author_facet Rüger, Melanie
St Hilaire, Melissa A.
Brainard, George C.
Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S.
Kronauer, Richard E.
Czeisler, Charles A.
Lockley, Steven W.
Rüger, Melanie
St Hilaire, Melissa A.
Brainard, George C.
Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S.
Kronauer, Richard E.
Czeisler, Charles A.
Lockley, Steven W.
author Rüger, Melanie
St Hilaire, Melissa A.
Brainard, George C.
Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S.
Kronauer, Richard E.
Czeisler, Charles A.
Lockley, Steven W.
spellingShingle Rüger, Melanie
St Hilaire, Melissa A.
Brainard, George C.
Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S.
Kronauer, Richard E.
Czeisler, Charles A.
Lockley, Steven W.
The Journal of Physiology
Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
Physiology
author_sort rüger, melanie
spelling Rüger, Melanie St Hilaire, Melissa A. Brainard, George C. Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S. Kronauer, Richard E. Czeisler, Charles A. Lockley, Steven W. 0022-3751 1469-7793 Wiley Physiology http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239046 <jats:title>Key points</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="explicit-label"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The human ∼24 h circadian pacemaker ensures appropriate timing of physiological, behavioural and metabolic events and is synchronized to the 24 h day primarily by the 24 h light–dark cycle.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The direction and magnitude of photic resetting depend on the timing of light exposure, and are described by a phase response curve (PRC).</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The human circadian photoreception system is functionally and anatomically distinct from the visual system and employs a novel photoreceptor, melanopsin, which is maximally sensitive to short‐wavelength (blue) visible light.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>We constructed a PRC to 6.5 h of blue (480 nm) light and compared it with a prior 6.7 h white light PRC; the blue light PRC achieved ∼75% of the resetting response of the white light PRC.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>This study suggests that short‐wavelength visible light exposures may be more efficient than traditional high‐intensity white light exposures for treatment of circadian rhythm sleep disorders.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract </jats:bold> The photic resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker depends on the timing of exposure, and the direction and magnitude of the resulting shift is described by a phase response curve (PRC). Previous PRCs in humans have utilized high‐intensity polychromatic white light. Given that the circadian photoreception system is maximally sensitive to short‐wavelength visible light, the aim of the current study was to construct a PRC to blue (480 nm) light and compare it to a 10,000 lux white light PRC constructed previously using a similar protocol. Eighteen young healthy participants (18–30 years) were studied for 9–10 days in a time‐free environment. The protocol included three baseline days followed by a constant routine (CR) to assess initial circadian phase. Following this CR, participants were exposed to a 6.5 h 480 nm light exposure (11.8 μW cm<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>, 11.2 lux) following mydriasis via a modified Ganzfeld dome. A second CR was conducted following the light exposure to re‐assess circadian phase. Phase shifts were calculated from the difference in dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) between CRs. Exposure to 6.5 h of 480 nm light resets the circadian pacemaker according to a conventional type 1 PRC with fitted maximum delays and advances of −2.6 h and 1.3 h, respectively. The 480 nm PRC induced ∼75% of the response of the 10,000 lux white light PRC. These results may contribute to a re‐evaluation of dosing guidelines for clinical light therapy and the use of light as a fatigue countermeasure.</jats:p> Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light The Journal of Physiology
doi_str_mv 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239046
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMy9qcGh5c2lvbC4yMDEyLjIzOTA0Ng
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMy9qcGh5c2lvbC4yMDEyLjIzOTA0Ng
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2013
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2013
issn 0022-3751
1469-7793
issn_str_mv 0022-3751
1469-7793
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str ruger2013humanphaseresponsecurvetoasingle65hpulseofshortwavelengthlight
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series The Journal of Physiology
source_id 49
title Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_unstemmed Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_full Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_fullStr Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_full_unstemmed Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_short Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_sort human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
topic Physiology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239046
publishDate 2013
physical 353-363
