Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed.: National Cancer Institute fund...
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Science |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Science, 184, 1974, 4139, S. 871-875 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Rauscher, Frank J. Rauscher, Frank J. |
---|---|
author |
Rauscher, Frank J. |
spellingShingle |
Rauscher, Frank J. Science Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Multidisciplinary |
author_sort |
rauscher, frank j. |
spelling |
Rauscher, Frank J. 0036-8075 1095-9203 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Multidisciplinary http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.871 <jats:p>The budget picture for the NCI is presented for your information and evaluation-evaluation in the sense that I need and would appreciate your comments. A major issue of course is balance, in terms of clinic versus laboratory; short-term versus long-term; academic versus commercial; targeted versus nontargeted; grants versus contracts versus intramural; national versus international, and the like. It must be recognized that within a program of this emotion, visibility, and importance scientific findings and other considerations will dictate changes on at least a monthly basis. Things other than science contribute to this balance. On any given day we live within the impact of at least three budget years (what we received and did last year, what we will receive and do this year, and what this will allow us to receive and do next year). The federal budgetary process as well as the priority-setting processes of science are such that new directions cannot be taken as quickly as would be optimal.</jats:p> <jats:p>Priorities must be set in cancer at least in their broad sense; for in addition to other areas of biomedical research, there are other compelling demands for the limited federal dollar. There will never be enough resources to do all that can be done or needs to be done in cancer research. That probably is as it should be. In this regard it is heartening that operating funds for the institutes at NIH other than NCI will increase by $264 million in 1974. It is as true that information from research in other disciplines and categorical diseases will provide leads to cancer, as well as the reverse. And certainly, virtually no one wants to see resources for cancer increased at the expense of other important tasks and opportunities.</jats:p> <jats:p> This article is not an attempt to justify or to defend the spending plan of the National Cancer Program. It is to let you know what's going on and to seek further advice on how to do it better. Articles on other aspects of the program will be published in journals including <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , <jats:italic>Cancer Research</jats:italic> , and the <jats:italic>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jats:italic> . </jats:p> National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Science |
doi_str_mv |
10.1126/science.184.4139.871 |
facet_avail |
Online |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyNi9zY2llbmNlLjE4NC40MTM5Ljg3MQ |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyNi9zY2llbmNlLjE4NC40MTM5Ljg3MQ |
institution |
DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 |
imprint |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1974 |
imprint_str_mv |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1974 |
issn |
0036-8075 1095-9203 |
issn_str_mv |
0036-8075 1095-9203 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
rauscher1974budgetandthenationalcancerprogramnationalcancerinstitutefundingthroughgrantsandcontractsfor1972to1974ispresentedanddiscussednationalcancerinstitutefundingthroughgrantsandcontractsfor1972to1974ispresentedanddiscussed |
publishDateSort |
1974 |
publisher |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Science |
source_id |
49 |
title_sub |
National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title |
Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_unstemmed |
Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_full |
Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_fullStr |
Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_short |
Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_sort |
budget and the national cancer program : national cancer institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
topic |
Multidisciplinary |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.871 |
publishDate |
1974 |
physical |
871-875 |
description |
<jats:p>The budget picture for the NCI is presented for your information and evaluation-evaluation in the sense that I need and would appreciate your comments. A major issue of course is balance, in terms of clinic versus laboratory; short-term versus long-term; academic versus commercial; targeted versus nontargeted; grants versus contracts versus intramural; national versus international, and the like. It must be recognized that within a program of this emotion, visibility, and importance scientific findings and other considerations will dictate changes on at least a monthly basis. Things other than science contribute to this balance. On any given day we live within the impact of at least three budget years (what we received and did last year, what we will receive and do this year, and what this will allow us to receive and do next year). The federal budgetary process as well as the priority-setting processes of science are such that new directions cannot be taken as quickly as would be optimal.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Priorities must be set in cancer at least in their broad sense; for in addition to other areas of biomedical research, there are other compelling demands for the limited federal dollar. There will never be enough resources to do all that can be done or needs to be done in cancer research. That probably is as it should be. In this regard it is heartening that operating funds for the institutes at NIH other than NCI will increase by $264 million in 1974. It is as true that information from research in other disciplines and categorical diseases will provide leads to cancer, as well as the reverse. And certainly, virtually no one wants to see resources for cancer increased at the expense of other important tasks and opportunities.</jats:p>
<jats:p>
This article is not an attempt to justify or to defend the spending plan of the National Cancer Program. It is to let you know what's going on and to seek further advice on how to do it better. Articles on other aspects of the program will be published in journals including
<jats:italic>Science</jats:italic>
,
<jats:italic>Cancer Research</jats:italic>
, and the
<jats:italic>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jats:italic>
.
