author_facet Moore, R.
Moore, R.
author Moore, R.
spellingShingle Moore, R.
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
Nutrition and Dietetics
Medicine (miscellaneous)
author_sort moore, r.
spelling Moore, R. 0952-3871 1365-277X Wiley Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277x.2004.00568_6.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Background: </jats:bold> In head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, the side effects of radiotherapy (RT) often lead to patients being unable to consume adequate nutrition and fluid (Chencharick and Mossman, 1983). Gastrostomy tube placement prior to RT can reduce incidence of severe weight loss and hospitalization during treatment (Beaver <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>., 2001). However, gastrostomy tube usage is dependant upon HNC site and area of RT. The aims of the study were to identify the characteristics of those HNC patients who will require gastrostomy tube feeding during RT and utilize these data to target future patients for prophylactic tube placement prior to commencing RT and to write guidelines for the placement of feeding tubes.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Method: </jats:bold> Data were collected retrospectively regarding diagnosis, surgery and area of RT on all HNC patients who had had a prophylactic gastrostomy placed prior to RT between April 2000 and April 2002. Outcome measurements in terms of utilization of gastrostomy, body weight and nutrition related emergency admissions were recorded.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> Thirty‐five patients had a prophylactic gastrostomy placed [26 male, nine female; mean age 62 (range 26–84) years]. Of these, 26 utilized their tube for feeding or fluids during RT. The sites of radiotherapy were: bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx and neck (20 patients), bilateral RT to the neck (five) and RT to the left oropharynx and neck (one). The mean weight loss during RT in patients who utilized their prophylactic gastrostomy was 3.3 (range 0–11.5%) compared to 8 (5.5–12.0%) in patients who did not have a prophylactic gastrostomy. Only one of the patients with a prophylactic gastrostomy had a hospital admission (length of stay 11 days) compared to four patients who did not [mean length of stay 21 days (range 14–29)]. Six of the nine patients who did not utilize their gastrostomy for feeding and were able to maintain their nutrition orally, received bilateral RT to the neck only.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Discussion: </jats:bold> Most of the patients who received bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx required gastrostomy feeding during RT, which is consistent with findings of Beaver <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>. (2001) who reported the highest incidence of weight loss in patients receiving RT to the nasopharynx or base of the tongue.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion: </jats:bold> In view of the association between the site of RT and gastrostomy utilization, hospital admissions, length of stay and weight loss, HNC patients with planned bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx or with existing dysphagia should be targeted for gastrostomy tube placement prior to starting treatment.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>References: </jats:bold> Beaver, M.E., Matheny, K.E., Roberts, D.B. &amp; Myers, J.N.(2001) Predictors of weight loss during radiation therapy. <jats:italic>Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg</jats:italic>. <jats:bold>125</jats:bold>, 645–648.</jats:p><jats:p>Chencharick, J.D. &amp; Mossman, K.L. (1983) Nutritionalconsequences of the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. <jats:italic>Cancer </jats:italic><jats:bold>51</jats:bold>, 811–815.</jats:p> Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2004.00568_6.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzNjUtMjc3eC4yMDA0LjAwNTY4XzYueA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzNjUtMjc3eC4yMDA0LjAwNTY4XzYueA
institution DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
imprint Wiley, 2004
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2004
issn 0952-3871
1365-277X
issn_str_mv 0952-3871
1365-277X
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str moore2004gastrostomytubeplacementinheadandneckcancerpatientsundergoingradiotherapy
publishDateSort 2004
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
source_id 49
title Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_unstemmed Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_full Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_fullStr Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_short Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_sort gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
topic Nutrition and Dietetics
Medicine (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277x.2004.00568_6.x
publishDate 2004
physical 578-578
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Background: </jats:bold> In head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, the side effects of radiotherapy (RT) often lead to patients being unable to consume adequate nutrition and fluid (Chencharick and Mossman, 1983). Gastrostomy tube placement prior to RT can reduce incidence of severe weight loss and hospitalization during treatment (Beaver <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>., 2001). However, gastrostomy tube usage is dependant upon HNC site and area of RT. The aims of the study were to identify the characteristics of those HNC patients who will require gastrostomy tube feeding during RT and utilize these data to target future patients for prophylactic tube placement prior to commencing RT and to write guidelines for the placement of feeding tubes.