author_facet Sciberras, Marija
Hiddink, Jan Geert
Jennings, Simon
Szostek, Claire L
Hughes, Kathryn M
Kneafsey, Brian
Clarke, Leo J
Ellis, Nick
Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D
McConnaughey, Robert A
Hilborn, Ray
Collie, Jeremy S
Pitcher, C. Roland
Amoroso, Ricardo O
Parma, Ana M
Suuronen, Petri
Kaiser, Michel J
Sciberras, Marija
Hiddink, Jan Geert
Jennings, Simon
Szostek, Claire L
Hughes, Kathryn M
Kneafsey, Brian
Clarke, Leo J
Ellis, Nick
Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D
McConnaughey, Robert A
Hilborn, Ray
Collie, Jeremy S
Pitcher, C. Roland
Amoroso, Ricardo O
Parma, Ana M
Suuronen, Petri
Kaiser, Michel J
author Sciberras, Marija
Hiddink, Jan Geert
Jennings, Simon
Szostek, Claire L
Hughes, Kathryn M
Kneafsey, Brian
Clarke, Leo J
Ellis, Nick
Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D
McConnaughey, Robert A
Hilborn, Ray
Collie, Jeremy S
Pitcher, C. Roland
Amoroso, Ricardo O
Parma, Ana M
Suuronen, Petri
Kaiser, Michel J
spellingShingle Sciberras, Marija
Hiddink, Jan Geert
Jennings, Simon
Szostek, Claire L
Hughes, Kathryn M
Kneafsey, Brian
Clarke, Leo J
Ellis, Nick
Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D
McConnaughey, Robert A
Hilborn, Ray
Collie, Jeremy S
Pitcher, C. Roland
Amoroso, Ricardo O
Parma, Ana M
Suuronen, Petri
Kaiser, Michel J
Fish and Fisheries
Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Aquatic Science
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
author_sort sciberras, marija
spelling Sciberras, Marija Hiddink, Jan Geert Jennings, Simon Szostek, Claire L Hughes, Kathryn M Kneafsey, Brian Clarke, Leo J Ellis, Nick Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D McConnaughey, Robert A Hilborn, Ray Collie, Jeremy S Pitcher, C. Roland Amoroso, Ricardo O Parma, Ana M Suuronen, Petri Kaiser, Michel J 1467-2960 1467-2979 Wiley Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Aquatic Science Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12283 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Bottom‐contact fishing gears are globally the most widespread anthropogenic sources of direct disturbance to the seabed and associated biota. Managing these fishing disturbances requires quantification of gear impacts on biota and the rate of recovery following disturbance. We undertook a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 122 experiments on the effects‐of‐bottom fishing to quantify the removal of benthos in the path of the fishing gear and to estimate rates of recovery following disturbance. A gear pass reduced benthic invertebrate abundance by 26% and species richness by 19%. The effect was strongly gear‐specific, with gears that penetrate deeper into the sediment having a significantly larger impact than those that penetrate less. Sediment composition (% mud and presence of biogenic habitat) and the history of fishing disturbance prior to an experimental fishing event were also important predictors of depletion, with communities in areas that were not previously fished, predominantly muddy or biogenic habitats being more strongly affected by fishing. Sessile and low mobility biota with longer life‐spans such as sponges, soft corals and bivalves took much longer to recover after fishing (&gt;3 year) than mobile biota with shorter life‐spans such as polychaetes and malacostracans (&lt;1 year). This meta‐analysis provides insights into the dynamics of recovery. Our estimates of depletion along with estimates of recovery rates and large‐scale, high‐resolution maps of fishing frequency and habitat will support more rigorous assessment of the environmental impacts of bottom‐contact gears, thus supporting better informed choices in trade‐offs between environmental impacts and fish production.</jats:p> Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis Fish and Fisheries
doi_str_mv 10.1111/faf.12283
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Biologie
Geographie
Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9mYWYuMTIyODM
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9mYWYuMTIyODM
institution DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
imprint Wiley, 2018
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2018
issn 1467-2960
1467-2979
issn_str_mv 1467-2960
1467-2979
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str sciberras2018responseofbenthicfaunatoexperimentalbottomfishingaglobalmetaanalysis
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Fish and Fisheries
source_id 49
title Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_unstemmed Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_full Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_short Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_sort response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: a global meta‐analysis
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Aquatic Science
