimensions are scored in environmental, social, physical and psychological domains. Although validity and reliability are demonstrated, clarity is needed on whether scores respond sensitively to changes induced by treatments, interventions and major life events. We address this aim.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The WHOQOL-BREF responsiveness literature was systematically searched (Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE and Medline). From 117 papers, 15 (24 studies) (n=2084) were included in a meta-analysis. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) assessed whether domain scores changed significantly during interventions/events, and whether such changes are relevant and meaningful to managing clinical and social change.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Scores changed significantly over time on all domains: small to moderate for physical (d=0.37; CI 0.25 to 0.49) and psychological QoL (d=0.22; CI 0.14 to 0.30), and small for social (d=0.10; CI 0.05 to 0.15) and environmental QoL (d=0.12; CI 0.06 to 0.18). More importantly, effect size was significant for every domain (p<0.001), indicating clinically relevant change, even when differences are small. Domains remained equally responsive regardless of sample age, gender and evaluation interval.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>International evidence from 11 cultures shows that all WHOQOL-BREF domains detect relevant, meaningful change, indicating its suitability to assess SDG well-being targets.</jats:p></jats:sec> How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change BMJ Global Health |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000609 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpnaC0yMDE3LTAwMDYwOQ |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpnaC0yMDE3LTAwMDYwOQ |
| institution |
DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 |
| imprint |
BMJ, 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv |
BMJ, 2018 |
| issn |
2059-7908 |
| issn_str_mv |
2059-7908 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
BMJ (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
skevington2018howwillthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsdeliverchangesinwellbeingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoinvestigatewhetherwhoqolbrefscoresrespondtochange |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| publisher |
BMJ |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
BMJ Global Health |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_unstemmed |
How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_full |
How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_fullStr |
How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_full_unstemmed |
How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_short |
How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_sort |
how will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether whoqol-bref scores respond to change |
| topic |
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Health Policy |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000609 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| physical |
e000609 |
| description |
<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2015 aim to ‘…promote well-being for all’, but this has raised questions about how its targets will be evaluated. A cross-cultural measure of subjective perspectives is needed to complement objective indicators in showing whether SDGs improve well-being. The WHOQOL-BREF offers a short, generic, subjective quality of life (QoL) measure, developed with lay people in 15 cultures worldwide; 25 important dimensions are scored in environmental, social, physical and psychological domains. Although validity and reliability are demonstrated, clarity is needed on whether scores respond sensitively to changes induced by treatments, interventions and major life events. We address this aim.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The WHOQOL-BREF responsiveness literature was systematically searched (Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE and Medline). From 117 papers, 15 (24 studies) (n=2084) were included in a meta-analysis. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) assessed whether domain scores changed significantly during interventions/events, and whether such changes are relevant and meaningful to managing clinical and social change.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Scores changed significantly over time on all domains: small to moderate for physical (d=0.37; CI 0.25 to 0.49) and psychological QoL (d=0.22; CI 0.14 to 0.30), and small for social (d=0.10; CI 0.05 to 0.15) and environmental QoL (d=0.12; CI 0.06 to 0.18). More importantly, effect size was significant for every domain (p<0.001), indicating clinically relevant change, even when differences are small. Domains remained equally responsive regardless of sample age, gender and evaluation interval.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>International evidence from 11 cultures shows that all WHOQOL-BREF domains detect relevant, meaningful change, indicating its suitability to assess SDG well-being targets.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| container_issue |
Suppl 1 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
BMJ Global Health |
| container_volume |
3 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792342171649572874 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:31:34.598Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=How+will+the+sustainable+development+goals+deliver+changes+in+well-being%3F+A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis+to+investigate+whether+WHOQOL-BREF+scores+respond+to+change&rft.date=2018-01-01&genre=article&issn=2059-7908&volume=3&issue=Suppl+1&pages=e000609&jtitle=BMJ+Global+Health&atitle=How+will+the+sustainable+development+goals+deliver+changes+in+well-being%3F+A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis+to+investigate+whether+WHOQOL-BREF+scores+respond+to+change&aulast=Epton&aufirst=Tracy&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1136%2Fbmjgh-2017-000609&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792342171649572874 |
