author_facet Jiang, H
Jiang, H
author Jiang, H
spellingShingle Jiang, H
Medical Physics
SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
General Medicine
author_sort jiang, h
spelling Jiang, H 0094-2405 2473-4209 Wiley General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2760865 <jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:</jats:bold> One shortcoming of using dose volume histogram (DVH) to evaluate a radiotherapy treatment plan is that the spatial distribution of the high dose voxels is not accounted. Cluster models, on the other hand, address not only the volumes but also their spatial location. This study is to evaluate cluster formation in clinical volume or organ at risk (OAR) receiving an inhomogeneous dose distribution. <jats:bold>Method and Materials:</jats:bold> In this study, upper five‐centimeter esophagus in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was used as the OAR. The patients were treated using IMRT. An in‐house program has been developed to analyze the Pinnacle dose grid, and to perform cluster searching. We studied one‐ and two‐connectivity of cluster formation. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> The characteristics of cluster formation are very different under different fractional density. The size of the largest cluster shows a distribution with a peak and also some extent of spread. The cluster size can vary in a large range and cannot be accurately predicted. Therefore, the clinical outcome of the same DVH could be potentially different. The relationship between the mean size of the largest cluster (MSLC) and fractional density is non‐linear. Above a specific fractional density there is a dramatic increase in the MSLC, which possibly also represents an increase of the chance of percolation. At a certain high fractional density, MSLC increases linearly with fractional density, and additional voxels just increase the size of the existing largest cluster instead of forming new independent short clusters. Comparing one‐connectivity with two‐connectivity, two‐connectivity presents a steeper slope in the exponential increase area on the MSLC v.s. fractional density curve. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold>Our investigation on the superior section of esophagus disclosed some interesting charasteristics. In the future, it may also be possible to incorporate these new NTCP models in the dose optimization algorithm.</jats:p> SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions Medical Physics
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.2760865
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjI3NjA4NjU
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjI3NjA4NjU
institution DE-D161
DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
imprint Wiley, 2007
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2007
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
issn_str_mv 0094-2405
2473-4209
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str jiang2007sufft204evaluationof3dclusterformationininhomogeneousdosedistributions
publishDateSort 2007
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Medical Physics
source_id 49
title SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_unstemmed SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_full SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_fullStr SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_full_unstemmed SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_short SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_sort su‐ff‐t‐204: evaluation of 3‐d cluster formation in inhomogeneous dose distributions
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2760865
publishDate 2007
physical 2448-2448
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:</jats:bold> One shortcoming of using dose volume histogram (DVH) to evaluate a radiotherapy treatment plan is that the spatial distribution of the high dose voxels is not accounted. Cluster models, on the other hand, address not only the volumes but also their spatial location. This study is to evaluate cluster formation in clinical volume or organ at risk (OAR) receiving an inhomogeneous dose distribution. <jats:bold>Method and Materials:</jats:bold> In this study, upper five‐centimeter esophagus in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was used as the OAR. The patients were treated using IMRT. An in‐house program has been developed to analyze the Pinnacle dose grid, and to perform cluster searching. We studied one‐ and two‐connectivity of cluster formation. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> The characteristics of cluster formation are very different under different fractional density. The size of the largest cluster shows a distribution with a peak and also some extent of spread. The cluster size can vary in a large range and cannot be accurately predicted. Therefore, the clinical outcome of the same DVH could be potentially different. The relationship between the mean size of the largest cluster (MSLC) and fractional density is non‐linear. Above a specific fractional density there is a dramatic increase in the MSLC, which possibly also represents an increase of the chance of percolation. At a certain high fractional density, MSLC increases linearly with fractional density, and additional voxels just increase the size of the existing largest cluster instead of forming new independent short clusters. Comparing one‐connectivity with two‐connectivity, two‐connectivity presents a steeper slope in the exponential increase area on the MSLC v.s. fractional density curve. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold>Our investigation on the superior section of esophagus disclosed some interesting charasteristics. In the future, it may also be possible to incorporate these new NTCP models in the dose optimization algorithm.</jats:p>
container_issue 6Part10
container_start_page 2448
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 34
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792334669568540676