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12283
publishDate 2018
physical 698-715
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Bottom‐contact fishing gears are globally the most widespread anthropogenic sources of direct disturbance to the seabed and associated biota. Managing these fishing disturbances requires quantification of gear impacts on biota and the rate of recovery following disturbance. We undertook a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 122 experiments on the effects‐of‐bottom fishing to quantify the removal of benthos in the path of the fishing gear and to estimate rates of recovery following disturbance. A gear pass reduced benthic invertebrate abundance by 26% and species richness by 19%. The effect was strongly gear‐specific, with gears that penetrate deeper into the sediment having a significantly larger impact than those that penetrate less. Sediment composition (% mud and presence of biogenic habitat) and the history of fishing disturbance prior to an experimental fishing event were also important predictors of depletion, with communities in areas that were not previously fished, predominantly muddy or biogenic habitats being more strongly affected by fishing. Sessile and low mobility biota with longer life‐spans such as sponges, soft corals and bivalves took much longer to recover after fishing (&gt;3 year) than mobile biota with shorter life‐spans such as polychaetes and malacostracans (&lt;1 year). This meta‐analysis provides insights into the dynamics of recovery. Our estimates of depletion along with estimates of recovery rates and large‐scale, high‐resolution maps of fishing frequency and habitat will support more rigorous assessment of the environmental impacts of bottom‐contact gears, thus supporting better informed choices in trade‐offs between environmental impacts and fish production.</jats:p>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 698
container_title Fish and Fisheries
container_volume 19
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792344883336314880
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:14:41.173Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Response+of+benthic+fauna+to+experimental+bottom+fishing%3A+A+global+meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.date=2018-07-01&genre=article&issn=1467-2979&volume=19&issue=4&spage=698&epage=715&pages=698-715&jtitle=Fish+and+Fisheries&atitle=Response+of+benthic+fauna+to+experimental+bottom+fishing%3A+A+global+meta%E2%80%90analysis&aulast=Kaiser&aufirst=Michel+J&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Ffaf.12283&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792344883336314880
author Sciberras, Marija, Hiddink, Jan Geert, Jennings, Simon, Szostek, Claire L, Hughes, Kathryn M, Kneafsey, Brian, Clarke, Leo J, Ellis, Nick, Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D, McConnaughey, Robert A, Hilborn, Ray, Collie, Jeremy S, Pitcher, C. Roland, Amoroso, Ricardo O, Parma, Ana M, Suuronen, Petri, Kaiser, Michel J
author_facet Sciberras, Marija, Hiddink, Jan Geert, Jennings, Simon, Szostek, Claire L, Hughes, Kathryn M, Kneafsey, Brian, Clarke, Leo J, Ellis, Nick, Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D, McConnaughey, Robert A, Hilborn, Ray, Collie, Jeremy S, Pitcher, C. Roland, Amoroso, Ricardo O, Parma, Ana M, Suuronen, Petri, Kaiser, Michel J, Sciberras, Marija, Hiddink, Jan Geert, Jennings, Simon, Szostek, Claire L, Hughes, Kathryn M, Kneafsey, Brian, Clarke, Leo J, Ellis, Nick, Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D, McConnaughey, Robert A, Hilborn, Ray, Collie, Jeremy S, Pitcher, C. Roland, Amoroso, Ricardo O, Parma, Ana M, Suuronen, Petri, Kaiser, Michel J
author_sort sciberras, marija
container_issue 4
container_start_page 698
container_title Fish and Fisheries
container_volume 19
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Bottom‐contact fishing gears are globally the most widespread anthropogenic sources of direct disturbance to the seabed and associated biota. Managing these fishing disturbances requires quantification of gear impacts on biota and the rate of recovery following disturbance. We undertook a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 122 experiments on the effects‐of‐bottom fishing to quantify the removal of benthos in the path of the fishing gear and to estimate rates of recovery following disturbance. A gear pass reduced benthic invertebrate abundance by 26% and species richness by 19%. The effect was strongly gear‐specific, with gears that penetrate deeper into the sediment having a significantly larger impact than those that penetrate less. Sediment composition (% mud and presence of biogenic habitat) and the history of fishing disturbance prior to an experimental fishing event were also important predictors of depletion, with