Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Plant Breeding |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Plant Breeding, 130, 2011, 2, S. 203-208 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Zhou, M. Zhou, M. |
---|---|
author |
Zhou, M. |
spellingShingle |
Zhou, M. Plant Breeding Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley Plant Science Genetics Agronomy and Crop Science |
author_sort |
zhou, m. |
spelling |
Zhou, M. 0179-9541 1439-0523 Wiley Plant Science Genetics Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01792.x <jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p> <jats:italic>With 5 figures and 2 tables</jats:italic> </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Tolerance to soil waterlogging stress is an important plant breeding objective in high rainfall or poorly drained areas across many countries in the world. Similar to other abiotic stresses, waterlogging tolerance is a complicated trait and the selection for tolerance has been a major obstacle in breeding programmes. Molecular marker‐assisted selection (MAS) can be very effective. However, the success of MAS depends on the development of reliable markers which requires accurate phenotyping when searching for the markers linked to the tolerance. In this experiment, a new screening facility, with the environment closer to field conditions, has been used to screen a double haploid population produced from a cross between waterlogging tolerant and susceptible varieties. A new scoring system of plant healthiness (0 = plant died from waterlogging; 10 = not affected by waterlogging) was also used in this experiment. The results were compared with a previous glasshouse pot experiment. Some quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified from the current experiment and previous pot experiment were quite different. From this experiment, two major QTL (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.4H</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.2H.2,</jats:italic> accounting 24% and 17% of phenotypic variation) and two minor QTL (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.2H.1</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.3H,</jats:italic> accounting 8% and 7% of the variation) were found. These four markers can be very effectively used to select waterlogging tolerance. By selecting all four closely linked markers, all the lines will be quite tolerant with an average score of 7.6. In contrast, if none of above markers were selected all the lines would be susceptible with an average score of 1.4.</jats:p></jats:sec> Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley Plant Breeding |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01792.x |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Biologie Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0MzktMDUyMy4yMDEwLjAxNzkyLng |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0MzktMDUyMy4yMDEwLjAxNzkyLng |
institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
imprint |
Wiley, 2011 |
imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2011 |
issn |
0179-9541 1439-0523 |
issn_str_mv |
0179-9541 1439-0523 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
match_str |
zhou2011accuratephenotypingrevealsbetterqtlforwaterloggingtoleranceinbarley |
publishDateSort |
2011 |
publisher |
Wiley |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Plant Breeding |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_unstemmed |
Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_full |
Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_fullStr |
Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_short |
Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_sort |
accurate phenotyping reveals better qtl for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
topic |
Plant Science Genetics Agronomy and Crop Science |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01792.x |
publishDate |
2011 |
physical |
203-208 |
description |
<jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p> <jats:italic>With 5 figures and 2 tables</jats:italic> </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Tolerance to soil waterlogging stress is an important plant breeding objective in high rainfall or poorly drained areas across many countries in the world. Similar to other abiotic stresses, waterlogging tolerance is a complicated trait and the selection for tolerance has been a major obstacle in breeding programmes. Molecular marker‐assisted selection (MAS) can be very effective. However, the success of MAS depends on the development of reliable markers which requires accurate phenotyping when searching for the markers linked to the tolerance. In this experiment, a new screening facility, with the environment closer to field conditions, has been used to screen a double haploid population produced from a cross between waterlogging tolerant and susceptible varieties. A new scoring system of plant healthiness (0 = plant died from waterlogging; 10 = not affected by waterlogging) was also used in this experiment. The results were compared with a previous glasshouse pot experiment. Some quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified from the current experiment and previous pot experiment were quite different. From this experiment, two major QTL (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.4H</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.2H.2,</jats:italic> accounting 24% and 17% of phenotypic variation) and two minor QTL (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.2H.1</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.3H,</jats:italic> accounting 8% and 7% of the variation) were found. These four markers can be very effectively used to select waterlogging tolerance. By selecting all four closely linked markers, all the lines will be quite tolerant with an average score of 7.6. In contrast, if none of above markers were selected all the lines would be susceptible with an average score of 1.4.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
203 |
container_title |
Plant Breeding |
container_volume |