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Method: </jats:bold> Data were collected retrospectively regarding diagnosis, surgery and area of RT on all HNC patients who had had a prophylactic gastrostomy placed prior to RT between April 2000 and April 2002. Outcome measurements in terms of utilization of gastrostomy, body weight and nutrition related emergency admissions were recorded.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> Thirty‐five patients had a prophylactic gastrostomy placed [26 male, nine female; mean age 62 (range 26–84) years]. Of these, 26 utilized their tube for feeding or fluids during RT. The sites of radiotherapy were: bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx and neck (20 patients), bilateral RT to the neck (five) and RT to the left oropharynx and neck (one). The mean weight loss during RT in patients who utilized their prophylactic gastrostomy was 3.3 (range 0–11.5%) compared to 8 (5.5–12.0%) in patients who did not have a prophylactic gastrostomy. Only one of the patients with a prophylactic gastrostomy had a hospital admission (length of stay 11 days) compared to four patients who did not [mean length of stay 21 days (range 14–29)]. Six of the nine patients who did not utilize their gastrostomy for feeding and were able to maintain their nutrition orally, received bilateral RT to the neck only.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Discussion: </jats:bold> Most of the patients who received bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx required gastrostomy feeding during RT, which is consistent with findings of Beaver <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>. (2001) who reported the highest incidence of weight loss in patients receiving RT to the nasopharynx or base of the tongue.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion: </jats:bold> In view of the association between the site of RT and gastrostomy utilization, hospital admissions, length of stay and weight loss, HNC patients with planned bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx or with existing dysphagia should be targeted for gastrostomy tube placement prior to starting treatment.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>References: </jats:bold> Beaver, M.E., Matheny, K.E., Roberts, D.B. &amp; Myers, J.N.(2001) Predictors of weight loss during radiation therapy. <jats:italic>Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg</jats:italic>. <jats:bold>125</jats:bold>, 645–648.</jats:p><jats:p>Chencharick, J.D. &amp; Mossman, K.L. (1983) Nutritionalconsequences of the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. <jats:italic>Cancer </jats:italic><jats:bold>51</jats:bold>, 811–815.</jats:p>
container_issue 6
container_start_page 578
container_title Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
container_volume 17
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792335344423665675
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:43:00.981Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Gastrostomy+tube+placement+in+head+and+neck+cancer+patients+undergoing+radiotherapy&rft.date=2004-12-01&genre=article&issn=1365-277X&volume=17&issue=6&spage=578&epage=578&pages=578-578&jtitle=Journal+of+Human+Nutrition+and+Dietetics&atitle=Gastrostomy+tube+placement+in+head+and+neck+cancer+patients+undergoing+radiotherapy&aulast=Moore&aufirst=R.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1365-277x.2004.00568_6.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792335344423665675
author Moore, R.
author_facet Moore, R., Moore, R.
author_sort moore, r.
container_issue 6
container_start_page 578
container_title Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
container_volume 17
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Background: </jats:bold> In head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, the side effects of radiotherapy (RT) often lead to patients being unable to consume adequate nutrition and fluid (Chencharick and Mossman, 1983). Gastrostomy tube placement prior to RT can reduce incidence of severe weight loss and hospitalization during treatment (Beaver <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>., 2001). However, gastrostomy tube usage is dependant upon HNC site and area of RT. The aims of the study were to identify the characteristics of those HNC patients who will require gastrostomy tube feeding during RT and utilize these data to target future patients for prophylactic tube placement prior to commencing RT and to write guidelines for the placement of feeding tubes.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Method: </jats:bold> Data were collected retrospectively regarding diagnosis, surgery and area of RT on all HNC patients who had had a prophylactic gastrostomy placed prior to RT between April 2000 and April 2002. Outcome measurements in terms of utilization of gastrostomy, body weight and nutrition related emergency admissions were recorded.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> Thirty‐five patients had a prophylactic gastrostomy placed [26 male, nine female; mean age 62 (range 26–84) years]. Of these, 26 utilized their tube for feeding or fluids during RT. The sites of radiotherapy were: bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx and neck (20 patients), bilateral RT to the neck (five) and RT to the left oropharynx and neck (one). The mean weight loss during RT in patients who utilized their prophylactic gastrostomy was 3.3 (range 0–11.5%) compared to 8 (5.5–12.0%) in patients who did not have a prophylactic gastrostomy. Only one of the patients with a prophylactic gastrostomy had a hospital admission (length of stay 11 days) compared to four patients who did not [mean length of stay 21 days (range 14–29)]. Six of the nine patients who did not utilize their gastrostomy for feeding and were able to maintain their nutrition orally, received bilateral RT to the neck only.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Discussion: </jats:bold> Most of the patients who received bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx required gastrostomy feeding during RT, which is consistent with findings of Beaver <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>. (2001) who reported the highest incidence of weight loss in patients receiving RT to the nasopharynx or base of the tongue.