Eintrag weiter verarbeiten

Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.: National Cancer Institute fund...

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Zeitschriftentitel: Science
Personen und Körperschaften: Rauscher, Frank J.
In: Science, 184, 1974, 4139, S. 871-875
Format: E-Article
Sprache: Englisch
veröffentlicht:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Schlagwörter:
author_facet Rauscher, Frank J.
Rauscher, Frank J.
author Rauscher, Frank J.
spellingShingle Rauscher, Frank J.
Science
Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
Multidisciplinary
author_sort rauscher, frank j.
spelling Rauscher, Frank J. 0036-8075 1095-9203 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Multidisciplinary http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.871 <jats:p>The budget picture for the NCI is presented for your information and evaluation-evaluation in the sense that I need and would appreciate your comments. A major issue of course is balance, in terms of clinic versus laboratory; short-term versus long-term; academic versus commercial; targeted versus nontargeted; grants versus contracts versus intramural; national versus international, and the like. It must be recognized that within a program of this emotion, visibility, and importance scientific findings and other considerations will dictate changes on at least a monthly basis. Things other than science contribute to this balance. On any given day we live within the impact of at least three budget years (what we received and did last year, what we will receive and do this year, and what this will allow us to receive and do next year). The federal budgetary process as well as the priority-setting processes of science are such that new directions cannot be taken as quickly as would be optimal.</jats:p> <jats:p>Priorities must be set in cancer at least in their broad sense; for in addition to other areas of biomedical research, there are other compelling demands for the limited federal dollar. There will never be enough resources to do all that can be done or needs to be done in cancer research. That probably is as it should be. In this regard it is heartening that operating funds for the institutes at NIH other than NCI will increase by $264 million in 1974. It is as true that information from research in other disciplines and categorical diseases will provide leads to cancer, as well as the reverse. And certainly, virtually no one wants to see resources for cancer increased at the expense of other important tasks and opportunities.</jats:p> <jats:p> This article is not an attempt to justify or to defend the spending plan of the National Cancer Program. It is to let you know what's going on and to seek further advice on how to do it better. Articles on other aspects of the program will be published in journals including <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , <jats:italic>Cancer Research</jats:italic> , and the <jats:italic>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jats:italic> . </jats:p> National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Science
doi_str_mv 10.1126/science.184.4139.871
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyNi9zY2llbmNlLjE4NC40MTM5Ljg3MQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyNi9zY2llbmNlLjE4NC40MTM5Ljg3MQ
institution DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
imprint American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1974
imprint_str_mv American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1974
issn 0036-8075
1095-9203
issn_str_mv 0036-8075
1095-9203
language English
mega_collection American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (CrossRef)
match_str rauscher1974budgetandthenationalcancerprogramnationalcancerinstitutefundingthroughgrantsandcontractsfor1972to1974ispresentedanddiscussednationalcancerinstitutefundingthroughgrantsandcontractsfor1972to1974ispresentedanddiscussed
publishDateSort 1974
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Science
source_id 49
title_sub National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_unstemmed Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_full Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_fullStr Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_full_unstemmed Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_short Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_sort budget and the national cancer program : national cancer institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
topic Multidisciplinary
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.871
publishDate 1974
physical 871-875
description <jats:p>The budget picture for the NCI is presented for your information and evaluation-evaluation in the sense that I need and would appreciate your comments. A major issue of course is balance, in terms of clinic versus laboratory; short-term versus long-term; academic versus commercial; targeted versus nontargeted; grants versus contracts versus intramural; national versus international, and the like. It must be recognized that within a program of this emotion, visibility, and importance scientific findings and other considerations will dictate changes on at least a monthly basis. Things other than science contribute to this balance. On any given day we live within the impact of at least three budget years (what we received and did last year, what we will receive and do this year, and what this will allow us to receive and do next year). The federal budgetary process as well as the priority-setting processes of science are such that new directions cannot be taken as quickly as would be optimal.</jats:p> <jats:p>Priorities must be set in cancer at least in their broad sense; for in addition to other areas of biomedical research, there are other compelling demands for the limited federal dollar. There will never be enough resources to do all that can be done or needs to be done in cancer research. That probably is as it should be. In this regard it is heartening that operating funds for the institutes at NIH other than NCI will increase by $264 million in 1974. It is as true that information from research in other disciplines and categorical diseases will provide leads to cancer, as well as the reverse. And certainly, virtually no one wants to see resources for cancer increased at the expense of other important tasks and opportunities.</jats:p> <jats:p> This article is not an attempt to justify or to defend the spending plan of the National Cancer Program. It is to let you know what's going on and to seek further advice on how to do it better. Articles on other aspects of the program will be published in journals including <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , <jats:italic>Cancer Research</jats:italic> , and the <jats:italic>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jats:italic> . </jats:p>
container_issue 4139
container_start_page 871
container_title Science
container_volume 184
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343173008195593
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:47:00.388Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Budget+and+the+National+Cancer+Program+%3A+National+Cancer+Institute+funding+through+grants+and+contracts+for+1972+to+1974+is+presented+and+discussed.&rft.date=1974-05-24&genre=article&issn=1095-9203&volume=184&issue=4139&spage=871&epage=875&pages=871-875&jtitle=Science&atitle=Budget+and+the+National+Cancer+Program+%3A+National+Cancer+Institute+funding+through+grants+and+contracts+for+1972+to+1974+is+presented+and+discussed.&aulast=Rauscher&aufirst=Frank+J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1126%2Fscience.184.4139.871&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792343173008195593
author Rauscher, Frank J.
