author_facet Baumgartner, Christoph
Pataraia, Ekaterina
Lindinger, Gerald
Deecke, Lüder
Baumgartner, Christoph
Pataraia, Ekaterina
Lindinger, Gerald
Deecke, Lüder
author Baumgartner, Christoph
Pataraia, Ekaterina
Lindinger, Gerald
Deecke, Lüder
spellingShingle Baumgartner, Christoph
Pataraia, Ekaterina
Lindinger, Gerald
Deecke, Lüder
Epilepsia
Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
Neurology (clinical)
Neurology
author_sort baumgartner, christoph
spelling Baumgartner, Christoph Pataraia, Ekaterina Lindinger, Gerald Deecke, Lüder 0013-9580 1528-1167 Wiley Neurology (clinical) Neurology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01533.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Summary: </jats:bold> The introduction of whole‐head magnetoencephalographic (MEG) systems facilitating simultaneous recording from the entire brain surface has led to a major breakthrough in the MEG evaluation of epilepsy patients. MEG localizations estimates of the interictal spike zone showed excellent agreement with invasive electrical recordings and were useful to clarify the spatial relationship of the irritative zone and structural lesions. MEG appears to be especially useful for study of patients with neocortical epilepsy, and helped to guide the placement of subdural grid electrodes in patients with nonlesional epilepsies. MEG could differentiate between patients with mesial and lateral temporal seizure onset. Spike propagation in the temporal lobe and the spatio–temporal organization of the interictal spike complex could be studied noninvasively. MEG was useful to delineate essential brain regions before surgical procedures adjacent to the central fissure. MEG appears to be more sensitive than scalp EEG for detection of epileptic discharges arising from the lateral neocortex, whereas only highly synchronized discharges arising from mesial temporal structures could be recorded. A major limitation of MEG has been the recording of seizures because long‐term recordings cannot be performed on a routine basis with the available technology. Because MEG and EEG yield both complementary and confirmatory information, combined MEG–EEG recordings in conjunction with advanced source modeling techniques should improve the noninvasive evaluation of epilepsy patients and further reduce the need for invasive procedures.</jats:p> Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy Epilepsia
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01533.x
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE1MjgtMTE1Ny4yMDAwLnRiMDE1MzMueA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE1MjgtMTE1Ny4yMDAwLnRiMDE1MzMueA
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2000
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2000
issn 0013-9580
1528-1167
issn_str_mv 0013-9580
1528-1167
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str baumgartner2000magnetoencephalographyinfocalepilepsy
publishDateSort 2000
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Epilepsia
source_id 49
title Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_unstemmed Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_full Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_fullStr Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_short Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_sort magnetoencephalography in focal epilepsy
topic Neurology (clinical)
Neurology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01533.x
publishDate 2000
physical
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Summary: </jats:bold> The introduction of whole‐head magnetoencephalographic (MEG) systems facilitating simultaneous recording from the entire brain surface has led to a major breakthrough in the MEG evaluation of epilepsy patients. MEG localizations estimates of the interictal spike zone showed excellent agreement with invasive electrical recordings and were useful to clarify the spatial relationship of the irritative zone and structural lesions. MEG appears to be especially useful for study of patients with neocortical epilepsy, and helped to guide the placement of subdural grid electrodes in patients with nonlesional epilepsies. MEG could differentiate between patients with mesial and lateral temporal seizure onset. Spike propagation in the temporal lobe and the spatio–temporal organization of the interictal spike complex could be studied noninvasively. MEG was useful to delineate essential brain regions before surgical procedures adjacent to the central fissure. MEG appears to be more sensitive than scalp EEG for detection of epileptic discharges arising from the lateral neocortex, whereas only highly synchronized discharges arising from mesial temporal structures could be recorded. A major limitation of MEG has been the recording of seizures because long‐term recordings cannot be performed on a routine basis with the available technology. Because MEG and EEG yield both complementary and confirmatory information, combined MEG–EEG recordings in conjunction with advanced source modeling techniques should improve the noninvasive evaluation of epilepsy patients and further reduce the need for invasive procedures.</jats:p>
container_issue s3
container_start_page 0
container_title Epilepsia
container_volume 41
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343631727689732
