Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , , |
| In: | Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 54, 2010, 2, S. 141-146 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
ABDI, W. AMATHIEU, R. ADHOUM, A. PONCELET, C. SLAVOV, V. KAMOUN, W. COMBES, X. DHONNEUR, G. ABDI, W. AMATHIEU, R. ADHOUM, A. PONCELET, C. SLAVOV, V. KAMOUN, W. COMBES, X. DHONNEUR, G. |
|---|---|
| author |
ABDI, W. AMATHIEU, R. ADHOUM, A. PONCELET, C. SLAVOV, V. KAMOUN, W. COMBES, X. DHONNEUR, G. |
| spellingShingle |
ABDI, W. AMATHIEU, R. ADHOUM, A. PONCELET, C. SLAVOV, V. KAMOUN, W. COMBES, X. DHONNEUR, G. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine General Medicine |
| author_sort |
abdi, w. |
| spelling |
ABDI, W. AMATHIEU, R. ADHOUM, A. PONCELET, C. SLAVOV, V. KAMOUN, W. COMBES, X. DHONNEUR, G. 0001-5172 1399-6576 Wiley Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Background: </jats:bold> We designed a prospective randomized single‐blind study to compare efficiency and post‐operative upper airway morbidity when the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme<jats:sup>™</jats:sup> is used as an alternative to the endotracheal tube (ETT).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods: </jats:bold> One hundred and thirty‐eight elective pelvic laparoscopic ASA I–II female patients were assigned to receive either the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> or the ETT for airway management. Balanced anesthesia and ventilation techniques were standardized to control end‐tidal CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and BIS value in the range 4.5–5 kPa and 40–50, respectively, and to maintain adequate hemodynamic stability. A single surgeon blinded to the airway management technique performed all surgical procedures. The ventilation efficiency of each airway was evaluated. Anesthesia‐ and surgery‐related times were calculated and anesthesia details were recorded. Post‐operative pain and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were measured in a blind fashion using a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0–100).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> Surgery duration was similar in both groups. Airway management duration was shorter with the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup>. Post‐operative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity incidence and all symptoms' intensity were significantly increased after ETT as compared with LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> anesthesia. At the end of the PACU stage, the incidence and mean NRS of post‐operative hoarseness were reduced when LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> was used as an alternative to the ETT (16% vs. 47%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0.01 and 9 vs. 19, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0.01, respectively).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion: </jats:bold> We demonstrated that choosing an LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> was an efficient pharyngolaryngeal morbidity‐sparing strategy. Moreover, we showed that the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> and the ETT were equally effective airways for a routine gynecological laparoscopy procedure.</jats:p> Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme<sup>™</sup> and the ETT Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzOTktNjU3Ni4yMDA5LjAyMDk1Lng |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzOTktNjU3Ni4yMDA5LjAyMDk1Lng |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2010 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2010 |
| issn |
0001-5172 1399-6576 |
| issn_str_mv |
0001-5172 1399-6576 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
abdi2010sparingthelarynxduringgynecologicallaparoscopyarandomizedtrialcomparingthelmasupremeandtheett |
| publishDateSort |
2010 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_unstemmed |
Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_full |
Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_fullStr |
Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_short |
Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_sort |
sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the lma supreme<sup>™</sup> and the ett |
| topic |
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine General Medicine |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| physical |
141-146 |
| description |
<jats:p><jats:bold>Background: </jats:bold> We designed a prospective randomized single‐blind study to compare efficiency and post‐operative upper airway morbidity when the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme<jats:sup>™</jats:sup> is used as an alternative to the endotracheal tube (ETT).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods: </jats:bold> One hundred and thirty‐eight elective pelvic laparoscopic ASA I–II female patients were assigned to receive either the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> or the ETT for airway management. Balanced anesthesia and ventilation techniques were standardized to control end‐tidal CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and BIS value in the range 4.5–5 kPa and 40–50, respectively, and to maintain adequate hemodynamic stability. A single surgeon blinded to the airway management technique performed all surgical procedures. The ventilation efficiency of each airway was evaluated. Anesthesia‐ and surgery‐related times were calculated and anesthesia details were recorded. Post‐operative pain and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were measured in a blind fashion using a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0–100).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> Surgery duration was similar in both groups. Airway management duration was shorter with the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup>. Post‐operative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity incidence and all symptoms' intensity were significantly increased after ETT as compared with LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> anesthesia. At the end of the PACU stage, the incidence and mean NRS of post‐operative hoarseness were reduced when LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> was used as an alternative to the ETT (16% vs. 47%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0.01 and 9 vs. 19, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0.01, respectively).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion: </jats:bold> We demonstrated that choosing an LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> was an efficient pharyngolaryngeal morbidity‐sparing strategy. Moreover, we showed that the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> and the ETT were equally effective airways for a routine gynecological laparoscopy procedure.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
141 |
| container_title |
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
| container_volume |
