Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Contingent Eclecticism
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42, 2012, 1, S. 20-39 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
SØGAARD, VILLY SØGAARD, VILLY |
|---|---|
| author |
SØGAARD, VILLY |
| spellingShingle |
SØGAARD, VILLY Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Contingent Eclecticism General Psychology Philosophy Social Psychology |
| author_sort |
søgaard, villy |
| spelling |
SØGAARD, VILLY 0021-8308 1468-5914 Wiley General Psychology Philosophy Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00474.x <jats:p>For more than a century, methodological diversity within the social sciences has been the source of recurrent paradigm wars, and no obvious winner seems to be in sight. The aim of this article is to explore the contingencies underlying this diversity. It is argued that the shared condition of complexity forces us to adopt a pragmatic perspective from which even relevant ontological and epistemological assumptions should be thought of as contextual rather than absolute. In particular, the extent to which social causality is perceived as stable and universal vs. dynamic and contextual and the extent to which research‐related reflexivity is an issue appear to set apart the different approaches. Towards the end of the article examples of methodological fit and misfit are provided to illustrate the relevancy of the “contingent eclecticism” observed in practice.</jats:p> Contingent Eclecticism Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00474.x |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Philosophie Psychologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjgtNTkxNC4yMDExLjAwNDc0Lng |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjgtNTkxNC4yMDExLjAwNDc0Lng |
| institution |
DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2012 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2012 |
| issn |
0021-8308 1468-5914 |
| issn_str_mv |
0021-8308 1468-5914 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
sogaard2012contingenteclecticism |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_unstemmed |
Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_full |
Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_fullStr |
Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_short |
Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_sort |
contingent eclecticism |
| topic |
General Psychology Philosophy Social Psychology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00474.x |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| physical |
20-39 |
| description |
<jats:p>For more than a century, methodological diversity within the social sciences has been the source of recurrent paradigm wars, and no obvious winner seems to be in sight. The aim of this article is to explore the contingencies underlying this diversity. It is argued that the shared condition of complexity forces us to adopt a pragmatic perspective from which even relevant ontological and epistemological assumptions should be thought of as contextual rather than absolute. In particular, the extent to which social causality is perceived as stable and universal vs. dynamic and contextual and the extent to which research‐related reflexivity is an issue appear to set apart the different approaches. Towards the end of the article examples of methodological fit and misfit are provided to illustrate the relevancy of the “contingent eclecticism” observed in practice.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
1 |
| container_start_page |
20 |
| container_title |
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| container_volume |
42 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792335500096307210 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:45:16.92Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Contingent+Eclecticism&rft.date=2012-03-01&genre=article&issn=1468-5914&volume=42&issue=1&spage=20&epage=39&pages=20-39&jtitle=Journal+for+the+Theory+of+Social+Behaviour&atitle=Contingent+Eclecticism&aulast=S%C3%98GAARD&aufirst=VILLY&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1468-5914.2011.00474.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792335500096307210 |
| author | SØGAARD, VILLY |
| author_facet | SØGAARD, VILLY, SØGAARD, VILLY |
| author_sort | søgaard, villy |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 20 |
| container_title | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| container_volume | 42 |
| description | <jats:p>For more than a century, methodological diversity within the social sciences has been the source of recurrent paradigm wars, and no obvious winner seems to be in sight. The aim of this article is to explore the contingencies underlying this diversity. It is argued that the shared condition of complexity forces us to adopt a pragmatic perspective from which even relevant ontological and epistemological assumptions should be thought of as contextual rather than absolute. In particular, the extent to which social causality is perceived as stable and universal vs. dynamic and contextual and the extent to which research‐related reflexivity is an issue appear to set apart the different approaches. Towards the end of the article examples of methodological fit and misfit are provided to illustrate the relevancy of the “contingent eclecticism” observed in practice.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00474.x |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Philosophie, Psychologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjgtNTkxNC4yMDExLjAwNDc0Lng |
| imprint | Wiley, 2012 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2012 |
| institution | DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15 |
| issn | 0021-8308, 1468-5914 |
| issn_str_mv | 0021-8308, 1468-5914 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:45:16.92Z |
| match_str | sogaard2012contingenteclecticism |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 20-39 |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | SØGAARD, VILLY 0021-8308 1468-5914 Wiley General Psychology Philosophy Social Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00474.x <jats:p>For more than a century, methodological diversity within the social sciences has been the source of recurrent paradigm wars, and no obvious winner seems to be in sight. The aim of this article is to explore the contingencies underlying this diversity. It is argued that the shared condition of complexity forces us to adopt a pragmatic perspective from which even relevant ontological and epistemological assumptions should be thought of as contextual rather than absolute. In particular, the extent to which social causality is perceived as stable and universal vs. dynamic and contextual and the extent to which research‐related reflexivity is an issue appear to set apart the different approaches. Towards the end of the article examples of methodological fit and misfit are provided to illustrate the relevancy of the “contingent eclecticism” observed in practice.</jats:p> Contingent Eclecticism Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| spellingShingle | SØGAARD, VILLY, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Contingent Eclecticism, General Psychology, Philosophy, Social Psychology |
| title | Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_full | Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_fullStr | Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_full_unstemmed | Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_short | Contingent Eclecticism |
| title_sort | contingent eclecticism |
| title_unstemmed | Contingent Eclecticism |
| topic | General Psychology, Philosophy, Social Psychology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00474.x |