</jats:p> |
container_issue |
4139 |
container_start_page |
871 |
container_title |
Science |
container_volume |
184 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792343173008195593 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:47:00.388Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Budget+and+the+National+Cancer+Program+%3A+National+Cancer+Institute+funding+through+grants+and+contracts+for+1972+to+1974+is+presented+and+discussed.&rft.date=1974-05-24&genre=article&issn=1095-9203&volume=184&issue=4139&spage=871&epage=875&pages=871-875&jtitle=Science&atitle=Budget+and+the+National+Cancer+Program+%3A+National+Cancer+Institute+funding+through+grants+and+contracts+for+1972+to+1974+is+presented+and+discussed.&aulast=Rauscher&aufirst=Frank+J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1126%2Fscience.184.4139.871&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792343173008195593 |
author | Rauscher, Frank J. |
author_facet | Rauscher, Frank J., Rauscher, Frank J. |
author_sort | rauscher, frank j. |
container_issue | 4139 |
container_start_page | 871 |
container_title | Science |
container_volume | 184 |
description | <jats:p>The budget picture for the NCI is presented for your information and evaluation-evaluation in the sense that I need and would appreciate your comments. A major issue of course is balance, in terms of clinic versus laboratory; short-term versus long-term; academic versus commercial; targeted versus nontargeted; grants versus contracts versus intramural; national versus international, and the like. It must be recognized that within a program of this emotion, visibility, and importance scientific findings and other considerations will dictate changes on at least a monthly basis. Things other than science contribute to this balance. On any given day we live within the impact of at least three budget years (what we received and did last year, what we will receive and do this year, and what this will allow us to receive and do next year). The federal budgetary process as well as the priority-setting processes of science are such that new directions cannot be taken as quickly as would be optimal.</jats:p> <jats:p>Priorities must be set in cancer at least in their broad sense; for in addition to other areas of biomedical research, there are other compelling demands for the limited federal dollar. There will never be enough resources to do all that can be done or needs to be done in cancer research. That probably is as it should be. In this regard it is heartening that operating funds for the institutes at NIH other than NCI will increase by $264 million in 1974. It is as true that information from research in other disciplines and categorical diseases will provide leads to cancer, as well as the reverse. And certainly, virtually no one wants to see resources for cancer increased at the expense of other important tasks and opportunities.</jats:p> <jats:p> This article is not an attempt to justify or to defend the spending plan of the National Cancer Program. It is to let you know what's going on and to seek further advice on how to do it better. Articles on other aspects of the program will be published in journals including <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , <jats:italic>Cancer Research</jats:italic> , and the <jats:italic>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jats:italic> . </jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1126/science.184.4139.871 |
facet_avail | Online |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyNi9zY2llbmNlLjE4NC40MTM5Ljg3MQ |
imprint | American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1974 |
imprint_str_mv | American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1974 |
institution | DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3 |
issn | 0036-8075, 1095-9203 |
issn_str_mv | 0036-8075, 1095-9203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:47:00.388Z |
match_str | rauscher1974budgetandthenationalcancerprogramnationalcancerinstitutefundingthroughgrantsandcontractsfor1972to1974ispresentedanddiscussednationalcancerinstitutefundingthroughgrantsandcontractsfor1972to1974ispresentedanddiscussed |
mega_collection | American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (CrossRef) |
physical | 871-875 |
publishDate | 1974 |
publishDateSort | 1974 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Science |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Rauscher, Frank J. 0036-8075 1095-9203 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Multidisciplinary http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.871 <jats:p>The budget picture for the NCI is presented for your information and evaluation-evaluation in the sense that I need and would appreciate your comments. A major issue of course is balance, in terms of clinic versus laboratory; short-term versus long-term; academic versus commercial; targeted versus nontargeted; grants versus contracts versus intramural; national versus international, and the like. It must be recognized that within a program of this emotion, visibility, and importance scientific findings and other considerations will dictate changes on at least a monthly basis. Things other than science contribute to this balance. On any given day we live within the impact of at least three budget years (what we received and did last year, what we will receive and do this year, and what this will allow us to receive and do next year). The federal budgetary process as well as the priority-setting processes of science are such that new directions cannot be taken as quickly as would be optimal.</jats:p> <jats:p>Priorities must be set in cancer at least in their broad sense; for in addition to other areas of biomedical research, there are other compelling demands for the limited federal dollar. There will never be enough resources to do all that can be done or needs to be done in cancer research. That probably is as it should be. In this regard it is heartening that operating funds for the institutes at NIH other than NCI will increase by $264 million in 1974. It is as true that information from research in other disciplines and categorical diseases will provide leads to cancer, as well as the reverse. And certainly, virtually no one wants to see resources for cancer increased at the expense of other important tasks and opportunities.</jats:p> <jats:p> This article is not an attempt to justify or to defend the spending plan of the National Cancer Program. It is to let you know what's going on and to seek further advice on how to do it better. Articles on other aspects of the program will be published in journals including <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , <jats:italic>Cancer Research</jats:italic> , and the <jats:italic>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jats:italic> . </jats:p> National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. Science |
spellingShingle | Rauscher, Frank J., Science, Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed., Multidisciplinary |
title | Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_full | Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_fullStr | Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_full_unstemmed | Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_short | Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_sort | budget and the national cancer program : national cancer institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_sub | National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
title_unstemmed | Budget and the National Cancer Program : National Cancer Institute funding through grants and contracts for 1972 to 1974 is presented and discussed. |
topic | Multidisciplinary |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.871 |