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion: </jats:bold> In view of the association between the site of RT and gastrostomy utilization, hospital admissions, length of stay and weight loss, HNC patients with planned bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx or with existing dysphagia should be targeted for gastrostomy tube placement prior to starting treatment.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>References: </jats:bold> Beaver, M.E., Matheny, K.E., Roberts, D.B. &amp; Myers, J.N.(2001) Predictors of weight loss during radiation therapy. <jats:italic>Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg</jats:italic>. <jats:bold>125</jats:bold>, 645–648.</jats:p><jats:p>Chencharick, J.D. &amp; Mossman, K.L. (1983) Nutritionalconsequences of the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. <jats:italic>Cancer </jats:italic><jats:bold>51</jats:bold>, 811–815.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2004.00568_6.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzNjUtMjc3eC4yMDA0LjAwNTY4XzYueA
imprint Wiley, 2004
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2004
institution DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1
issn 0952-3871, 1365-277X
issn_str_mv 0952-3871, 1365-277X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:43:00.981Z
match_str moore2004gastrostomytubeplacementinheadandneckcancerpatientsundergoingradiotherapy
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 578-578
publishDate 2004
publishDateSort 2004
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
source_id 49
spelling Moore, R. 0952-3871 1365-277X Wiley Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277x.2004.00568_6.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Background: </jats:bold> In head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, the side effects of radiotherapy (RT) often lead to patients being unable to consume adequate nutrition and fluid (Chencharick and Mossman, 1983). Gastrostomy tube placement prior to RT can reduce incidence of severe weight loss and hospitalization during treatment (Beaver <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>., 2001). However, gastrostomy tube usage is dependant upon HNC site and area of RT. The aims of the study were to identify the characteristics of those HNC patients who will require gastrostomy tube feeding during RT and utilize these data to target future patients for prophylactic tube placement prior to commencing RT and to write guidelines for the placement of feeding tubes.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Method: </jats:bold> Data were collected retrospectively regarding diagnosis, surgery and area of RT on all HNC patients who had had a prophylactic gastrostomy placed prior to RT between April 2000 and April 2002. Outcome measurements in terms of utilization of gastrostomy, body weight and nutrition related emergency admissions were recorded.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> Thirty‐five patients had a prophylactic gastrostomy placed [26 male, nine female; mean age 62 (range 26–84) years]. Of these, 26 utilized their tube for feeding or fluids during RT. The sites of radiotherapy were: bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx and neck (20 patients), bilateral RT to the neck (five) and RT to the left oropharynx and neck (one). The mean weight loss during RT in patients who utilized their prophylactic gastrostomy was 3.3 (range 0–11.5%) compared to 8 (5.5–12.0%) in patients who did not have a prophylactic gastrostomy. Only one of the patients with a prophylactic gastrostomy had a hospital admission (length of stay 11 days) compared to four patients who did not [mean length of stay 21 days (range 14–29)]. Six of the nine patients who did not utilize their gastrostomy for feeding and were able to maintain their nutrition orally, received bilateral RT to the neck only.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Discussion: </jats:bold> Most of the patients who received bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx required gastrostomy feeding during RT, which is consistent with findings of Beaver <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>. (2001) who reported the highest incidence of weight loss in patients receiving RT to the nasopharynx or base of the tongue.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion: </jats:bold> In view of the association between the site of RT and gastrostomy utilization, hospital admissions, length of stay and weight loss, HNC patients with planned bilateral RT to the oro‐ or nasopharynx or with existing dysphagia should be targeted for gastrostomy tube placement prior to starting treatment.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>References: </jats:bold> Beaver, M.E., Matheny, K.E., Roberts, D.B. &amp; Myers, J.N.(2001) Predictors of weight loss during radiation therapy. <jats:italic>Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg</jats:italic>. <jats:bold>125</jats:bold>, 645–648.</jats:p><jats:p>Chencharick, J.D. &amp; Mossman, K.L. (1983) Nutritionalconsequences of the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. <jats:italic>Cancer </jats:italic><jats:bold>51</jats:bold>, 811–815.</jats:p> Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
spellingShingle Moore, R., Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous)
title Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_full Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_fullStr Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_short Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_sort gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_unstemmed Gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
topic Nutrition and Dietetics, Medicine (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277x.2004.00568_6.x