author_facet WALL, R.S. (RONALD)
WALL, R.S. (RONALD)
author WALL, R.S. (RONALD)
spellingShingle WALL, R.S. (RONALD)
Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
Economics and Econometrics
Geography, Planning and Development
author_sort wall, r.s. (ronald)
spelling WALL, R.S. (RONALD) 0040-747X 1467-9663 Wiley Economics and Econometrics Geography, Planning and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00533.x <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Today, the importance of the Randstad agglomeration is often discussed in terms of the economic coherence between its four largest cities. This is remarkable when several leading authors argue that the economic importance of cities is strongly determined by economic networks between cities worldwide. This discrepancy stems from the fact that limited empirical research exists on corporate networks. Furthermore, the relative importance of cities within various studies is based on different functional types and spatial scales of data, making the results incomparable. Therefore, in this paper, the relative importance of the four largest Randstad cities is explored within three independent, comparative networks (top 100 global firms, top 100 European firms, and top 100 Dutch firms). Employing network analysis techniques, this paper evaluates the local, supra‐regional and global importance of the four Randstad cities within the three independent networks. The results show that the relative importance and network structures of these four cities are highly dependent on the economic size and locality of the initial headquarters and that Amsterdam proves to be the most important Randstad city in all three scales of corporate networks.</jats:p> THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00533.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Geographie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTY2My4yMDA5LjAwNTMzLng
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTY2My4yMDA5LjAwNTMzLng
institution DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
imprint Wiley, 2009
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2009
issn 0040-747X
1467-9663
issn_str_mv 0040-747X
1467-9663
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str wall2009therelativeimportanceofrandstadcitieswithincomparativeworldwidecorporatenetworks
publishDateSort 2009
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
source_id 49
title THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_unstemmed THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_full THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_fullStr THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_full_unstemmed THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_short THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_sort the relative importance of randstad cities within comparative worldwide corporate networks
topic Economics and Econometrics
Geography, Planning and Development
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00533.x
publishDate 2009
physical 250-259
description <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Today, the importance of the Randstad agglomeration is often discussed in terms of the economic coherence between its four largest cities. This is remarkable when several leading authors argue that the economic importance of cities is strongly determined by economic networks between cities worldwide. This discrepancy stems from the fact that limited empirical research exists on corporate networks. Furthermore, the relative importance of cities within various studies is based on different functional types and spatial scales of data, making the results incomparable. Therefore, in this paper, the relative importance of the four largest Randstad cities is explored within three independent, comparative networks (top 100 global firms, top 100 European firms, and top 100 Dutch firms). Employing network analysis techniques, this paper evaluates the local, supra‐regional and global importance of the four Randstad cities within the three independent networks. The results show that the relative importance and network structures of these four cities are highly dependent on the economic size and locality of the initial headquarters and that Amsterdam proves to be the most important Randstad city in all three scales of corporate networks.</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 250
container_title Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
container_volume 100
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792339087011610632
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:42:32.473Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=THE+RELATIVE+IMPORTANCE+OF+RANDSTAD+CITIES+WITHIN+COMPARATIVE+WORLDWIDE+CORPORATE+NETWORKS&rft.date=2009-04-01&genre=article&issn=1467-9663&volume=100&issue=2&spage=250&epage=259&pages=250-259&jtitle=Tijdschrift+voor+Economische+en+Sociale+Geografie&atitle=THE+RELATIVE+IMPORTANCE+OF+RANDSTAD+CITIES+WITHIN+COMPARATIVE+WORLDWIDE+CORPORATE+NETWORKS&aulast=WALL&aufirst=R.S.+%28RONALD%29&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1467-9663.2009.00533.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792339087011610632
author WALL, R.S. (RONALD)
author_facet WALL, R.S. (RONALD), WALL, R.S. (RONALD)
author_sort wall, r.s. (ronald)
container_issue 2
container_start_page 250
container_title Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
container_volume 100
description <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Today, the importance of the Randstad agglomeration is often discussed in terms of the economic coherence between its four largest cities. This is remarkable when several leading authors argue that the economic importance of cities is strongly determined by economic networks between cities worldwide. This discrepancy stems from the fact that limited empirical research exists on corporate networks. Furthermore, the relative importance of cities within various studies is based on different functional types and spatial scales of data, making the results incomparable. Therefore, in this paper, the relative importance of the four largest Randstad cities is explored within three independent, comparative networks (top 100 global firms, top 100 European firms, and top 100 Dutch firms). Employing network analysis techniques, this paper evaluates the local, supra‐regional and global importance of the four Randstad cities within the three independent networks. The results show that the relative importance and network structures of these four cities are highly dependent on the economic size and locality of the initial headquarters and that Amsterdam proves to be the most important Randstad city in all three scales of corporate networks.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00533.x
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Geographie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTY2My4yMDA5LjAwNTMzLng
imprint Wiley, 2009
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2009
institution DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14
issn 0040-747X, 1467-9663
issn_str_mv 0040-747X, 1467-9663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:42:32.473Z
match_str wall2009therelativeimportanceofrandstadcitieswithincomparativeworldwidecorporatenetworks
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 250-259
publishDate 2009
publishDateSort 2009
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
source_id 49
spelling WALL, R.S. (RONALD) 0040-747X 1467-9663 Wiley Economics and Econometrics Geography, Planning and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00533.x <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Today, the importance of the Randstad agglomeration is often discussed in terms of the economic coherence between its four largest cities. This is remarkable when several leading authors argue that the economic importance of cities is strongly determined by economic networks between cities worldwide. This discrepancy stems from the fact that limited empirical research exists on corporate networks. Furthermore, the relative importance of cities within various studies is based on different functional types and spatial scales of data, making the results incomparable. Therefore, in this paper, the relative importance of the four largest Randstad cities is explored within three independent, comparative networks (top 100 global firms, top 100 European firms, and top 100 Dutch firms). Employing network analysis techniques, this paper evaluates the local, supra‐regional and global importance of the four Randstad cities within the three independent networks. The results show that the relative importance and network structures of these four cities are highly dependent on the economic size and locality of the initial headquarters and that Amsterdam proves to be the most important Randstad city in all three scales of corporate networks.</jats:p> THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
spellingShingle WALL, R.S. (RONALD), Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS, Economics and Econometrics, Geography, Planning and Development
title THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_full THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_fullStr THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_full_unstemmed THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_short THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
title_sort the relative importance of randstad cities within comparative worldwide corporate networks
title_unstemmed THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RANDSTAD CITIES WITHIN COMPARATIVE WORLDWIDE CORPORATE NETWORKS
topic Economics and Econometrics, Geography, Planning and Development
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00533.x