author_facet Bezemer, Nicole
Hopper, Stephen D.
Krauss, Siegy L.
Phillips, Ryan D.
Roberts, David G.
Bezemer, Nicole
Hopper, Stephen D.
Krauss, Siegy L.
Phillips, Ryan D.
Roberts, David G.
author Bezemer, Nicole
Hopper, Stephen D.
Krauss, Siegy L.
Phillips, Ryan D.
Roberts, David G.
spellingShingle Bezemer, Nicole
Hopper, Stephen D.
Krauss, Siegy L.
Phillips, Ryan D.
Roberts, David G.
Molecular Ecology
Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
Genetics
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
author_sort bezemer, nicole
spelling Bezemer, Nicole Hopper, Stephen D. Krauss, Siegy L. Phillips, Ryan D. Roberts, David G. 0962-1083 1365-294X Wiley Genetics Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.15264 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Pollination by nectarivorous birds is predicted to result in different patterns of pollen dispersal and plant mating compared to pollination by insects. We tested the prediction that paternal genetic diversity, outcrossing rate and realized pollen dispersal will be reduced when the primary pollinator group is excluded from bird‐pollinated plants. Pollinator exclusion experiments in conjunction with paternity analysis of progeny were applied to <jats:italic>Eucalyptus caesia</jats:italic> Benth. (Myrtaceae), a predominantly honeyeater‐pollinated tree that is visited by native insects and the introduced <jats:italic>Apis mellifera</jats:italic> (Apidae). Microsatellite genotyping at 14 loci of all adult <jats:italic>E. caesia</jats:italic> at two populations (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 580 and 315), followed by paternity analysis of 705 progeny, revealed contrasting results between populations. Honeyeater exclusion did not significantly impact pollen dispersal or plant mating at Mount Caroline. In contrast, at the Chiddarcooping site, the exclusion of honeyeaters led to lower outcrossing rates, a threefold reduction in the average number of sires per fruit, a decrease in intermediate‐distance mating and an increase in near‐neighbour mating. The results from Chiddarcooping suggest that bird pollination may increase paternal genetic diversity, potentially leading to higher fitness of progeny and favouring the evolution of this strategy. However, further experimentation involving additional trees and study sites is required to test this hypothesis. Alternatively, insects may be effective pollinators in some populations of bird‐adapted plants, but ineffective in others.</jats:p> Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree Molecular Ecology
doi_str_mv 10.1111/mec.15264
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geographie
Biologie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9tZWMuMTUyNjQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9tZWMuMTUyNjQ
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
issn 0962-1083
1365-294X
issn_str_mv 0962-1083
1365-294X
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str bezemer2019primarypollinatorexclusionhasdivergentconsequencesforpollendispersalandmatingindifferentpopulationsofabirdpollinatedtree
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Molecular Ecology
source_id 49
title Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_unstemmed Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_full Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_fullStr Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_full_unstemmed Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_short Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_sort primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
topic Genetics
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.15264
publishDate 2019
physical 4883-4898
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Pollination by nectarivorous birds is predicted to result in different patterns of pollen dispersal and plant mating compared to pollination by insects. We tested the prediction that paternal genetic diversity, outcrossing rate and realized pollen dispersal will be reduced when the primary pollinator group is excluded from bird‐pollinated plants. Pollinator exclusion experiments in conjunction with paternity analysis of progeny were applied to <jats:italic>Eucalyptus caesia</jats:italic> Benth. (Myrtaceae), a predominantly honeyeater‐pollinated tree that is visited by native insects and the introduced <jats:italic>Apis mellifera</jats:italic> (Apidae). Microsatellite genotyping at 14 loci of all adult <jats:italic>E. caesia</jats:italic> at two populations (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 580 and 315), followed by paternity analysis of 705 progeny, revealed contrasting results between populations. Honeyeater exclusion did not significantly impact pollen dispersal or plant mating at Mount Caroline. In contrast, at the Chiddarcooping site, the exclusion of honeyeaters led to lower outcrossing rates, a threefold reduction in the average number of sires per fruit, a decrease in intermediate‐distance mating and an increase in near‐neighbour mating. The results from Chiddarcooping suggest that bird pollination may increase paternal genetic diversity, potentially leading to higher fitness of progeny and favouring the evolution of this strategy. However, further experimentation involving additional trees and study sites is required to test this hypothesis. Alternatively, insects may be effective pollinators in some populations of bird‐adapted plants, but ineffective in others.</jats:p>
container_issue 22
container_start_page 4883
container_title Molecular Ecology
container_volume 28
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343629328547847
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:54:43.442Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Primary+pollinator+exclusion+has+divergent+consequences+for+pollen+dispersal+and+mating+in+different+populations+of+a+bird%E2%80%90pollinated+tree&rft.date=2019-11-01&genre=article&issn=1365-294X&volume=28&issue=22&spage=4883&epage=4898&pages=4883-4898&jtitle=Molecular+Ecology&atitle=Primary+pollinator+exclusion+has+divergent+consequences+for+pollen+dispersal+and+mating+in+different+populations+of+a+bird%E2%80%90pollinated+tree&aulast=Roberts&aufirst=David+G.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fmec.15264&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792343629328547847
author Bezemer, Nicole, Hopper, Stephen D., Krauss, Siegy L., Phillips, Ryan D., Roberts, David G.