130 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792343845998952456 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:58:11.045Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Accurate+phenotyping+reveals+better+QTL+for+waterlogging+tolerance+in+barley&rft.date=2011-04-01&genre=article&issn=1439-0523&volume=130&issue=2&spage=203&epage=208&pages=203-208&jtitle=Plant+Breeding&atitle=Accurate+phenotyping+reveals+better+QTL+for+waterlogging+tolerance+in+barley&aulast=Zhou&aufirst=M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1439-0523.2010.01792.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792343845998952456 |
author | Zhou, M. |
author_facet | Zhou, M., Zhou, M. |
author_sort | zhou, m. |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | Plant Breeding |
container_volume | 130 |
description | <jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p> <jats:italic>With 5 figures and 2 tables</jats:italic> </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Tolerance to soil waterlogging stress is an important plant breeding objective in high rainfall or poorly drained areas across many countries in the world. Similar to other abiotic stresses, waterlogging tolerance is a complicated trait and the selection for tolerance has been a major obstacle in breeding programmes. Molecular marker‐assisted selection (MAS) can be very effective. However, the success of MAS depends on the development of reliable markers which requires accurate phenotyping when searching for the markers linked to the tolerance. In this experiment, a new screening facility, with the environment closer to field conditions, has been used to screen a double haploid population produced from a cross between waterlogging tolerant and susceptible varieties. A new scoring system of plant healthiness (0 = plant died from waterlogging; 10 = not affected by waterlogging) was also used in this experiment. The results were compared with a previous glasshouse pot experiment. Some quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified from the current experiment and previous pot experiment were quite different. From this experiment, two major QTL (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.4H</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.2H.2,</jats:italic> accounting 24% and 17% of phenotypic variation) and two minor QTL (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.2H.1</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.3H,</jats:italic> accounting 8% and 7% of the variation) were found. These four markers can be very effectively used to select waterlogging tolerance. By selecting all four closely linked markers, all the lines will be quite tolerant with an average score of 7.6. In contrast, if none of above markers were selected all the lines would be susceptible with an average score of 1.4.</jats:p></jats:sec> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01792.x |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Biologie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE0MzktMDUyMy4yMDEwLjAxNzkyLng |
imprint | Wiley, 2011 |
imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2011 |
institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
issn | 0179-9541, 1439-0523 |
issn_str_mv | 0179-9541, 1439-0523 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:58:11.045Z |
match_str | zhou2011accuratephenotypingrevealsbetterqtlforwaterloggingtoleranceinbarley |
mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
physical | 203-208 |
publishDate | 2011 |
publishDateSort | 2011 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Plant Breeding |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Zhou, M. 0179-9541 1439-0523 Wiley Plant Science Genetics Agronomy and Crop Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01792.x <jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p> <jats:italic>With 5 figures and 2 tables</jats:italic> </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Tolerance to soil waterlogging stress is an important plant breeding objective in high rainfall or poorly drained areas across many countries in the world. Similar to other abiotic stresses, waterlogging tolerance is a complicated trait and the selection for tolerance has been a major obstacle in breeding programmes. Molecular marker‐assisted selection (MAS) can be very effective. However, the success of MAS depends on the development of reliable markers which requires accurate phenotyping when searching for the markers linked to the tolerance. In this experiment, a new screening facility, with the environment closer to field conditions, has been used to screen a double haploid population produced from a cross between waterlogging tolerant and susceptible varieties. A new scoring system of plant healthiness (0 = plant died from waterlogging; 10 = not affected by waterlogging) was also used in this experiment. The results were compared with a previous glasshouse pot experiment. Some quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified from the current experiment and previous pot experiment were quite different. From this experiment, two major QTL (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.4H</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.2H.2,</jats:italic> accounting 24% and 17% of phenotypic variation) and two minor QTL (<jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.2H.1</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>WL</jats:italic></jats:sub><jats:italic>.YeFr.3H,</jats:italic> accounting 8% and 7% of the variation) were found. These four markers can be very effectively used to select waterlogging tolerance. By selecting all four closely linked markers, all the lines will be quite tolerant with an average score of 7.6. In contrast, if none of above markers were selected all the lines would be susceptible with an average score of 1.4.</jats:p></jats:sec> Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley Plant Breeding |
spellingShingle | Zhou, M., Plant Breeding, Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley, Plant Science, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science |
title | Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_full | Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_fullStr | Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_full_unstemmed | Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_short | Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_sort | accurate phenotyping reveals better qtl for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
title_unstemmed | Accurate phenotyping reveals better QTL for waterlogging tolerance in barley |
topic | Plant Science, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01792.x |