| author | Skevington, Suzanne M, Epton, Tracy |
| author_facet | Skevington, Suzanne M, Epton, Tracy, Skevington, Suzanne M, Epton, Tracy |
| author_sort | skevington, suzanne m |
| container_issue | Suppl 1 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | BMJ Global Health |
| container_volume | 3 |
| description | <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2015 aim to ‘…promote well-being for all’, but this has raised questions about how its targets will be evaluated. A cross-cultural measure of subjective perspectives is needed to complement objective indicators in showing whether SDGs improve well-being. The WHOQOL-BREF offers a short, generic, subjective quality of life (QoL) measure, developed with lay people in 15 cultures worldwide; 25 important dimensions are scored in environmental, social, physical and psychological domains. Although validity and reliability are demonstrated, clarity is needed on whether scores respond sensitively to changes induced by treatments, interventions and major life events. We address this aim.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The WHOQOL-BREF responsiveness literature was systematically searched (Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE and Medline). From 117 papers, 15 (24 studies) (n=2084) were included in a meta-analysis. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) assessed whether domain scores changed significantly during interventions/events, and whether such changes are relevant and meaningful to managing clinical and social change.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Scores changed significantly over time on all domains: small to moderate for physical (d=0.37; CI 0.25 to 0.49) and psychological QoL (d=0.22; CI 0.14 to 0.30), and small for social (d=0.10; CI 0.05 to 0.15) and environmental QoL (d=0.12; CI 0.06 to 0.18). More importantly, effect size was significant for every domain (p<0.001), indicating clinically relevant change, even when differences are small. Domains remained equally responsive regardless of sample age, gender and evaluation interval.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>International evidence from 11 cultures shows that all WHOQOL-BREF domains detect relevant, meaningful change, indicating its suitability to assess SDG well-being targets.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000609 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpnaC0yMDE3LTAwMDYwOQ |
| imprint | BMJ, 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv | BMJ, 2018 |
| institution | DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1 |
| issn | 2059-7908 |
| issn_str_mv | 2059-7908 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:31:34.598Z |
| match_str | skevington2018howwillthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsdeliverchangesinwellbeingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoinvestigatewhetherwhoqolbrefscoresrespondtochange |
| mega_collection | BMJ (CrossRef) |
| physical | e000609 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | BMJ |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | BMJ Global Health |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Skevington, Suzanne M Epton, Tracy 2059-7908 BMJ Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Health Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000609 <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2015 aim to ‘…promote well-being for all’, but this has raised questions about how its targets will be evaluated. A cross-cultural measure of subjective perspectives is needed to complement objective indicators in showing whether SDGs improve well-being. The WHOQOL-BREF offers a short, generic, subjective quality of life (QoL) measure, developed with lay people in 15 cultures worldwide; 25 important dimensions are scored in environmental, social, physical and psychological domains. Although validity and reliability are demonstrated, clarity is needed on whether scores respond sensitively to changes induced by treatments, interventions and major life events. We address this aim.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The WHOQOL-BREF responsiveness literature was systematically searched (Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE and Medline). From 117 papers, 15 (24 studies) (n=2084) were included in a meta-analysis. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) assessed whether domain scores changed significantly during interventions/events, and whether such changes are relevant and meaningful to managing clinical and social change.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Scores changed significantly over time on all domains: small to moderate for physical (d=0.37; CI 0.25 to 0.49) and psychological QoL (d=0.22; CI 0.14 to 0.30), and small for social (d=0.10; CI 0.05 to 0.15) and environmental QoL (d=0.12; CI 0.06 to 0.18). More importantly, effect size was significant for every domain (p<0.001), indicating clinically relevant change, even when differences are small. Domains remained equally responsive regardless of sample age, gender and evaluation interval.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>International evidence from 11 cultures shows that all WHOQOL-BREF domains detect relevant, meaningful change, indicating its suitability to assess SDG well-being targets.</jats:p></jats:sec> How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change BMJ Global Health |
| spellingShingle | Skevington, Suzanne M, Epton, Tracy, BMJ Global Health, How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Policy |
| title | How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_full | How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_fullStr | How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_full_unstemmed | How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_short | How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| title_sort | how will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether whoqol-bref scores respond to change |
| title_unstemmed | How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change |
| topic | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Policy |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000609 |