author_facet Rauscher, Frank J., Rauscher, Frank J.
author_sort rauscher, frank j.
container_issue 4139
container_start_page 871
container_title Science
container_volume 184
description <jats:p>The budget picture for the NCI is presented for your information and evaluation-evaluation in the sense that I need and would appreciate your comments. A major issue of course is balance, in terms of clinic versus laboratory; short-term versus long-term; academic versus commercial; targeted versus nontargeted; grants versus contracts versus intramural; national versus international, and the like. It must be recognized that within a program of this emotion, visibility, and importance scientific findings and other considerations will dictate changes on at least a monthly basis. Things other than science contribute to this balance. On any given day we live within the impact of at least three budget years (what we received and did last year, what we will receive and do this year, and what this will allow us to receive and do next year). The federal budgetary process as well as the priority-setting processes of science are such that new directions cannot be taken as quickly as would be optimal.</jats:p> <jats:p>Priorities must be set in cancer at least in their broad sense; for in addition to other areas of biomedical research, there are other compelling demands for the limited federal dollar. There will never be enough resources to do all that can be done or needs to be done in cancer research. That probably is as it should be. In this regard it is heartening that operating funds for the institutes at NIH other than NCI will increase by $264 million in 1974. It is as true that information from research in other disciplines and categorical diseases will provide leads to cancer, as well as the reverse. And certainly, virtually no one wants to see resources for cancer increased at the expense of other important tasks and opportunities.</jats:p> <jats:p> This article is not an attempt to justify or to defend the spending plan of the National Cancer Program. It is to let you know what's going on and to seek further advice on how to do it better. Articles on other aspects of the program will be published in journals including <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , <jats:italic>Cancer Research</jats:italic> , and the <jats:italic>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jats:italic> . </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1126/science.184.4139.871
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyNi9zY2llbmNlLjE4NC40MTM5Ljg3MQ
imprint American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1974
imprint_str_mv American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1974
institution DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3
issn 0036-8075, 1095-9203
issn_str_mv 0036-8075, 1095-9203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:47:00.388Z
match_str rauscher1974budgetandthenationalcancerprogramnationalcancerinstitutefundingthroughgrantsandcontractsfor1972to1974ispresentedanddiscussednationalcancerinstitutefundingthroughgrantsandcontractsfor1972to1974ispresentedanddiscussed
mega_collection American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (CrossRef)
physical 871-875
publishDate 1974
publishDateSort 1974
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Science
source_id 49
spelling Rauscher, Frank J. 0036-8075 1095-9203 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Multidisciplinary http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.871 <jats:p>The budget picture for the NCI is presented for your information and evaluation-evaluation in the sense that I need and would appreciate your comments. A major issue of course is balance, in terms of clinic versus laboratory; short-term versus long-term; academic versus commercial; targeted versus nontargeted; grants versus contracts versus intramural; national versus international, and the like. It must be recognized that within a program of this emotion, visibility, and importance scientific findings and other considerations will dictate changes on at least a monthly basis. Things other than science contribute to this balance. On any given day we live within the impact of at least three budget years (what we received and did last year, what we will receive and do this year, and what this will allow us to receive and do next year). The federal budgetary process as well as the priority-setting processes of science are such that new directions cannot be taken as quickly as would be optimal.</jats:p> <jats:p>Priorities must be set in cancer at least in their broad sense; for in addition to other areas of biomedical research, there are other compelling demands for the limited federal dollar. There will never be enough resources to do all that can be done or needs to be done in cancer research. That probably is as it should be. In this regard it is heartening that operating funds for the institutes at NIH other than NCI will increase by $264 million in 1974. It is as true that information from research in other disciplines and categorical diseases will provide leads to cancer, as well as the reverse. And certainly, virtually no one wants to see resources for cancer increased at the expense of other important tasks and opportunities.</jats:p> <jats:p> This article is not an attempt to justify or to defend the spending plan of the National Cancer Program. It is to let you know what's going on and to seek further advice on how to do it better. Articles on other aspects of the program will be published in journals including <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , <jats:italic>Cancer Research</jats:italic> , and the <jats:italic>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jats:italic> . </jats:p> National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Science
spellingShingle Rauscher, Frank J., Science, Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed., Multidisciplinary
title Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_full Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_fullStr Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_full_unstemmed Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_short Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_sort budget and the national cancer program : national cancer institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_sub National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
title_unstemmed Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.
topic Multidisciplinary
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.871