Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”?
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Seminars in Dialysis |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , |
| In: | Seminars in Dialysis, 31, 2018, 1, S. 3-10 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Dumaine, Chance S. Brown, Robert S. MacRae, Jennifer M. Oliver, Matthew J. Ravani, Pietro Quinn, Robert R. Dumaine, Chance S. Brown, Robert S. MacRae, Jennifer M. Oliver, Matthew J. Ravani, Pietro Quinn, Robert R. |
|---|---|
| author |
Dumaine, Chance S. Brown, Robert S. MacRae, Jennifer M. Oliver, Matthew J. Ravani, Pietro Quinn, Robert R. |
| spellingShingle |
Dumaine, Chance S. Brown, Robert S. MacRae, Jennifer M. Oliver, Matthew J. Ravani, Pietro Quinn, Robert R. Seminars in Dialysis Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? Nephrology |
| author_sort |
dumaine, chance s. |
| spelling |
Dumaine, Chance S. Brown, Robert S. MacRae, Jennifer M. Oliver, Matthew J. Ravani, Pietro Quinn, Robert R. 0894-0959 1525-139X Wiley Nephrology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12655 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since the publication of the first vascular access clinical practice guidelines in 1997, the global nephrology community has dedicated significant time and resources toward increasing the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas and decreasing the prevalence of central venous catheters for hemodialysis. These efforts have been bolstered by observational studies showing an association between catheter use and increased patient morbidity and mortality. To date, however, no randomized comparisons of the outcomes of different forms of vascular access have been conducted. There is mounting evidence that much of the difference in patient outcomes may be explained by patient factors, rather than choice of vascular access. Some have called into question the appropriateness of fistula creation for certain patient populations, such as those with limited life expectancy and those at high risk of fistula‐related complications. In this review, we explore the extent to which catheters and fistulas exhibit the characteristics of the “ideal” vascular access and highlight the significant knowledge gaps that exist in the current literature. Further studies, ideally randomized comparisons of different forms of vascular access, are required to better inform shared decision making.</jats:p> Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? Seminars in Dialysis |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/sdi.12655 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9zZGkuMTI2NTU |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9zZGkuMTI2NTU |
| institution |
DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2018 |
| issn |
0894-0959 1525-139X |
| issn_str_mv |
0894-0959 1525-139X |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
dumaine2018centralvenouscathetersforchronichemodialysisislastchoicenevertherightchoice |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Seminars in Dialysis |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_unstemmed |
Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_full |
Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_fullStr |
Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_short |
Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_sort |
central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| topic |
Nephrology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12655 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| physical |
3-10 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since the publication of the first vascular access clinical practice guidelines in 1997, the global nephrology community has dedicated significant time and resources toward increasing the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas and decreasing the prevalence of central venous catheters for hemodialysis. These efforts have been bolstered by observational studies showing an association between catheter use and increased patient morbidity and mortality. To date, however, no randomized comparisons of the outcomes of different forms of vascular access have been conducted. There is mounting evidence that much of the difference in patient outcomes may be explained by patient factors, rather than choice of vascular access. Some have called into question the appropriateness of fistula creation for certain patient populations, such as those with limited life expectancy and those at high risk of fistula‐related complications. In this review, we explore the extent to which catheters and fistulas exhibit the characteristics of the “ideal” vascular access and highlight the significant knowledge gaps that exist in the current literature. Further studies, ideally randomized comparisons of different forms of vascular access, are required to better inform shared decision making.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
1 |
| container_start_page |
3 |
| container_title |
Seminars in Dialysis |
| container_volume |
