author_facet Gantt, Edwin E.
Lindstrom, Jeffrey P.
Williams, Richard N.
Gantt, Edwin E.
Lindstrom, Jeffrey P.
Williams, Richard N.
author Gantt, Edwin E.
Lindstrom, Jeffrey P.
Williams, Richard N.
spellingShingle Gantt, Edwin E.
Lindstrom, Jeffrey P.
Williams, Richard N.
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
General Psychology
Philosophy
Social Psychology
author_sort gantt, edwin e.
spelling Gantt, Edwin E. Lindstrom, Jeffrey P. Williams, Richard N. 0021-8308 1468-5914 Wiley General Psychology Philosophy Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12111 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since its inception, experimental social psychology has arguably been of two minds about the nature and role of theory. Contemporary social psychology's experimental approach has been strongly informed by the “nomological‐deductive” approach of Carl Hempel in tandem with the “hypothetico‐deducive” approach of Karl Popper. Social psychology's commitment to this hybrid model of science has produced at least two serious obstacles to more fruitful theorizing about human experience: (1) the problem of situational specificity, and (2) the manifest impossibility of formulating meaningful general laws of human social behavior. It is argued that a social psychology based on the search for this kind of lawfulness, under the auspices of either a strict or loose interpretation of the largely Hempelian model, is ultimately unworkable. An alternative approach to social psychology that is attentive both to the need for understanding individual situations and behaviors and to the need for generalized understanding of actual human behaviors is offered. This approach is grounded in the hermeneutic tradition.</jats:p> The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jtsb.12111
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Psychologie
Philosophie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qdHNiLjEyMTEx
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qdHNiLjEyMTEx
institution DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
issn 0021-8308
1468-5914
issn_str_mv 0021-8308
1468-5914
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str gantt2017thegeneralityoftheoryandthespecificityofsocialbehaviorcontrastingexperimentalandhermeneuticsocialscience
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
source_id 49
title The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_unstemmed The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_full The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_fullStr The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_full_unstemmed The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_short The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_sort the generality of theory and the specificity of social behavior: contrasting experimental and hermeneutic social science
topic General Psychology
Philosophy
Social Psychology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12111
publishDate 2017
physical 130-153
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since its inception, experimental social psychology has arguably been of two minds about the nature and role of theory. Contemporary social psychology's experimental approach has been strongly informed by the “nomological‐deductive” approach of Carl Hempel in tandem with the “hypothetico‐deducive” approach of Karl Popper. Social psychology's commitment to this hybrid model of science has produced at least two serious obstacles to more fruitful theorizing about human experience: (1) the problem of situational specificity, and (2) the manifest impossibility of formulating meaningful general laws of human social behavior. It is argued that a social psychology based on the search for this kind of lawfulness, under the auspices of either a strict or loose interpretation of the largely Hempelian model, is ultimately unworkable. An alternative approach to social psychology that is attentive both to the need for understanding individual situations and behaviors and to the need for generalized understanding of actual human behaviors is offered. This approach is grounded in the hermeneutic tradition.</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 130
container_title Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
container_volume 47
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792335415962763279
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:43:46.962Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+Generality+of+Theory+and+the+Specificity+of+Social+Behavior%3A+Contrasting+Experimental+and+Hermeneutic+Social+Science&rft.date=2017-06-01&genre=article&issn=1468-5914&volume=47&issue=2&spage=130&epage=153&pages=130-153&jtitle=Journal+for+the+Theory+of+Social+Behaviour&atitle=The+Generality+of+Theory+and+the+Specificity+of+Social+Behavior%3A+Contrasting+Experimental+and+Hermeneutic+Social+Science&aulast=Williams&aufirst=Richard+N.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fjtsb.12111&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792335415962763279
author Gantt, Edwin E., Lindstrom, Jeffrey P., Williams, Richard N.
author_facet Gantt, Edwin E., Lindstrom, Jeffrey P., Williams, Richard N., Gantt, Edwin E., Lindstrom, Jeffrey P., Williams, Richard N.
author_sort gantt, edwin e.
container_issue 2
container_start_page 130
container_title Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
container_volume 47
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since its inception, experimental social psychology has arguably been of two minds about the nature and role of theory. Contemporary social psychology's experimental approach has been strongly informed by the “nomological‐deductive” approach of Carl Hempel in tandem with the “hypothetico‐deducive” approach of Karl Popper. Social psychology's commitment to this hybrid model of science has produced at least two serious obstacles to more fruitful theorizing about human experience: (1) the problem of situational specificity, and (2) the manifest impossibility of formulating meaningful general laws of human social behavior. It is argued that a social psychology based on the search for this kind of lawfulness, under the auspices of either a strict or loose interpretation of the largely Hempelian model, is ultimately unworkable. An alternative approach to social psychology that is attentive both to the need for understanding individual situations and behaviors and to the need for generalized understanding of actual human behaviors is offered. This approach is grounded in the hermeneutic tradition.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jtsb.12111
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Psychologie, Philosophie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qdHNiLjEyMTEx
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
institution DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275
issn 0021-8308, 1468-5914
issn_str_mv 0021-8308, 1468-5914
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:43:46.962Z
match_str gantt2017thegeneralityoftheoryandthespecificityofsocialbehaviorcontrastingexperimentalandhermeneuticsocialscience
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 130-153
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
source_id 49
spelling Gantt, Edwin E. Lindstrom, Jeffrey P. Williams, Richard N. 0021-8308 1468-5914 Wiley General Psychology Philosophy Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12111 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since its inception, experimental social psychology has arguably been of two minds about the nature and role of theory. Contemporary social psychology's experimental approach has been strongly informed by the “nomological‐deductive” approach of Carl Hempel in tandem with the “hypothetico‐deducive” approach of Karl Popper. Social psychology's commitment to this hybrid model of science has produced at least two serious obstacles to more fruitful theorizing about human experience: (1) the problem of situational specificity, and (2) the manifest impossibility of formulating meaningful general laws of human social behavior. It is argued that a social psychology based on the search for this kind of lawfulness, under the auspices of either a strict or loose interpretation of the largely Hempelian model, is ultimately unworkable. An alternative approach to social psychology that is attentive both to the need for understanding individual situations and behaviors and to the need for generalized understanding of actual human behaviors is offered. This approach is grounded in the hermeneutic tradition.</jats:p> The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
spellingShingle Gantt, Edwin E., Lindstrom, Jeffrey P., Williams, Richard N., Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science, General Psychology, Philosophy, Social Psychology
title The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_full The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_fullStr The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_full_unstemmed The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_short The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
title_sort the generality of theory and the specificity of social behavior: contrasting experimental and hermeneutic social science
title_unstemmed The Generality of Theory and the Specificity of Social Behavior: Contrasting Experimental and Hermeneutic Social Science
topic General Psychology, Philosophy, Social Psychology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12111