author_facet Kautzky‐Willer, A.
Thurner, S.
Klimek, P.
Kautzky‐Willer, A.
Thurner, S.
Klimek, P.
author Kautzky‐Willer, A.
Thurner, S.
Klimek, P.
spellingShingle Kautzky‐Willer, A.
Thurner, S.
Klimek, P.
Journal of Internal Medicine
Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
Internal Medicine
author_sort kautzky‐willer, a.
spelling Kautzky‐Willer, A. Thurner, S. Klimek, P. 0954-6820 1365-2796 Wiley Internal Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12567 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>There is firm evidence of a relation between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and increased risks of cancer at various sites, but it is still unclear how different antihyperglycaemic therapies modify site‐specific cancer risks. The aim of this study was to provide a complete characterization of all possible associations between individual T2DM therapies, statin use and site‐specific cancers in the Austrian population.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Medical claims data of 1 847 051 patients with hospital stays during 2006–2007 were used to estimate age‐ and sex‐dependent co‐occurrences of site‐specific cancer diagnoses and treatment with specific glucose‐lowering drugs and statins.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Patients treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues showed up to ninefold increased risks for cancers of the colon [males only (m)], liver (m), pancreas, lung (m) and brain (m), as well as a strongly decreased risk for prostate cancer (m). In patients taking statins, the risks were generally decreased, with a greater risk reduction in patients not receiving antihyperglycaemic therapies. The strongest effects were observed for use of insulin and pancreatic cancer [m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.5, 95% CI: 3.1–6.6; females (f): <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.2, 95% CI: 2.5–7.1], sulfonylureas (m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 2.8, 95% CI: 1.7–4.6; f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 3.0, 95% CI: 2.1–4.2) or glitazones and skin cancer (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.80), as well as metformin and cancer of the prostate (m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75–0.91) and corpus uteri (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4–2.0) and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64–0.91).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risks in patients with diabetes independently of sex and age. Overall, our data support the hyperglycaemia–cancer hypothesis. A reduction in endogenous or exogenous hyperinsulinaemia may be beneficial for cancer prevention. Therefore, insulin‐sparing and insulin‐sensitizing drugs should be the preferred treatment choices.</jats:p></jats:sec> Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk Journal of Internal Medicine
doi_str_mv 10.1111/joim.12567
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb2ltLjEyNTY3
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb2ltLjEyNTY3
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Zwi2
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
issn 0954-6820
1365-2796
issn_str_mv 0954-6820
1365-2796
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str kautzkywiller2017useofstatinsoffsetsinsulinrelatedcancerrisk
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Internal Medicine
source_id 49
title Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_unstemmed Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_full Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_fullStr Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_full_unstemmed Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_short Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_sort use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
topic Internal Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12567
publishDate 2017
physical 206-216
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>There is firm evidence of a relation between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and increased risks of cancer at various sites, but it is still unclear how different antihyperglycaemic therapies modify site‐specific cancer risks. The aim of this study was to provide a complete characterization of all possible associations between individual T2DM therapies, statin use and site‐specific cancers in the Austrian population.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Medical claims data of 1 847 051 patients with hospital stays during 2006–2007 were used to estimate age‐ and sex‐dependent co‐occurrences of site‐specific cancer diagnoses and treatment with specific glucose‐lowering drugs and statins.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Patients treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues showed up to ninefold increased risks for cancers of the colon [males only (m)], liver (m), pancreas, lung (m) and brain (m), as well as a strongly decreased risk for prostate cancer (m). In patients taking statins, the risks were generally decreased, with a greater risk reduction in patients not receiving antihyperglycaemic therapies. The strongest effects were observed for use of insulin and pancreatic cancer [m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.5, 95% CI: 3.1–6.6; females (f): <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.2, 95% CI: 2.5–7.1], sulfonylureas (m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 2.8, 95% CI: 1.7–4.6; f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 3.0, 95% CI: 2.1–4.2) or glitazones and skin cancer (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.80), as well as metformin and cancer of the prostate (m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75–0.91) and corpus uteri (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4–2.0) and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64–0.91).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risks in patients with diabetes independently of sex and age. Overall, our data support the hyperglycaemia–cancer hypothesis. A reduction in endogenous or exogenous hyperinsulinaemia may be beneficial for cancer prevention. Therefore, insulin‐sparing and insulin‐sensitizing drugs should be the preferred treatment choices.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 206
container_title Journal of Internal Medicine
container_volume 281
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792334328341987334
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:26:54.617Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Use+of+statins+offsets+insulin%E2%80%90related+cancer+risk&rft.date=2017-02-01&genre=article&issn=1365-2796&volume=281&issue=2&spage=206&epage=216&pages=206-216&jtitle=Journal+of+Internal+Medicine&atitle=Use+of+statins+offsets+insulin%E2%80%90related+cancer+risk&aulast=Klimek&aufirst=P.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fjoim.12567&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792334328341987334
author Kautzky‐Willer, A., Thurner, S., Klimek, P.