description <jats:title>Key points</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="explicit-label"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The human ∼24 h circadian pacemaker ensures appropriate timing of physiological, behavioural and metabolic events and is synchronized to the 24 h day primarily by the 24 h light–dark cycle.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The direction and magnitude of photic resetting depend on the timing of light exposure, and are described by a phase response curve (PRC).</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The human circadian photoreception system is functionally and anatomically distinct from the visual system and employs a novel photoreceptor, melanopsin, which is maximally sensitive to short‐wavelength (blue) visible light.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>We constructed a PRC to 6.5 h of blue (480 nm) light and compared it with a prior 6.7 h white light PRC; the blue light PRC achieved ∼75% of the resetting response of the white light PRC.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>This study suggests that short‐wavelength visible light exposures may be more efficient than traditional high‐intensity white light exposures for treatment of circadian rhythm sleep disorders.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract </jats:bold> The photic resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker depends on the timing of exposure, and the direction and magnitude of the resulting shift is described by a phase response curve (PRC). Previous PRCs in humans have utilized high‐intensity polychromatic white light. Given that the circadian photoreception system is maximally sensitive to short‐wavelength visible light, the aim of the current study was to construct a PRC to blue (480 nm) light and compare it to a 10,000 lux white light PRC constructed previously using a similar protocol. Eighteen young healthy participants (18–30 years) were studied for 9–10 days in a time‐free environment. The protocol included three baseline days followed by a constant routine (CR) to assess initial circadian phase. Following this CR, participants were exposed to a 6.5 h 480 nm light exposure (11.8 μW cm<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>, 11.2 lux) following mydriasis via a modified Ganzfeld dome. A second CR was conducted following the light exposure to re‐assess circadian phase. Phase shifts were calculated from the difference in dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) between CRs. Exposure to 6.5 h of 480 nm light resets the circadian pacemaker according to a conventional type 1 PRC with fitted maximum delays and advances of −2.6 h and 1.3 h, respectively. The 480 nm PRC induced ∼75% of the response of the 10,000 lux white light PRC. These results may contribute to a re‐evaluation of dosing guidelines for clinical light therapy and the use of light as a fatigue countermeasure.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 353
container_title The Journal of Physiology
container_volume 591
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792348337630871552
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:09:35.326Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Human+phase+response+curve+to+a+single+6.5%C2%A0h+pulse+of+short%E2%80%90wavelength+light&rft.date=2013-01-01&genre=article&issn=1469-7793&volume=591&issue=1&spage=353&epage=363&pages=353-363&jtitle=The+Journal+of+Physiology&atitle=Human+phase+response+curve+to+a+single+6.5%C2%A0h+pulse+of+short%E2%80%90wavelength+light&aulast=Lockley&aufirst=Steven+W.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1113%2Fjphysiol.2012.239046&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792348337630871552
author Rüger, Melanie, St Hilaire, Melissa A., Brainard, George C., Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S., Kronauer, Richard E., Czeisler, Charles A., Lockley, Steven W.
author_facet Rüger, Melanie, St Hilaire, Melissa A., Brainard, George C., Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S., Kronauer, Richard E., Czeisler, Charles A., Lockley, Steven W., Rüger, Melanie, St Hilaire, Melissa A., Brainard, George C., Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S., Kronauer, Richard E., Czeisler, Charles A., Lockley, Steven W.
author_sort rüger, melanie
container_issue 1
container_start_page 353
container_title The Journal of Physiology
container_volume 591
description <jats:title>Key points</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="explicit-label"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The human ∼24 h circadian pacemaker ensures appropriate timing of physiological, behavioural and metabolic events and is synchronized to the 24 h day primarily by the 24 h light–dark cycle.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The direction and magnitude of photic resetting depend on the timing of light exposure, and are described by a phase response curve (PRC).</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The human circadian photoreception system is functionally and anatomically distinct from the visual system and employs a novel photoreceptor, melanopsin, which is maximally sensitive to short‐wavelength (blue) visible light.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>We constructed a PRC to 6.5 h of blue (480 nm) light and compared it with a prior 6.7 h white light PRC; the blue light PRC achieved ∼75% of the resetting response of the white light PRC.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>This study suggests that short‐wavelength visible light exposures may be more efficient than traditional high‐intensity white light exposures for treatment of circadian rhythm sleep disorders.