author_facet Barrett, P.
Kline, P.
Paltiel, L.
Eysenck, H. J.
Barrett, P.
Kline, P.
Paltiel, L.
Eysenck, H. J.
author Barrett, P.
Kline, P.
Paltiel, L.
Eysenck, H. J.
spellingShingle Barrett, P.
Kline, P.
Paltiel, L.
Eysenck, H. J.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Applied Psychology
author_sort barrett, p.
spelling Barrett, P. Kline, P. Paltiel, L. Eysenck, H. J. 0963-1798 2044-8325 Wiley Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Applied Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00595.x <jats:p>Using three samples of applicant data, encompassing over 2300 participants, the Concept Model 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ) was examined for scale discriminability at the item, scale and factorial level. Item analysis and maximum likelihood factor analysis indicated that the OPQ questionnaire provided good, low complexity measurement on 22 out of the 31 scales. Nine exhibited poor signal‐to‐noise ratios, high item complexity indices, and insufficient number of keyed loadings on the appropriate factor. On the basis of the results below and from those reported by Matthews &amp; Stanton (1994), it was argued that the test requires further development in conjunction with the revision of the psychological and measurement models specified as underlying its construction.</jats:p> An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00595.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Psychologie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjIwNDQtODMyNS4xOTk2LnRiMDA1OTUueA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjIwNDQtODMyNS4xOTk2LnRiMDA1OTUueA
institution DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
imprint Wiley, 1996
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1996
issn 0963-1798
2044-8325
issn_str_mv 0963-1798
2044-8325
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str barrett1996anevaluationofthepsychometricpropertiesoftheconcept52occupationalpersonalityquestionnaire
publishDateSort 1996
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
source_id 49
title An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_unstemmed An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_full An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_fullStr An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_short An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_sort an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 occupational personality questionnaire
topic Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Applied Psychology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00595.x
publishDate 1996
physical 1-19
description <jats:p>Using three samples of applicant data, encompassing over 2300 participants, the Concept Model 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ) was examined for scale discriminability at the item, scale and factorial level. Item analysis and maximum likelihood factor analysis indicated that the OPQ questionnaire provided good, low complexity measurement on 22 out of the 31 scales. Nine exhibited poor signal‐to‐noise ratios, high item complexity indices, and insufficient number of keyed loadings on the appropriate factor. On the basis of the results below and from those reported by Matthews &amp; Stanton (1994), it was argued that the test requires further development in conjunction with the revision of the psychological and measurement models specified as underlying its construction.</jats:p>
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
container_volume 69
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792337308871032834
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:14:17.388Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=An+evaluation+of+the+psychometric+properties+of+the+concept+5.2+Occupational+Personality+Questionnaire&rft.date=1996-03-01&genre=article&issn=2044-8325&volume=69&issue=1&spage=1&epage=19&pages=1-19&jtitle=Journal+of+Occupational+and+Organizational+Psychology&atitle=An+evaluation+of+the+psychometric+properties+of+the+concept+5.2+Occupational+Personality+Questionnaire&aulast=Eysenck&aufirst=H.+J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.2044-8325.1996.tb00595.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792337308871032834
author Barrett, P., Kline, P., Paltiel, L., Eysenck, H. J.
author_facet Barrett, P., Kline, P., Paltiel, L., Eysenck, H. J., Barrett, P., Kline, P., Paltiel, L., Eysenck, H. J.
author_sort barrett, p.
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
container_volume 69
description <jats:p>Using three samples of applicant data, encompassing over 2300 participants, the Concept Model 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ) was examined for scale discriminability at the item, scale and factorial level. Item analysis and maximum likelihood factor analysis indicated that the OPQ questionnaire provided good, low complexity measurement on 22 out of the 31 scales. Nine exhibited poor signal‐to‐noise ratios, high item complexity indices, and insufficient number of keyed loadings on the appropriate factor. On the basis of the results below and from those reported by Matthews &amp; Stanton (1994), it was argued that the test requires further development in conjunction with the revision of the psychological and measurement models specified as underlying its construction.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00595.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Psychologie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjIwNDQtODMyNS4xOTk2LnRiMDA1OTUueA
imprint Wiley, 1996
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1996
institution DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14
issn 0963-1798, 2044-8325
issn_str_mv 0963-1798, 2044-8325
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:14:17.388Z
match_str barrett1996anevaluationofthepsychometricpropertiesoftheconcept52occupationalpersonalityquestionnaire
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 1-19
publishDate 1996
publishDateSort 1996
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
source_id 49
spelling Barrett, P. Kline, P. Paltiel, L. Eysenck, H. J. 0963-1798 2044-8325 Wiley Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Applied Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00595.x <jats:p>Using three samples of applicant data, encompassing over 2300 participants, the Concept Model 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ) was examined for scale discriminability at the item, scale and factorial level. Item analysis and maximum likelihood factor analysis indicated that the OPQ questionnaire provided good, low complexity measurement on 22 out of the 31 scales. Nine exhibited poor signal‐to‐noise ratios, high item complexity indices, and insufficient number of keyed loadings on the appropriate factor. On the basis of the results below and from those reported by Matthews &amp; Stanton (1994), it was argued that the test requires further development in conjunction with the revision of the psychological and measurement models specified as underlying its construction.</jats:p> An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
spellingShingle Barrett, P., Kline, P., Paltiel, L., Eysenck, H. J., Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology
title An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_full An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_fullStr An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_short An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
title_sort an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 occupational personality questionnaire
title_unstemmed An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the concept 5.2 Occupational Personality Questionnaire
topic Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00595.x