31 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792339927509237766 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:54:59.494Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Central+venous+catheters+for+chronic+hemodialysis%3A+Is+%E2%80%9Clast+choice%E2%80%9D+never+the+%E2%80%9Cright+choice%E2%80%9D%3F&rft.date=2018-01-01&genre=article&issn=1525-139X&volume=31&issue=1&spage=3&epage=10&pages=3-10&jtitle=Seminars+in+Dialysis&atitle=Central+venous+catheters+for+chronic+hemodialysis%3A+Is+%E2%80%9Clast+choice%E2%80%9D+never+the+%E2%80%9Cright+choice%E2%80%9D%3F&aulast=Quinn&aufirst=Robert+R.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fsdi.12655&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792339927509237766 |
| author | Dumaine, Chance S., Brown, Robert S., MacRae, Jennifer M., Oliver, Matthew J., Ravani, Pietro, Quinn, Robert R. |
| author_facet | Dumaine, Chance S., Brown, Robert S., MacRae, Jennifer M., Oliver, Matthew J., Ravani, Pietro, Quinn, Robert R., Dumaine, Chance S., Brown, Robert S., MacRae, Jennifer M., Oliver, Matthew J., Ravani, Pietro, Quinn, Robert R. |
| author_sort | dumaine, chance s. |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | Seminars in Dialysis |
| container_volume | 31 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since the publication of the first vascular access clinical practice guidelines in 1997, the global nephrology community has dedicated significant time and resources toward increasing the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas and decreasing the prevalence of central venous catheters for hemodialysis. These efforts have been bolstered by observational studies showing an association between catheter use and increased patient morbidity and mortality. To date, however, no randomized comparisons of the outcomes of different forms of vascular access have been conducted. There is mounting evidence that much of the difference in patient outcomes may be explained by patient factors, rather than choice of vascular access. Some have called into question the appropriateness of fistula creation for certain patient populations, such as those with limited life expectancy and those at high risk of fistula‐related complications. In this review, we explore the extent to which catheters and fistulas exhibit the characteristics of the “ideal” vascular access and highlight the significant knowledge gaps that exist in the current literature. Further studies, ideally randomized comparisons of different forms of vascular access, are required to better inform shared decision making.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/sdi.12655 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9zZGkuMTI2NTU |
| imprint | Wiley, 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2018 |
| institution | DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3 |
| issn | 0894-0959, 1525-139X |
| issn_str_mv | 0894-0959, 1525-139X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:54:59.494Z |
| match_str | dumaine2018centralvenouscathetersforchronichemodialysisislastchoicenevertherightchoice |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 3-10 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Seminars in Dialysis |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Dumaine, Chance S. Brown, Robert S. MacRae, Jennifer M. Oliver, Matthew J. Ravani, Pietro Quinn, Robert R. 0894-0959 1525-139X Wiley Nephrology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12655 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since the publication of the first vascular access clinical practice guidelines in 1997, the global nephrology community has dedicated significant time and resources toward increasing the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas and decreasing the prevalence of central venous catheters for hemodialysis. These efforts have been bolstered by observational studies showing an association between catheter use and increased patient morbidity and mortality. To date, however, no randomized comparisons of the outcomes of different forms of vascular access have been conducted. There is mounting evidence that much of the difference in patient outcomes may be explained by patient factors, rather than choice of vascular access. Some have called into question the appropriateness of fistula creation for certain patient populations, such as those with limited life expectancy and those at high risk of fistula‐related complications. In this review, we explore the extent to which catheters and fistulas exhibit the characteristics of the “ideal” vascular access and highlight the significant knowledge gaps that exist in the current literature. Further studies, ideally randomized comparisons of different forms of vascular access, are required to better inform shared decision making.</jats:p> Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? Seminars in Dialysis |
| spellingShingle | Dumaine, Chance S., Brown, Robert S., MacRae, Jennifer M., Oliver, Matthew J., Ravani, Pietro, Quinn, Robert R., Seminars in Dialysis, Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”?, Nephrology |
| title | Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_full | Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_fullStr | Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_short | Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_sort | central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| title_unstemmed | Central venous catheters for chronic hemodialysis: Is “last choice” never the “right choice”? |
| topic | Nephrology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12655 |