author_facet BORTFELD, R.
KIEHN, M.
BORTFELD, R.
KIEHN, M.
author BORTFELD, R.
KIEHN, M.
spellingShingle BORTFELD, R.
KIEHN, M.
Geophysical Prospecting
REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
Geochemistry and Petrology
Geophysics
author_sort bortfeld, r.
spelling BORTFELD, R. KIEHN, M. 0016-8025 1365-2478 Wiley Geochemistry and Petrology Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00557.x <jats:title>A<jats:sc>bstract</jats:sc></jats:title><jats:p>The effect of wave‐equation migration on amplitudes is determined. This effect is derived for zero‐offset traces and for second‐order approximations of the traveltimes. Three steps are followed: firstly, the amplitudes of zero‐offset traces are established; secondly minus half the traveltimes are used as input for downward continuation in migration (forward in space and time); thirdly, the amplitudes of the migrated events are determined by downward continuation (at zero‐traveltimes).</jats:p><jats:p>Layered models (piles of homogeneous layers) with smooth interfaces are used. The determinants of the 2 × 2 matrices <jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub> obtained for these models are responsible for the main effect on migration. The migration result primarily depends on the overburden as the inverse of det (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>). Drastic effects can occur over small distances. For weakly reflecting media, it is confirmed that wave‐equation migration gives “correct” results (but the input data must be multiplied by <jats:italic>V</jats:italic><jats:sub>0</jats:sub><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>), i.e. amplitudes proportional to the reflection coefficient. For any velocity changes, the inverse of det (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>) will, in general, give inaccurate migration amplitudes and inaccurate lithological interpretations. In a simple step, true amplitude migration, or exact migration, is derived from our results.</jats:p><jats:p>It is assumed that no focus phenomena are present. The effect of buried foci is discussed briefly.</jats:p> REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)<sup>1</sup> Geophysical Prospecting
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00557.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Chemie und Pharmazie
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzNjUtMjQ3OC4xOTkyLnRiMDA1NTcueA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzNjUtMjQ3OC4xOTkyLnRiMDA1NTcueA
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 1992
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1992
issn 0016-8025
1365-2478
issn_str_mv 0016-8025
1365-2478
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str bortfeld1992reflectionamplitudesandmigrationamplitudeszerooffsetsituation1
publishDateSort 1992
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Geophysical Prospecting
source_id 49
title REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_unstemmed REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_full REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_fullStr REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_full_unstemmed REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_short REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_sort reflection amplitudes and migration amplitudes (zero‐offset situation)<sup>1</sup>
topic Geochemistry and Petrology
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00557.x
publishDate 1992
physical 873-884
description <jats:title>A<jats:sc>bstract</jats:sc></jats:title><jats:p>The effect of wave‐equation migration on amplitudes is determined. This effect is derived for zero‐offset traces and for second‐order approximations of the traveltimes. Three steps are followed: firstly, the amplitudes of zero‐offset traces are established; secondly minus half the traveltimes are used as input for downward continuation in migration (forward in space and time); thirdly, the amplitudes of the migrated events are determined by downward continuation (at zero‐traveltimes).</jats:p><jats:p>Layered models (piles of homogeneous layers) with smooth interfaces are used. The determinants of the 2 × 2 matrices <jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub> obtained for these models are responsible for the main effect on migration. The migration result primarily depends on the overburden as the inverse of det (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>). Drastic effects can occur over small distances. For weakly reflecting media, it is confirmed that wave‐equation migration gives “correct” results (but the input data must be multiplied by <jats:italic>V</jats:italic><jats:sub>0</jats:sub><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>), i.e. amplitudes proportional to the reflection coefficient. For any velocity changes, the inverse of det (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>) will, in general, give inaccurate migration amplitudes and inaccurate lithological interpretations. In a simple step, true amplitude migration, or exact migration, is derived from our results.</jats:p><jats:p>It is assumed that no focus phenomena are present. The effect of buried foci is discussed briefly.</jats:p>
container_issue 8
container_start_page 873
container_title Geophysical Prospecting
container_volume 40
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792336542587420688
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:01:45.919Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=REFLECTION+AMPLITUDES+AND+MIGRATION+AMPLITUDES+%28ZERO%E2%80%90OFFSET+SITUATION%291&rft.date=1992-11-01&genre=article&issn=1365-2478&volume=40&issue=8&spage=873&epage=884&pages=873-884&jtitle=Geophysical+Prospecting&atitle=REFLECTION+AMPLITUDES+AND+MIGRATION+AMPLITUDES+%28ZERO%E2%80%90OFFSET+SITUATION%29%3Csup%3E1%3C%2Fsup%3E&aulast=KIEHN&aufirst=M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1365-2478.1992.tb00557.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792336542587420688
author BORTFELD, R., KIEHN, M.
