author_facet Grzetic, S
Hessler, J
Gupta, N
Woollard, J
DiCostanzo, D
Ayan, A
Carlson, M
Grzetic, S
Hessler, J
Gupta, N
Woollard, J
DiCostanzo, D
Ayan, A
Carlson, M
author Grzetic, S
Hessler, J
Gupta, N
Woollard, J
DiCostanzo, D
Ayan, A
Carlson, M
spellingShingle Grzetic, S
Hessler, J
Gupta, N
Woollard, J
DiCostanzo, D
Ayan, A
Carlson, M
Medical Physics
SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
General Medicine
author_sort grzetic, s
spelling Grzetic, S Hessler, J Gupta, N Woollard, J DiCostanzo, D Ayan, A Carlson, M 0094-2405 2473-4209 Wiley General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4924572 <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose:</jats:title><jats:p>To develop an independent software tool to assist in commissioning linacs with enhanced beam conformance, as well as perform ongoing QA for dosimetrically equivalent linacs.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Linac manufacturers offer enhanced beam conformance as an option to allow for clinics to complete commissioning efficiently, as well as implement dosimetrically equivalent linacs. The specification for enhanced conformance includes PDD as well as profiles within 80% FWHM. Recently, we commissioned seven Varian TrueBeam linacs with enhanced beam conformance. We developed a software tool in Visual Basic to allow us to load the reference beam data and compare our beam data during commissioning to evaluate enhanced beam conformance. This tool also allowed us to upload our beam data used for commissioning our dosimetrically equivalent beam models to compare and tweak each of our linac beams to match our modelled data in Varian's Eclipse TPS. This tool will also be used during annual QA of the linacs to compare our beam data to our baseline data, as required by TG‐142.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>Our software tool was used to check beam conformance for seven TrueBeam linacs that we commissioned in the past six months. Using our tool we found that the factory conformed linacs showed up to 3.82% difference in their beam profile data upon installation. Using our beam comparison tool, we were able to adjust the energy and profiles of our beams to accomplish a better than 1.00% point by point data conformance.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>The availability of quantitative comparison tools is essential to accept and commission linacs with enhanced beam conformance, as well as to beam match multiple linacs. We further intend to use the same tool to ensure our beam data conforms to the commissioning beam data during our annual QA in keeping with the requirements of TG‐142.</jats:p></jats:sec> SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool Medical Physics
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4924572
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjQ5MjQ1NzI
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjQ5MjQ1NzI
institution DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
imprint Wiley, 2015
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2015
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
issn_str_mv 0094-2405
2473-4209
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str grzetic2015suet211comparisonofsevennewtruebeamlinacswithenhancedbeamdataconformanceusingabeamcomparisonsoftwaretool
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Medical Physics
source_id 49
title SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_unstemmed SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_full SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_fullStr SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_full_unstemmed SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_short SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_sort su‐e‐t‐211: comparison of seven new truebeam linacs with enhanced beam data conformance using a beam comparison software tool
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4924572
publishDate 2015
physical 3380-3380
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose:</jats:title><jats:p>To develop an independent software tool to assist in commissioning linacs with enhanced beam conformance, as well as perform ongoing QA for dosimetrically equivalent linacs.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Linac manufacturers offer enhanced beam conformance as an option to allow for clinics to complete commissioning efficiently, as well as implement dosimetrically equivalent linacs. The specification for enhanced conformance includes PDD as well as profiles within 80% FWHM. Recently, we commissioned seven Varian TrueBeam linacs with enhanced beam conformance. We developed a software tool in Visual Basic to allow us to load the reference beam data and compare our beam data during commissioning to evaluate enhanced beam conformance. This tool also allowed us to upload our beam data used for commissioning our dosimetrically equivalent beam models to compare and tweak each of our linac beams to match our modelled data in Varian's Eclipse TPS. This tool will also be used during annual QA of the linacs to compare our beam data to our baseline data, as required by TG‐142.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>Our software tool was used to check beam conformance for seven TrueBeam linacs that we commissioned in the past six months. Using our tool we found that the factory conformed linacs showed up to 3.82% difference in their beam profile data upon installation. Using our beam comparison tool, we were able to adjust the energy and profiles of our beams to accomplish a better than 1.00% point by point data conformance.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>The availability of quantitative comparison tools is essential to accept and commission linacs with enhanced beam conformance, as well as to beam match multiple linacs. We further intend to use the same tool to ensure our beam data conforms to the commissioning beam data during our annual QA in keeping with the requirements of TG‐142.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 6Part15
container_start_page 3380
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 42
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792334837261008909