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:31:50.677Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=SU%E2%80%90FF%E2%80%90T%E2%80%90204%3A+Evaluation+of+3%E2%80%90D+Cluster+Formation+in+Inhomogeneous+Dose+Distributions&rft.date=2007-06-01&genre=article&issn=2473-4209&volume=34&issue=6Part10&spage=2448&epage=2448&pages=2448-2448&jtitle=Medical+Physics&atitle=SU%E2%80%90FF%E2%80%90T%E2%80%90204%3A+Evaluation+of+3%E2%80%90D+Cluster+Formation+in+Inhomogeneous+Dose+Distributions&aulast=Jiang&aufirst=H&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1118%2F1.2760865&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792334669568540676
author Jiang, H
author_facet Jiang, H, Jiang, H
author_sort jiang, h
container_issue 6Part10
container_start_page 2448
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 34
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:</jats:bold> One shortcoming of using dose volume histogram (DVH) to evaluate a radiotherapy treatment plan is that the spatial distribution of the high dose voxels is not accounted. Cluster models, on the other hand, address not only the volumes but also their spatial location. This study is to evaluate cluster formation in clinical volume or organ at risk (OAR) receiving an inhomogeneous dose distribution. <jats:bold>Method and Materials:</jats:bold> In this study, upper five‐centimeter esophagus in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was used as the OAR. The patients were treated using IMRT. An in‐house program has been developed to analyze the Pinnacle dose grid, and to perform cluster searching. We studied one‐ and two‐connectivity of cluster formation. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> The characteristics of cluster formation are very different under different fractional density. The size of the largest cluster shows a distribution with a peak and also some extent of spread. The cluster size can vary in a large range and cannot be accurately predicted. Therefore, the clinical outcome of the same DVH could be potentially different. The relationship between the mean size of the largest cluster (MSLC) and fractional density is non‐linear. Above a specific fractional density there is a dramatic increase in the MSLC, which possibly also represents an increase of the chance of percolation. At a certain high fractional density, MSLC increases linearly with fractional density, and additional voxels just increase the size of the existing largest cluster instead of forming new independent short clusters. Comparing one‐connectivity with two‐connectivity, two‐connectivity presents a steeper slope in the exponential increase area on the MSLC v.s. fractional density curve. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold>Our investigation on the superior section of esophagus disclosed some interesting charasteristics. In the future, it may also be possible to incorporate these new NTCP models in the dose optimization algorithm.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.2760865
facet_avail Online
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExOC8xLjI3NjA4NjU
imprint Wiley, 2007
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2007
institution DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1
issn 0094-2405, 2473-4209
issn_str_mv 0094-2405, 2473-4209
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:31:50.677Z
match_str jiang2007sufft204evaluationof3dclusterformationininhomogeneousdosedistributions
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 2448-2448
publishDate 2007
publishDateSort 2007
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Medical Physics
source_id 49
spelling Jiang, H 0094-2405 2473-4209 Wiley General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2760865 <jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:</jats:bold> One shortcoming of using dose volume histogram (DVH) to evaluate a radiotherapy treatment plan is that the spatial distribution of the high dose voxels is not accounted. Cluster models, on the other hand, address not only the volumes but also their spatial location. This study is to evaluate cluster formation in clinical volume or organ at risk (OAR) receiving an inhomogeneous dose distribution. <jats:bold>Method and Materials:</jats:bold> In this study, upper five‐centimeter esophagus in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was used as the OAR. The patients were treated using IMRT. An in‐house program has been developed to analyze the Pinnacle dose grid, and to perform cluster searching. We studied one‐ and two‐connectivity of cluster formation. <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> The characteristics of cluster formation are very different under different fractional density. The size of the largest cluster shows a distribution with a peak and also some extent of spread. The cluster size can vary in a large range and cannot be accurately predicted. Therefore, the clinical outcome of the same DVH could be potentially different. The relationship between the mean size of the largest cluster (MSLC) and fractional density is non‐linear. Above a specific fractional density there is a dramatic increase in the MSLC, which possibly also represents an increase of the chance of percolation. At a certain high fractional density, MSLC increases linearly with fractional density, and additional voxels just increase the size of the existing largest cluster instead of forming new independent short clusters. Comparing one‐connectivity with two‐connectivity, two‐connectivity presents a steeper slope in the exponential increase area on the MSLC v.s. fractional density curve. <jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold>Our investigation on the superior section of esophagus disclosed some interesting charasteristics. In the future, it may also be possible to incorporate these new NTCP models in the dose optimization algorithm.</jats:p> SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions Medical Physics
spellingShingle Jiang, H, Medical Physics, SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions, General Medicine
title SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_full SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_fullStr SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_full_unstemmed SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_short SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
title_sort su‐ff‐t‐204: evaluation of 3‐d cluster formation in inhomogeneous dose distributions
title_unstemmed SU‐FF‐T‐204: Evaluation of 3‐D Cluster Formation in Inhomogeneous Dose Distributions
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2760865