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:54:44.025Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Magnetoencephalography+in+Focal+Epilepsy&rft.date=2000-03-01&genre=article&issn=1528-1167&volume=41&issue=s3&jtitle=Epilepsia&atitle=Magnetoencephalography+in+Focal+Epilepsy&aulast=Deecke&aufirst=L%C3%BCder&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1528-1157.2000.tb01533.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792343631727689732
author Baumgartner, Christoph, Pataraia, Ekaterina, Lindinger, Gerald, Deecke, Lüder
author_facet Baumgartner, Christoph, Pataraia, Ekaterina, Lindinger, Gerald, Deecke, Lüder, Baumgartner, Christoph, Pataraia, Ekaterina, Lindinger, Gerald, Deecke, Lüder
author_sort baumgartner, christoph
container_issue s3
container_start_page 0
container_title Epilepsia
container_volume 41
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Summary: </jats:bold> The introduction of whole‐head magnetoencephalographic (MEG) systems facilitating simultaneous recording from the entire brain surface has led to a major breakthrough in the MEG evaluation of epilepsy patients. MEG localizations estimates of the interictal spike zone showed excellent agreement with invasive electrical recordings and were useful to clarify the spatial relationship of the irritative zone and structural lesions. MEG appears to be especially useful for study of patients with neocortical epilepsy, and helped to guide the placement of subdural grid electrodes in patients with nonlesional epilepsies. MEG could differentiate between patients with mesial and lateral temporal seizure onset. Spike propagation in the temporal lobe and the spatio–temporal organization of the interictal spike complex could be studied noninvasively. MEG was useful to delineate essential brain regions before surgical procedures adjacent to the central fissure. MEG appears to be more sensitive than scalp EEG for detection of epileptic discharges arising from the lateral neocortex, whereas only highly synchronized discharges arising from mesial temporal structures could be recorded. A major limitation of MEG has been the recording of seizures because long‐term recordings cannot be performed on a routine basis with the available technology. Because MEG and EEG yield both complementary and confirmatory information, combined MEG–EEG recordings in conjunction with advanced source modeling techniques should improve the noninvasive evaluation of epilepsy patients and further reduce the need for invasive procedures.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01533.x
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE1MjgtMTE1Ny4yMDAwLnRiMDE1MzMueA
imprint Wiley, 2000
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2000
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0013-9580, 1528-1167
issn_str_mv 0013-9580, 1528-1167
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:54:44.025Z
match_str baumgartner2000magnetoencephalographyinfocalepilepsy
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2000
publishDateSort 2000
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Epilepsia
source_id 49
spelling Baumgartner, Christoph Pataraia, Ekaterina Lindinger, Gerald Deecke, Lüder 0013-9580 1528-1167 Wiley Neurology (clinical) Neurology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01533.x <jats:p><jats:bold>Summary: </jats:bold> The introduction of whole‐head magnetoencephalographic (MEG) systems facilitating simultaneous recording from the entire brain surface has led to a major breakthrough in the MEG evaluation of epilepsy patients. MEG localizations estimates of the interictal spike zone showed excellent agreement with invasive electrical recordings and were useful to clarify the spatial relationship of the irritative zone and structural lesions. MEG appears to be especially useful for study of patients with neocortical epilepsy, and helped to guide the placement of subdural grid electrodes in patients with nonlesional epilepsies. MEG could differentiate between patients with mesial and lateral temporal seizure onset. Spike propagation in the temporal lobe and the spatio–temporal organization of the interictal spike complex could be studied noninvasively. MEG was useful to delineate essential brain regions before surgical procedures adjacent to the central fissure. MEG appears to be more sensitive than scalp EEG for detection of epileptic discharges arising from the lateral neocortex, whereas only highly synchronized discharges arising from mesial temporal structures could be recorded. A major limitation of MEG has been the recording of seizures because long‐term recordings cannot be performed on a routine basis with the available technology. Because MEG and EEG yield both complementary and confirmatory information, combined MEG–EEG recordings in conjunction with advanced source modeling techniques should improve the noninvasive evaluation of epilepsy patients and further reduce the need for invasive procedures.</jats:p> Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy Epilepsia
spellingShingle Baumgartner, Christoph, Pataraia, Ekaterina, Lindinger, Gerald, Deecke, Lüder, Epilepsia, Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy, Neurology (clinical), Neurology
title Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_full Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_fullStr Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_short Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
title_sort magnetoencephalography in focal epilepsy
title_unstemmed Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy
topic Neurology (clinical), Neurology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01533.x