54 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792337671850295296 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:20:03.93Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Sparing+the+larynx+during+gynecological+laparoscopy%3A+a+randomized+trial+comparing+the+LMA+Supreme%E2%84%A2+and+the+ETT&rft.date=2010-02-01&genre=article&issn=1399-6576&volume=54&issue=2&spage=141&epage=146&pages=141-146&jtitle=Acta+Anaesthesiologica+Scandinavica&atitle=Sparing+the+larynx+during+gynecological+laparoscopy%3A+a+randomized+trial+comparing+the+LMA+Supreme%3Csup%3E%E2%84%A2%3C%2Fsup%3E+and+the+ETT&aulast=DHONNEUR&aufirst=G.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2009.02095.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792337671850295296 |
| author | ABDI, W., AMATHIEU, R., ADHOUM, A., PONCELET, C., SLAVOV, V., KAMOUN, W., COMBES, X., DHONNEUR, G. |
| author_facet | ABDI, W., AMATHIEU, R., ADHOUM, A., PONCELET, C., SLAVOV, V., KAMOUN, W., COMBES, X., DHONNEUR, G., ABDI, W., AMATHIEU, R., ADHOUM, A., PONCELET, C., SLAVOV, V., KAMOUN, W., COMBES, X., DHONNEUR, G. |
| author_sort | abdi, w. |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 141 |
| container_title | Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
| container_volume | 54 |
| description | <jats:p><jats:bold>Background: </jats:bold> We designed a prospective randomized single‐blind study to compare efficiency and post‐operative upper airway morbidity when the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme<jats:sup>™</jats:sup> is used as an alternative to the endotracheal tube (ETT).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods: </jats:bold> One hundred and thirty‐eight elective pelvic laparoscopic ASA I–II female patients were assigned to receive either the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> or the ETT for airway management. Balanced anesthesia and ventilation techniques were standardized to control end‐tidal CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and BIS value in the range 4.5–5 kPa and 40–50, respectively, and to maintain adequate hemodynamic stability. A single surgeon blinded to the airway management technique performed all surgical procedures. The ventilation efficiency of each airway was evaluated. Anesthesia‐ and surgery‐related times were calculated and anesthesia details were recorded. Post‐operative pain and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were measured in a blind fashion using a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0–100).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> Surgery duration was similar in both groups. Airway management duration was shorter with the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup>. Post‐operative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity incidence and all symptoms' intensity were significantly increased after ETT as compared with LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> anesthesia. At the end of the PACU stage, the incidence and mean NRS of post‐operative hoarseness were reduced when LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> was used as an alternative to the ETT (16% vs. 47%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0.01 and 9 vs. 19, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0.01, respectively).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion: </jats:bold> We demonstrated that choosing an LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> was an efficient pharyngolaryngeal morbidity‐sparing strategy. Moreover, we showed that the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> and the ETT were equally effective airways for a routine gynecological laparoscopy procedure.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzOTktNjU3Ni4yMDA5LjAyMDk1Lng |
| imprint | Wiley, 2010 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2010 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 0001-5172, 1399-6576 |
| issn_str_mv | 0001-5172, 1399-6576 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:20:03.93Z |
| match_str | abdi2010sparingthelarynxduringgynecologicallaparoscopyarandomizedtrialcomparingthelmasupremeandtheett |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 141-146 |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | ABDI, W. AMATHIEU, R. ADHOUM, A. PONCELET, C. SLAVOV, V. KAMOUN, W. COMBES, X. DHONNEUR, G. 0001-5172 1399-6576 Wiley Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Background: </jats:bold> We designed a prospective randomized single‐blind study to compare efficiency and post‐operative upper airway morbidity when the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme<jats:sup>™</jats:sup> is used as an alternative to the endotracheal tube (ETT).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods: </jats:bold> One hundred and thirty‐eight elective pelvic laparoscopic ASA I–II female patients were assigned to receive either the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> or the ETT for airway management. Balanced anesthesia and ventilation techniques were standardized to control end‐tidal CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and BIS value in the range 4.5–5 kPa and 40–50, respectively, and to maintain adequate hemodynamic stability. A single surgeon blinded to the airway management technique performed all surgical procedures. The ventilation efficiency of each airway was evaluated. Anesthesia‐ and surgery‐related times were calculated and anesthesia details were recorded. Post‐operative pain and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were measured in a blind fashion using a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0–100).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> Surgery duration was similar in both groups. Airway management duration was shorter with the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup>. Post‐operative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity incidence and all symptoms' intensity were significantly increased after ETT as compared with LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> anesthesia. At the end of the PACU stage, the incidence and mean NRS of post‐operative hoarseness were reduced when LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> was used as an alternative to the ETT (16% vs. 47%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0.01 and 9 vs. 19, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic><0.01, respectively).</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion: </jats:bold> We demonstrated that choosing an LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> was an efficient pharyngolaryngeal morbidity‐sparing strategy. Moreover, we showed that the LMA Supreme<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> and the ETT were equally effective airways for a routine gynecological laparoscopy procedure.</jats:p> Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme<sup>™</sup> and the ETT Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
| spellingShingle | ABDI, W., AMATHIEU, R., ADHOUM, A., PONCELET, C., SLAVOV, V., KAMOUN, W., COMBES, X., DHONNEUR, G., Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, General Medicine |
| title | Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_full | Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_fullStr | Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_short | Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| title_sort | sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the lma supreme<sup>™</sup> and the ett |
| title_unstemmed | Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme™ and the ETT |
| topic | Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, General Medicine |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x |