Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Medical Physics |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Medical Physics, 33, 2006, 6Part4, S. 2014-2014 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Liu, B Liu, B |
|---|---|
| author |
Liu, B |
| spellingShingle |
Liu, B Medical Physics SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography General Medicine |
| author_sort |
liu, b |
| spelling |
Liu, B 0094-2405 2473-4209 Wiley General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2240754 <jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:</jats:bold> To compare image quality in contact and magnification modes in digital mammography. <jats:bold>Method and Materials:</jats:bold> Images of three anthropomorphic breast phantoms were acquired using a Hologic FFDM system. First, images were acquired in contact mode with grid. The exposure parameters were determined by AEC. Second, images were acquired in 1.5x magnification mode without grid. The exposure parameters were selected such that the detector entrance exposures were the same as those in the first experiment. The third, images were acquired in contact mode with grid and with the same patient doses in magnification mode. Image quality was analyzed using MIPAV software. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> 9lp/mm and 6lp/mm were resolved in the magnification mode and in the contact mode respectively. However, the smallest specks group in the phantoms (0.13 mm) could be detected in all modes. For masses and fibers, more features were detected in the magnification mode when the detector entrance exposures were fixed at those determined in the contact mode. More masses and fibers were detected in contact mode when the breast skin entrance exposures were the same as those in the magnification mode. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> At the same patient dose, the contact mode provides better detectability of masses and fibers. The detectability of microcalcification above 0.13 mm is not improved by using the magnification mode. The detectability of smaller microcalcifications (<0.13 mm) needs further investigation.</jats:p> SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography Medical Physics |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1118/1.2240754 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjIyNDA3NTQ |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjIyNDA3NTQ |
| institution |
DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2006 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2006 |
| issn |
2473-4209 0094-2405 |
| issn_str_mv |
2473-4209 0094-2405 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
liu2006suffi74comparisonofimagequalityincontactandmagnificationmodesindigitalmammography |
| publishDateSort |
2006 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Medical Physics |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_unstemmed |
SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_full |
SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_fullStr |
SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_full_unstemmed |
SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_short |
SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_sort |
su‐ff‐i‐74: comparison of image quality in contact and magnification modes in digital mammography |
| topic |
General Medicine |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2240754 |
| publishDate |
2006 |
| physical |
2014-2014 |
| description |
<jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:</jats:bold> To compare image quality in contact and magnification modes in digital mammography. <jats:bold>Method and Materials:</jats:bold> Images of three anthropomorphic breast phantoms were acquired using a Hologic FFDM system. First, images were acquired in contact mode with grid. The exposure parameters were determined by AEC. Second, images were acquired in 1.5x magnification mode without grid. The exposure parameters were selected such that the detector entrance exposures were the same as those in the first experiment. The third, images were acquired in contact mode with grid and with the same patient doses in magnification mode. Image quality was analyzed using MIPAV software. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> 9lp/mm and 6lp/mm were resolved in the magnification mode and in the contact mode respectively. However, the smallest specks group in the phantoms (0.13 mm) could be detected in all modes. For masses and fibers, more features were detected in the magnification mode when the detector entrance exposures were fixed at those determined in the contact mode. More masses and fibers were detected in contact mode when the breast skin entrance exposures were the same as those in the magnification mode. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> At the same patient dose, the contact mode provides better detectability of masses and fibers. The detectability of microcalcification above 0.13 mm is not improved by using the magnification mode. The detectability of smaller microcalcifications (<0.13 mm) needs further investigation.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
6Part4 |
| container_start_page |
2014 |
| container_title |
Medical Physics |
| container_volume |