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract </jats:bold> The photic resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker depends on the timing of exposure, and the direction and magnitude of the resulting shift is described by a phase response curve (PRC). Previous PRCs in humans have utilized high‐intensity polychromatic white light. Given that the circadian photoreception system is maximally sensitive to short‐wavelength visible light, the aim of the current study was to construct a PRC to blue (480 nm) light and compare it to a 10,000 lux white light PRC constructed previously using a similar protocol. Eighteen young healthy participants (18–30 years) were studied for 9–10 days in a time‐free environment. The protocol included three baseline days followed by a constant routine (CR) to assess initial circadian phase. Following this CR, participants were exposed to a 6.5 h 480 nm light exposure (11.8 μW cm<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>, 11.2 lux) following mydriasis via a modified Ganzfeld dome. A second CR was conducted following the light exposure to re‐assess circadian phase. Phase shifts were calculated from the difference in dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) between CRs. Exposure to 6.5 h of 480 nm light resets the circadian pacemaker according to a conventional type 1 PRC with fitted maximum delays and advances of −2.6 h and 1.3 h, respectively. The 480 nm PRC induced ∼75% of the response of the 10,000 lux white light PRC. These results may contribute to a re‐evaluation of dosing guidelines for clinical light therapy and the use of light as a fatigue countermeasure.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239046
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMy9qcGh5c2lvbC4yMDEyLjIzOTA0Ng
imprint Wiley, 2013
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2013
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0022-3751, 1469-7793
issn_str_mv 0022-3751, 1469-7793
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:09:35.326Z
match_str ruger2013humanphaseresponsecurvetoasingle65hpulseofshortwavelengthlight
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 353-363
publishDate 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series The Journal of Physiology
source_id 49
spelling Rüger, Melanie St Hilaire, Melissa A. Brainard, George C. Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S. Kronauer, Richard E. Czeisler, Charles A. Lockley, Steven W. 0022-3751 1469-7793 Wiley Physiology http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239046 <jats:title>Key points</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="explicit-label"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The human ∼24 h circadian pacemaker ensures appropriate timing of physiological, behavioural and metabolic events and is synchronized to the 24 h day primarily by the 24 h light–dark cycle.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The direction and magnitude of photic resetting depend on the timing of light exposure, and are described by a phase response curve (PRC).</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>The human circadian photoreception system is functionally and anatomically distinct from the visual system and employs a novel photoreceptor, melanopsin, which is maximally sensitive to short‐wavelength (blue) visible light.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>We constructed a PRC to 6.5 h of blue (480 nm) light and compared it with a prior 6.7 h white light PRC; the blue light PRC achieved ∼75% of the resetting response of the white light PRC.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>This study suggests that short‐wavelength visible light exposures may be more efficient than traditional high‐intensity white light exposures for treatment of circadian rhythm sleep disorders.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract </jats:bold> The photic resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker depends on the timing of exposure, and the direction and magnitude of the resulting shift is described by a phase response curve (PRC). Previous PRCs in humans have utilized high‐intensity polychromatic white light. Given that the circadian photoreception system is maximally sensitive to short‐wavelength visible light, the aim of the current study was to construct a PRC to blue (480 nm) light and compare it to a 10,000 lux white light PRC constructed previously using a similar protocol. Eighteen young healthy participants (18–30 years) were studied for 9–10 days in a time‐free environment. The protocol included three baseline days followed by a constant routine (CR) to assess initial circadian phase. Following this CR, participants were exposed to a 6.5 h 480 nm light exposure (11.8 μW cm<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>, 11.2 lux) following mydriasis via a modified Ganzfeld dome. A second CR was conducted following the light exposure to re‐assess circadian phase. Phase shifts were calculated from the difference in dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) between CRs. Exposure to 6.5 h of 480 nm light resets the circadian pacemaker according to a conventional type 1 PRC with fitted maximum delays and advances of −2.6 h and 1.3 h, respectively. The 480 nm PRC induced ∼75% of the response of the 10,000 lux white light PRC. These results may contribute to a re‐evaluation of dosing guidelines for clinical light therapy and the use of light as a fatigue countermeasure.</jats:p> Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light The Journal of Physiology
spellingShingle Rüger, Melanie, St Hilaire, Melissa A., Brainard, George C., Khalsa, Sat‐Bir S., Kronauer, Richard E., Czeisler, Charles A., Lockley, Steven W., The Journal of Physiology, Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light, Physiology
title Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_full Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_fullStr Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_full_unstemmed Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_short Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_sort human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
title_unstemmed Human phase response curve to a single 6.5 h pulse of short‐wavelength light
topic Physiology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239046