Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Cognitive Science |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | Cognitive Science, 34, 2010, 2, S. 311-321 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Rai, Tage S. Holyoak, Keith J. Rai, Tage S. Holyoak, Keith J. |
|---|---|
| author |
Rai, Tage S. Holyoak, Keith J. |
| spellingShingle |
Rai, Tage S. Holyoak, Keith J. Cognitive Science Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Neuroscience Experimental and Cognitive Psychology |
| author_sort |
rai, tage s. |
| spelling |
Rai, Tage S. Holyoak, Keith J. 0364-0213 1551-6709 Wiley Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Neuroscience Experimental and Cognitive Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01088.x <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We created paired moral dilemmas with minimal contrasts in wording, a research strategy that has been advocated as a way to empirically establish principles operative in a domain‐specific moral psychology. However, the candidate “principles” we tested were not derived from work in moral philosophy, but rather from work in the areas of consumer choice and risk perception. Participants were paradoxically less likely to choose an action that sacrifices one life to save others when they were asked to provide more reasons for doing so (Experiment 1), and their willingness to sacrifice lives depended not only on how many lives would be saved, but on the number of lives at risk (Experiment 2). The latter effect was also found in a within‐subjects design (Experiment 3). These findings suggest caution in the use of artificial dilemmas as a key testbed for revealing principled bases for moral judgment.</jats:p> Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem Cognitive Science |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01088.x |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin Biologie Psychologie Informatik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE1NTEtNjcwOS4yMDA5LjAxMDg4Lng |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE1NTEtNjcwOS4yMDA5LjAxMDg4Lng |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2010 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2010 |
| issn |
0364-0213 1551-6709 |
| issn_str_mv |
0364-0213 1551-6709 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
rai2010moralprinciplesorconsumerpreferencesalternativeframingsofthetrolleyproblem |
| publishDateSort |
2010 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Cognitive Science |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_unstemmed |
Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_full |
Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_fullStr |
Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_short |
Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_sort |
moral principles or consumer preferences? alternative framings of the trolley problem |
| topic |
Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Neuroscience Experimental and Cognitive Psychology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01088.x |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| physical |
311-321 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We created paired moral dilemmas with minimal contrasts in wording, a research strategy that has been advocated as a way to empirically establish principles operative in a domain‐specific moral psychology. However, the candidate “principles” we tested were not derived from work in moral philosophy, but rather from work in the areas of consumer choice and risk perception. Participants were paradoxically less likely to choose an action that sacrifices one life to save others when they were asked to provide more reasons for doing so (Experiment 1), and their willingness to sacrifice lives depended not only on how many lives would be saved, but on the number of lives at risk (Experiment 2). The latter effect was also found in a within‐subjects design (Experiment 3). These findings suggest caution in the use of artificial dilemmas as a key testbed for revealing principled bases for moral judgment.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
311 |
| container_title |
Cognitive Science |
| container_volume |
34 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792344896941588482 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T17:14:54.129Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Moral+Principles+or+Consumer+Preferences%3F+Alternative+Framings+of+the+Trolley+Problem&rft.date=2010-03-01&genre=article&issn=1551-6709&volume=34&issue=2&spage=311&epage=321&pages=311-321&jtitle=Cognitive+Science&atitle=Moral+Principles+or+Consumer+Preferences%3F+Alternative+Framings+of+the+Trolley+Problem&aulast=Holyoak&aufirst=Keith+J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1551-6709.2009.01088.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792344896941588482 |
| author | Rai, Tage S., Holyoak, Keith J. |
| author_facet | Rai, Tage S., Holyoak, Keith J., Rai, Tage S., Holyoak, Keith J. |
| author_sort | rai, tage s. |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 311 |
| container_title | Cognitive Science |
| container_volume | 34 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We created paired moral dilemmas with minimal contrasts in wording, a research strategy that has been advocated as a way to empirically establish principles operative in a domain‐specific moral psychology. However, the candidate “principles” we tested were not derived from work in moral philosophy, but rather from work in the areas of consumer choice and risk perception. Participants were paradoxically less likely to choose an action that sacrifices one life to save others when they were asked to provide more reasons for doing so (Experiment 1), and their willingness to sacrifice lives depended not only on how many lives would be saved, but on the number of lives at risk (Experiment 2). The latter effect was also found in a within‐subjects design (Experiment 3). These findings suggest caution in the use of artificial dilemmas as a key testbed for revealing principled bases for moral judgment.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01088.x |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin, Biologie, Psychologie, Informatik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE1NTEtNjcwOS4yMDA5LjAxMDg4Lng |
| imprint | Wiley, 2010 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2010 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 0364-0213, 1551-6709 |
| issn_str_mv | 0364-0213, 1551-6709 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T17:14:54.129Z |
| match_str | rai2010moralprinciplesorconsumerpreferencesalternativeframingsofthetrolleyproblem |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 311-321 |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Cognitive Science |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Rai, Tage S. Holyoak, Keith J. 0364-0213 1551-6709 Wiley Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Neuroscience Experimental and Cognitive Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01088.x <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We created paired moral dilemmas with minimal contrasts in wording, a research strategy that has been advocated as a way to empirically establish principles operative in a domain‐specific moral psychology. However, the candidate “principles” we tested were not derived from work in moral philosophy, but rather from work in the areas of consumer choice and risk perception. Participants were paradoxically less likely to choose an action that sacrifices one life to save others when they were asked to provide more reasons for doing so (Experiment 1), and their willingness to sacrifice lives depended not only on how many lives would be saved, but on the number of lives at risk (Experiment 2). The latter effect was also found in a within‐subjects design (Experiment 3). These findings suggest caution in the use of artificial dilemmas as a key testbed for revealing principled bases for moral judgment.</jats:p> Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem Cognitive Science |
| spellingShingle | Rai, Tage S., Holyoak, Keith J., Cognitive Science, Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology |
| title | Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_full | Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_fullStr | Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_full_unstemmed | Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_short | Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| title_sort | moral principles or consumer preferences? alternative framings of the trolley problem |
| title_unstemmed | Moral Principles or Consumer Preferences? Alternative Framings of the Trolley Problem |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01088.x |