Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | European Law Journal |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | European Law Journal, 19, 2013, 4, S. 517-544 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Dewhurst, Elaine Dewhurst, Elaine |
|---|---|
| author |
Dewhurst, Elaine |
| spellingShingle |
Dewhurst, Elaine European Law Journal The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ Law |
| author_sort |
dewhurst, elaine |
| spelling |
Dewhurst, Elaine 1351-5993 1468-0386 Wiley Law http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12042 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article addresses the development of age discrimination law in the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice and concludes that there is a marked difference in the level of discretion given to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">M</jats:styled-content>ember <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">S</jats:styled-content>tates in cases relating to mandatory retirement policies. The article will critique the approach of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice to the legitimate objective test and the proportionality test in retirement cases. It will also argue that the decisions of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice to date have all involved cases with very similar factual scenarios, and the article hypothesises how a different conclusion might be reached in cases with different factors. It also considers the impact of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>harter of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">F</jats:styled-content>undamental <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>ights on such cases. The article concludes by arguing that mandatory retirement policies may no longer be compatible with <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EU</jats:styled-content> law and that there is a need to move towards more flexible retirement policies.</jats:p> The Development of <scp>EU</scp> Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ European Law Journal |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/eulj.12042 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| finc_class_facet |
Rechtswissenschaft |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9ldWxqLjEyMDQy |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9ldWxqLjEyMDQy |
| institution |
DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 |
| imprint |
Wiley, 2013 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Wiley, 2013 |
| issn |
1351-5993 1468-0386 |
| issn_str_mv |
1351-5993 1468-0386 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Wiley (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
dewhurst2013thedevelopmentofeucaselawonagediscriminationinemploymentwillyoustillneedmewillyoustillfeedmewhenimsixtyfour |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| publisher |
Wiley |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
European Law Journal |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_unstemmed |
The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_full |
The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_fullStr |
The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_short |
The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_sort |
the development of <scp>eu</scp> case‐law on age discrimination in employment: ‘will you still need me? will you still feed me? when i'm sixty‐four’ |
| topic |
Law |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12042 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| physical |
517-544 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article addresses the development of age discrimination law in the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice and concludes that there is a marked difference in the level of discretion given to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">M</jats:styled-content>ember <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">S</jats:styled-content>tates in cases relating to mandatory retirement policies. The article will critique the approach of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice to the legitimate objective test and the proportionality test in retirement cases. It will also argue that the decisions of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice to date have all involved cases with very similar factual scenarios, and the article hypothesises how a different conclusion might be reached in cases with different factors. It also considers the impact of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>harter of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">F</jats:styled-content>undamental <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>ights on such cases. The article concludes by arguing that mandatory retirement policies may no longer be compatible with <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EU</jats:styled-content> law and that there is a need to move towards more flexible retirement policies.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
4 |
| container_start_page |
517 |
| container_title |
European Law Journal |
| container_volume |
19 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792334862858846219 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:35:24.471Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+Development+of+EU+Case%E2%80%90Law+on+Age+Discrimination+in+Employment%3A+%E2%80%98Will+You+Still+Need+Me%3F+Will+You+Still+Feed+Me%3F+When+I%27m+Sixty%E2%80%90Four%E2%80%99&rft.date=2013-07-01&genre=article&issn=1468-0386&volume=19&issue=4&spage=517&epage=544&pages=517-544&jtitle=European+Law+Journal&atitle=The+Development+of+%3Cscp%3EEU%3C%2Fscp%3E+Case%E2%80%90Law+on+Age+Discrimination+in+Employment%3A+%E2%80%98Will+You+Still+Need+Me%3F+Will+You+Still+Feed+Me%3F+When+I%27m+Sixty%E2%80%90Four%E2%80%99&aulast=Dewhurst&aufirst=Elaine&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Feulj.12042&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792334862858846219 |
| author | Dewhurst, Elaine |
| author_facet | Dewhurst, Elaine, Dewhurst, Elaine |
| author_sort | dewhurst, elaine |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 517 |
| container_title | European Law Journal |
| container_volume | 19 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article addresses the development of age discrimination law in the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice and concludes that there is a marked difference in the level of discretion given to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">M</jats:styled-content>ember <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">S</jats:styled-content>tates in cases relating to mandatory retirement policies. The article will critique the approach of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice to the legitimate objective test and the proportionality test in retirement cases. It will also argue that the decisions of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice to date have all involved cases with very similar factual scenarios, and the article hypothesises how a different conclusion might be reached in cases with different factors. It also considers the impact of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>harter of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">F</jats:styled-content>undamental <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>ights on such cases. The article concludes by arguing that mandatory retirement policies may no longer be compatible with <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EU</jats:styled-content> law and that there is a need to move towards more flexible retirement policies.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/eulj.12042 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| finc_class_facet | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9ldWxqLjEyMDQy |
| imprint | Wiley, 2013 |
| imprint_str_mv | Wiley, 2013 |
| institution | DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14 |
| issn | 1351-5993, 1468-0386 |
| issn_str_mv | 1351-5993, 1468-0386 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:35:24.471Z |
| match_str | dewhurst2013thedevelopmentofeucaselawonagediscriminationinemploymentwillyoustillneedmewillyoustillfeedmewhenimsixtyfour |
| mega_collection | Wiley (CrossRef) |
| physical | 517-544 |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | European Law Journal |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Dewhurst, Elaine 1351-5993 1468-0386 Wiley Law http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12042 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article addresses the development of age discrimination law in the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice and concludes that there is a marked difference in the level of discretion given to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">M</jats:styled-content>ember <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">S</jats:styled-content>tates in cases relating to mandatory retirement policies. The article will critique the approach of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice to the legitimate objective test and the proportionality test in retirement cases. It will also argue that the decisions of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>ourt of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">J</jats:styled-content>ustice to date have all involved cases with very similar factual scenarios, and the article hypothesises how a different conclusion might be reached in cases with different factors. It also considers the impact of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>harter of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">F</jats:styled-content>undamental <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>ights on such cases. The article concludes by arguing that mandatory retirement policies may no longer be compatible with <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EU</jats:styled-content> law and that there is a need to move towards more flexible retirement policies.</jats:p> The Development of <scp>EU</scp> Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ European Law Journal |
| spellingShingle | Dewhurst, Elaine, European Law Journal, The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’, Law |
| title | The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_full | The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_fullStr | The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_short | The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| title_sort | the development of <scp>eu</scp> case‐law on age discrimination in employment: ‘will you still need me? will you still feed me? when i'm sixty‐four’ |
| title_unstemmed | The Development of EU Case‐Law on Age Discrimination in Employment: ‘Will You Still Need Me? Will You Still Feed Me? When I'm Sixty‐Four’ |
| topic | Law |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12042 |