author_facet Kautzky‐Willer, A., Thurner, S., Klimek, P., Kautzky‐Willer, A., Thurner, S., Klimek, P.
author_sort kautzky‐willer, a.
container_issue 2
container_start_page 206
container_title Journal of Internal Medicine
container_volume 281
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>There is firm evidence of a relation between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and increased risks of cancer at various sites, but it is still unclear how different antihyperglycaemic therapies modify site‐specific cancer risks. The aim of this study was to provide a complete characterization of all possible associations between individual T2DM therapies, statin use and site‐specific cancers in the Austrian population.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Medical claims data of 1 847 051 patients with hospital stays during 2006–2007 were used to estimate age‐ and sex‐dependent co‐occurrences of site‐specific cancer diagnoses and treatment with specific glucose‐lowering drugs and statins.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Patients treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues showed up to ninefold increased risks for cancers of the colon [males only (m)], liver (m), pancreas, lung (m) and brain (m), as well as a strongly decreased risk for prostate cancer (m). In patients taking statins, the risks were generally decreased, with a greater risk reduction in patients not receiving antihyperglycaemic therapies. The strongest effects were observed for use of insulin and pancreatic cancer [m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.5, 95% CI: 3.1–6.6; females (f): <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.2, 95% CI: 2.5–7.1], sulfonylureas (m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 2.8, 95% CI: 1.7–4.6; f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 3.0, 95% CI: 2.1–4.2) or glitazones and skin cancer (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.80), as well as metformin and cancer of the prostate (m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75–0.91) and corpus uteri (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4–2.0) and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64–0.91).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risks in patients with diabetes independently of sex and age. Overall, our data support the hyperglycaemia–cancer hypothesis. A reduction in endogenous or exogenous hyperinsulinaemia may be beneficial for cancer prevention. Therefore, insulin‐sparing and insulin‐sensitizing drugs should be the preferred treatment choices.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/joim.12567
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb2ltLjEyNTY3
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0954-6820, 1365-2796
issn_str_mv 0954-6820, 1365-2796
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:26:54.617Z
match_str kautzkywiller2017useofstatinsoffsetsinsulinrelatedcancerrisk
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 206-216
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Internal Medicine
source_id 49
spelling Kautzky‐Willer, A. Thurner, S. Klimek, P. 0954-6820 1365-2796 Wiley Internal Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12567 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>There is firm evidence of a relation between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and increased risks of cancer at various sites, but it is still unclear how different antihyperglycaemic therapies modify site‐specific cancer risks. The aim of this study was to provide a complete characterization of all possible associations between individual T2DM therapies, statin use and site‐specific cancers in the Austrian population.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Medical claims data of 1 847 051 patients with hospital stays during 2006–2007 were used to estimate age‐ and sex‐dependent co‐occurrences of site‐specific cancer diagnoses and treatment with specific glucose‐lowering drugs and statins.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Patients treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues showed up to ninefold increased risks for cancers of the colon [males only (m)], liver (m), pancreas, lung (m) and brain (m), as well as a strongly decreased risk for prostate cancer (m). In patients taking statins, the risks were generally decreased, with a greater risk reduction in patients not receiving antihyperglycaemic therapies. The strongest effects were observed for use of insulin and pancreatic cancer [m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.5, 95% CI: 3.1–6.6; females (f): <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.2, 95% CI: 2.5–7.1], sulfonylureas (m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 2.8, 95% CI: 1.7–4.6; f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 3.0, 95% CI: 2.1–4.2) or glitazones and skin cancer (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.80), as well as metformin and cancer of the prostate (m: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75–0.91) and corpus uteri (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4–2.0) and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (f: <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OR</jats:styled-content> 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64–0.91).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risks in patients with diabetes independently of sex and age. Overall, our data support the hyperglycaemia–cancer hypothesis. A reduction in endogenous or exogenous hyperinsulinaemia may be beneficial for cancer prevention. Therefore, insulin‐sparing and insulin‐sensitizing drugs should be the preferred treatment choices.</jats:p></jats:sec> Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk Journal of Internal Medicine
spellingShingle Kautzky‐Willer, A., Thurner, S., Klimek, P., Journal of Internal Medicine, Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk, Internal Medicine
title Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_full Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_fullStr Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_full_unstemmed Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_short Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_sort use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
title_unstemmed Use of statins offsets insulin‐related cancer risk
topic Internal Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12567