Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Metaphilosophy |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Metaphilosophy, 43, 2012, 1-2, S. 82-95 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Edwards, Michael Edwards, Michael |
|---|---|
| author |
Edwards, Michael |
| spellingShingle |
Edwards, Michael Metaphilosophy Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy Philosophy |
| author_sort |
edwards, michael |
| spelling |
Edwards, Michael 0026-1068 1467-9973 Wiley Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01731.x <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Historians of philosophy are increasingly likely to emphasize the extent to which their work offers a pay‐off for philosophers of un‐historical or anti‐historical inclinations; but this defence is less familiar, and often seems less than self‐evident, to intellectual historians. This article examines this tendency, arguing that such arguments for the instrumental value of historical scholarship in philosophy are often more problematic than they at first appear. Using the relatively familiar case study of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>ené <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">D</jats:styled-content>escartes' reading of his scholastic and Aristotelian contemporaries, the article attempts to problematize this notion of pay‐off from an historian's perspective.</jats:p> Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy Metaphilosophy |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01731.x |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Philosophie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTk3My4yMDExLjAxNzMxLng |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTk3My4yMDExLjAxNzMxLng |
| institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2012 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2012 |
| issn |
0026-1068 1467-9973 |
| issn_str_mv |
0026-1068 1467-9973 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
edwards2012philosophyearlymodernintellectualhistoryandthehistoryofphilosophy |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Metaphilosophy |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_unstemmed |
Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_full |
Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_fullStr |
Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_short |
Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_sort |
philosophy, early modern intellectual history, and the history of philosophy |
| topic |
Philosophy |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01731.x |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| physical |
82-95 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Historians of philosophy are increasingly likely to emphasize the extent to which their work offers a pay‐off for philosophers of un‐historical or anti‐historical inclinations; but this defence is less familiar, and often seems less than self‐evident, to intellectual historians. This article examines this tendency, arguing that such arguments for the instrumental value of historical scholarship in philosophy are often more problematic than they at first appear. Using the relatively familiar case study of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>ené <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">D</jats:styled-content>escartes' reading of his scholastic and Aristotelian contemporaries, the article attempts to problematize this notion of pay‐off from an historian's perspective.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
1-2 |
| container_start_page |
82 |
| container_title |
Metaphilosophy |
| container_volume |
43 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792339372783173646 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:47:05.464Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Philosophy%2C+Early+Modern+Intellectual+History%2C+and+the+History+of+Philosophy&rft.date=2012-01-01&genre=article&issn=1467-9973&volume=43&issue=1-2&spage=82&epage=95&pages=82-95&jtitle=Metaphilosophy&atitle=Philosophy%2C+Early+Modern+Intellectual+History%2C+and+the+History+of+Philosophy&aulast=Edwards&aufirst=Michael&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1467-9973.2011.01731.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792339372783173646 |
| author | Edwards, Michael |
| author_facet | Edwards, Michael, Edwards, Michael |
| author_sort | edwards, michael |
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 82 |
| container_title | Metaphilosophy |
| container_volume | 43 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Historians of philosophy are increasingly likely to emphasize the extent to which their work offers a pay‐off for philosophers of un‐historical or anti‐historical inclinations; but this defence is less familiar, and often seems less than self‐evident, to intellectual historians. This article examines this tendency, arguing that such arguments for the instrumental value of historical scholarship in philosophy are often more problematic than they at first appear. Using the relatively familiar case study of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>ené <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">D</jats:styled-content>escartes' reading of his scholastic and Aristotelian contemporaries, the article attempts to problematize this notion of pay‐off from an historian's perspective.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01731.x |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Philosophie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTk3My4yMDExLjAxNzMxLng |
| imprint | Wiley, 2012 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2012 |
| institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
| issn | 0026-1068, 1467-9973 |
| issn_str_mv | 0026-1068, 1467-9973 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:47:05.464Z |
| match_str | edwards2012philosophyearlymodernintellectualhistoryandthehistoryofphilosophy |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 82-95 |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Metaphilosophy |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Edwards, Michael 0026-1068 1467-9973 Wiley Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01731.x <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Historians of philosophy are increasingly likely to emphasize the extent to which their work offers a pay‐off for philosophers of un‐historical or anti‐historical inclinations; but this defence is less familiar, and often seems less than self‐evident, to intellectual historians. This article examines this tendency, arguing that such arguments for the instrumental value of historical scholarship in philosophy are often more problematic than they at first appear. Using the relatively familiar case study of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>ené <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">D</jats:styled-content>escartes' reading of his scholastic and Aristotelian contemporaries, the article attempts to problematize this notion of pay‐off from an historian's perspective.</jats:p> Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy Metaphilosophy |
| spellingShingle | Edwards, Michael, Metaphilosophy, Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy, Philosophy |
| title | Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_full | Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_fullStr | Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_short | Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| title_sort | philosophy, early modern intellectual history, and the history of philosophy |
| title_unstemmed | Philosophy, Early Modern Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy |
| topic | Philosophy |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01731.x |