Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems?
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Psychological Science |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | Psychological Science, 6, 1995, 6, S. 352-358 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Strack, Fritz Forster, Jens Strack, Fritz Forster, Jens |
|---|---|
| author |
Strack, Fritz Forster, Jens |
| spellingShingle |
Strack, Fritz Forster, Jens Psychological Science Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? General Psychology |
| author_sort |
strack, fritz |
| spelling |
Strack, Fritz Forster, Jens 0956-7976 1467-9280 SAGE Publications General Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00525.x <jats:p> It has been suggested that the use of different memory systems can be identified by asking subjects whether they remember or know a recognized stimulus (e g, Gardiner & Java, 1990, Tulving, 1985) In this view, remember responses indicate the use of episodic memory, and know responses the use of implicit memory (e g, Gardiner & Java, in press) or semantic memory (Tulving, 1993) We criticize this position on both conceptual and empirical grounds We argue that the concept of knowing and the instructions of the studies confound declarative knowledge (knowledge by description) and familiarity-based knowledge (knowledge by acquaintance) The two types of knowledge, however, seem to be associated with different psychological processes To test this notion, we conducted two recognition experiments in which the response criteria were either explicitly or implicitly manipulated The results clearly suggest that know responses are more likely than remember responses to be influenced by judgmental strategies that do not require a memorial presentation of the known stimulus Self-reports appear to be useful indicators of underlying mechanisms only to the extent that it is sufficiently understood how such reports are generated </jats:p> Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? Psychological Science |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00525.x |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTI4MC4xOTk1LnRiMDA1MjUueA |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTI4MC4xOTk1LnRiMDA1MjUueA |
| institution |
DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
| imprint |
SAGE Publications, 1995 |
| imprint_str_mv |
SAGE Publications, 1995 |
| issn |
0956-7976 1467-9280 |
| issn_str_mv |
0956-7976 1467-9280 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
strack1995reportingrecollectiveexperiencesdirectaccesstomemorysystems |
| publishDateSort |
1995 |
| publisher |
SAGE Publications |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Psychological Science |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_unstemmed |
Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_full |
Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_fullStr |
Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_short |
Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_sort |
reporting recollective experiences: direct access to memory systems? |
| topic |
General Psychology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00525.x |
| publishDate |
1995 |
| physical |
352-358 |
| description |
<jats:p> It has been suggested that the use of different memory systems can be identified by asking subjects whether they remember or know a recognized stimulus (e g, Gardiner & Java, 1990, Tulving, 1985) In this view, remember responses indicate the use of episodic memory, and know responses the use of implicit memory (e g, Gardiner & Java, in press) or semantic memory (Tulving, 1993) We criticize this position on both conceptual and empirical grounds We argue that the concept of knowing and the instructions of the studies confound declarative knowledge (knowledge by description) and familiarity-based knowledge (knowledge by acquaintance) The two types of knowledge, however, seem to be associated with different psychological processes To test this notion, we conducted two recognition experiments in which the response criteria were either explicitly or implicitly manipulated The results clearly suggest that know responses are more likely than remember responses to be influenced by judgmental strategies that do not require a memorial presentation of the known stimulus Self-reports appear to be useful indicators of underlying mechanisms only to the extent that it is sufficiently understood how such reports are generated </jats:p> |
| container_issue |
6 |
| container_start_page |
352 |
| container_title |
Psychological Science |
| container_volume |
6 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792339265113292806 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:44:54.587Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Reporting+Recollective+Experiences%3A+Direct+Access+to+Memory+Systems%3F&rft.date=1995-11-01&genre=article&issn=1467-9280&volume=6&issue=6&spage=352&epage=358&pages=352-358&jtitle=Psychological+Science&atitle=Reporting+Recollective+Experiences%3A+Direct+Access+to+Memory+Systems%3F&aulast=Forster&aufirst=Jens&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.1995.tb00525.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792339265113292806 |
| author | Strack, Fritz, Forster, Jens |
| author_facet | Strack, Fritz, Forster, Jens, Strack, Fritz, Forster, Jens |
| author_sort | strack, fritz |
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 352 |
| container_title | Psychological Science |
| container_volume | 6 |
| description | <jats:p> It has been suggested that the use of different memory systems can be identified by asking subjects whether they remember or know a recognized stimulus (e g, Gardiner & Java, 1990, Tulving, 1985) In this view, remember responses indicate the use of episodic memory, and know responses the use of implicit memory (e g, Gardiner & Java, in press) or semantic memory (Tulving, 1993) We criticize this position on both conceptual and empirical grounds We argue that the concept of knowing and the instructions of the studies confound declarative knowledge (knowledge by description) and familiarity-based knowledge (knowledge by acquaintance) The two types of knowledge, however, seem to be associated with different psychological processes To test this notion, we conducted two recognition experiments in which the response criteria were either explicitly or implicitly manipulated The results clearly suggest that know responses are more likely than remember responses to be influenced by judgmental strategies that do not require a memorial presentation of the known stimulus Self-reports appear to be useful indicators of underlying mechanisms only to the extent that it is sufficiently understood how such reports are generated </jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00525.x |
| facet_avail | Online |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0NjctOTI4MC4xOTk1LnRiMDA1MjUueA |
| imprint | SAGE Publications, 1995 |
| imprint_str_mv | SAGE Publications, 1995 |
| institution | DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
| issn | 0956-7976, 1467-9280 |
| issn_str_mv | 0956-7976, 1467-9280 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:44:54.587Z |
| match_str | strack1995reportingrecollectiveexperiencesdirectaccesstomemorysystems |
| mega_collection | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
| physical | 352-358 |
| publishDate | 1995 |
| publishDateSort | 1995 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Psychological Science |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Strack, Fritz Forster, Jens 0956-7976 1467-9280 SAGE Publications General Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00525.x <jats:p> It has been suggested that the use of different memory systems can be identified by asking subjects whether they remember or know a recognized stimulus (e g, Gardiner & Java, 1990, Tulving, 1985) In this view, remember responses indicate the use of episodic memory, and know responses the use of implicit memory (e g, Gardiner & Java, in press) or semantic memory (Tulving, 1993) We criticize this position on both conceptual and empirical grounds We argue that the concept of knowing and the instructions of the studies confound declarative knowledge (knowledge by description) and familiarity-based knowledge (knowledge by acquaintance) The two types of knowledge, however, seem to be associated with different psychological processes To test this notion, we conducted two recognition experiments in which the response criteria were either explicitly or implicitly manipulated The results clearly suggest that know responses are more likely than remember responses to be influenced by judgmental strategies that do not require a memorial presentation of the known stimulus Self-reports appear to be useful indicators of underlying mechanisms only to the extent that it is sufficiently understood how such reports are generated </jats:p> Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? Psychological Science |
| spellingShingle | Strack, Fritz, Forster, Jens, Psychological Science, Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems?, General Psychology |
| title | Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_full | Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_fullStr | Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_short | Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| title_sort | reporting recollective experiences: direct access to memory systems? |
| title_unstemmed | Reporting Recollective Experiences: Direct Access to Memory Systems? |
| topic | General Psychology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00525.x |