Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
| author_facet |
Simion, Mona Simion, Mona |
|---|---|
| author |
Simion, Mona |
| spellingShingle |
Simion, Mona Noûs Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology Philosophy |
| author_sort |
simion, mona |
| spelling |
Simion, Mona 0029-4624 1468-0068 Wiley Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nous.12337 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>According to anti‐reductionism in the epistemology of testimony, testimonial entitlement is easy to come by: all you need to do is listen to what you are being told. Say you like anti‐reductionism; one question that you will need to answer is how come testimonial entitlement comes so cheap; after all, people are free to lie.</jats:p><jats:p>This paper has two aims: first, it looks at the main anti‐reductionist answers to this question and argues that they remain unsatisfactory. Second, it goes on a rescue mission on behalf of anti‐reductionism. I put forth a novel, knowledge‐first anti‐reductionist account, which I dub ‘Testimonial Contractarianism’. According to the view defended here, in virtue of the social contract in play, compliance with the norms governing speech acts is the default position for speakers. Insofar as norm compliance is the default for speakers, I argue, all else equal, entitlement to believe is the default for hearers.</jats:p> Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology Noûs |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/nous.12337 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Philosophie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9ub3VzLjEyMzM3 |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9ub3VzLjEyMzM3 |
| institution |
DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2021 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2021 |
| issn |
0029-4624 1468-0068 |
| issn_str_mv |
0029-4624 1468-0068 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
simion2021testimonialcontractarianismaknowledgefirstsocialepistemology |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Noûs |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_unstemmed |
Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_full |
Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_fullStr |
Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_short |
Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_sort |
testimonial contractarianism: a knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| topic |
Philosophy |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nous.12337 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| physical |
891-916 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>According to anti‐reductionism in the epistemology of testimony, testimonial entitlement is easy to come by: all you need to do is listen to what you are being told. Say you like anti‐reductionism; one question that you will need to answer is how come testimonial entitlement comes so cheap; after all, people are free to lie.</jats:p><jats:p>This paper has two aims: first, it looks at the main anti‐reductionist answers to this question and argues that they remain unsatisfactory. Second, it goes on a rescue mission on behalf of anti‐reductionism. I put forth a novel, knowledge‐first anti‐reductionist account, which I dub ‘Testimonial Contractarianism’. According to the view defended here, in virtue of the social contract in play, compliance with the norms governing speech acts is the default position for speakers. Insofar as norm compliance is the default for speakers, I argue, all else equal, entitlement to believe is the default for hearers.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
4 |
| container_start_page |
891 |
| container_title |
Noûs |
| container_volume |
55 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792343419566161922 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:51:23.698Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Testimonial+contractarianism%3A+A+knowledge%E2%80%90first+social+epistemology&rft.date=2021-12-01&genre=article&issn=1468-0068&volume=55&issue=4&spage=891&epage=916&pages=891-916&jtitle=No%C3%BBs&atitle=Testimonial+contractarianism%3A+A+knowledge%E2%80%90first+social+epistemology&aulast=Simion&aufirst=Mona&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fnous.12337&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792343419566161922 |
| author | Simion, Mona |
| author_facet | Simion, Mona, Simion, Mona |
| author_sort | simion, mona |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 891 |
| container_title | Noûs |
| container_volume | 55 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>According to anti‐reductionism in the epistemology of testimony, testimonial entitlement is easy to come by: all you need to do is listen to what you are being told. Say you like anti‐reductionism; one question that you will need to answer is how come testimonial entitlement comes so cheap; after all, people are free to lie.</jats:p><jats:p>This paper has two aims: first, it looks at the main anti‐reductionist answers to this question and argues that they remain unsatisfactory. Second, it goes on a rescue mission on behalf of anti‐reductionism. I put forth a novel, knowledge‐first anti‐reductionist account, which I dub ‘Testimonial Contractarianism’. According to the view defended here, in virtue of the social contract in play, compliance with the norms governing speech acts is the default position for speakers. Insofar as norm compliance is the default for speakers, I argue, all else equal, entitlement to believe is the default for hearers.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nous.12337 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Philosophie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9ub3VzLjEyMzM3 |
| imprint | Wiley, 2021 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2021 |
| institution | DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1 |
| issn | 0029-4624, 1468-0068 |
| issn_str_mv | 0029-4624, 1468-0068 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:51:23.698Z |
| match_str | simion2021testimonialcontractarianismaknowledgefirstsocialepistemology |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 891-916 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Noûs |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Simion, Mona 0029-4624 1468-0068 Wiley Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nous.12337 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>According to anti‐reductionism in the epistemology of testimony, testimonial entitlement is easy to come by: all you need to do is listen to what you are being told. Say you like anti‐reductionism; one question that you will need to answer is how come testimonial entitlement comes so cheap; after all, people are free to lie.</jats:p><jats:p>This paper has two aims: first, it looks at the main anti‐reductionist answers to this question and argues that they remain unsatisfactory. Second, it goes on a rescue mission on behalf of anti‐reductionism. I put forth a novel, knowledge‐first anti‐reductionist account, which I dub ‘Testimonial Contractarianism’. According to the view defended here, in virtue of the social contract in play, compliance with the norms governing speech acts is the default position for speakers. Insofar as norm compliance is the default for speakers, I argue, all else equal, entitlement to believe is the default for hearers.</jats:p> Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology Noûs |
| spellingShingle | Simion, Mona, Noûs, Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology, Philosophy |
| title | Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_full | Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_fullStr | Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_full_unstemmed | Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_short | Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_sort | testimonial contractarianism: a knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| title_unstemmed | Testimonial contractarianism: A knowledge‐first social epistemology |
| topic | Philosophy |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nous.12337 |