33 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792334793096036365 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:33:42.391Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=SU%E2%80%90FF%E2%80%90I%E2%80%9074%3A+Comparison+of+Image+Quality+in+Contact+and+Magnification+Modes+in+Digital+Mammography&rft.date=2006-06-01&genre=article&issn=2473-4209&volume=33&issue=6Part4&spage=2014&epage=2014&pages=2014-2014&jtitle=Medical+Physics&atitle=SU%E2%80%90FF%E2%80%90I%E2%80%9074%3A+Comparison+of+Image+Quality+in+Contact+and+Magnification+Modes+in+Digital+Mammography&aulast=Liu&aufirst=B&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1118%2F1.2240754&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792334793096036365 |
| author | Liu, B |
| author_facet | Liu, B, Liu, B |
| author_sort | liu, b |
| container_issue | 6Part4 |
| container_start_page | 2014 |
| container_title | Medical Physics |
| container_volume | 33 |
| description | <jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:</jats:bold> To compare image quality in contact and magnification modes in digital mammography. <jats:bold>Method and Materials:</jats:bold> Images of three anthropomorphic breast phantoms were acquired using a Hologic FFDM system. First, images were acquired in contact mode with grid. The exposure parameters were determined by AEC. Second, images were acquired in 1.5x magnification mode without grid. The exposure parameters were selected such that the detector entrance exposures were the same as those in the first experiment. The third, images were acquired in contact mode with grid and with the same patient doses in magnification mode. Image quality was analyzed using MIPAV software. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> 9lp/mm and 6lp/mm were resolved in the magnification mode and in the contact mode respectively. However, the smallest specks group in the phantoms (0.13 mm) could be detected in all modes. For masses and fibers, more features were detected in the magnification mode when the detector entrance exposures were fixed at those determined in the contact mode. More masses and fibers were detected in contact mode when the breast skin entrance exposures were the same as those in the magnification mode. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> At the same patient dose, the contact mode provides better detectability of masses and fibers. The detectability of microcalcification above 0.13 mm is not improved by using the magnification mode. The detectability of smaller microcalcifications (<0.13 mm) needs further investigation.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.2240754 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjIyNDA3NTQ |
| imprint | Wiley, 2006 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2006 |
| institution | DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4 |
| issn | 2473-4209, 0094-2405 |
| issn_str_mv | 2473-4209, 0094-2405 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:33:42.391Z |
| match_str | liu2006suffi74comparisonofimagequalityincontactandmagnificationmodesindigitalmammography |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 2014-2014 |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Medical Physics |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Liu, B 0094-2405 2473-4209 Wiley General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2240754 <jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:</jats:bold> To compare image quality in contact and magnification modes in digital mammography. <jats:bold>Method and Materials:</jats:bold> Images of three anthropomorphic breast phantoms were acquired using a Hologic FFDM system. First, images were acquired in contact mode with grid. The exposure parameters were determined by AEC. Second, images were acquired in 1.5x magnification mode without grid. The exposure parameters were selected such that the detector entrance exposures were the same as those in the first experiment. The third, images were acquired in contact mode with grid and with the same patient doses in magnification mode. Image quality was analyzed using MIPAV software. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> 9lp/mm and 6lp/mm were resolved in the magnification mode and in the contact mode respectively. However, the smallest specks group in the phantoms (0.13 mm) could be detected in all modes. For masses and fibers, more features were detected in the magnification mode when the detector entrance exposures were fixed at those determined in the contact mode. More masses and fibers were detected in contact mode when the breast skin entrance exposures were the same as those in the magnification mode. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> At the same patient dose, the contact mode provides better detectability of masses and fibers. The detectability of microcalcification above 0.13 mm is not improved by using the magnification mode. The detectability of smaller microcalcifications (<0.13 mm) needs further investigation.</jats:p> SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography Medical Physics |
| spellingShingle | Liu, B, Medical Physics, SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography, General Medicine |
| title | SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_full | SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_fullStr | SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_full_unstemmed | SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_short | SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| title_sort | su‐ff‐i‐74: comparison of image quality in contact and magnification modes in digital mammography |
| title_unstemmed | SU‐FF‐I‐74: Comparison of Image Quality in Contact and Magnification Modes in Digital Mammography |
| topic | General Medicine |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2240754 |