Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Social Issues |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Journal of Social Issues, 70, 2014, 3, S. 489-500 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Burger, Jerry M. Burger, Jerry M. |
---|---|
author |
Burger, Jerry M. |
spellingShingle |
Burger, Jerry M. Journal of Social Issues Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking General Social Sciences |
author_sort |
burger, jerry m. |
spelling |
Burger, Jerry M. 0022-4537 1540-4560 Wiley General Social Sciences http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josi.12073 <jats:p>Although people are often astonished by the high rates of obedience in Milgram's famous studies, research on social influence processes in other settings provides considerable insight into why so many of Milgram's participants continued to press the shock levers all the way to 450 volts. That research suggests that four situational features Milgram built into his experimental procedure contributed to the high levels of obedience. The four features are the incremental nature of the task, the novelty of the situation and the kind of normative information made available, the opportunity to deny or diffuse responsibility, and the limited opportunity to ponder decisions. When looked at in this light, Milgram's research can be seen as a dramatic example of some well‐documented psychological effects.</jats:p> Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking Journal of Social Issues |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/josi.12073 |
facet_avail |
Online |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb3NpLjEyMDcz |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb3NpLjEyMDcz |
institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
imprint |
Wiley, 2014 |
imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2014 |
issn |
0022-4537 1540-4560 |
issn_str_mv |
0022-4537 1540-4560 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
match_str |
burger2014situationalfeaturesinmilgramsexperimentthatkepthisparticipantsshocking |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
publisher |
Wiley |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Journal of Social Issues |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_unstemmed |
Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_full |
Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_fullStr |
Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_full_unstemmed |
Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_short |
Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_sort |
situational features in milgram's experiment that kept his participants shocking |
topic |
General Social Sciences |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josi.12073 |
publishDate |
2014 |
physical |
489-500 |
description |
<jats:p>Although people are often astonished by the high rates of obedience in Milgram's famous studies, research on social influence processes in other settings provides considerable insight into why so many of Milgram's participants continued to press the shock levers all the way to 450 volts. That research suggests that four situational features Milgram built into his experimental procedure contributed to the high levels of obedience. The four features are the incremental nature of the task, the novelty of the situation and the kind of normative information made available, the opportunity to deny or diffuse responsibility, and the limited opportunity to ponder decisions. When looked at in this light, Milgram's research can be seen as a dramatic example of some well‐documented psychological effects.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
489 |
container_title |
Journal of Social Issues |
container_volume |
70 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792340181843443719 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:59:56.512Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Situational+Features+in+Milgram%27s+Experiment+That+Kept+His+Participants+Shocking&rft.date=2014-09-01&genre=article&issn=1540-4560&volume=70&issue=3&spage=489&epage=500&pages=489-500&jtitle=Journal+of+Social+Issues&atitle=Situational+Features+in+Milgram%27s+Experiment+That+Kept+His+Participants+Shocking&aulast=Burger&aufirst=Jerry+M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fjosi.12073&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792340181843443719 |
author | Burger, Jerry M. |
author_facet | Burger, Jerry M., Burger, Jerry M. |
author_sort | burger, jerry m. |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 489 |
container_title | Journal of Social Issues |
container_volume | 70 |
description | <jats:p>Although people are often astonished by the high rates of obedience in Milgram's famous studies, research on social influence processes in other settings provides considerable insight into why so many of Milgram's participants continued to press the shock levers all the way to 450 volts. That research suggests that four situational features Milgram built into his experimental procedure contributed to the high levels of obedience. The four features are the incremental nature of the task, the novelty of the situation and the kind of normative information made available, the opportunity to deny or diffuse responsibility, and the limited opportunity to ponder decisions. When looked at in this light, Milgram's research can be seen as a dramatic example of some well‐documented psychological effects.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/josi.12073 |
facet_avail | Online |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb3NpLjEyMDcz |
imprint | Wiley, 2014 |
imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2014 |
institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
issn | 0022-4537, 1540-4560 |
issn_str_mv | 0022-4537, 1540-4560 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:59:56.512Z |
match_str | burger2014situationalfeaturesinmilgramsexperimentthatkepthisparticipantsshocking |
mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
physical | 489-500 |
publishDate | 2014 |
publishDateSort | 2014 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Journal of Social Issues |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Burger, Jerry M. 0022-4537 1540-4560 Wiley General Social Sciences http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josi.12073 <jats:p>Although people are often astonished by the high rates of obedience in Milgram's famous studies, research on social influence processes in other settings provides considerable insight into why so many of Milgram's participants continued to press the shock levers all the way to 450 volts. That research suggests that four situational features Milgram built into his experimental procedure contributed to the high levels of obedience. The four features are the incremental nature of the task, the novelty of the situation and the kind of normative information made available, the opportunity to deny or diffuse responsibility, and the limited opportunity to ponder decisions. When looked at in this light, Milgram's research can be seen as a dramatic example of some well‐documented psychological effects.</jats:p> Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking Journal of Social Issues |
spellingShingle | Burger, Jerry M., Journal of Social Issues, Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking, General Social Sciences |
title | Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_full | Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_fullStr | Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_full_unstemmed | Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_short | Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
title_sort | situational features in milgram's experiment that kept his participants shocking |
title_unstemmed | Situational Features in Milgram's Experiment That Kept His Participants Shocking |
topic | General Social Sciences |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josi.12073 |