author_facet BORTFELD, R., KIEHN, M., BORTFELD, R., KIEHN, M.
author_sort bortfeld, r.
container_issue 8
container_start_page 873
container_title Geophysical Prospecting
container_volume 40
description <jats:title>A<jats:sc>bstract</jats:sc></jats:title><jats:p>The effect of wave‐equation migration on amplitudes is determined. This effect is derived for zero‐offset traces and for second‐order approximations of the traveltimes. Three steps are followed: firstly, the amplitudes of zero‐offset traces are established; secondly minus half the traveltimes are used as input for downward continuation in migration (forward in space and time); thirdly, the amplitudes of the migrated events are determined by downward continuation (at zero‐traveltimes).</jats:p><jats:p>Layered models (piles of homogeneous layers) with smooth interfaces are used. The determinants of the 2 × 2 matrices <jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub> obtained for these models are responsible for the main effect on migration. The migration result primarily depends on the overburden as the inverse of det (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>). Drastic effects can occur over small distances. For weakly reflecting media, it is confirmed that wave‐equation migration gives “correct” results (but the input data must be multiplied by <jats:italic>V</jats:italic><jats:sub>0</jats:sub><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>), i.e. amplitudes proportional to the reflection coefficient. For any velocity changes, the inverse of det (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>) will, in general, give inaccurate migration amplitudes and inaccurate lithological interpretations. In a simple step, true amplitude migration, or exact migration, is derived from our results.</jats:p><jats:p>It is assumed that no focus phenomena are present. The effect of buried foci is discussed briefly.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00557.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjEzNjUtMjQ3OC4xOTkyLnRiMDA1NTcueA
imprint Wiley, 1992
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1992
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0016-8025, 1365-2478
issn_str_mv 0016-8025, 1365-2478
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:01:45.919Z
match_str bortfeld1992reflectionamplitudesandmigrationamplitudeszerooffsetsituation1
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 873-884
publishDate 1992
publishDateSort 1992
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Geophysical Prospecting
source_id 49
spelling BORTFELD, R. KIEHN, M. 0016-8025 1365-2478 Wiley Geochemistry and Petrology Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00557.x <jats:title>A<jats:sc>bstract</jats:sc></jats:title><jats:p>The effect of wave‐equation migration on amplitudes is determined. This effect is derived for zero‐offset traces and for second‐order approximations of the traveltimes. Three steps are followed: firstly, the amplitudes of zero‐offset traces are established; secondly minus half the traveltimes are used as input for downward continuation in migration (forward in space and time); thirdly, the amplitudes of the migrated events are determined by downward continuation (at zero‐traveltimes).</jats:p><jats:p>Layered models (piles of homogeneous layers) with smooth interfaces are used. The determinants of the 2 × 2 matrices <jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub> obtained for these models are responsible for the main effect on migration. The migration result primarily depends on the overburden as the inverse of det (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>). Drastic effects can occur over small distances. For weakly reflecting media, it is confirmed that wave‐equation migration gives “correct” results (but the input data must be multiplied by <jats:italic>V</jats:italic><jats:sub>0</jats:sub><jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>), i.e. amplitudes proportional to the reflection coefficient. For any velocity changes, the inverse of det (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold><jats:sub>0</jats:sub>) will, in general, give inaccurate migration amplitudes and inaccurate lithological interpretations. In a simple step, true amplitude migration, or exact migration, is derived from our results.</jats:p><jats:p>It is assumed that no focus phenomena are present. The effect of buried foci is discussed briefly.</jats:p> REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)<sup>1</sup> Geophysical Prospecting
spellingShingle BORTFELD, R., KIEHN, M., Geophysical Prospecting, REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1, Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics
title REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_full REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_fullStr REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_full_unstemmed REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_short REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
title_sort reflection amplitudes and migration amplitudes (zero‐offset situation)<sup>1</sup>
title_unstemmed REFLECTION AMPLITUDES AND MIGRATION AMPLITUDES (ZERO‐OFFSET SITUATION)1
topic Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00557.x