communities in areas that were not previously fished, predominantly muddy or biogenic habitats being more strongly affected by fishing. Sessile and low mobility biota with longer life‐spans such as sponges, soft corals and bivalves took much longer to recover after fishing (&gt;3 year) than mobile biota with shorter life‐spans such as polychaetes and malacostracans (&lt;1 year). This meta‐analysis provides insights into the dynamics of recovery. Our estimates of depletion along with estimates of recovery rates and large‐scale, high‐resolution maps of fishing frequency and habitat will support more rigorous assessment of the environmental impacts of bottom‐contact gears, thus supporting better informed choices in trade‐offs between environmental impacts and fish production.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/faf.12283
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Biologie, Geographie, Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9mYWYuMTIyODM
imprint Wiley, 2018
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2018
institution DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275
issn 1467-2960, 1467-2979
issn_str_mv 1467-2960, 1467-2979
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:14:41.173Z
match_str sciberras2018responseofbenthicfaunatoexperimentalbottomfishingaglobalmetaanalysis
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 698-715
publishDate 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Fish and Fisheries
source_id 49
spelling Sciberras, Marija Hiddink, Jan Geert Jennings, Simon Szostek, Claire L Hughes, Kathryn M Kneafsey, Brian Clarke, Leo J Ellis, Nick Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D McConnaughey, Robert A Hilborn, Ray Collie, Jeremy S Pitcher, C. Roland Amoroso, Ricardo O Parma, Ana M Suuronen, Petri Kaiser, Michel J 1467-2960 1467-2979 Wiley Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Aquatic Science Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12283 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Bottom‐contact fishing gears are globally the most widespread anthropogenic sources of direct disturbance to the seabed and associated biota. Managing these fishing disturbances requires quantification of gear impacts on biota and the rate of recovery following disturbance. We undertook a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 122 experiments on the effects‐of‐bottom fishing to quantify the removal of benthos in the path of the fishing gear and to estimate rates of recovery following disturbance. A gear pass reduced benthic invertebrate abundance by 26% and species richness by 19%. The effect was strongly gear‐specific, with gears that penetrate deeper into the sediment having a significantly larger impact than those that penetrate less. Sediment composition (% mud and presence of biogenic habitat) and the history of fishing disturbance prior to an experimental fishing event were also important predictors of depletion, with communities in areas that were not previously fished, predominantly muddy or biogenic habitats being more strongly affected by fishing. Sessile and low mobility biota with longer life‐spans such as sponges, soft corals and bivalves took much longer to recover after fishing (&gt;3 year) than mobile biota with shorter life‐spans such as polychaetes and malacostracans (&lt;1 year). This meta‐analysis provides insights into the dynamics of recovery. Our estimates of depletion along with estimates of recovery rates and large‐scale, high‐resolution maps of fishing frequency and habitat will support more rigorous assessment of the environmental impacts of bottom‐contact gears, thus supporting better informed choices in trade‐offs between environmental impacts and fish production.</jats:p> Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis Fish and Fisheries
spellingShingle Sciberras, Marija, Hiddink, Jan Geert, Jennings, Simon, Szostek, Claire L, Hughes, Kathryn M, Kneafsey, Brian, Clarke, Leo J, Ellis, Nick, Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D, McConnaughey, Robert A, Hilborn, Ray, Collie, Jeremy S, Pitcher, C. Roland, Amoroso, Ricardo O, Parma, Ana M, Suuronen, Petri, Kaiser, Michel J, Fish and Fisheries, Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Aquatic Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Oceanography
title Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_full Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_short Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
title_sort response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: a global meta‐analysis
title_unstemmed Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis
topic Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Aquatic Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Oceanography
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12283