author_facet Bezemer, Nicole, Hopper, Stephen D., Krauss, Siegy L., Phillips, Ryan D., Roberts, David G., Bezemer, Nicole, Hopper, Stephen D., Krauss, Siegy L., Phillips, Ryan D., Roberts, David G.
author_sort bezemer, nicole
container_issue 22
container_start_page 4883
container_title Molecular Ecology
container_volume 28
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Pollination by nectarivorous birds is predicted to result in different patterns of pollen dispersal and plant mating compared to pollination by insects. We tested the prediction that paternal genetic diversity, outcrossing rate and realized pollen dispersal will be reduced when the primary pollinator group is excluded from bird‐pollinated plants. Pollinator exclusion experiments in conjunction with paternity analysis of progeny were applied to <jats:italic>Eucalyptus caesia</jats:italic> Benth. (Myrtaceae), a predominantly honeyeater‐pollinated tree that is visited by native insects and the introduced <jats:italic>Apis mellifera</jats:italic> (Apidae). Microsatellite genotyping at 14 loci of all adult <jats:italic>E. caesia</jats:italic> at two populations (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 580 and 315), followed by paternity analysis of 705 progeny, revealed contrasting results between populations. Honeyeater exclusion did not significantly impact pollen dispersal or plant mating at Mount Caroline. In contrast, at the Chiddarcooping site, the exclusion of honeyeaters led to lower outcrossing rates, a threefold reduction in the average number of sires per fruit, a decrease in intermediate‐distance mating and an increase in near‐neighbour mating. The results from Chiddarcooping suggest that bird pollination may increase paternal genetic diversity, potentially leading to higher fitness of progeny and favouring the evolution of this strategy. However, further experimentation involving additional trees and study sites is required to test this hypothesis. Alternatively, insects may be effective pollinators in some populations of bird‐adapted plants, but ineffective in others.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/mec.15264
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geographie, Biologie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9tZWMuMTUyNjQ
imprint Wiley, 2019
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2019
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0962-1083, 1365-294X
issn_str_mv 0962-1083, 1365-294X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:54:43.442Z
match_str bezemer2019primarypollinatorexclusionhasdivergentconsequencesforpollendispersalandmatingindifferentpopulationsofabirdpollinatedtree
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 4883-4898
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Molecular Ecology
source_id 49
spelling Bezemer, Nicole Hopper, Stephen D. Krauss, Siegy L. Phillips, Ryan D. Roberts, David G. 0962-1083 1365-294X Wiley Genetics Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.15264 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Pollination by nectarivorous birds is predicted to result in different patterns of pollen dispersal and plant mating compared to pollination by insects. We tested the prediction that paternal genetic diversity, outcrossing rate and realized pollen dispersal will be reduced when the primary pollinator group is excluded from bird‐pollinated plants. Pollinator exclusion experiments in conjunction with paternity analysis of progeny were applied to <jats:italic>Eucalyptus caesia</jats:italic> Benth. (Myrtaceae), a predominantly honeyeater‐pollinated tree that is visited by native insects and the introduced <jats:italic>Apis mellifera</jats:italic> (Apidae). Microsatellite genotyping at 14 loci of all adult <jats:italic>E. caesia</jats:italic> at two populations (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 580 and 315), followed by paternity analysis of 705 progeny, revealed contrasting results between populations. Honeyeater exclusion did not significantly impact pollen dispersal or plant mating at Mount Caroline. In contrast, at the Chiddarcooping site, the exclusion of honeyeaters led to lower outcrossing rates, a threefold reduction in the average number of sires per fruit, a decrease in intermediate‐distance mating and an increase in near‐neighbour mating. The results from Chiddarcooping suggest that bird pollination may increase paternal genetic diversity, potentially leading to higher fitness of progeny and favouring the evolution of this strategy. However, further experimentation involving additional trees and study sites is required to test this hypothesis. Alternatively, insects may be effective pollinators in some populations of bird‐adapted plants, but ineffective in others.</jats:p> Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree Molecular Ecology
spellingShingle Bezemer, Nicole, Hopper, Stephen D., Krauss, Siegy L., Phillips, Ryan D., Roberts, David G., Molecular Ecology, Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
title Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_full Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_fullStr Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_full_unstemmed Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_short Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_sort primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
title_unstemmed Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird‐pollinated tree
topic Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.15264