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:34:42.803Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=SU%E2%80%90E%E2%80%90T%E2%80%90211%3A+Comparison+of+Seven+New+TrueBeam+Linacs+with+Enhanced+Beam+Data+Conformance+Using+a+Beam+Comparison+Software+Tool&rft.date=2015-06-01&genre=article&issn=2473-4209&volume=42&issue=6Part15&spage=3380&epage=3380&pages=3380-3380&jtitle=Medical+Physics&atitle=SU%E2%80%90E%E2%80%90T%E2%80%90211%3A+Comparison+of+Seven+New+TrueBeam+Linacs+with+Enhanced+Beam+Data+Conformance+Using+a+Beam+Comparison+Software+Tool&aulast=Carlson&aufirst=M&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1118%2F1.4924572&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792334837261008909
author Grzetic, S, Hessler, J, Gupta, N, Woollard, J, DiCostanzo, D, Ayan, A, Carlson, M
author_facet Grzetic, S, Hessler, J, Gupta, N, Woollard, J, DiCostanzo, D, Ayan, A, Carlson, M, Grzetic, S, Hessler, J, Gupta, N, Woollard, J, DiCostanzo, D, Ayan, A, Carlson, M
author_sort grzetic, s
container_issue 6Part15
container_start_page 3380
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 42
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose:</jats:title><jats:p>To develop an independent software tool to assist in commissioning linacs with enhanced beam conformance, as well as perform ongoing QA for dosimetrically equivalent linacs.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Linac manufacturers offer enhanced beam conformance as an option to allow for clinics to complete commissioning efficiently, as well as implement dosimetrically equivalent linacs. The specification for enhanced conformance includes PDD as well as profiles within 80% FWHM. Recently, we commissioned seven Varian TrueBeam linacs with enhanced beam conformance. We developed a software tool in Visual Basic to allow us to load the reference beam data and compare our beam data during commissioning to evaluate enhanced beam conformance. This tool also allowed us to upload our beam data used for commissioning our dosimetrically equivalent beam models to compare and tweak each of our linac beams to match our modelled data in Varian's Eclipse TPS. This tool will also be used during annual QA of the linacs to compare our beam data to our baseline data, as required by TG‐142.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>Our software tool was used to check beam conformance for seven TrueBeam linacs that we commissioned in the past six months. Using our tool we found that the factory conformed linacs showed up to 3.82% difference in their beam profile data upon installation. Using our beam comparison tool, we were able to adjust the energy and profiles of our beams to accomplish a better than 1.00% point by point data conformance.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>The availability of quantitative comparison tools is essential to accept and commission linacs with enhanced beam conformance, as well as to beam match multiple linacs. We further intend to use the same tool to ensure our beam data conforms to the commissioning beam data during our annual QA in keeping with the requirements of TG‐142.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4924572
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjQ5MjQ1NzI
imprint Wiley, 2015
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2015
institution DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15
issn 0094-2405, 2473-4209
issn_str_mv 0094-2405, 2473-4209
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:34:42.803Z
match_str grzetic2015suet211comparisonofsevennewtruebeamlinacswithenhancedbeamdataconformanceusingabeamcomparisonsoftwaretool
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 3380-3380
publishDate 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Medical Physics
source_id 49
spelling Grzetic, S Hessler, J Gupta, N Woollard, J DiCostanzo, D Ayan, A Carlson, M 0094-2405 2473-4209 Wiley General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4924572 <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose:</jats:title><jats:p>To develop an independent software tool to assist in commissioning linacs with enhanced beam conformance, as well as perform ongoing QA for dosimetrically equivalent linacs.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Linac manufacturers offer enhanced beam conformance as an option to allow for clinics to complete commissioning efficiently, as well as implement dosimetrically equivalent linacs. The specification for enhanced conformance includes PDD as well as profiles within 80% FWHM. Recently, we commissioned seven Varian TrueBeam linacs with enhanced beam conformance. We developed a software tool in Visual Basic to allow us to load the reference beam data and compare our beam data during commissioning to evaluate enhanced beam conformance. This tool also allowed us to upload our beam data used for commissioning our dosimetrically equivalent beam models to compare and tweak each of our linac beams to match our modelled data in Varian's Eclipse TPS. This tool will also be used during annual QA of the linacs to compare our beam data to our baseline data, as required by TG‐142.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>Our software tool was used to check beam conformance for seven TrueBeam linacs that we commissioned in the past six months. Using our tool we found that the factory conformed linacs showed up to 3.82% difference in their beam profile data upon installation. Using our beam comparison tool, we were able to adjust the energy and profiles of our beams to accomplish a better than 1.00% point by point data conformance.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>The availability of quantitative comparison tools is essential to accept and commission linacs with enhanced beam conformance, as well as to beam match multiple linacs. We further intend to use the same tool to ensure our beam data conforms to the commissioning beam data during our annual QA in keeping with the requirements of TG‐142.</jats:p></jats:sec> SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool Medical Physics
spellingShingle Grzetic, S, Hessler, J, Gupta, N, Woollard, J, DiCostanzo, D, Ayan, A, Carlson, M, Medical Physics, SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool, General Medicine
title SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_full SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_fullStr SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_full_unstemmed SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_short SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
title_sort su‐e‐t‐211: comparison of seven new truebeam linacs with enhanced beam data conformance using a beam comparison software tool
title_unstemmed SU‐E‐T‐211: Comparison of Seven New TrueBeam Linacs with Enhanced Beam Data Conformance Using a Beam Comparison Software Tool
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4924572